High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Plus External Beam Radiotherapy for T1 to T3 Prostate Cancer: An Experience in Taiwan

Sociodemographic and clinicopathologic characteristics of patients treated with high dose rate prostate brachytherapy in Nigeria

Introduction

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in adult males. High dose rate brachytherapy (HDRB) recently became available in the country for the management of localized prostate cancer in addition to other treatment modalities. HDRB offers a less invasive option to radical prostatectomy and also has a better side effects profile.

Aim

To report the socio-demographic features of the patients treated with HDRB, the clinicopathologic pattern of their disease and possible predictors of these features.

Methods

A retrospective study of patients with histopathologically confirmed prostate cancer, who had HDRB at the Department of Radiation Oncology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria, between July 2020 and 2023 was done. Patients' socio-demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics were extracted from their treatment records.

Results

A total of 73 patients had HDRB within the period under review. The median age was 66 years (51-78 years). About 40% had prostate cancer diagnosed following routine prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. The median screening PSA was 20.5 ng/mL (5.83-75.35 ng/mL). About a quarter (24.7%) were asymptomatic at presentation while frequency (60.3%), nocturia (45.2%) and urgency (35.6%) were the most common symptoms. The median initial PSA was 26.00 ng/mL (5.10-124.50 ng/mL) and the median PSA before brachytherapy was 6.25 ng/mL (0.03-175.30 ng/mL), the majority (75.3%) had androgen deprivation therapy before brachytherapy. Forty-seven patients (64.4%) presented with TNM stages 1 and 2 while grade group 2 (24.7%) and high risk (76.7%) were the commonest grade group and risk group, respectively. There was a significant association between age group and TNM stage (p = 0.043), level of education (LOE) and TNM stage (p = 0.037) as well as PSA screening and grade group (p = 0.007).

Conclusion

The majority of the patients who presented for prostate brachytherapy were elderly, had higher initial PSA, were in the high-risk group and had early-stage disease. About 25% of the patients were asymptomatic at presentation. Patients with tertiary LOE and elderly patients presented more with stage 1 and 2 diseases.

Results of 15 Gy HDR-BT boost plus EBRT in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Analysis of over 500 patients

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

To report biochemical control associated with single fraction 15 Gy high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost followed by external beam radiation (EBRT) in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients with intermediate-risk disease treated with a real-time ultrasound-based 15 Gy HDR-BT boost followed by EBRT between 2009 and 2016 at a single quaternary cancer center was performed. Freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), cumulative incidence of androgen deprivation therapy use for biochemical or clinical failure post-treatment (CI of ADT) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) outcomes were measured.

RESULTS

518 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Median age at HDR-BT was 67 years (IQR 61-72). 506 (98%) had complete pathologic information available. Of these, 146 (28%) had favorable (FIR) and 360 (69%) had unfavorable (UIR) intermediate-risk disease. 83 (16%) received short course hormones with EBRT + HDR. Median overall follow-up was 5.2 years. FFBF was 91 (88-94)% at 5 years. Five-year FFBF was 94 (89-99)% and 89 (85-94)% in FIR and UIR patients, respectively (p = 0.045). CI of ADT was 4 (2-6)% at 5 years. Five-year CI of ADT was 1 (0-3)% and 5 (2-8)% in FIR and UIR patients, respectively (p = 0.085). MFS was 97 (95-98)% at 5 years. Five-year MFS was 100 (N/A-100)% and 95 (92-98)% in FIR and UIR patients, respectively (p = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients, 15 Gy HDR-BT boost plus EBRT results in durable biochemical control and low rates of ADT use for biochemical failure.

The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer

Brachytherapy (BT), using low-dose-rate (LDR) permanent seed implantation or high-dose-rate (HDR) temporary source implantation, is an acceptable treatment option for select patients with prostate cancer of any risk group. The benefits of HDR-BT over LDR-BT include the ability to use the same source for other cancers, lower operator dependence, and - typically - fewer acute irritative symptoms. By contrast, the benefits of LDR-BT include more favourable scheduling logistics, lower initial capital equipment costs, no need for a shielded room, completion in a single implant, and more robust data from clinical trials. Prospective reports comparing HDR-BT and LDR-BT to each other or to other treatment options (such as external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or surgery) suggest similar outcomes. The 5-year freedom from biochemical failure rates for patients with low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk disease are >85%, 69-97%, and 63-80%, respectively. Brachytherapy with EBRT (versus brachytherapy alone) is an appropriate approach in select patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk disease. The 10-year rates of overall survival, distant metastasis, and cancer-specific mortality are >85%, <10%, and <5%, respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities associated with HDR-BT and LDR-BT are rare, at <4% in most series, and quality of life is improved in patients who receive brachytherapy compared with those who undergo surgery.

