Optimizing the formulation variables for encapsulation of linezolid into polycaprolactone inhalable microspheres using double emulsion solvent evaporation

Development of inhaled moxifloxacin-metformin formulation as an alternative for pulmonary tuberculosis treatment

Resistant M. tuberculosis strains threaten pulmonary tuberculosis (P-TB) control since they limit drug options. Drug repositioning and new development strategies are urgently required to overcome resistance. Studies have already shown the beneficial role of the oral antidiabetic metformin as an anti-tuberculosis adjuvant drug. This work aimed to develop an inhalatory dry powder co-formulation of metformin and moxifloxacin to figure out a future option for P-TB treatment. Pre-formulation evaluations indicated the physicochemical compatibility of constituents, demonstrating powder crystallinity and acceptable drug content. Eight moxifloxacin-metformin dry powder formulations were produced by spray drying, and solid-state characterizations showed partial amorphization, ascribed to moxifloxacin. Four formulations containing L-leucine exhibited micromeritic and in vitro deposition profiles indicating pulmonary delivery suitability, like spherical and corrugated particle surface, geometric diameters < 5 μm, high emitted doses (>85 %), and mass median aerodynamic diameters between 1-5 μm. The use of a second spray dryer model further optimized the aerodynamic properties and yield of the best formulation, demonstrating the influence of the equipment used on the product obtained. Moreover, the final formulation showed high in vitro cell tolerability and characteristics in permeability studies indicative of good drug retention in the lungs.

Biopolymeric Inhalable Dry Powders for Pulmonary Drug Delivery

Natural and synthetic biopolymers are gaining popularity in the development of inhaled drug formulations. Their highly tunable properties and ability to sustain drug release allow for the incorporation of attributes not achieved in dry powder inhaler formulations composed only of micronized drugs, standard excipients, and/or carriers. There are multiple physiological barriers to the penetration of inhaled drugs to the epithelial surface, such as the periciliary layer mucus mesh, pulmonary macrophages, and inflammation and mucus compositional changes resulting from respiratory diseases. Biopolymers may facilitate transport to the epithelial surface despite such barriers. A variety of categories of biopolymers have been assessed for their potential in inhaled drug formulations throughout the research literature, ranging from natural biopolymers (e.g., chitosan, alginate, hyaluronic acid) to those synthesized in a laboratory setting (e.g., polycaprolactone, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)) with varying structures and compositions. To date, no biopolymers have been approved as a commercial dry powder inhaler product. However, advances may be possible in the treatment of respiratory diseases and infections upon further investigation and evaluation. Herein, this review will provide a thorough foundation of reported research utilizing biopolymers in dry powder inhaler formulations. Furthermore, insight and considerations for the future development of dry powder formulations will be proposed.

Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability study of two cefquinome sulfate intramammary infusions in cow milk

In this study, two intramammary infusions of cefquinome sulfate were investigated for pharmacokinetics and bioavailability. Twelve lactating cows for each group were administered an effective dose of 75 mg/gland for cefquinome, with milk samples collected at various time intervals. The concentrations of cefquinome in milk at different times were determined by the UPLC-MS/MS method. Analyses of noncompartmental pharmacokinetics were conducted on the concentration of cefquinome in milk. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters of group A and group B following intramammary administration were as follows: AUClast 300558.57 ± 25052.78 ng/mL and 266551.3 ± 50654.85 ng/mL, Cmax 51786.35 ± 11948.4 ng/mL and 59763.7 ± 8403.2 ng/mL, T1/2 5.69 ± 0.62 h and 5.25 ± 1.62 h, MRT 7.43 ± 0.79 h and 4.8 ± 0.78 h, respectively. Pharmacokinetic experiments showed that the relative bioavailability of group B was 88.69% that of group A. From our findings, group B (3 g: 75 mg) shows a quicker drug elimination process than group A (8 g: 75 mg), which suggests that the withdrawal period for the new formulation may be shorter.