1
|
Enikeeva K, Rafikova G, Sharifyanova Y, Mulyukova D, Vanzin A, Pavlov V. Epigenetics as a Key Factor in Prostate Cancer. Adv Biol (Weinh) 2024; 8:e2300520. [PMID: 38379272 DOI: 10.1002/adbi.202300520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
Nowadays, prostate cancer is one of the most common forms of malignant neoplasms in men all over the world. Against the background of increasing incidence, there is a high mortality rate from prostate cancer, which is associated with an inadequate treatment strategy. Such a high prevalence of prostate cancer requires the development of methods that can ensure early detection of the disease, improve the effectiveness of treatment, and predict the therapeutic effect. Under these circumstances, it becomes crucial to focus on the development of effective diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Due to the development of molecular genetic methods, a large number of studies have been accumulated on the role of epigenetic regulation of gene activity in cancer development, since it is epigenetic changes that can be detected at the earliest stages of cancer development. The presence of epigenetic aberrations in tumor tissue and correlations with drug resistance suggest new therapeutic approaches. Detection of epigenetic alterations such as CpG island methylation, histone modification, and microRNAs as biomarkers will improve the diagnosis of the disease, and the use of these strategies as targets for therapy will allow for greater personalization of prostate cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kadriia Enikeeva
- Institute of Urology and Clinical Oncology, Bashkir State Medical University, Ufa, 450008, Russia
| | - Guzel Rafikova
- Institute of Urology and Clinical Oncology, Bashkir State Medical University, Ufa, 450008, Russia
| | - Yuliya Sharifyanova
- Institute of Urology and Clinical Oncology, Bashkir State Medical University, Ufa, 450008, Russia
| | - Diana Mulyukova
- Institute of Urology and Clinical Oncology, Bashkir State Medical University, Ufa, 450008, Russia
| | - Alexandr Vanzin
- Institute of Urology and Clinical Oncology, Bashkir State Medical University, Ufa, 450008, Russia
| | - Valentin Pavlov
- Institute of Urology and Clinical Oncology, Bashkir State Medical University, Ufa, 450008, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Coşarcan SK, Gürkan Y, Manici M, Özdemir İ, Kılıç M, Esen T, Erçelen Ö. The effect of ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block on postoperative analgesia in robot assisted prostatectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e37975. [PMID: 38669407 PMCID: PMC11049694 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000037975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pain continues to represent an important problem even after minimally invasive robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, which results in discomfort in the postoperative period and sometimes prolongs hospital stays. Regional anesthesia and analgesia techniques are used in addition to systemic analgesics with the multimodal approach in postoperative pain management. Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks are becoming increasingly important, especially in minimally invasive surgeries. Another important cause of discomfort is urinary catheter pain. The present randomized controlled study investigated the effect of rectus sheath block on postoperative pain and catheter-related bladder discomfort in robotic prostatectomy operations. METHODS This randomized controlled trial was conducted from March to August 2022. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Approval for the study was granted by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee. All individuals provided written informed consent, and adults with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Condition classification I to III planned for robotic prostatectomy operations under general anesthesia were enrolled. Following computer-assisted randomization, patients were divided into 2 groups, and general anesthesia was induced in all cases. Rectus sheath block was performed under general anesthesia and at the end of the surgery. No fascial plane block was applied to the patients in the non-rectus sheath block (RSB) group.Postoperative pain and urinary catheter pain were assessed using a numerical rating scale. Fentanyl was planned as rescue analgesia in the recovery room. In case of numerical rating scale scores of 4 or more, patients were given 50 µg fentanyl IV, repeated if necessary. The total fentanyl dose administered was recorded in the recovery room. IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia was planned for all patients. All patients' pain (postoperative pain at surgical site and urethral catheter discomfort) scores and total morphine consumption in the recovery unit and during follow-ups on the ward (3, 6, 12, and 24 hours) in the postoperative period were recorded. RESULTS Sixty-one patients were evaluated. Total tramadol consumption during follow-up on the ward was significantly higher in the non-RSB group. Fentanyl consumption in the postanesthesia care unit was significantly higher in the non-RSB group. Total morphine consumption was significantly lower in the RSB group at 0 to 12 hours and 12 to 24 hours. Total opioid consumption was 8.81 mg in the RSB group and 19.87 mg in the non-RSB group. A statistically significant decrease in urethral catheter pain was noted in the RSB group at all time points. CONCLUSION RSB exhibits effective analgesia by significantly reducing postoperative opioid consumption in robotic prostatectomy operations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sami Kaan Coşarcan
- Department of Anesthesiology, VKV American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Koç University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yavuz Gürkan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Koç University Hospital, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mete Manici
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Koç University Hospital, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - İrem Özdemir
