Kidney transplantation for HIV-positive patients

An Enhanced Role of Innate Immunity in the Immune Response After Kidney Transplant in People Living With HIV: A Transcriptomic Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although kidney transplantation (KT) has become the standard of care for people living with HIV (PLWH) suffering from renal failure, early experiences revealed unanticipated higher rejection rates than those observed in HIV- recipients. The cause of increased acute rejection (AR) in PLWH was assessed by performing a transcriptomic analysis of biopsy specimens, comparing HIV+ to HIV- recipients.

METHODS

An analysis of 68 (34 HIV+, 34 HIV-) formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) renal biopsies matched for degree of inflammation was performed from KT recipients with acute T cell-mediated rejection (aTCMR), borderline for aTCMR (BL), and normal findings. Gene expression was measured using the NanoString platform on a custom gene panel to assess differential gene expression (DE) and pathway analysis (PA).

RESULTS

DE analysis revealed multiple genes with significantly increased expression in the HIV+ cohort in aTCMR and BL relative to the HIV- cohort. PA of these genes showed enrichment of various inflammatory pathways, particularly innate immune pathways associated with Toll-like receptors.

CONCLUSIONS

Upregulation of the innate immune pathways in the biopsies of PLWH with aTCMR and BL is suggestive of a unique immune response that may stem from immune dysregulation related to HIV infection. These findings suggest that these unique HIV-driven pathways may in part be contributory to the increased incidence of allograft rejection after renal transplantation in PLWH.

Infectious disease events in people with HIV receiving kidney transplantation: Analysis of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study and the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Since the implementation of universal antiretroviral therapy, kidney transplantation (K-Tx) has become a valuable option for treatment of end-stage kidney disease for people with HIV (PWH) with similar patient and graft survival as compared to HIV-uninfected patients. Little is known about the hazards and manifestations of infectious disease (ID) events occurring in kidney transplant recipients with HIV.

METHODS

Using linked information collected in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS) and the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS), we described in-depth demographical and clinical characteristics of PWH who received a K-Tx since 2008. Further, we performed recurrent time to event analyses to understand whether HIV was an independent risk factor for ID events.

RESULTS

Overall, 24 PWH with 57 ID events were included in this study (100% match of SHCS to STCS). Of these, 17 (70.8%) patients had at least one ID event: 22 (38.6%) viral (HIV not counted), 18 (31.6%) bacterial, one (1.8%) fungal and 16 (28.1%) probable infections. Most ID events affected the respiratory tract (25, 37.3%) or the urinary tract (13, 19.4%). Pathogen types and infection sites were similar in PWH and a matched control group of HIV-uninfected patients. HIV was not an independent risk factor for ID events (adjusted hazard ratio 0.94, p = 0.9).

CONCLUSION

By linking data from two large national Swiss cohorts, we provided in-depth information on ID events in PWH receiving a K-Tx in Switzerland. HIV infection was not associated with an increased hazard for ID events after K-Tx.

Belatacept-based immunosuppressive regimen in HIV-positive kidney transplant recipients

Background

Kidney allograft survival in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients is lower than that in the general population. Belatacept increases long-term patient and allograft survival rates when compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Its use in HIV-positive recipients remains poorly documented.

Methods

We retrospectively report a French cohort of HIV-positive kidney allograft recipients who were switched from CNI to belatacept, between June 2012 and December 2018. Patient and allograft survival rates, HIV immunovirological and clinical outcomes, acute rejection, opportunistic infections (OIs) and HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) were analysed at 3 and 12 months, and at the end of follow-up (last clinical visit attended after transplantation). Results were compared with HIV-positive recipients group treated with CNI.

