What immunosuppression should be used for old-to-old recipients?

Does Donor Age Have Effects on Senescence Biomarkers in Kidney-Transplanted Patients?

Renal transplantation is an effective treatment for severe chronic kidney diseases. However, young patients often face a scarcity of kidneys from donors of similar age, resulting in the transplantation of older organs, which increase the risk of graft rejection and several complications compared with older individuals who receive kidneys from donors of similar age or younger. This article focuses on studying different senescence biomarkers in donors and patients who received kidneys from various age ranges complying with the STROBE requirements. We studied 61 patients subjected to renal transplant isolating blood samples 24 h before, and 24 h, 3 days, 7 days, 3 months, and 6 months after transplant. The patients were divided into three groups: older donor than the patient (Old Donor), younger donor than the patient (Young Donor), and similar age (Matched). We studied different senescence markers such as p16, p21, interleukin 6 (IL-6), and senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) release. Young patients who receive older organs showed increased mRNA and protein expression of the senescence makers. Hence, increased SASP release was also observed in patients from older donor. In contrast, older patients who receive younger organs showed a slow but consistent improvement in their initial senescent phenotype. In addition, macrophage cell model treated with blood-derived serum from patients 6 months after the transplant showed a pro-senescence environment in macrophages proposed by the SASP from the patients. These results lead the hypothesis that senolytics could reduce the presence of senescent cells and mitigate the complications associated with the transplantation of older organs in young patients.

Influence of Calcineurin Inhibitor Choice on Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients Aged ≥60 Y: A Collaborative Transplant Study Report

BACKGROUND

Patients aged ≥60 y represent the fastest growing population among kidney transplant recipients and waitlist patients. They show an elevated infection risk and are frequently transplanted with multiple human leukocyte antigen mismatches. Whether the choice of calcineurin inhibitor influences graft survival, mortality, or key secondary outcomes such as infections in this vulnerable recipient population is unknown.

METHODS

A total of 31 177 kidney transplants from deceased donors performed between 2000 and 2019 at European centers and reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study were analyzed using multivariable Cox and logistic regression analyses. All recipients were ≥60 y old and received tacrolimus (Tac) or cyclosporine A on an intention-to-treat basis, combined with mycophenolic acid or azathioprine plus/minus steroids.

RESULTS

The risk of 3-y death-censored graft loss and patient mortality did not differ significantly between Tac- and cyclosporine A-treated patients (hazard ratio 0.98 and 0.95, P = 0.74 and 0.20, respectively). No difference was found in the overall risk of hospitalization for infection (hazard ratio = 0.95, P = 0.19); however, a lower incidence of rejection treatment (hazard ratio = 0.81, P < 0.001) was observed in Tac-treated patients. Assessment of pathogen-specific hospitalizations revealed no difference in the risk of hospitalization due to bacterial infection (odds ratio = 1.00, P = 0.96), but a significantly higher risk of hospitalization due to human polyomavirus infection was found among Tac-treated patients (odds ratio = 2.45, P = 0.002). The incidence of de novo diabetes was higher for Tac-based immunosuppression (odds ratio = 1.79, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Calcineurin inhibitor selection has no significant influence on death-censored graft survival, mortality, and overall infection risk in ≥60-y-old kidney transplant recipients.

Elderly kidney transplant recipients have favorable outcomes but increased infection-related mortality

Background

The number of elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease has been increasing, but the outcomes of kidney transplants (KT) remain poorly understood in elderly patients. Therefore, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of elderly KT recipients and analyzed the impact of elderly donors.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent KT between 2000 and 2019. KT recipients were divided into four groups according to a combination of recipient and donor age (≥60 or <60 years); elderly recipients: old-to-old (n = 46) and young-to-old (n = 83); young recipients: old-to-young (n = 98) and young-to-young (n = 796). We compared the risks of mortality, graft failure, and acute rejection between groups using Cox regression analysis.

Results

The incidence of delayed graft function, graft failure, and acute rejection was not different among groups. Annual mean tacrolimus trough level was not lower in elderly recipients than young recipients during 10-year follow-up. Mortality was significantly higher in elderly recipients (p = 0.001), particularly infection-related mortality (p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, old-to-old and young-to-old groups had increased risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14–7.32; p = 0.03; aHR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.51–6.20; p = 0.002). However, graft failure and acute rejection risks were not increased in elderly recipients.

Conclusion

In elderly recipients, graft survival and acute rejection-free survival were not inferior to those of young recipients. However, mortality, especially risk of infection-related death, was increased in elderly recipients. Thus, low immunosuppression intensity might help decrease mortality in elderly recipients.