- Department of Anesthesiology and Algology Clinic, Koç University Hospital, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mert Kılıç
- Department of Urology, VKV American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tarik Esen
- Department of Urology, VKV American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Urology, Koç University Hospital, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ömür Erçelen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Algology Clinic, Koç University Hospital, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Anesthesiology and Algology Clinic, VKV American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mian AH, Tollefson MK, Shah P, Sharma V, Mian A, Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Frank I, Khanna A. Navigating Now and Next: Recent Advances and Future Horizons in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy. J Clin Med 2024; 13:359. [PMID: 38256493 PMCID: PMC10815957 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Revised: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become the leading approach for radical prostatectomy driven by innovations aimed at improving functional and oncological outcomes. The initial advancement in this field was transperitoneal multiport robotics, which has since undergone numerous technical modifications. These enhancements include the development of extraperitoneal, transperineal, and transvesical approaches to radical prostatectomy, greatly facilitated by the advent of the Single Port (SP) robot. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of these evolving techniques and their impact on RARP. Additionally, we explore the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in digitizing robotic prostatectomy. AI advancements, particularly in automated surgical video analysis using computer vision technology, are unprecedented in their scope. These developments hold the potential to revolutionize surgeon feedback and assessment and transform surgical documentation, and they could lay the groundwork for real-time AI decision support during surgical procedures in the future. Furthermore, we discuss future robotic platforms and their potential to further enhance the field of RARP. Overall, the field of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer has been an incubator of innovation over the last two decades. This review focuses on some recent developments in robotic prostatectomy, provides an overview of the next frontier in AI innovation during prostate cancer surgery, and highlights novel robotic platforms that may play an increasing role in prostate cancer surgery in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abrar H. Mian
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | - Paras Shah
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Vidit Sharma
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Ahmed Mian
- Urology Associates of Green Bay, Green Bay, WI 54301, USA
| | | | | | - Igor Frank
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Abhinav Khanna
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bratic Hench I, Roma L, Conticelli F, Bubendorf L, Calgua B, Le Magnen C, Piscuoglio S, Rubin MA, Chirindel A, Nicolas GP, Vlajnic T, Zellweger T, Templeton AJ, Stenner F, Ruiz C, Rentsch C, Bubendorf L. Cell-Free DNA Genomic Profiling and Its Clinical Implementation in Advanced Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:45. [PMID: 38201475 PMCID: PMC10778564 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Most men with prostate cancer (PCa), despite potentially curable localized disease at initial diagnosis, progress to metastatic disease. Despite numerous treatment options, choosing the optimal treatment for individual patients remains challenging. Biomarkers guiding treatment sequences in an advanced setting are lacking. To estimate the diagnostic potential of liquid biopsies in guiding personalized treatment of PCa, we evaluated the utility of a custom-targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel based on the AmpliSeq HD Technology. Ultra-deep sequencing on plasma circulating free DNA (cfDNA) samples of 40 metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) and 28 metastatic hormone-naive PCa (mCSPC) was performed. CfDNA somatic mutations were detected in 48/68 (71%) patients. Of those 68 patients, 42 had matched tumor and cfDNA samples. In 21/42 (50%) patients, mutations from the primary tumor tissue were detected in the plasma cfDNA. In 7/42 (17%) patients, mutations found in the primary tumor were not detected in the cfDNA. Mutations from primary tumors were detected in all tested mCRPC patients (17/17), but only in 4/11 with mCSPC. AR amplifications were detected in 12/39 (31%) mCRPC patients. These results indicate that our targeted NGS approach has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting clinically relevant mutations in PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivana Bratic Hench
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Luca Roma
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Floriana Conticelli
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Lenard Bubendorf
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Byron Calgua
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Clémentine Le Magnen
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Salvatore Piscuoglio
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Mark A. Rubin
- Precision Oncology Laboratory, Department for Biomedical Research, Bern Center for Precision Medicine, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
- Bern Center for Precision Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alin Chirindel
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Theragnostics, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Guillaume P. Nicolas
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Theragnostics, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tatjana Vlajnic
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Arnoud J. Templeton
- St. Claraspital, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
- St. Clara Research, Basel and Faculty of Medicine, University Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Frank Stenner
