Renal transplantation in high cardiovascular risk patients

Management of Kidney Failure in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: What Are the Best Options?

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the most frequent cause of kidney failure (KF). There are large variations in the incidence rates of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Late referral to nephrology services has been associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. In many countries, when patients reach severely reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR), they are managed by multidisciplinary teams led by nephrologists. In these clinics, efforts will continue to halt chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and to prevent cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. In patients with diabetes and severely reduced GFR and KF, treating hyperglycemia is a challenge, since some drugs are contraindicated and most of them require dose adjustments. Even more, a decision-making process will help in deciding whether the patient would prefer comprehensive conservative care or KRT. On many occasions, this decision will be conditioned by diabetes mellitus itself. Effective education should cover the necessary information for the patient and family to answer these questions: 1. Should I go for KRT or not? 2. If the answer is KRT, dialysis and/or transplantation? 3. Dialysis at home or in center? 4. If dialysis at home, peritoneal dialysis or home hemodialysis? 5. If transplantation is desired, discuss the options of whether the donation would be from a living or deceased donor. This review addresses the determinant factors with an impact on DKD, aiming to shed light on the specific needs that arise in the management and recommendations on how to achieve a comprehensive approach to the diabetic patient with chronic kidney disease.

Hypothermic machine perfusion can safely prolong cold ischemia time in deceased donor kidney transplantation. A retrospective analysis on postoperative morbidity and graft function

In deceased donor kidney transplantation (KT), a prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT) is a negative prognostic factor for KT outcome, and the efficacy of hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) in prolonging CIT without any additional hazard is highly debated. We conducted a retrospective study on a cohort of 154 single graft deceased donor KTs, in which a delayed HMP, after a preliminary period of static cold storage (SCS), was used to prolong CIT for logistic reasons. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications as well as 1 year graft survival and function. 73 cases (47.4%) were managed with HMP and planned KT, while 81 (52.6%) with SCS and urgent KT. The median CIT in HMP group and SCS group was 29 hour:57 minutes [27-31 hour:45 minutes] and 11 hour:25 minutes [9-14 hour:30 minutes], respectively (P < .001). The period of SCS in the HMP group was significantly shorter than in the SCS group (10 vs. 11 hour:25 minutes, P = .02) as well as the prevalence of expanded criteria donors was significantly higher (43.8% vs. 18.5%, P < .01). After propensity score matching for these two baseline characteristics, the HMP and SCS groups showed comparable outcomes in terms of delayed graft function, vascular, and urologic complications, infections, and episodes of graft rejection. At 1 year follow-up, serum creatinine levels were comparable between the groups. Therefore, the use of HMP to prolong the CIT and convert KT into a planned procedure seemed to have an adequate safety profile, with outcomes comparable to KT managed as an urgent procedure and a CIT nearly three time shorter.

Impact of Pre-existing Comorbidities on Long-term Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of patients with end-stage renal disease are mainly affected by their comorbidities. Detailed data evaluating the impact of pre-transplant comorbidities on long-term outcome after kidney transplantation are largely missing.

METHODS

In a long-term retrospective analysis, we investigated 839 deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who received transplants between 1999 and 2014. The prevalence and impact of the most relevant comorbidities were studied in detail.

RESULTS

At the time of transplantation, 25% of KTRs had coronary artery disease (CAD), 16% had diabetes mellitus (DM), 11% had peripheral arterial disease (PAD), 8% had chronic heart failure (CHF), and 7% had cerebrovascular disease (CVD). KTRs with pre-existing CAD, DM, PAD, and CHF showed a significantly inferior patient survival. Multivariate analysis adjusting for all relevant factors and comorbidities confirmed CAD as most hazardous independent risk factor for premature death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.70; P = .002). A multivariate analysis revealed CHF and PAD as independent risk factors for death censored graft loss (HR 2.20; P = .003 and HR 1.80; P = .013). Diabetes was independently and significantly associated with T-cell- (HR 1.46; P = .020) and antibody-mediated rejections (HR 2.27; P = .030).

