Machine-assisted interpretation of auramine stains substantially increases through-put and sensitivity of microscopic tuberculosis diagnosis

Artificial intelligence applications in the diagnosis and treatment of bacterial infections

The diagnosis and treatment of bacterial infections in the medical and public health field in the 21st century remain significantly challenging. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful new tool in diagnosing and treating bacterial infections. AI is rapidly revolutionizing epidemiological studies of infectious diseases, providing effective early warning, prevention, and control of outbreaks. Machine learning models provide a highly flexible way to simulate and predict the complex mechanisms of pathogen-host interactions, which is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the nature of diseases. Machine learning-based pathogen identification technology and antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing break through the limitations of traditional methods, significantly shorten the time from sample collection to the determination of result, and greatly improve the speed and accuracy of laboratory testing. In addition, AI technology application in treating bacterial infections, particularly in the research and development of drugs and vaccines, and the application of innovative therapies such as bacteriophage, provides new strategies for improving therapy and curbing bacterial resistance. Although AI has a broad application prospect in diagnosing and treating bacterial infections, significant challenges remain in data quality and quantity, model interpretability, clinical integration, and patient privacy protection. To overcome these challenges and, realize widespread application in clinical practice, interdisciplinary cooperation, technology innovation, and policy support are essential components of the joint efforts required. In summary, with continuous advancements and in-depth application of AI technology, AI will enable doctors to more effectivelyaddress the challenge of bacterial infection, promoting the development of medical practice toward precision, efficiency, and personalization; optimizing the best nursing and treatment plans for patients; and providing strong support for public health safety.

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Microbial Diagnosis

Traditional microbial diagnostic methods face many obstacles such as sample handling, culture difficulties, misidentification, and delays in determining susceptibility. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has markedly transformed microbial diagnostics with rapid and precise analyses. Nonetheless, ethical considerations accompany AI adoption, necessitating measures to uphold patient privacy, mitigate biases, and ensure data integrity. This review examines conventional diagnostic hurdles, stressing the significance of standardized procedures in sample processing. It underscores AI's significant impact, particularly through machine learning (ML), in microbial diagnostics. Recent progressions in AI, particularly ML methodologies, are explored, showcasing their influence on microbial categorization, comprehension of microorganism interactions, and augmentation of microscopy capabilities. This review furnishes a comprehensive evaluation of AI's utility in microbial diagnostics, addressing both advantages and challenges. A few case studies including SARS-CoV-2, malaria, and mycobacteria serve to illustrate AI's potential for swift and precise diagnosis. Utilization of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in digital pathology, automated bacterial classification, and colony counting further underscores AI's versatility. Additionally, AI improves antimicrobial susceptibility assessment and contributes to disease surveillance, outbreak forecasting, and real-time monitoring. Despite a few limitations, integration of AI in diagnostic microbiology presents robust solutions, user-friendly algorithms, and comprehensive training, promising paradigm-shifting advancements in healthcare.

Performance evaluation of machine-assisted interpretation of Gram stains from positive blood cultures

Manual microscopy of Gram stains from positive blood cultures (PBCs) is crucial for diagnosing bloodstream infections but remains labor intensive, time consuming, and subjective. This study aimed to evaluate a scan and analysis system that combines fully automated digital microscopy with deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to assist the interpretation of Gram stains from PBCs for routine laboratory use. The CNN was trained to classify images of Gram stains based on staining and morphology into seven different classes: background/false-positive, Gram-positive cocci in clusters (GPCCL), Gram-positive cocci in pairs (GPCP), Gram-positive cocci in chains (GPCC), rod-shaped bacilli (RSB), yeasts, and polymicrobial specimens. A total of 1,555 Gram-stained slides of PBCs were scanned, pre-classified, and reviewed by medical professionals. The results of assisted Gram stain interpretation were compared to those of manual microscopy and cultural species identification by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). The comparison of assisted Gram stain interpretation and manual microscopy yielded positive/negative percent agreement values of 95.8%/98.0% (GPCCL), 87.6%/99.3% (GPCP/GPCC), 97.4%/97.8% (RSB), 83.3%/99.3% (yeasts), and 87.0%/98.5% (negative/false positive). The assisted Gram stain interpretation, when compared to MALDI-TOF MS species identification, also yielded similar results. During the analytical performance study, assisted interpretation showed excellent reproducibility and repeatability. Any microorganism in PBCs should be detectable at the determined limit of detection of 105 CFU/mL. Although the CNN-based interpretation of Gram stains from PBCs is not yet ready for clinical implementation, it has potential for future integration and advancement.