- Division of Oncology, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian Ruiz
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Cyrill Rentsch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Bubendorf
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hutchison D, Zillioux J, Ali M, Farhi J, DeNovio A, Barquin D, Rapp DE. Predictors of urinary outcomes following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJUI COMPASS 2023; 4:722-728. [PMID: 37818018 PMCID: PMC10560616 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Incontinence and urgency are common after prostatectomy. The University of Virginia prostatectomy functional outcomes program (PFOP) was developed to comprehensively assess and optimise continence outcomes following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Patients are prospectively evaluated by a Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery specialist. This study assessed for predictors of 3- and 6-month stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urgency symptom outcomes following RALP. Methods We performed a post hoc review of patients from our PFOP receiving a minimum of 6-month follow-up. Urinary symptoms are prospectively assessed using the validated International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-MLUTS) questionnaire and daily pad use (pads per day [PPD]). Primary study outcomes included ICIQ-MLUTS SUI and urgency domain scores and PPD. Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify variables associated with outcomes at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Variables included patient, oncologic and surgical factors. Each variable was run in a separate model with pelvic floor muscle therapy and surgeon to reduce confounding and prevent overfitting. Results Forty men were included. In assessment of ICIQ-MLUTS SUI domain score, at 3 months, body mass index (BMI) was associated with worse scores, and at 6 months, BMI, hypertension and estimated blood loss (EBL) were associated with worse scores, whereas bilateral nerve-sparing technique was associated with better scores. For ICIQ-MLUTS Urgency domain score, at 3 months, preoperative use of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) medication was associated with better scores. No covariates predicted 6-month ICIQ-MLUTS Urgency domain scores. For PPD use, at both 3 and 6 months, BMI was a positive predictor, while preoperative use of BPH medication was a negative predictor. Conclusion Increased BMI, EBL and hypertension are associated with worsened SUI outcomes following RALP, whereas bilateral nerve-sparing technique and preoperative BPH medication are associated with improved SUI outcomes. These data may inform patient counselling and help identify patients who may benefit from closer surveillance and earlier anti-incontinence intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Hutchison
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleVirginiaUSA
| | | | - Marwan Ali
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleVirginiaUSA
| | - Jacques Farhi
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleVirginiaUSA
| | - Anthony DeNovio
- School of MedicineUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleVirginiaUSA
| | - David Barquin
- School of MedicineUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleVirginiaUSA
| | - David E. Rapp
- Department of UrologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleVirginiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
O'Connor-Cordova MA, Macías AGO, Sancen-Herrera JP, Altamirano-Lamarque F, Vargas Del Toro A, Peddinani BK, Canal-Zarate P, O'Connor-Juarez MA. Surgical and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. Are outcomes worth it? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate 2023; 83:1395-1414. [PMID: 37555617 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical prostatectomy is the standard of care for prostate cancer. Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) is being widely adopted due to positive functional outcomes compared to conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (c-RARP). Concerns regarding potency, oncological outcomes, and learning curve are still a matter of debate. METHODS Following Preferred Instrument for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines and PROSPERO registration CRD42023398724, a systematic review was performed in February 2023 on RS-RARP compared to conventional c-RARP. Outcomes of interest were continence recovery, potency, positive surgical margins (PSM), biochemical recurrence (BCR), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), operation time and complications. Data were analyzed using R version 4.2.2. RESULTS A total of 17 studies were included, totaling 2751 patients, out of which 1221 underwent RS-RARP and 1530 underwent c-RARP. Continence was analyzed using two definitions: zero pad and one safety pad. Cumulative analysis showed with both definitions statistical difference in terms of continence recovery at 1 month (0 pad odds ratio [OR] = 4.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.32-15.77]; Safety pad OR = 13.19; 95% CI = [8.92-19.49]), as well as at 3 months (0 pad OR, 2.93; 95% CI = [1.57-5.46]; Safety pad OR = 5.31; 95% CI = [1.33-21.13]). Continence recovery at 12 months was higher in the one safety pad group after RS-RARP (OR = 4.37; 95% CI = [1.97-9.73]). The meta-analysis revealed that overall PSM rates without pathologic stage classification were not different following RS-RARP (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = [0.96-1.33]. Analysis according to the tumor stage revealed PSM rates in pT2 and pT3 tumors are not different following RS-RARP compared to c-RARP (OR = 1.46; 95% CI = [0.84-2.55]) and (OR = 1.41; 95% CI = [0.93-2.13]), respectively. No difference in potency at 12 months (OR = 0.98; 95% CI = [0.69-1.41], BCR at 12 months (OR = 0.99; 95% CI = [0.46-2.16]), EBL (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.01; 95% CI = [-0.31 to 0.29]), LOS (SMD = -0.01; 95% CI = [-0.48 to 0.45]), operation time (SMD = -0.14; 95% CI = [-0.41 to 0.12]) or complications (OR = 0.9; 95% CI = [0.62-1.29]) were observed. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis suggests that RS-RARP is safe and feasible. Faster continence recovery rate is seen after RS-RARP. Potency outcomes appear to be similar. PSM rates are not different following RS-RARP regardless of pathologic stage. Further quality studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario A O'Connor-Cordova