Recipient efficacy and safety of kidney transplantation from older living donor: consideration for using older kidney as a solution to the shortage of organs

Background

As a solution to organ shortages, studies on kidney transplantation (KT) from older donors are being conducted. However, many controversies remain about its safety and efficacy.

Methods

In Samsung Medical Center, from January 2000 to May 2015, 1,141 patients underwent living KT. Cases of retransplantation, recipient and donor aged younger than 18 years, and multiorgan transplantation were excluded, and a total of 859 cases were selected. Analysis was performed by dividing the patents into two groups a younger donor group (donors <60 years old; n=826) and an older donor group (donors ≥60 years old; n=33).

Results

There were no significant differences between the two groups in patient death (log-rank P=0.173) or in postoperative complications. The older donor group had a higher acute rejection (P=0.034; hazard ratio [HR], 1.704) and graft failure rate (P=0.029, HR=2.352). There was no significant difference in the trend of estimated glomerular filtration rate over time (P=0.189).

Conclusions

KT using kidneys from old-aged donors is safe, but there is room for improvement due to problems with higher acute rejection and graft failure rate.

Immunosenescence as a reason of individualizing immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplantation

Transplantation in elderly patients is obviously more challenging due to existing underlying diseases, changes in pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs, polypragmasy, and transformation of immunoreactivity (immunosenescence). Our review presents data on modification of adaptive and innate immunity during aging. It also considers the possibility of both reduced and adapted immunosuppressive therapy in elderly renal transplant recipients in achieving an optimal balance between efficacy and complications.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations in Relation to Calcineurin Usage in Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients

This review summarizes how possible age-related changes in tacrolimus and cyclosporine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may influence drug dosing and monitoring in the elderly, and highlights how micro-sampling may be useful in this cohort in the future. Advancing biological age leads to physiological changes that can affect drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion, as well as immune system responsiveness. Some studies have shown that elderly recipients may have higher dose-adjusted exposure and/or lower clearance of the calcineurin inhibitors, suggesting that doses may need to be lowered in elderly recipients. Only one study has examined how aging effects drug target enzyme activity and demonstrated that age does not correlate with the calcineurin inhibitor half-maximal inhibitory concentration. Several studies have shown elderly kidney transplant recipients have increased risk of both morbidity and mortality, compared to younger adults due to increased susceptibility to immunosuppressant side effects, particularly cardiovascular disease, infection and malignancy. Current immunosuppressant dosing and monitoring protocols often make no adjustments for age. Lower maintenance immunosuppressant targets in elderly recipients may decrease patient susceptibility to drug side effects, however, further studies are required and appropriate targets need to be established. Blood draw by micro-sampling may be useful for drug monitoring in this cohort in the future, as blood collection is minimally invasive and less painful than venepuncture. Micro-sampling could also make further pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamics and outcome studies in the elderly more feasible.

Everolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients participating in the Eurotransplant senior program: Results of a prospective randomized multicenter study (SENATOR)

Early conversion to everolimus was assessed in kidney transplant recipients participating in the Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP), a population in whom data are lacking. The SENATOR multicenter study enrolled 207 kidney transplant recipients undergoing steroid withdrawal at week 2 post-transplant (ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT00956293]). At week 7, patients were randomized (1:2 ratio) to continue the previous calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based regimen with mycophenolic acid (MPA) and cyclosporine or switch to a CNI-free regimen with MPA, everolimus (5–10 ng/mL) and basiliximab at weeks 7 and 12, then followed for 18 weeks to month 6 post-transplant. The primary endpoint was estimated GFR (eGFR). At week 7, 77/207 (37.2%) patients were randomized (53 everolimus, 24 control). At month 6, eGFR was comparable: 36.5±10.8ml/min with everolimus versus 42.0±13.0ml/min in the control group (p = 0.784). Discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 27.8% of everolimus-treated patients and 0.0% of control patients (p = 0005). Efficacy profiles showed no difference. In conclusion, eGFR, safety and efficacy outcomes at month 6 post-transplant showed no difference between groups. The everolimus group experienced a higher rate of discontinuation due to adverse events. However, the high rate of non-randomization is highly relevant, indicating this to be a somewhat unstable patient population regardless of treatment.

