1
|
Yee CH, Chiu PK, Tay KJ, Tan YG, Wong HF, Siu B, Nicoletti R, Teoh JY, Ng CF. Cryotherapy for posterior lesions of the prostate: the hydrogel technique. BJU Int 2025; 135:869-873. [PMID: 39988465 PMCID: PMC11975199 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Chi Hang Yee
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology CentreThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong
| | - Peter Ka‐Fung Chiu
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology CentreThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of UrologySingapore General HospitalSingaporeSingapore
| | - Yu Guang Tan
- Department of UrologySingapore General HospitalSingaporeSingapore
| | - Ho Fai Wong
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology CentreThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong
| | - Brian Siu
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology CentreThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong
| | - Rossella Nicoletti
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology CentreThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi HospitalUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
| | - Jeremy Yuen‐Chun Teoh
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology CentreThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong
| | - Chi Fai Ng
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology CentreThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Y, Li X. Rectal mesenteric metastasis from prostate cancer treated with adjunctive hydrodissection during cryoablation. J Cancer Res Ther 2025; 21:509-511. [PMID: 40317158 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1148_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 12/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2025]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Cryoablation is a safe and promising technique for patients with solid tumors. However, when adjacent to vulnerable structures, appropriate protective measures are necessary while carrying out this procedure. Herein, we present a case of a prostate cancer patient with rectal mesenteric metastasis who underwent cryoablation. The lesion was separated from the rectum by hydrodissection. No grade II-IV adverse events were encountered intraoperatively, and dramatic improvements in the stool were observed. These findings indicate that cryoablation combined with hydrodissection is a safe and reliable treatment method for lesions adjacent to the rectum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yufeng Wang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoguang Li
- Department of Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang N, Zhao DW, Chen D, Wu ZM, Wang YJ, Yang ZY, Zhao JL, Zhou FJ, Li YH. Clinical value of normal saline injection for expansion of the anterior perirectal space during prostate cryoablation. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:252-256. [PMID: 35817633 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.06.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study is to describe the technique and evaluate the clinical value of normal saline (NS) injection for expanding the anterior perirectal space during prostate cryoablation for prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS PCa patients who received cryoablation between August 2014 and December 2019 were enrolled, and the technique of NS injection was adopted. The complications were evaluated. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir and biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) were measured in localized PCa patients who received cryoablation as the primary treatment. RESULTS A total of 159 PCa patients were included. Among 147 patients with the data of anterior perirectal space, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) distance of estimated iceball edge beyond the prostatic capsule was 8.3 (7.0-10.0) mm. No cases of urethrorectal fistula were reported; 29 patients developed urinary retention and 25 patients presented scrotal edema. All complications below Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb disappeared within 7 weeks after surgery. Urinary incontinence was reported in 6 patients. Among localized PCa patients, the median (IQR) follow-up time was 56.5 (36.0-73.5) months. The estimated 5-year bPFS was 82.3% overall, 82.8% for low-to intermediate-risk PCa patients, and 82.1% for high-risk PCa patients. For 52 patients received cryoablation alone, the median (IQR) PSA nadir was 0.147 (0.027-0.381) ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS The technique of NS injection for expanding the anterior perirectal space during cryoablation surgery could avoid urethrorectal fistula and might benefit localized PCa patients with lower PSA nadir and longer bPFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510075, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510075, China
| | - Di-Wei Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510075, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510075, China
| | - Dong Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510075, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510075, China
| | - Zhi-Ming Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510075, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510075, China
| | - Yan-Jun Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510075, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510075, China
| | - Zhen-Yu Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510075, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510075, China
| | - Jun-Liang Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510075, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510075, China
| | - Fang-Jian Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510075, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510075, China.