- Departamento de Ciencias Clínicas, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud del Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Alan Gabriel Ortega Macías
- Departamento de Ciencias Clínicas, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud del Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Juan Pablo Sancen-Herrera
- Departamento de Ciencias Clínicas, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud del Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Francisco Altamirano-Lamarque
- Departamento de Ciencias Clínicas, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud del Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Alexis Vargas Del Toro
- Departamento de Ciencias Clínicas, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud del Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Bharat Kumar Peddinani
- Departamento de Ciencias Clínicas, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud del Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Pia Canal-Zarate
- Departamento de Ciencias Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina Universidad Anáhuac, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Maes K, Alves LJ, Spena G. Posterior reconstruction in Retzius-sparing 'zero-clip' robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: 'the Lisbon stitch'. BJU Int 2023; 132:461-463. [PMID: 37309280 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kris Maes
- Hospital Da Luz, Hospital Da Luz Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Gianluca Spena
- Hospital Da Luz, Hospital Da Luz Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wennerberg C, Hellström A, Schildmeijer K, Ekstedt M. Effects of Web-Based and Mobile Self-Care Support in Addition to Standard Care in Patients After Radical Prostatectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Cancer 2023; 9:e44320. [PMID: 37672332 PMCID: PMC10512115 DOI: 10.2196/44320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is a common form of cancer that is often treated with radical prostatectomy, which can leave patients with urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction. Self-care (pelvic floor muscle exercises and physical activity) is recommended to reduce the side effects. As more and more men are living in the aftermath of treatment, effective rehabilitation support is warranted. Digital self-care support has the potential to improve patient outcomes, but it has rarely been evaluated longitudinally in randomized controlled trials. Therefore, we developed and evaluated the effects of digital self-care support (electronic Patient Activation in Treatment at Home [ePATH]) on prostate-specific symptoms. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the effects of web-based and mobile self-care support on urinary continence, sexual function, and self-care, compared with standard care, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after radical prostatectomy. METHODS A multicenter randomized controlled trial with 2 study arms was conducted, with the longitudinal effects of additional digital self-care support (ePATH) compared with those of standard care alone. ePATH was designed based on the self-determination theory to strengthen patients' activation in self-care through nurse-assisted individualized modules. Men planned for radical prostatectomy at 3 county hospitals in southern Sweden were included offline and randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. The effects of ePATH were evaluated for 1 year after surgery using self-assessed questionnaires. Linear mixed models and ordinal regression analyses were performed. RESULTS This study included 170 men (85 in each group) from January 2018 to December 2019. The participants in the intervention and control groups did not differ in their demographic characteristics. In the intervention group, 64% (53/83) of the participants used ePATH, but the use declined over time. The linear mixed model showed no substantial differences between the groups in urinary continence (β=-5.60; P=.09; 95% CI -12.15 to -0.96) or sexual function (β=-.12; P=.97; 95% CI -7.05 to -6.81). Participants in the intervention and control groups did not differ in physical activity (odds ratio 1.16, 95% CI 0.71-1.89; P=.57) or pelvic floor muscle exercises (odds ratio 1.51, 95% CI 0.86-2.66; P=.15). CONCLUSIONS ePATH did not affect postoperative side effects or self-care but reflected how this support may work in typical clinical conditions. To complement standard rehabilitation, digital self-care support must be adapted to the context and individual preferences for use and effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN18055968; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN18055968. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/11625.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Wennerberg
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Region Kalmar County, Kalmar, Sweden
| | - Amanda Hellström
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
| | | | - Mirjam Ekstedt
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
