1
|
Gennari AG, Doniselli FM, Coley J, Grisoli M, Quaia E, Souchon R, Prada F, DiMeco F. Intraoperative Comparison Between Strain Elastography and Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features in High-Grade Gliomas Using Fusion Imaging: A Pilot Study. World Neurosurg 2024; 192:e83-e89. [PMID: 39265936 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Revised: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the elastographic patterns of high-grade gliomas (HGGs) solid portions and those of adjacent healthy brain parenchyma, on intraoperative ultrasound, with magnetic resonance image (MRI) characteristics. METHODS Clinical records and images of HGGs patients, operated between June and December 2018, were retrospectively reviewed. Fusion images were used to compare preoperative gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images (Gd-T1 MRI/FLAIR) to intraoperative strain elastography (SE). FLAIR/Gd-T1 MRI images were used to define enhancement patterns (absent/whole lesion/peripheral) and lesions' characteristics (primary and secondary pattern, further subdivided in solid/necrotic/cystic/infiltrating). HGGs SE patterns were categorized as homogeneous/inhomogeneous, while lesions' primary and secondary patterns as stiff/intermediate/elastic. The SE motive of neighboring healthy brain parenchyma was defined similarly. RESULTS Eighteen patients (M:F, 11:7; mean age: 53 years) harboring 14 glioblastomas (77.8%) and 4 anaplastic astrocytomas (22.2%) were compared. Glioblastomas typically enhanced peripherally and had a primary necrotic pattern (78.6% and 64.3%, respectively), while anaplastic astrocytomas did not enhance and were solid (75% both) at T1-Gd MRI and FLAIR images. At SE anaplastic astrocytomas had a homogeneous stiff primary pattern, whereas the majority of glioblastomas primary patterns were heterogeneous (85.7%) and intermediate (78.6%). CONCLUSIONS Three major SE patterns defined HGGs and adjacent healthy brain parenchyma. SE patterns varied according to HGG histotypes and Gd-T1 MRI/FLAIR characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Giulio Gennari
- Department of Neuropediatrics, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland; Center for MR Research, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fabio Martino Doniselli
- Department of Neuroradiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "C. Besta", Milan, Italy
| | - Justin Coley
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Marina Grisoli
- Department of Neuroradiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "C. Besta", Milan, Italy
| | - Emilio Quaia
- Department of Radiology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Prada
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA; Acoustic Neuroimaging and Therapy Lab, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "C. Besta", Milan, Italy; Focused Ultrasound Foundation, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "C. Besta", Milan, Italy.
| | - Francesco DiMeco
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "C. Besta", Milan, Italy; Department of Neurological Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical School, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Università degli studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wei R, Chen H, Cai Y, Chen J. Application of intraoperative ultrasound in the resection of high-grade gliomas. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1240150. [PMID: 37965171 PMCID: PMC10640994 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1240150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of gliomas is approximately 3-5/100,000, with high-grade gliomas accounting for approximately 30-40% of these tumors. Surgery is a confirmed positive factor in prolonging the survival of these patients, and a larger resection range means a longer survival time. Therefore, surgery for high-grade glioma patients should aim to maximize the extent of resection while preserving neurological function to achieve a better quality of life. There is consensus regarding the need to lengthen progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times. In glioma surgery, methods such as intraoperative computed tomography (ICT), intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (IMRI), navigation, 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), and intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) are used to achieve an expanded resection during the surgical procedure. IOUS has been increasingly used in the surgery of high-grade gliomas and various tumors due to its convenient intraoperative use, its flexible repeatability, and the relatively low cost of operating room construction. With the continuous upgrading of ultrasound equipment, IOUS has been able to better assist surgeons in achieving an increased extent of resection. This review aims to summarize the application of ultrasound in the surgery of high-grade gliomas in the past decade, its improvement in patient prognosis, and its prospects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- RenJie Wei
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Hao Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - YuXiang Cai
- Department of Pathology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - JingCao Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dixon L, Lim A, Grech-Sollars M, Nandi D, Camp S. Intraoperative ultrasound in brain tumor surgery: A review and implementation guide. Neurosurg Rev 2022; 45:2503-2515. [PMID: 35353266 PMCID: PMC9349149 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01778-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Accurate and reliable intraoperative neuronavigation is crucial for achieving maximal safe resection of brain tumors. Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) has received significant attention as the next step in improving navigation. However, the immense cost and logistical challenge of iMRI precludes implementation in most centers worldwide. In comparison, intraoperative ultrasound (ioUS) is an affordable tool, easily incorporated into existing theatre infrastructure, and operative workflow. Historically, ultrasound has been perceived as difficult to learn and standardize, with poor, artifact-prone image quality. However, ioUS has dramatically evolved over the last decade, with vast improvements in image quality and well-integrated navigation tools. Advanced techniques, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), have also matured and moved from the research field into actual clinical use. In this review, we provide a comprehensive and pragmatic guide to ioUS. A suggested protocol to facilitate learning ioUS and improve standardization is provided, and an outline of common artifacts and methods to minimize them given. The review also includes an update of advanced techniques and how they can be incorporated into clinical practice.