| | - Yong-Hong Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510075, China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510075, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Repka MC, Creswell M, Lischalk JW, Carrasquilla M, Forsthoefel M, Lee J, Lei S, Aghdam N, Kataria S, Obayomi-Davies O, Collins BT, Suy S, Hankins RA, Collins SP. Rationale for Utilization of Hydrogel Rectal Spacers in Dose Escalated SBRT for the Treatment of Unfavorable Risk Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:860848. [PMID: 35433457 PMCID: PMC9008358 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.860848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review we outline the current evidence for the use of hydrogel rectal spacers in the treatment paradigm for prostate cancer with external beam radiation therapy. We review their development, summarize clinical evidence, risk of adverse events, best practices for placement, treatment planning considerations and finally we outline a framework and rationale for the utilization of rectal spacers when treating unfavorable risk prostate cancer with dose escalated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Repka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Michael Creswell
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Jonathan W Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Oncology at New York University (NYU) Long Island School of Medicine, Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYCyberKnife, New York, NY, United States
| | - Michael Carrasquilla
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Matthew Forsthoefel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapy Centers of Kentuckiana, Louisville, KY, United States
| | - Jacqueline Lee
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Siyuan Lei
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Nima Aghdam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Shaan Kataria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arlington & Reston Radiation Oncology, Arlington, VA, United States
| | - Olusola Obayomi-Davies
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wellstar Kennestone Hospital, Marietta, GA, United States
| | - Brian T Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Simeng Suy
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Ryan A Hankins
- Department of Urology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sean P Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Garnon J, Cazzato RL, Koch G, Uri IF, Tsoumakidou G, Caudrelier J, Tricard T, Gangi A, Lang H. Trans-rectal Ultrasound-Guided Autologous Blood Injection in the Interprostatorectal Space Prior to Percutaneous MRI-Guided Cryoablation of the Prostate. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 41:653-659. [PMID: 29230498 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-017-1853-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report a novel technique of ultrasound-guided injection of autologous blood in the interprostatorectal space, in an attempt to facilitate ablative prostatic procedures by widening durably the space between the rectum and the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between April and November 2016, four consecutive patients underwent the haemoprotection injection technique. For each patient, we recorded the time to perform the technique, the amount of injected blood, the achieved distances between the rectum and the prostate post-injection at fixed defined points (apex, middle, and base of prostate at the midline, left, and right sides of the gland), the extension of the ice ball outside the prostate capsule at those fixed points, and whether any residual blood was present on 1-month follow-up MRI. RESULTS Mean time to perform haemoprotection injection was 54 min, with an average blood volume of 103 cc. Mean distance achieved at the apex, middle, and base of the prostate, respectively, was 12, 13, and 16 mm in the midline; 8, 10, and 13 mm on the left side; and 9, 10, and 13 mm on the right side. The mean extension distance of the ice ball beyond the capsule was 4, 6, and 6 mm in the midline; 4, 5, and 6 mm on the left side; and 1, 3, and 3 mm on the right side. No residual blood was present on 1-month follow-up MRI in all patients. No rectal fistula occurred. CONCLUSION Haemoprotection may create a safe and effective virtual space between the prostate and rectum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Garnon
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67098, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
| | - Roberto Luigi Cazzato
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67098, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Guillaume Koch
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67098, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Ishaq Fahmi Uri
- Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Georgia Tsoumakidou
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67098, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Jean Caudrelier
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67098, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Thibault Tricard
- Department of Urology, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67098, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Afshin Gangi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67098, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Hervé Lang
- Department of Urology, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67098, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Postema AW, De Reijke TM, Ukimura O, Van den Bos W, Azzouzi AR, Barret E, Baumunk D, Blana A, Bossi A, Brausi M, Coleman JA, Crouzet S, Dominguez-Escrig J, Eggener S, Ganzer R, Ghai S, Gill IS, Gupta RT, Henkel TO, Hohenfellner M, Jones JS, Kahmann F, Kastner C, Köhrmann KU, Kovacs G, Miano R, van Moorselaar RJ, Mottet N, Osorio L, Pieters BR, Polascik TJ, Rastinehad AR, Salomon G, Sanchez-Salas R, Schostak M, Sentker L, Tay KJ, Varkarakis IM, Villers A, Walz J, De la Rosette JJ. Standardization of definitions in focal therapy of prostate cancer: report from a Delphi consensus project. World J Urol 2016; 34:1373-82. [PMID: 26892160 PMCID: PMC5026990 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1782-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2015] [Accepted: 02/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To reach standardized terminology in focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS A four-stage modified Delphi consensus project was undertaken among a panel of international experts in the field of FT for PCa. Data on terminology in FT was collected from the panel by three rounds of online questionnaires. During a face-to-face meeting on June 21, 2015, attended by 38 experts, all data from the online rounds were reviewed and recommendations for definitions were formulated. RESULTS