Results

Twelve patients were switched to belatacept 10 (2–25) months after transplantation. One year after belatacept therapy, patient and allograft survival rates scored 92% for both, two (17%) HIV virological rebounds occurred due to antiretroviral therapy non-compliance, and CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell counts remained stable over time. Serious adverse events included two (17%) acute steroid-resistant T-cell-mediated rejections and three (25%) OIs. Kidney allograft function significantly increased over the 12 post-switch months (P = 0.009), and DSAs remained stable at 12 months after treatment. The control group showed similar results in terms of patient and kidney allograft survival rates, DSA characteristics and proteinuria

Conclusions

Switch from CNI to belatacept can be considered safe and may increase long-term kidney allograft survival in HIV-positive kidney allograft recipients. These results need to be confirmed in a larger cohort.

Successful treatment of BK virus associated-nephropathy in a human immunodeficiency virus-positive kidney transplant recipient

BK virus (BKV) is an opportunistic pathogen in those with impaired immunity. Viral replication is generally asymptomatic but is able to induce cytopathic alterations in renal cells. If BKV infection is left untreated, it leads to BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) and graft loss. There is scarce experience in the management of BKV infection in kidney transplant recipients living with HIV. We report the successful treatment of BKVAN in an HIV-positive kidney transplant recipient who experienced BKV replication in the immediate post-transplantation period. A change in therapy from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus, steroid withdrawal and a short course of an immunomodulatory agent (leflunomide) controlled BKV viremia in the absence of drug side-effects or impairment of graft function.

Low incidence of acute rejection within 6 months of kidney transplantation in HIV-infected recipients treated with raltegravir: the Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le Sida et les Hépatites Virales (ANRS) 153 TREVE trial

OBJECTIVES

High rates of clinical acute rejection after kidney transplantation have been reported in people living with HIV (PLHIV), probably as a consequence of drug interactions. We therefore investigated the incidence of acute rejection within 6 months of transplantation in HIV-infected recipients treated with a protease-inhibitor-free raltegravir-based regimen.

METHODS

The Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le Sida et les Hépatites Virales (ANRS) 153 TREVE (NCT01453192) study was a prospective multicentre single-arm trial in adult PLHIV awaiting kidney transplantation, with viral load < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL, CD4 T-cell count > 200 cells/μL, and HIV-1 strains sensitive to raltegravir, aiming to demonstrate 6-month clinical acute rejection rates < 30%. Time to transplantation was compared with that for uninfected subjects matched for age, sex and registration date.

RESULTS

In total, 61 participants were enrolled in the study, and 26 underwent kidney transplantation. Two participants experienced clinical acute rejection, corresponding to an estimated clinical acute rejection rate of 8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2-24%] at 6 and 12 months post-transplantation. HIV infection remained under control in all but one participant, who temporarily stopped antiretroviral treatment. Median time to transplantation was longer in PLHIV than in controls (4.3 versus 2.8 years, respectively; P = 0.002) and was not influenced by blood group.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute rejection rates were low after kidney transplantation in PLHIV treated with a raltegravir-based regimen. However, PLHIV have poorer access to transplantation than HIV-uninfected individuals after registration on the waiting list.

Outcomes in human immunodeficiency virus-infected recipients of heart transplants

BACKGROUND

With the advent of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), growing evidence has shown human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) may no longer be an absolute contraindication for solid organ transplantation. This study compares outcomes of heart transplantations between HIV-positive and HIV-negative recipients using SRTR transplant registry data.

METHODS

Patient survival, overall graft survival and death-censored graft survival were compared between HIV-positive and HIV-negative recipients. Multivariate Cox regression and Cox regression with a disease risk score (DRS) methodology were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios among heart transplant recipients (HTRs).

RESULTS

In total, 35 HTRs with HIV+ status were identified. No significant differences were found in patient survival (88% vs 77%; P = 0.1493), overall graft survival (85% vs 76%; P = 0.2758), and death-censored graft survival (91% vs 91%; P = 0.9871) between HIV-positive and HIV-negative HTRs in 5-year follow-up. No significant differences were found after adjusting for confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the use of heart transplant procedures in selected HIV-positive patients. This study suggests that HIV-positive status is not a contraindication for life-saving heart transplant as there were no differences in graft, patient survival.