Varicocelectomy for Infertile Couples with Advanced Paternal Age

Does age matter? Impact of age on testicular function and pregnancy outcomes following microsurgical varicocelectomy in patients with grade 3 varicocele

Objective

To evaluate the effects of age on semen and hormonal parameters following microsurgical varicocelectomy among patients with grade 3 varicocele, and to compare fertility outcomes between younger (<40 years) and older (≥40 years) men.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of infertile patients with clinical left grade 3 varicocele who underwent microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy (MV). Patients meeting the inclusion criteria (N = 550) were divided into two groups based on their age at the time of MV: <40 (n = 441) and ≥40 years (n = 109). Preoperative semen analysis and hormonal profiles were collected, and follow-up data including pregnancy outcomes were gathered at 3 and 6 months post-surgery.

Results

Post-surgery, the younger group showed significant improvements in sperm count and total motility (p < 0.001 for each) as well as progressive motility (p = 0.005), while older men exhibited a significant increase in progressive motility (p = 0.002). For each group, there were no significant changes in hormonal levels post-surgery. Comparative analysis across the two age groups showed no significant differences in the postoperative extent of semen improvements or pregnancy.

Conclusion

MV is a viable option for older infertile patients as it is for younger infertile men with grade 3 varicocele, and both groups can achieve similarly high rates of pregnancy outcomes.

Predictive parameters of the efficacy of varicocele repair: a review

ABSTRACT

Varicocele has a prevalence of 15% in the population and represents a primary cause of infertility in 40% of cases and a secondary cause in approximately 80% of cases. It is considered the major correctable cause of male infertility. Despite its high prevalence in the infertile population, a large number of patients with varicocele do not experience reproductive difficulties. For this reason, it is still highly debated which parameters could be used to predict which patients with varicocele will be most likely to benefit from its repair. The main international and European guidelines state that treatment should only be considered in infertile patients with abnormal sperm quality. However, these guidelines do not help physicians to identify which of these patients may benefit from the treatment. Therefore, this narrative review collects the evidence in the literature on the usefulness of some factors as predictors of improvement, highlighting how some of them may be effective in an initial selection of patients to be treated, while others are promising but further studies are needed. Finally, a brief consideration on the possible role of artificial intelligence is proposed.

The benefits of varicocele repair for achieving pregnancy in male infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Varicocele is one of the most common treatable causes of male infertility. However, the decision to perform varicocelectomy before starting a fertility program remains controversial. This study aimed to thoroughly review and analyze the benefit of varicocele repair and its impact on the success rate of a fertility program.

Materials and methods

A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Wiley Library. The primary outcome was the pregnancy rate, and the secondary outcomes were live birth rate and surgical sperm retrieval success rate. Outcomes were compared between men who underwent treatment for a varicocele and those that did not. The pooled analysis data are presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

A total of 31 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the treated group (odds ratio = 1.82; 95% confidence interval: 1.37-2.41; P < 0.0001) along with the live birth rate (odds ratio = 2.80; 95% confidence interval: 1.67-4.72; P = 0.0001). The further subgroup analysis revealed a higher pregnancy rate in treated men with azoospermia, subnormal semen parameters, and normozoospermia (P = 0.04, P = 0.0005, and P = 0.002, respectively), while the live birth rate was only significantly higher in the treated men with subnormal semen parameters and normozoospermia (P = 0.001 and P < 0.0001). Treated varicocele also led to a higher sperm retrieval rate in azoospermic patients (odds ratio = 1.69; 95% confidence interval: 1.16-2.45; P = 0.006).

Conclusions

Varicocele repair increased the pregnancy and live birth rates regardless the semen analysis result, along with the sperm retrieval success rate in azoospermic men. Thus, varicocele repair may be beneficial prior to joining a fertility program.

Varicocele as a source of male infertility - current treatment techniques

To establish the extent of varicocele as the cause of infertility in men and compare the various techniques of treatment. We searched PubMed and the Cochrane Library database using varicocele, male infertility, varicocelectomy as keywords. Varicocele seems to be a growing problem considered to be one of the most common causes of male infertility in recent times. Nevertheless, its role remains unclear. The best treatment option seems to be microscopic surgery - the most effective and linked to rare surgical complications. But the greatest clinical problem remains the selection of patients to treat - recently it is believed that varicocelectomy is a possibly advisable option in patients with clinical varicocele and seminal parameter impairment [1]. More high-quality, multicenter, long-term randomized controlled trials (RCT's) are required to verify the findings.