- Department of Learning, Management, Informatics and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yang JM, Ye H, Long Y, Zhu Q, Huang H, Xie HY, Luo Y, Zhong YB, Chen J, Wang MY. Effect of pelvic floor muscle training on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: An umbrella review of meta-analysis and systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2023; 37:494-515. [PMID: 36305082 DOI: 10.1177/02692155221136046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyse the specific exercise effects of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with or without biofeedback or electrical stimulation on urinary incontinence rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy. DATA SOURCES We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science and Scopus databases for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on PFMT for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy from inception to 3 October 2022. REVIEW METHODS Two authors independently extracted key data from the included studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the A Measure Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2 checklist. Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation was used to evaluate the quality of the outcomes. RESULTS A total of 18 studies with 29,925 patients were included, all of which were of critically low methodological quality. Biofeedback therapy seemed to show additional benefits compared to PFMT alone; however, the adjunctive role of electrical stimulation remained more controversial due to the lack of strong evidence. Preoperative PFMT sometimes, but not always, showed the potential to improve urinary incontinence. PFMT with the guidance of a therapist could bring some benefits to the patient and was more acceptable to the patient, but consumed some medical resources. CONCLUSIONS PFMT has a good effect on improving post-radical prostatectomy incontinence in men, and biofeedback can have an additional beneficial effect on patients, especially in the short-term and medium-term. However, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that electrical stimulation is beneficial for patients with urinary incontinence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Ming Yang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, 477808First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.,74554Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
| | - Hua Ye
- 74554Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yi Long
- 74554Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
| | - Qiang Zhu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, 477808First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
| | - Hui Huang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, 477808First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
| | - Hui-Yong Xie
- 74554Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yun Luo
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, 477808First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yan-Biao Zhong
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, 477808First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.,Ganzhou Intelligent Rehabilitation Technology Innovation Center, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
| | - Jing Chen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, 477808First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
| | - Mao-Yuan Wang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, 477808First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.,Ganzhou Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li H, Yang C, Liao Z, Wang K, Zhang Y, Cao R. Modified anterior approach preserving Retzius space versus standard anterior approach robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A matched-pair analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1108202. [PMID: 36816922 PMCID: PMC9932684 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1108202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To compare our initial perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the modified anterior approach (MA) with Retzius space preservation robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with the standard anterior approach (SA) RARP. Materials and methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 116 patients with RARP completed by the same surgeon between September 2019 and March 2022. They were divided into SA-RARP group (77 cases) and MA-RARP group (39 cases). Propensity score matching was performed using eight preoperative variables, including age, BMI, preoperative PSA, biopsy Gleason score, prostate volume, D'Amico risk classification, SHIM, and clinical T stage. Functional outcome was assessed by urine pad count and SHIM after surgery, and oncological outcome was assessed by statistics of postoperative pathological findings as well as follow-up postoperative PSA. The median follow-up was 13 months and 17 months for MA-RARP and SA-RARP groups respectively. Results Propensity score matching was performed 1:1, and baseline data were comparable between the two groups after matching. Comparison of postoperative data: MA-RARP group had less mean EBL than SA-RARP group (200 vs 150 ml, p = 0.033). PSM did not differ between groups (p = 1). In terms of urinary control recovery, the MA-RARP group showed significant advantages in urinary control recovery at 24 h, 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months after catheter removal, respectively (48.6% vs 5.7%, p < 0.001; 80% vs 22.9%, p < 0.001; 94.3% vs 51.4%, p < 0.001; 100% vs 74.3%, p = 0.002). This advantage gradually disappeared 6 months or more after surgery. The median time to recovery of sexual function was shorter in the MA-RARP group (165 vs 255 d, p = 0.001). Conclusion MA-RARP is safe and reliable, and can achieve better early urinary control function and sexual function recovery while achieving the primary tumor control goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Kaihong Wang
- *Correspondence: Kaihong Wang, ; Yida Zhang, ; Runfu Cao,
| | - Yida Zhang
- *Correspondence: Kaihong Wang, ; Yida Zhang, ; Runfu Cao,
| | - Runfu Cao
- *Correspondence: Kaihong Wang, ; Yida Zhang, ; Runfu Cao,