Retrospective validation of MetaSystems' deep-learning-based digital microscopy platform with assistance compared to manual fluorescence microscopy for detection of mycobacteria

This study aimed to validate Metasystems' automated acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy scanning and deep-learning-based image analysis module (Neon Metafer) with assistance on respiratory and pleural samples, compared to conventional manual fluorescence microscopy (MM). Analytical parameters were assessed first, followed by a retrospective validation study. In all, 320 archived auramine-O-stained slides selected non-consecutively [85 originally reported as AFB-smear-positive, 235 AFB-smear-negative slides; with an overall mycobacterial culture positivity rate of 24.1% (77/320)] underwent whole-slide imaging and were analyzed by the Metafer Neon AFB Module (version 4.3.130) using a predetermined probability threshold (PT) for AFB detection of 96%. Digital slides were then examined by a trained reviewer blinded to previous AFB smear and culture results, for the final interpretation of assisted digital microscopy (a-DM). Paired results from both microscopic methods were compared to mycobacterial culture. A scanning failure rate of 10.6% (34/320) was observed, leaving 286 slides for analysis. After discrepant analysis, concordance, positive and negative agreements were 95.5% (95%CI, 92.4%-97.6%), 96.2% (95%CI, 89.2%-99.2%), and 95.2% (95%CI, 91.3%-97.7%), respectively. Using mycobacterial culture as reference standard, a-DM and MM had comparable sensitivities: 90.7% (95%CI, 81.7%-96.2%) versus 92.0% (95%CI, 83.4%-97.0%) (P-value = 1.00); while their specificities differed 91.9% (95%CI, 87.4%-95.2%) versus 95.7% (95%CI, 92.1%-98.0%), respectively (P-value = 0.03). Using a PT of 96%, MetaSystems' platform shows acceptable performance. With a national laboratory staff shortage and a local low mycobacterial infection rate, this instrument when combined with culture, can reliably triage-negative AFB-smear respiratory slides and identify positive slides requiring manual confirmation and semi-quantification.

IMPORTANCE

This manuscript presents a full validation of MetaSystems' automated acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy scanning and deep-learning-based image analysis module using a probability threshold of 96% including accuracy, precision studies, and evaluation of limit of AFB detection on respiratory samples when the technology is used with assistance. This study is complementary to the conversation started by Tomasello et al. on the use of image analysis artificial intelligence software in routine mycobacterial diagnostic activities within the context of high-throughput laboratories with low incidence of tuberculosis.

Harnessing of Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Infections: A Systematic Review

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are the most common adverse events in healthcare and constitute a major global public health concern. Surveillance represents the foundation for the effective prevention and control of HAIs, yet conventional surveillance is costly and labor intensive. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have the potential to support the development of HAI surveillance algorithms for the understanding of HAI risk factors, the improvement of patient risk stratification as well as the prediction and timely detection and prevention of infections. AI-supported systems have so far been explored for clinical laboratory testing and imaging diagnosis, antimicrobial resistance profiling, antibiotic discovery and prediction-based clinical decision support tools in terms of HAIs. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the current literature on AI applications in the field of HAIs and discuss the future potentials of this emerging technology in infection practice. Following the PRISMA guidelines, this study examined the articles in databases including PubMed and Scopus until November 2023, which were screened based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in 162 included articles. By elucidating the advancements in the field, we aim to highlight the potential applications of AI in the field, report related issues and shortcomings and discuss the future directions.