Consensus was attained on 23 of 27 topics; Targeted FT was defined as a lesion-based treatment strategy, treating all identified significant cancer foci; FT was generically defined as an anatomy-based (zonal) treatment strategy. Treatment failure due to the ablative energy inadequately destroying treated tissue is defined as ablation failure. In targeting failure the energy is not adequately applied to the tumor spatially and selection failure occurs when a patient was wrongfully selected for FT. No definition of biochemical recurrence can be recommended based on the current data. Important definitions for outcome measures are potency (minimum IIEF-5 score of 21), incontinence (new need for pads or leakage) and deterioration in urinary function (increase in IPSS >5 points). No agreement on the best quality of life tool was established, but UCLA-EPIC and EORTC-QLQ-30 were most commonly supported by the experts. A complete overview of statements is presented in the text. CONCLUSION Focal therapy is an emerging field of PCa therapeutics. Standardization of definitions helps to create comparable research results and facilitate clear communication in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A W Postema
- Departments of Urology, AMC University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - T M De Reijke
- Departments of Urology, AMC University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - O Ukimura
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - W Van den Bos
- Departments of Urology, AMC University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A R Azzouzi
- Department of Urology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - E Barret
- Department of Urology, Institut Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - D Baumunk
- Department of Urology, Magdeburg University Medical Center, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - A Blana
- Department of Urology, Fuerth Hospital, Fuerth, Germany
| | - A Bossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - M Brausi
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Civile Ramazzini, Carpi, Italy
| | - J A Coleman
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - S Crouzet
- Department of Urology and Transplantation, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - J Dominguez-Escrig
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Eggener
- Department of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - R Ganzer
- Department of Urology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - S Ghai
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - I S Gill
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - R T Gupta
- Departments of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - T O Henkel
- Urologische Praxis Dr. Henkel & Dr. Kahmann, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Hohenfellner
- Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J S Jones
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - F Kahmann
- Urologische Praxis Dr. Henkel & Dr. Kahmann, Berlin, Germany
| | - C Kastner
- CamPARI Prostate Cancer Clinic, Cancer Directorate, Cambridge University Hospitals Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - K U Köhrmann
- Department of Urology, Theresien Krankenhaus Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - G Kovacs
- Interdisciplinary Brachytherapy Unit, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - R Miano
- Division of Urology, Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - R J van Moorselaar
- Department of Urology, Free University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital St Etienne, Saint-Étienne, France
| | - L Osorio
- Department of Urology, Porto Hospital Centre, Porto, Portugal
| | - B R Pieters
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, AMC University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T J Polascik
- Departments of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - A R Rastinehad
- Department of Urology, Hofstra North Shore-Lij, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - G Salomon
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - R Sanchez-Salas
- Department of Urology, Institut Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - M Schostak
- Department of Urology, Magdeburg University Medical Center, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - L Sentker
- Urologische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Sinsheim, Germany
| | - K J Tay
- Departments of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - I M Varkarakis
- 2nd Department of Urology, Athens Medical University, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A Villers
- Department of Urology, Lille University Medical Center, Lille, France
| | - J Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - J J De la Rosette
- Departments of Urology, AMC University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
de Castro Abreu AL, Ma Y, Shoji S, Marien A, Leslie S, Gill I, Ukimura O. Denonvilliers' space expansion by transperineal injection of hydrogel: implications for focal therapy of prostate cancer. Int J Urol 2013; 21:416-8. [PMID: 24118183 DOI: 10.1111/iju.12290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2013] [Accepted: 08/27/2013] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
We developed and assessed a technique of: (i) expanding Denonvilliers' space by hydrogel (polyethylene glycol) during focal cryoabation; and (ii) temperature mapping to ensure protection of the rectal wall. In a fresh cadaver, 20 cc of hydrogel was injected transperineally into Denonvilliers' space under transrectal ultrasound guidance. Successful expansion of Denonvilliers' space was achieved with a range of 9-11 mm thickness covering the entire posterior prostate surface. Two freeze-thaw cycles were used to expand the iceball reaching the rectal wall as an end-point. Intraoperative transrectal ultrasound monitoring and temperature mapping in Denonvilliers' space by multiple thermocouples documented real-time iceball expansion up to 10 mm beyond the prostate, and safety in protecting the rectal wall from thermal injury. The lowest temperatures of the thermocouples with a distance of 0 mm, 5 mm and 10 mm from the prostate were: -35°C, -18°C and 0°C (P < 0.001), respectively. In gross and microscopic examination, the hydrogel mass measured 11 × 40 × 34 mm, which was identical to the intraoperative transrectal ultrasound measurements, there was no infiltration of the hydrogel into the rectal wall or prostate and no injury to the pelvic organs. In conclusion, the expansion of Denonvilliers' space by transperineal injection of hydrogel is feasible and a promising technique to facilitate energy-based focal therapy of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre Luis de Castro Abreu
- USC Institute of Urology, Center for Prostate Cancer Focal Therapy, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|