Characterizing the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of immunosuppressant medicines and patient outcomes in elderly renal transplant patients

This review examines what is currently known about the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of commonly prescribed immunosuppressant medicines, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, mycophenolate and prednisolone, in elderly renal transplant recipients, and reported patient outcomes in this cohort. Renal transplantation is increasing rapidly in the elderly, however, currently, long-term patient outcomes are relatively poor compared to younger adults. Some studies have suggested that elderly recipients may have higher dose-adjusted exposure and/or lower clearance of the calcineurin inhibitors tacrolimus and cyclosporine; with one study reporting up to 50% reduction in tacrolimus exposure in the elderly. Elderly transplant recipients do not appear to have higher dosage-adjusted exposure to mycophenolic acid (MPA). The effects of ageing on the pharmacokinetics of prednisolone are unknown. Only one study has examined how aging effects drug target enzymes, reporting no difference in baseline inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity and MPA-induced IMPDH activity in elderly compared to younger adult renal transplant recipients. In elderly transplant recipients, immunosenescence likely lowers the risk of acute rejection, but increases the risk of drug-related adverse effects. Currently, the three main causes of death in elderly renal transplant recipients are cardiovascular disease, infection and malignancy. One study has showed that renal transplant recipients aged over 65 years are seven times more likely to die with a functioning graft compared with young adults (aged 18-29 years). This suggests that an optimal balance between immunosuppressant medicine efficacy and toxicity is not achieved in elderly recipients, and further studies are needed to foster long-term graft and patient survival. Lower maintenance immunosuppressant targets in elderly recipients may decrease patient susceptibility to drug side effects, however, further studies are required and appropriate targets need to be established.

The Value of Older Donors' Klotho Level in Predicting Recipients' Short-Term Renal Function

BACKGROUND The present organ shortage has led to increased use of kidneys from expanded-criteria donors, but the prognosis is disappointing due to poor graft quality. As a promising kidney protector, the Klotho gene's role in predicting short-term prognosis has not been assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 41 recipients and 25 donors. Multiple clinical variables were compared between different subgroups of donors or their corresponding recipients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to evaluate the distinguishing ability. Dynamic changes in serum Klotho, FGF-23, and urinary NGAL were assessed. RESULTS Serum Klotho level was significantly lower in donors age ≥50 years (p=0.017), and there was a moderate negative correlation between serum Klotho expression and age (r=-0.464, p=0.019). Moreover, detection of Klotho mRNA and immunohistochemical analysis in kidneys revealed the same trend as in serum. Furthermore, for older donors (age ≥50 years), serum Klotho level had a strong negative correlation with recipient eGFR 1 month post-transplant (r=-0.686, p=0.007), which was proved to be a good predictor for estimating graft function by ROC analysis. Additionally, during the post-transplant follow-up, serum Klotho levels increased slightly after a temporary decline, while serum FGF-23 and urinary NGAL decreased significantly and then stayed low thereafter. CONCLUSIONS Klotho level, which decreases with age, may be a potential predictor of short-term renal function, especially for grafts from older donors.

[Focusing on kidney transplantation in the elderly]

Due to the increase in life expectancy and the ageing of end-stage renal disease patients, the number of patients older than 65 years receiving a kidney transplant has been continuously growing over the last fifteen years. The benefits of renal transplantation compared to dialysis in terms of survival and quality of life have been shown in selected recipients over 65, or 70 years. However, the age remains the main limiting factor for the access to the waiting list, and the reluctance of the clinicians can be explained by the multiple comorbidities of these candidates, their limited life expectancy or the shortage of grafts. The challenge is to select the candidates who can benefit from renal transplantation, thanks to rigorous cardiovascular and neoplastic evaluation before enrolment and by taking into account the specific characteristics of elderly patients. The living donor appears to be the ideal option for elderly recipients, the alternative being the extended criteria donor, allowing waiting times to be limited. The choice of immunosuppressive therapy is also crucial in these patients at high risk of infectious and cardiovascular complications in whom the occurrence of acute rejection can have severe consequences. There are currently no specific recommendations for immunosuppression in elderly recipients, and we would need large-scale randomized studies to improve the prognosis of renal transplantation in this population.

Kidney Transplantation Among the Elderly: Challenges and Opportunities to Improve Outcomes

Elderly patients (>65 years old) represent the fastest growing population among the ESRD patients and those awaiting kidney transplantation. There is ample evidence to suggest that kidney transplant in the elderly population offers the best chance of survival and improves health-related quality of life compared to remaining on dialysis. Although all these emerging facts are encouraging, this population brings with them complex medical problems including frailty, cognitive impairment, and multiple comorbidities. These issues can be barriers to transplantation and threaten the well-being of the patients after transplantation. Furthermore, aging results in changes to the immune system and affects the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressants. All these changes can increase risk of complications such as infections and malignancy. Because death with a functioning graft is a common cause of graft loss, the new kidney allocation system has been implemented in an attempt to maximize allograft utilization and minimize unrealized graft years. This may result in longer wait-times for the elderly. In this review, we will highlight the barriers to kidney transplant, characterize transplant-related issues in the elderly, and propose alternative strategies under the new allocation system.