The performance of VCS(volume, conductivity, light scatter) parameters in distinguishing latent tuberculosis and active tuberculosis by using machine learning algorithm

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis is a chronic infectious disease caused by mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and is the ninth leading cause of death worldwide. It is still difficult to distinguish active TB from latent TB,but it is very important for individualized management and treatment to distinguish whether patients are active or latent tuberculosis infection.

METHODS

A total of 220 subjects, including active TB patients (ATB, n = 97) and latent TB patients (LTB, n = 113), were recruited in this study .46 features about blood routine indicators and the VCS parameters (volume, conductivity, light scatter) of neutrophils(NE), monocytes(MO), and lymphocytes(LY) were collected and was constructed classification model by four machine learning algorithms(logistic regression(LR), random forest(RF), support vector machine(SVM) and k-nearest neighbor(KNN)). And the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) to estimate of the model's predictive performance for dentifying active and latent tuberculosis infection.

RESULTS

After verification,among the four classifications, LR and RF had the best performance (AUROC = 1, AUPRC = 1), followed by SVM (AUROC = 0.967, AUPRC = 0.971), KNN (AUROC = 0.943, AUPRC = 0.959) in the training set. And LR had the best performance (AUROC = 0.977, AUPRC = 0.957), followed by SVM (AUROC = 0.962, AUPRC = 0.949), RF (AUROC = 0.903, AUPRC = 0.922),KNN(AUROC = 0.883, AUPRC = 0.901) in the testing set.

CONCLUSIONS

The machine learning algorithm classifier based on leukocyte VCS parameters is of great value in identifying active and latent tuberculosis infection.

The Use of Machine Learning for Image Analysis Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Microbiology

The growing transition to digital microbiology in clinical laboratories creates the opportunity to interpret images using software. Software analysis tools can be designed to use human-curated knowledge and expert rules, but more novel artificial intelligence (AI) approaches such as machine learning (ML) are being integrated into clinical microbiology practice. These image analysis AI (IAAI) tools are beginning to penetrate routine clinical microbiology practice, and their scope and impact on routine clinical microbiology practice will continue to grow. This review separates the IAAI applications into 2 broad classification categories: (i) rare event detection/classification or (ii) score-based/categorical classification. Rare event detection can be used for screening purposes or for final identification of a microbe including microscopic detection of mycobacteria in a primary specimen, detection of bacterial colonies growing on nutrient agar, or detection of parasites in a stool preparation or blood smear. Score-based image analysis can be applied to a scoring system that classifies images in toto as its output interpretation and examples include application of the Nugent score for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis and interpretation of urine cultures. The benefits, challenges, development, and implementation strategies of IAAI tools are explored. In conclusion, IAAI is beginning to impact the routine practice of clinical microbiology, and its use can enhance the efficiency and quality of clinical microbiology practice. Although the future of IAAI is promising, currently IAAI only augments human effort and is not a replacement for human expertise.

Evaluation of MetaSystems Automated Fluorescent Microscopy System for the Machine-Assisted Detection of Acid-Fast Bacilli in Clinical Samples

Manual reading of fluorescent acid-fast bacilli (AFB) microscopy slides is time-intensive and technically demanding. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of MetaSystems' automated fluorescent AFB slide scanner and analyzer. Auramine O-stained slides corresponding to 133 culture-positive and 363 culture-negative respiratory (n = 284), tissue (n = 120), body fluid (n = 81), and other (n = 11) sources were evaluated with the MetaSystems Mycobacteria Scanner running the NEON Metafer AFB Module. The sensitivity and specificity of the MetaSystems platform was measured as a standalone diagnostic and as an assistant to technologists to review positive images. Culture results were used as the reference method. The MetaSystems platform failed to scan 57 (11.5%) slides. The MetaSystems platform used as a standalone had a sensitivity of 97.0% (129/133; 95% CI 92.5 to 99.2) and specificity of 12.7% (46/363; 95% CI 9.4 to 16.5). When positive scans were used to assist technologists, the MetaSystems platform had a sensitivity of 70.7% (94/133; 95% CI 62.2 to 78.3) and specificity of 89.0% (323/363; 95% CI 85.3 to 92.0). The manual microscopy method had a sensitivity of 79.7% (106/133; 95% CI 71.9 to 86.2) and specificity of 98.6% (358/363; 95% CI 96.8 to 99.6). The sensitivity of the MetaSystems platform was not impacted by smear grade or mycobacterial species. The majority (70.3%) of false positive smears had ≥2+ smear results with the MetaSystems platform. Further performance improvements are needed before the MetaSystems' automated fluorescent AFB slide reader can be used to assist microscopist in the clinical laboratory.