Outcomes of T3a Prostate Cancer with Unfavorable Prognostic Factors Treated with Brachytherapy Combined with External Radiotherapy and Hormone Therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes of T3a prostate cancer with unfavorable prognostic factors treated with permanent interstitial brachytherapy combined with external radiotherapy and hormone therapy.

METHODS

From January 2003 to December 2008, 38 patients classified as T3a prostate cancer with unfavorable prognostic factors were treated with trimodality therapy (brachytherapy + external radiotherapy + hormone therapy). The prescription dose of brachytherapy and external radiotherapy were 110 Gy and 45 Gy, respectively. The duration of hormone therapy was 2-3 years. The endpoints of this study included biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Log-rank test was used to identify the prognostic predictors for univariate analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 71 months. The serum pre-treatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ranged from 10.0 to 99.8 ng/ml (mean 56.3 ng/ml), the Gleason score ranged from 5 to 9 (median 8), and the percentage of positive biopsy cores ranged from 10% to 100% (mean 65%). The 5-year BFFS, DMFS, CSS, and OS rates were 44%, 69%, 82%, and 76%, respectively. All biochemical failures occurred within 40 months. The percentage of positive biopsy cores was significantly correlated with BFFS, DMFS, and OS (all P=0.000), and the Gleason score with DMFS (P=0.000) and OS (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

T3a prostate cancer with unfavorable prognostic factors presents not so optimistic outcome. Hormone therapy should be applied to prolong the biochemical progression-free or metastasis-free survival. The percentage of positive biopsy cores and the Gleason score are significant prognostic factors.

Conformal radiotherapy plus high dose rate brachytherapy prostate boost in patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer: our experience in Asian males

Purpose: Recent studies have shown increased prostate cancer control rates with radiation dose escalation. Herein the experience of dose escalation by high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) adjunct to the three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for prostate cancer is presented.

Patients and methods: During the period between August 2005 and July 2007, patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer were treated with 3D-CRT of dose 46Gy ÷ 23 fractions to whole pelvis followed by: Arm A (102 patients): prostate boost with HDR-BT 14 Gy × 2 sessions and Arm B (103 patients): prostate boost via 3D-CRT of dose 26 Gy ÷ 13 fractions. Primary objectives were overall survival (OS), distant metastases free survival (DMFS) and PSA progression free survival (PPFS) rates. Secondary objectives were the toxicity profile and post-radiation histopathological response.

Results: At median follow up of 3.5 years, PPFS, DMFS and OS rates were; 97.8% versus 89.0% (p = 0.009), 98.1% versus 93.6% (p = 0.13) and 98.8% versus 91.6% (p = 0.24) in Arm A and Arm B. respectively. Grade 3 or 4 delayed genitourinary toxicities occurred in 2% and 4.8% of patients in Arm A and Arm B, respectively. Delayed grade 3 and 4 gastrointestinal toxicities were seen in 2% and 3.9% of patients in Arm A and Arm B, respectively. The post-radiation prostate biopsies were negative in 14/17(82.3%) and 9/15 (60%) in Arm A and Arm B, respectively.

Conclusion: 3D-CRT combined with HDR-BT resulted in better PPFS and lower morbidity than 3DCRT alone for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.

American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

A well-established body of literature supports the use of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer. Most of the articles describe HDR as a boost with adjuvant external beam radiation, but there is a growing experience with HDR monotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The American Brachytherapy Society has convened a group of expert practitioners and physicists to develop guidelines for the use of HDR in the management of prostate cancer. This involved an extensive literature review and input from an expert panel.

RESULTS

Despite a wide variation in doses and fractionation reported, HDR brachytherapy provides biochemical control rates of 85-100%, 81-100%, and 43-93% for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancers, respectively. Severe toxicity is rare, with most authors reporting less than 5% Grade 3 or higher toxicity. Careful attention to patient evaluation for appropriate patient selection, meticulous technique, treatment planning, and delivery are essential for successful treatment.

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcomes for HDR are excellent, with high rates of biochemical control, even for high-risk disease, with low morbidity. HDR monotherapy, both for primary treatment and salvage, are promising treatment modalities.

An overview of prostate diseases and their characteristics specific to Asian men

In this paper, we reviewed the features of common prostate diseases, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostate cancer (PCa) and chronic prostatitis (CP) that are specific to Asian men. Compared to the Westerners, Asians exhibit particular characteristics of prostate diseases. Through summarizing the epidemiology, symptomatology, diagnostics and therapeutics of these diseases, we find that Asians have a lower incidence of PCa than whites, but the incidences of BPH and CP are similar. Asian men with CP often suffer from fewer disease sites, but have a higher frequency of pain during urination rather than after sexual climax. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a widely used marker for the diagnosis of PCa in both Asian and Western countries. Although the PSA level may be lower in Asians, the threshold used is based on whites. After reviewing the treatments available for these diseases, we did not find a fundamental difference between Asians and whites. Furthermore, the selection for the most appropriate treatment based on the individual needs of patients remains a challenge to urologists in Asia. After considering the traits of prostate diseases that are specific to Asian men, we hope to pave the way for the development of specific diagnostic and therapeutic strategies targeted specifically to Asian men.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy as boost for organ-confined prostate cancer