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Samora NL, Wallis CJD, Huang L, Tallman JE, Zhao Z, Hoffman K, Morgans A, Cooperberg M, Goodman M, Greenfield S, Hamilton AS, Hashibe M, Kaplan S, O'Neil B, Paddock LE, Stroup A, Wu X, Koyama T, Penson DF, Barocas DA. Association between body mass index and localized prostate cancer management and disease-specific quality of life. BJUI COMPASS 2022; 4:223-233. [PMID: 36816144 PMCID: PMC9931544 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this work is to describe the association between body mass index (BMI) and (1) management option for localized prostate cancer (PCa) and (2) disease-specific quality of life (ds-QoL) after treatment or active surveillance. Subjects/patients and methods We analysed data from men with localized PCa managed with radical prostatectomy (RP), radiation therapy (RT), or active surveillance (AS) in a prospective, population-based cohort study. We evaluated the association between BMI and management option with multivariable multinomial logistic regression analysis. The association between BMI and ds-QoL was assessed using multivariable longitudinal linear regression. Regression models were adjusted for baseline domain scores, demographics, and clinicopathologic characteristics. Results A total of 2378 men were included (medians [quartiles]: age 64 [59-69] years; BMI 27 kg/m2; 77% were non-Hispanic white); 29% were obese (BMI ≥ 30). Accounting for demographic and clinicopathologic features, BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2 was inversely associated with the likelihood of receiving RP (compared with RT) and became statistically significant at BMI ≥ 33 kg/m2 (maximum adjusted relative risk ratio = 0.80, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.95, p = 0.013 for BMI ≥ 33 vs. 25). Conversely, BMI was not significantly associated with the likelihood of receiving AS compared with RT. After stratification by management option, obese men who underwent definitive treatment were not found to have clinically worse ds-QoL. Obese men initially on AS appeared to have worse urinary incontinence than nonobese men, but this was not significant on an as-treated sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Among men with localized PCa, those with BMI ≥ 33 kg/m2 were less likely to receive surgery than radiation. Obesity was not associated with ds-QoL in men undergoing definitive treatment, nor in men who remained on AS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Li‐Ching Huang
- Department of BiostatisticsVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTennesseeUSA
| | - Jacob E. Tallman
- Department of UrologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTennesseeUSA
| | - Zhiguo Zhao
- Department of BiostatisticsVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTennesseeUSA
| | - Karen Hoffman
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Alicia Morgans
- Dana Farber Cancer InstituteHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | - Michael Goodman
- Department of EpidemiologyEmory University Rollins School of Public HealthAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Sheldon Greenfield
- Department of MedicineUniversity of California IrvineIrvineCaliforniaUSA
| | - Ann S. Hamilton
- Department of Population and Public Health SciencesKeck School of Medicine at the University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Mia Hashibe
- Department of Family and Preventative MedicineUniversity of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Sherrie Kaplan
- Department of MedicineUniversity of California IrvineIrvineCaliforniaUSA
| | - Brock O'Neil
- Department of UrologyUniversity of Utah HealthSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Lisa E. Paddock
- Department of EpidemiologyRutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyNew BrunswickNew JerseyUSA
| | - Antoinette Stroup
- Department of EpidemiologyRutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyNew BrunswickNew JerseyUSA
| | - Xiao‐Cheng Wu
- Department of EpidemiologyLouisiana State University New Orleans School of Public HealthNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Tatsuki Koyama
- Department of BiostatisticsVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTennesseeUSA
| | - David F. Penson
- Department of UrologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTennesseeUSA
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical CenterVeterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare SystemNashvilleTennesseeUSA
| | - Daniel A. Barocas
- Department of UrologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTennesseeUSA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Patient reported outcomes and health related quality of life in localized prostate cancer: A review of current evidence. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:304-314. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
13
|
Transvesical versus extraperitoneal single-port robotic radical prostatectomy: a matched-pair analysis. World J Urol 2022; 40:2001-2008. [PMID: 35718816 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04056-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare our initial perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the single-port (SP) transvesical radical prostatectomy (TVRP) approach with the single-port extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (ERP) approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS Initial consecutive seventy-eight patients underwent SP TVRP between December 2020 and October 2021. Patients with extensive previous abdominal surgeries, or low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer were selected. Data of consecutive 169 patients treated with SP ERP between February 2019 and November 2020, were used for comparison. Optimal matched-paired analysis of PSA value, biopsy Gleason score, and prostate volume was performed. Preoperative, perioperative, and early functional outcomes were included in the analysis. The median follow-up was 7 months and 9 months for TVRP and ERP groups respectively. RESULTS The median total operative time was longer in the TVRP compared to the ERP group (p = .002). There were no differences in intraoperative complications or surgical margin status. TVRP group had less rate of grade 3a Clavien-Dindo complications (p = .026). The Foley catheter duration was 3 (3, 4) days in the TVRP group compared to 7 (7, 8) days in the ERP group (p < .001). There was a consistently improved continence rate in the TVRP group at 6 weeks (72% TVRP, 48% ERP, p = .004), 3 months (97% TVRP, 81% ERP, p = .008), and 6 months postoperatively (100% TVRP, 93% ERP, p = .047). There was no difference in biochemical recurrence at 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION In our initial series, TVRP allows for a faster continence recovery, without other functional or oncological compromises.