Artificial intelligence in disease diagnosis: a systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda

Artificial intelligence can assist providers in a variety of patient care and intelligent health systems. Artificial intelligence techniques ranging from machine learning to deep learning are prevalent in healthcare for disease diagnosis, drug discovery, and patient risk identification. Numerous medical data sources are required to perfectly diagnose diseases using artificial intelligence techniques, such as ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, genomics, computed tomography scan, etc. Furthermore, artificial intelligence primarily enhanced the infirmary experience and sped up preparing patients to continue their rehabilitation at home. This article covers the comprehensive survey based on artificial intelligence techniques to diagnose numerous diseases such as Alzheimer, cancer, diabetes, chronic heart disease, tuberculosis, stroke and cerebrovascular, hypertension, skin, and liver disease. We conducted an extensive survey including the used medical imaging dataset and their feature extraction and classification process for predictions. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines are used to select the articles published up to October 2020 on the Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, Excerpta Medical Database, and Psychology Information for early prediction of distinct kinds of diseases using artificial intelligence-based techniques. Based on the study of different articles on disease diagnosis, the results are also compared using various quality parameters such as prediction rate, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, the area under curve precision, recall, and F1-score.

Artificial Intelligence and Mapping a New Direction in Laboratory Medicine: A Review

BACKGROUND

Modern artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods are now capable of completing tasks with performance characteristics that are comparable to those of expert human operators. As a result, many areas throughout healthcare are incorporating these technologies, including in vitro diagnostics and, more broadly, laboratory medicine. However, there are limited literature reviews of the landscape, likely future, and challenges of the application of AI/ML in laboratory medicine.

CONTENT

In this review, we begin with a brief introduction to AI and its subfield of ML. The ensuing sections describe ML systems that are currently in clinical laboratory practice or are being proposed for such use in recent literature, ML systems that use laboratory data outside the clinical laboratory, challenges to the adoption of ML, and future opportunities for ML in laboratory medicine.

SUMMARY

AI and ML have and will continue to influence the practice and scope of laboratory medicine dramatically. This has been made possible by advancements in modern computing and the widespread digitization of health information. These technologies are being rapidly developed and described, but in comparison, their implementation thus far has been modest. To spur the implementation of reliable and sophisticated ML-based technologies, we need to establish best practices further and improve our information system and communication infrastructure. The participation of the clinical laboratory community is essential to ensure that laboratory data are sufficiently available and incorporated conscientiously into robust, safe, and clinically effective ML-supported clinical diagnostics.

Laboratory Automation in the Microbiology Laboratory: an Ongoing Journey, Not a Tale?

Clinical chemistry laboratories implemented fully automated devices decades before microbiologists started their subtle approaches to follow. Meanwhile several papers have been published about reduced time to reports, faster workflows, and increased sensitivity as results of lab automation. While the journey of automating microbiology workflows step by step was fascinating and beneficial, monetary aspects were uncommon in most publications. In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, K. Culbreath, H. Piwonka, J. Korver, and M. Noorbakhsh (J Clin Microbiol 59:e01969-20, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01969-20) calculate the benefits of total lab automation in terms of cost savings and lab efficiency in a "tale of four laboratories." The authors here provide facts and solid calculations about the benefits achieved in four different-sized labs after implementation of full laboratory automation.