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost following external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for advanced localized prostate cancer may reduce toxicity while escalating the dose. We present preliminary biochemical control and urinary, rectal and sexual toxicities for 73 patients treated with SBRT as a boost to EBRT. Forty-one intermediate- and 32 high-risk localized prostate cancer patients received 45 Gy EBRT with SBRT boost. Twenty-eight patients (38.3%) received a total SBRT boost dose of 18 Gy (3 fractions of 6 Gy), 28 patients (38.3%) received 19.5 Gy (3 fractions of 6.5 Gy), and 17 patients (23.2%) received 21 Gy (3 fractions of 7 Gy). Toxicity was assessed using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group urinary and rectal toxicity scale. Biochemical failure was assessed using the Phoenix definition. The median follow-up was 33 months (range, 22 - 43 months). Less than 7% Grade II and no higher grade acute toxicities occurred. To date, one Grade III and no Grade IV late toxicities occurred. For the 97% of patients with 24 months minimum follow-up, 71.8% achieved a PSA nadir threshold of 0.5 ng/mL. Three intermediate-risk and seven high-risk biochemical failures occurred; one high-risk patient died of his cancer. Three-year actuarial biochemical control rates were 89.5% and 77.7% for intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively. SBRT boost for prostate cancer treatment is safe and feasible with minimal acute toxicity. At 33 months late toxicity and biochemical control are promising. Long-term durability of these findings remains to be established.

Moderate dose escalation with single-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for clinically localized intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: 5-year outcome of the first 100 consecutively treated patients

PURPOSE

To analyze the clinical outcome and toxicity data of the first 100 consecutive patients treated with a single-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two-hundred eighty patients have been treated with HDR-BT boost for localized intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer. Among these, the outcome and toxicity of the first 100 patients treated with a single HDR-BT fraction were assessed. A median dose of 60Gy EBRT was given to the prostate and vesicles. Interstitial HDR-BT of 10Gy was performed during the course of EBRT.

RESULTS

Median followup time was 61.5 months. The 5-year actuarial rates of overall survival, cause-specific survival, disease-free survival, and biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) for the entire cohort were 93.3%, 99.0%, 89.3%, and 85.5%, respectively. The 7-year actuarial rate of bNED was 84.2% for the intermediate-risk group and 81.6% for the high-risk group (p=0.8464). The 7-year actuarial rates of bNED for Grade 1, 2, and 3 tumors were 97.5%, 80.0%, and 67.1%, respectively. The 5-year probability for developing late Grade 3 gastrointestinal and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was 2.1% and 14.4%, respectively. Grade 3 GU complications occurred significantly more frequently in patients with a history of preirradiation transurethral resection (29.1% vs. 8.8%; p=0.0047).

CONCLUSIONS

Five-year outcome after 60Gy EBRT plus a single fraction of 10Gy HDR-BT boost is encouraging. Preradiation transurethral resection significantly increases the risk of late severe GU complications.

Genitourinary toxicity after high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with Hypofractionated External beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: an analysis to determine the correlation between dose-volume histogram parameters in HDR brachytherapy and severity of toxicity

PURPOSE

To evaluate the severity of genitourinary (GU) toxicity in high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer and to explore factors that might affect the severity of GU toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 100 Japanese men with prostate cancer underwent (192)Ir HDR brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated EBRT. Mean (SD) dose to 90% of the planning target volume was 6.3 (0.7) Gy per fraction of HDR. After 5 fractions of HDR treatment, EBRT with 10 fractions of 3 Gy was administrated. The urethral volume receiving 1-15 Gy per fraction in HDR brachytherapy (V1-V15) and the dose to at least 5-100% of urethral volume in HDR brachytherapy (D5-D100) were compared between patients with Grade 3 toxicity and those with Grade 0-2 toxicity. Prostate volume, patient age, and International Prostate Symptom Score were also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of the 100 patients, 6 displayed Grade 3 acute GU toxicity, and 12 displayed Grade 3 late GU toxicity. Regarding acute GU toxicity, values of V1, V2, V3, and V4 were significantly higher in patients with Grade 3 toxicity than in those with Grade 0-2 toxicity. Regarding late GU toxicity, values of D70, D80, V12, and V13 were significantly higher in patients with Grade 3 toxicity than in those with Grade 0-2 toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of GU toxicity in HDR brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated EBRT for prostate cancer was relatively high. The volume of prostatic urethra was associated with grade of acute GU toxicity, and urethral dose was associated with grade of late GU toxicity.