CONCLUSIONS

Detailed quantification of the impact of pre-transplant comorbidities may facilitate the evaluation of transplant candidates, guide post-transplant follow-up, and may help to further refine prediction algorithms and allocation systems.

The significance of pre-operative coronary interventions on outcome after pancreas transplantation

Pancreas transplant candidates are at very high risk of coronary vascular disease. We hypothesized that the requirement for pre-operative coronary intervention (PCI) may be associated with an adverse impact on short- and long-term outcomes. Retrospective analysis of 366 consecutive primary pancreas transplants was undertaken. Outcomes were compared between recipients who had undergone PCI (n = 48) and those who had not (n = 318). In 48% (23/48) of instances, the PCI was initiated by the transplant cardiology evaluation. The recipients undergoing PCI were older than those not undergoing PCI (47.6 yr vs. 41.9 yr, respectively, p < 0.0001). Although not statistically significant, there was a higher rate of post-operative major cardiovascular events (MCVE) in the PCI group (10.4%) compared with those not undergoing PCI (4.7%) (RR [95% CI]: 2.0 [0.90-4.5]; p = 0.17). In the long term, there were no differences in the rate of death with graft function (p = 0.77) or rejection (p = 0.17). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to patient (p = 0.54), kidney (p = 0.76), or pancreas (p = 0.63) graft survival. PCI is not a risk factor for short-term perioperative events, and long-term transplant outcomes are equivalent to patients not requiring PCI. PCI, by itself, should not be considered a contraindication for pancreas transplantation, but should raise awareness of perioperative risk.

[Evaluation of patients' readiness for surgery when called from the waiting list for kidney transplantation: experience of the Budapest Centre]

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the establishment of waiting list committee on recipient evaluation for kidney transplantation. Studies on this issue have not been previously reported.

METHODS

Data of 714 patients were collected between September 1, 2007 and April 20, 2010. Of the 714 patients 354 were transplanted. Data from the first 16 months period were compared to those obtained during the second 16 months period.

RESULTS

During the first period 171 patients (47.9%) were unfit for transplantation [129 patients (36.1%) were refused after telephone information and 42 patients (11.8%) after clinical investigation]. During the second period 141 (39.5%) patients were found to be unsuitable [80 patients (22.4%) after telephone information and 61 patients (17.1)] after clinical examination. During the two periods of the study 44% of patients were unfit for transplantation. A considerable number of patients were refused because of cardiologic reasons. The percent of fit patients was 52.1% in the first period and 60.5% in the second period. In addition, the percent of unfit patients who were unsuitable for kidney transplantation after telephone information decreased from 36.1% to 22.4%, while the percent of unfit patients after clinical evaluation increased from 11.% to 17.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Authors conclude that waiting list committee made an effective work.

Characteristics of elderly patients with diabetes and end-stage renal disease

Because of a combination of demographic and social factors, such as the aging of the population in general, increased incidence of diabetes, and more liberal criteria for renal replacement therapy initiation, the proportion of the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with diabetes who are considered elderly is currently the fastest growing segment of incident ESRD population. Despite the fast growth of this group, it is poorly characterized in current literature. In this review, we attempt to summarize the data available to date regarding demographic composition, outcomes, choice of renal replacement therapy, and other management issues including renal transplantation. There is significant evidence that the elderly diabetic patients might differ from the general dialysis population regarding renal replacement modality, vascular access for dialysis, and that guidelines addressing chronic kidney disease (CKD) issues such as nutrition and blood pressure may need modification in this ESRD subgroup. At the same time, other areas such as anemia and bone mineral metabolism have not been adequately studied. Lastly, despite lower rates of kidney transplantation in this population, it confers significant survival advantages, similar to that seen in younger populations. As the fastest growing group in the incident ESRD population, these patients have issues related to clinical management, which represent very important areas for future research.