Collapse
|
14
|
[Clinically localized prostate cancer: Retzius-sparing vs. retropubic robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy]. Urologe A 2022; 61:297-300. [PMID: 35175363 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-022-01774-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
15
|
Schuetz V, Reimold P, Goertz M, Hofer L, Dieffenbacher S, Nyarangi-Dix J, Duensing S, Hohenfellner M, Hatiboglu G. Evolution of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy from Open to Robotic and Further to Retzius Sparing Surgery. J Clin Med 2021; 11:jcm11010202. [PMID: 35011942 PMCID: PMC8745561 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11010202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) has evolved from open to minimally invasive approaches. sRP can be offered to patients with local recurrence to improve biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free and overall survival. We evaluate oncological outcome and continence after retropubic (RRP), conventional (cRARP), and Retzius-sparing robotic (rsRARP) surgery. Materials/methods: A total of 53 patients undergoing sRP between 2010 and 2020 were included. Follow-up included oncological outcome and continence. Results: sRP was done as RRP (n = 25), cRARP (n = 7), or rsRARP (n = 21). Median blood loss was 900 mL, 500 mL, and 300 mL for RRP, cRARP, and rsRARP, respectively. At 12 months, 5 (20%), 0, and 4 (19%) patients were continent, 9 (36%), 3 (43%), and 7 (33%) had grade 1 incontinence, 5 (20%), 2 (29%), and 3 (14%) had grade 2 incontinence, and 3 (12%), 2 (29%), and 4 (19%) had grade 3 incontinence for RRP, cRARP, or rsRARP, respectively. During a mean follow-up of 52.6 months, 16 (64%), 4 (57%), and 3 (14%) developed BCR in the RRP-, cRARP-, and rsRARP-group, respectively. Conclusions: Over the years, sRP has shifted from open to laparoscopic/robotic surgery. RARP shows good oncological and functional outcome. rsRARP ensures direct vision on the rectum during preparation and can therefore increase safety and surgeon’s confidence, especially in the salvage setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viktoria Schuetz
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.R.); (M.G.); (L.H.); (S.D.); (J.N.-D.); (S.D.); (M.H.)
- Correspondence: (V.S.); (G.H.); Tel.: +49-6221-6110 (V.S. & G.H.)
| | - Philipp Reimold
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.R.); (M.G.); (L.H.); (S.D.); (J.N.-D.); (S.D.); (M.H.)
| | - Magdalena Goertz
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.R.); (M.G.); (L.H.); (S.D.); (J.N.-D.); (S.D.); (M.H.)
| | - Luisa Hofer
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.R.); (M.G.); (L.H.); (S.D.); (J.N.-D.); (S.D.); (M.H.)
| | - Svenja Dieffenbacher
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.R.); (M.G.); (L.H.); (S.D.); (J.N.-D.); (S.D.); (M.H.)
| | - Joanne Nyarangi-Dix
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.R.); (M.G.); (L.H.); (S.D.); (J.N.-D.); (S.D.); (M.H.)
| | - Stefan Duensing
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.R.); (M.G.); (L.H.); (S.D.); (J.N.-D.); (S.D.); (M.H.)
- Section of Molecular Urooncology, Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Hohenfellner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.R.); (M.G.); (L.H.); (S.D.); (J.N.-D.); (S.D.); (M.H.)
| | - Gencay Hatiboglu
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (P.R.); (M.G.); (L.H.); (S.D.); (J.N.-D.); (S.D.); (M.H.)