Predictors of improvement in semen parameters after varicocelectomy for male subfertility: A prospective study

INTRODUCTION

We aim to predict results of varicocelectomy on sperm density and progressive motility using preoperative clinical, laboratory and radiological data and to propose cut-off values for significant parameters.

METHODS

This prospective study was carried out between July 2011 and June 2014. We included 123 patients in our study. They were diagnosed with primary infertility with varicocele, were scheduled for varicocelectomy, and completed their follow-up. We excluded patients with azoospermia, total necrospermia, recurrent varicocele, and pituitary hormonal abnormalities. Varicocele was diagnosed and graded by physical examination and colour Doppler ultrasound. Semen analyses were completed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy was done in all cases. Patient demographics, pre- and postoperative clinical data (varicocele grade and semen parameters) were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation of age, body mass index, and subfertility duration was 28.3 ± 7.4 years, 29.1 ± 2.7 kg/m(2), and 21.9 ± 7.1 months, respectively. About 53% of our patients (n = 66) had bilateral varicocele, and unilateral disease was found in the other 57 (46.3%) cases. Varicocele grade I was diagnosed in 42 (34.1%) patients, while the other 81 (65.9%) patients had grade II or III. Higher grades of varicocele, preoperative total testosterone level, sperm density, and progressive motility had a statistically significant impact on the outcome of varicocelectomy in univariate testing. Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that grade of preoperative varicocele (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6-6.3, p = 0.007) and sperm density (95% CI 2.7-1.6, p = 0.0035), and progressive motility (95% CI 1.1-2.3, p = 0.0123) are independent predictors of semen parameters improvement after varicocelectomy.

CONCLUSION

The grade of the varicocele, sperm density, and progressive motility are major predictors of outcome in varicocelectomy. Cut-off values of >8 million/mL and >18% for sperm density and progressive motility, respectively, in men with varicocele grade II or III, indicate a successful outcome.

Children and adults varicocele: diagnostic issues and therapeutical strategies

Varicocele is defined as abnormally dilated scrotal veins. It is present in 15 % of normal males and in 40 % of males with infertility. This disorder is a challenge for the physicians involved in the diagnosis and treatment, as the pathophysiology of varicocele is not yet completely understood. For this reason, accurate diagnostic criteria and clear indications for treatment in asymptomatic adolescents or adults with clinical or subclinical varicocele are still not defined. Ultrasonography (US) is considered the best method for calculating the volume of the testicles, measuring vein diameter and monitoring the growth of the testis in adolescent patients. Color-Doppler US is the method of choice for detecting spermatic vein reflux and for classifying the grade of varicocele. Various classification systems have been published with recommendations on how to perform US imaging of the scrotum. Currently, color-Doppler US and spectral analysis are the most effective, non-invasive diagnostic procedures as they allow detection of subclinical varicocele associated with infertility. Various techniques are used in the treatment of varicocele including open surgery, laparoscopic procedures and interventional radiology. However, there is no consensus among physicians on which technique is the most effective in terms of outcome and complication rates. This review shows that color-Doppler US is currently the most widely employed diagnostic method for detection and classification of varicocele caused by venous reflux, as it is reliable and easily performed. The review also highlights the role of varicocelectomy in the management of adult male infertility.

High prevalence of isolated sperm DNA damage in infertile men with advanced paternal age

BACKGROUND

Sperm DNA damage is associated with male infertility, lower pregnancy rates and pregnancy loss.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of sperm DNA damage in younger and older men with normozoospermia.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We obtained semen from 277 consecutive non-azoospermic men presenting for sperm DNA testing.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The main outcome measures included sperm % DNA fragmentation index (%DFI, using sperm chromatin structure assay), sperm concentration, motility and morphology, and, paternal age.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Sperm % DFI was positively correlated with paternal age (r = 0.20, P < 0.001) and inversely correlated % progressive motility (r = -0.16, P = 0.01). Sperm %DFI was significantly higher in older (≥40 years) compared to younger (<40 years) normozoospermic men (17 ± 13 vs. 12 ± 8, respectively P = 0.008), whereas, sperm concentration, progressive motility and morphology were not significantly different in these two groups. Moreover, the prevalence of high levels of sperm DNA damage (>30 % DFI) was significantly higher in older compared to younger normozoospermic men (17 % vs. 3 %, respectively, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The data indicate that a conventional semen analysis can often fail to detect a defect in spermatogenesis (high %DFI) in older men and suggest that infertile couples with advanced paternal age, including those with normal semen parameters, should consider sperm DNA testing as part of the couple evaluation.