Collapse
|
4
|
Stumpo V, Guida L, Bellomo J, Van Niftrik CHB, Sebök M, Berhouma M, Bink A, Weller M, Kulcsar Z, Regli L, Fierstra J. Hemodynamic Imaging in Cerebral Diffuse Glioma-Part B: Molecular Correlates, Treatment Effect Monitoring, Prognosis, and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1342. [PMID: 35267650 PMCID: PMC8909110 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Gliomas, and glioblastoma in particular, exhibit an extensive intra- and inter-tumoral molecular heterogeneity which represents complex biological features correlating to the efficacy of treatment response and survival. From a neuroimaging point of view, these specific molecular and histopathological features may be used to yield imaging biomarkers as surrogates for distinct tumor genotypes and phenotypes. The development of comprehensive glioma imaging markers has potential for improved glioma characterization that would assist in the clinical work-up of preoperative treatment planning and treatment effect monitoring. In particular, the differentiation of tumor recurrence or true progression from pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse, and radiation-induced necrosis can still not reliably be made through standard neuroimaging only. Given the abundant vascular and hemodynamic alterations present in diffuse glioma, advanced hemodynamic imaging approaches constitute an attractive area of clinical imaging development. In this context, the inclusion of objective measurable glioma imaging features may have the potential to enhance the individualized care of diffuse glioma patients, better informing of standard-of-care treatment efficacy and of novel therapies, such as the immunotherapies that are currently increasingly investigated. In Part B of this two-review series, we assess the available evidence pertaining to hemodynamic imaging for molecular feature prediction, in particular focusing on isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status, MGMT promoter methylation, 1p19q codeletion, and EGFR alterations. The results for the differentiation of tumor progression/recurrence from treatment effects have also been the focus of active research and are presented together with the prognostic correlations identified by advanced hemodynamic imaging studies. Finally, the state-of-the-art concepts and advancements of hemodynamic imaging modalities are reviewed together with the advantages derived from the implementation of radiomics and machine learning analyses pipelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittorio Stumpo
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (L.G.); (J.B.); (C.H.B.V.N.); (M.S.); (L.R.); (J.F.)
- Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; (A.B.); (M.W.); (Z.K.)
| | - Lelio Guida
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (L.G.); (J.B.); (C.H.B.V.N.); (M.S.); (L.R.); (J.F.)
- Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; (A.B.); (M.W.); (Z.K.)
| | - Jacopo Bellomo
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (L.G.); (J.B.); (C.H.B.V.N.); (M.S.); (L.R.); (J.F.)
- Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; (A.B.); (M.W.); (Z.K.)
| | - Christiaan Hendrik Bas Van Niftrik
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (L.G.); (J.B.); (C.H.B.V.N.); (M.S.); (L.R.); (J.F.)
- Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; (A.B.); (M.W.); (Z.K.)
| | - Martina Sebök
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (L.G.); (J.B.); (C.H.B.V.N.); (M.S.); (L.R.); (J.F.)
- Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; (A.B.); (M.W.); (Z.K.)
| | - Moncef Berhouma
- Department of Neurosurgical Oncology and Vascular Neurosurgery, Pierre Wertheimer Neurological and Neurosurgical Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69500 Lyon, France;
| | - Andrea Bink
- Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; (A.B.); (M.W.); (Z.K.)
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; (A.B.); (M.W.); (Z.K.)
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Zsolt Kulcsar
- Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; (A.B.); (M.W.); (Z.K.)
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Luca Regli
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (L.G.); (J.B.); (C.H.B.V.N.); (M.S.); (L.R.); (J.F.)
- Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; (A.B.); (M.W.); (Z.K.)
| | - Jorn Fierstra
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (L.G.); (J.B.); (C.H.B.V.N.); (M.S.); (L.R.); (J.F.)
- Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; (A.B.); (M.W.); (Z.K.)
| |
Collapse
|