- Correspondence: (V.S.); (G.H.); Tel.: +49-6221-6110 (V.S. & G.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Anıl H, Karamık K, Yıldız A, Savaş M. Does transition from standard to Retzius-sparing technique in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy affect the functional and oncological outcomes? Arch Ital Urol Androl 2021; 93:399-403. [PMID: 34933525 DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2021.4.399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To appraise the outcomes on the Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (Rs-RARP) learning curve of a surgeon with previous experience of anterior (standard) RARP. MATERIALS AND METHODS The first 50 cases during the Rs-RARP learning curve (group 1) and 50 cases after the second 100 cases with the standard approach (group 2) were comprised in the study. Patients who used zero or one safety pads were considered continent. Erectile function recuperation was characterized as the competence to achieve penetrative intercourse without receiving any medication. All patients were reevaluated at two weeks, first, third, sixth, and 12th months after surgery using IIEF-5, PSA level, and continence status. RESULTS Immediate continence rates following catheter removal were 32/50 (64%) in Rs-RARP group and 26/50 (52%) in S-RARP group (p = 0.224). The continence recovery rate was 48/50 (96%) in Rs-RARP group and 46/50 (92%) in the S-RARP group at 12 months follow-up (p = 0.400). Total nerve-sparing surgery was enforced in 36/50 (72%) patients for group 1 and 35/50 (70%) patients for group 2. Potency recovery was 27/43 (62.8%) in Rs-RARP and 30/44 (68.2%) for S-RARP at 12 months follow up (p = 0.597). Surgical margin positivity was detected in 6/50 (12%) cases in the Rs-RARP group and in 4/50 (8%) cases in the S-RARP (p = 0.444). CONCLUSIONS Functional and oncological results are not negatively affected in the first 50 cases for a surgeon who is experienced in S-RARP before transition to the Rs-RARP method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hakan Anıl
- Department of Urology, Adana Seyhan State Hospital, Adana.
| | - Kaan Karamık
- Department of Urology, Antalya Korkuteli State Hospital, Antalya.
| | - Ali Yıldız
- Department of Urology, Okan University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul.
| | - Murat Savaş
- Department of Urology, Antalya Memorial Hospital, Antalya.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lei KY, Xie WJ, Fu SQ, Ma M, Sun T. A comparison of the da Vinci Xi vs. da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy. BMC Surg 2021; 21:409. [PMID: 34847882 PMCID: PMC8638093 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01406-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the perioperative and short-term efficacy and cost of the da Vinci Xi and da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 175 patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si or Xi surgical systems in our hospital from June 2019 to June 2020. Of the 175 patients, 82 underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Xi surgery system, and 93 patients underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si surgical system. The perioperative outcomes, short-term efficacy and costs were compared between the two groups. RESULTS The anesthesia time, operation time, docking time, indwelling catheter time and postoperative bed rest time in the Xi group were shorter than those in the Si group (respectively, 268.8 min vs. 219.3 min, P = 0.001; 228.2 min vs. 259.6 min, P < 0.001; 7.4 min vs. 12.7 min, P < 0.001; 8.6 d vs. 9.7 d, P = 0.036; 2.2 d vs. 2.6 d, P = 0.002). However, the total cost of hospitalization and the cost of intraoperative consumables in the Xi group were higher than those in the Si group (84,740.7 vs. 76,739.1 ¥, P = 0.003; 13,199.4 vs. 10,823.0 ¥, P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS Although the cost of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is higher, compared with the Si system, the Xi system has better perioperative outcomes and can provide similar short-term efficacy and oncology outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kun-Yang Lei
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330000, Jiangxi, China
| | - Wen-Jie Xie
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330000, Jiangxi, China
| | - Sheng-Qiang Fu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330000, Jiangxi, China
| | - Ming Ma
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330000, Jiangxi, China
| | - Ting Sun
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330000, Jiangxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Furrer MA, Costello DM, Thomas BC, Peters JS, Costello AJ, Dundee P. Robotics in Australian urology contemporary practice and future perspectives. ANZ J Surg 2021; 91:2241-2245. [PMID: 34766679 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Furrer
- Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,The Australian Medical Robotics Academy, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Costello
- The Australian Medical Robotics Academy, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Benjamin C Thomas
- Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,The Australian Medical Robotics Academy, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Australian Prostate Cancer Centre, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Justin S Peters
- Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,The Australian Medical Robotics Academy, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Australian Prostate Cancer Centre, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anthony J Costello
- Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,The Australian Medical Robotics Academy, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Australian Prostate Cancer Centre, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Philip Dundee
- Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,The Australian Medical Robotics Academy, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Australian Prostate Cancer Centre, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|