Varicocelectomy is associated with increases in serum testosterone independent of clinical grade

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the varicocele grade is related to the degree of improvement in serum testosterone levels after varicocelectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of men with a total serum testosterone level <400 ng/dL who had undergone microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy for infertility and/or hypogonadism. All men had clinically palpable left varicoceles and preoperative and postoperative total serum testosterone levels available. For patients with bilateral varicoceles, the greatest grade on either side was used to stratify the patients. The men with an isolated, left-side, grade I varicocele were not offered varicocelectomy. The changes in the testosterone levels were evaluated, with the results expressed as the mean ± standard error. P ≤.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients had undergone bilateral varicocelectomy and 19 unilateral varicocelectomy. Overall, an increase in testosterone was seen in 65 of the 78 men (83%) in the present study. The mean follow-up was 7 months. The mean serum testosterone level increased from 308.4 to 417.5 ng/dL, with a mean increase of 109.1 ± 12.8 ng/dL (n = 78). The improvements in the serum testosterone levels were seen regardless of the clinical grade.

CONCLUSION

Microsurgical varicocelectomy resulted in significant increases in the serum testosterone level, independent of the varicocele grade.

A critical appraisal on the role of varicocele in male infertility

Varicocele is a major cause of male infertility, as it may impair spermatogenesis through several distinct physiopathological mechanisms. With the recent advances in biomolecular techniques and the development of novel sperm functional tests, it has been possible to better understand the mechanisms involved in testicular damage provoked by varicocele and, therefore, propose optimized ways to prevent and/or reverse them. Up to now, there is still controversy involving the true benefit of varicocele repair in subfertile men as well as in certain specific situations such as concomitant contralateral subclinical varicocele or associated nonobstructive azoospermia. Also, with the continued development of assisted reproductive technology new issues and questions are emerging regarding the role of varicocelectomy in this context. This paper reviews the most recent data available on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of varicocele with regard to male infertility.

Effect of age on semen parameters in infertile men after varicocelectomy

Background

The effectiveness of varicocelectomy in restoration of fertility and improvement of semen parameters is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of age on semen parameters following varicocelectomy in a group of infertile men.

Methods

Improvements in sperm count, morphology, and motility were studied in 67 infertile patients 4–10 months after varicocelectomy.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 30.48 ± 7.49 years. Significant improvements in total sperm count, percentage normal morphology, and motility were noted in all age groups (P < 0.05). Patients aged <25 years demonstrated the greatest increase in sperm counts, normal morphology, and motility following varicocelectomy. There was a significant negative correlation between age and sperm count, sperm morphology, and sperm motility (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The effect of age on improvement in sperm parameters after varicocelectomy is inconsistent with some reports in the literature, and could be attributable to the duration of infertility prior to surgery; in the long term, varicoceles are known to have deleterious effects on testis biology.

Does varicocele repair improve male infertility? An evidence-based perspective from a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) addressing varicocele treatment are scarce and have conflicting outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether varicocele treatment is superior or inferior to no treatment in male infertility from an evidence-based perspective.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A prospective, nonmasked, parallel-group RCT with a one-to-one concealed-to-random allocation was conducted at the authors' institution from February 2006 to October 2009. Married men 20-39 yr of age who had experience infertility ≥1 yr, had palpable varicoceles, and with at least one impaired semen parameter (sperm concentration <20 million/ml, progressive motility <50%, or normal morphology <30%) were eligible. Exclusions included subclinical or recurrent varicoceles, normal semen parameters, and azoospermia. Sample size analysis suggested 68 participants per arm.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomly allocated to observation (the control arm [CA]) or subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy (the treatment arm [TA]). Semen analyses were obtained at baseline (three analyses) and at follow-up months 3, 6, 9, and 12. The mean of each sperm parameter at baseline and follow-ups was determined.

MEASUREMENTS

We measured the spontaneous pregnancy rate (the primary outcome), changes from baseline in mean semen parameters, and the occurrence of adverse events (AE-the secondary outcomes) during 12-mo follow-up; p<0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Analysis included 145 participants (CA: n=72; TA: n=73), with a mean age plus or minus standard deviation of 29.3±5.7 in the CA and 28.4±5.7 in the TA (p=0.34). Baseline characteristics in both arms were comparable. Spontaneous pregnancy was achieved in 13.9% (CA) versus 32.9% (TA), with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.04 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-6.95) and a number needed to treat (NNT) of 5.27 patients (95% CI, 1.55-8.99). In CA within-arm analysis, none of semen parameters revealed significant changes from baseline (sperm concentration [p=0.18], progressive motility [p=0.29], and normal morphology [p=0.05]). Conversely, in TA within-arm analysis, the mean of all semen parameters improved significantly in follow-up versus baseline (p<0.0001). In between-arm analysis, all semen parameters improved significantly in the TA versus CA (p<0.0001). No AEs were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Our RCT provided level 1b evidence of the superiority of varicocelectomy over observation in infertile men with palpable varicoceles and impaired semen quality, with increased odds of spontaneous pregnancy and improvements in semen characteristics within 1-yr of follow-up.

Older age is associated with similar improvements in semen parameters and testosterone after subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy

PURPOSE

It is generally accepted that men with clinically palpable varicocele are at high risk for a progressive decrease in fertility and testosterone levels with time. Varicocelectomy is thought to improve testicular function or at least halt the accelerated decrease in testicular function associated with varicocele. Substantial controversy exists as to whether varicocelectomy is effective in older men, possibly due to irreversible testicular damage or limited potential for recovery from varicocele induced damage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of men who underwent microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy, as done by a single surgeon. Demographics, patient questionnaires, operative notes, charts, testosterone and semen analysis were reviewed. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on age at surgery, including less than 30, 30 to 39 and 40 years or greater.

RESULTS

A total of 272 men met study inclusion criteria. In all 3 age groups we noted similar testosterone and baseline semen analysis parameters. There were significant increases in sperm concentration and total sperm count in all age groups. When analysis was restricted to men with baseline testosterone 400 ng/dl or less, there was a mean 110, 133 and 136 ng/dl increase in 21 men who were 40 years old or older, in 30 who were 30 to 39 years old and in 21 who were younger than 30 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Microsurgical varicocelectomy resulted in significant increases in sperm concentration, total sperm count and testosterone in all age groups studied, including men in the fifth and sixth decades of life. Microsurgical varicocelectomy should be offered to older men for infertility and/or hypogonadism.

The role of testicular volume in adolescents with varicocele: the better way and time of surgical treatment

PURPOSE

We report varicocele prevalence in adolescents. Surgical treatment has been proposed in adolescents with relevant testicular disproportion to avoid fertility problems in adulthood. We prospectively analyzed the testicular volume variation in adolescents with varicocele and hypoplastic testis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a 2-year period we selected 54 consecutive pediatric patients with a median age of 14.5 years (range 13 to 16) who had left varicocele using certain criteria, including testicular volume discrepancy greater than 20%, no previous inguinal-testicular surgery and no symptoms. Adolescents were divided into 2 groups, including 27 who underwent surgical correction with lymphatic sparing microsurgical varicocelectomy (intervention) and 27 who were only observed (control). After surgery or at first observation patients were evaluated clinically and by ultrasound at 3, 6 and 12 months. Testicular volume was estimated by the prolate ellipsoid formula.

RESULTS

We noted significant improvement in testicular volume with less than 20% disparity between the 2 gonads in 23 patients (85.2%) in the intervention group and in 8 controls (29.6%). Two recurrences (7.4%) were reported in the intervention group, each in an adolescent with increased testicular volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms significantly increased testicular volume in many surgically treated boys and shows that physiological catch-up growth occurs in adolescents with varicocele without treatment. Considering critically results in each group, in select cases clinical and ultrasound followup is indicated before intervention due to a possible spontaneous decrease in testicular asymmetry. Further histopathological studies are needed to identify the relationship between testicular hypoplasia, irreversible damage and future fertility problems to determine which adolescents should be treated.

Adult varicocele

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adult varicocele presents a challenge for male reproductive specialists. We have yet to fully elucidate the pathophysiology of varicocele. The enigma of the varicocele, although a source of frustration for clinicians, has been a siren call for researchers as attested to by the substantial, if flawed body of literature on the topic. We critically review recent publications on varicocele.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although yielding mixed results, studies this year have explored the potential relationship between oxidative stress and varicocele-associated infertility. In clinically focused research, one group tackled the contentious question of efficacy of surgical varicocele management. Building on the errors of prior meta-analyses, this study takes a fresh view on an old but vital topic. Finally, it is becoming clearer that varicocele affects Leydig cell function as well as seminiferous tubular function, and is a risk factor for androgen deficiency.

SUMMARY

With exceptions, recent studies support a role for varicocelectomy in the management of infertile couples. In addition, evidence is accumulating that early repair of varicoceles, especially large varicoceles, may be effective in preventing future infertility and may be an effective treatment for androgen deficiency.