Surgical Reconstruction of Giant Penoscrotal Lymphedema in Sub-Saharan Africa

No difference between split-thickness and full-thickness skin grafts for surgical repair in adult acquired buried penis regarding surgical and functional outcomes: a comparative retrospective analysis

Adult Acquired Buried Penis (AABP) is a pathological condition necessitating surgical correction, ranging from simple to complex procedures involving the utilization of full-thickness (FTSG) or split-thickness (STSG) skin grafts especially in cases of substantial viable penile skin loss. In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the surgical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of graft types that were utilized to treat AABP among 39 patients at a single center between November 2017 and May 2023. Among these patients, 22 needed skin grafts, with 9 undergoing FTSG and the remainder receiving STSG. Lichen Sclerosus (LS) was the primary cause (54.6%) of AABP requiring skin grafts. Patients primarily presented with voiding (63.6%) and sexual (27.3%) dysfunction. The STSG group had a lower mean age (64.7 ± 11.6) than the FTSG group (66.7 ± 11.6; P = 0.015), with no significant differences in BMI (p = 0.643). Complex repairs (Santucci grade ≥3) were performed in 81.0% of cases, with 88.9% in the FTSG group and 75.0% in the STSG group. Operative times were similar (160.2 ± 31.7 vs 161.5 ± 50.3, p = 0.945). No significant differences in preoperative penis length were found between the FTSG and STSG groups (P = 0.918). Postoperative complications occurred in 36.4% of patients, with severe complications (Clavien grade ≥3) in 9.1%. General postoperative complications and recurrence rates did not significantly differ between groups (P = 0.397 and 0.375; respectively). Functional outcomes, evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function and the International Prostate Symptom Score, improved significantly in both groups after surgical procedures (P < 0.001 for all). Patient-reported satisfaction for the operation was 81.3% calculated by ad-hoc questionnaire. In conclusion, no discernible differences in outcomes were observed between STSG and FTSG. Larger comparative studies with extended follow-up periods and validated questionnaires are warranted for confirmation. Physicians should consider specialized centers for AABP surgical repair due to its intricacies.

Genital Lymphedema and How to Deal with It: Pearls and Pitfalls from over 38 Years of Experience with Unusual Lymphatic System Impairment

Background and Objectives: Conservative treatment represents an essential pillar of lymphedema management, along with debulking and physiologic surgeries. Despite the consistent number of treatment options, there is currently no agreement on their indications and possible combinations. When dealing with unusual lymphedema presentation as in the genitalia (Genital Lymphedema—GL), treatment choice becomes even more difficult. The authors aimed to present their targeted algorithm of single and combined treatment modalities for rare GL in order to face this paucity of information. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from a prospectively maintained database since January 1983, and cases of GL that were managed in the authors’ department were selected. Only patients that were treated in the authors’ institution and presented a minimum follow-up of 3 months were admitted to the current study. Results: From January 1983 to July 2021, 19 patients with GL were recruited. All the patients were male, and their ages ranged from 21 to 73 years old (average: 52). Ten cases (52.6%) presented with ISL (International Society of Lymphology) stage I, five (26.3%) were stage II and four (21.1%) were stage III. GL was managed with conservative treatment (12 cases), LVA (LymphaticoVenous Anastomosis) (3) or surgical excision (4). In a mean follow-up of 7.5 years (range: 3 months—11 years), no major complications occurred, and all cases reached improvements in functional and quality of life terms. Conclusions: Contrary to the predominant thought of the necessity to avoid surgery in unusual lymphedema presentations such as GL, they can be managed using targeted multimodal approaches or by adapting well-known procedures in unusual ways to achieve control of disease progression and improve patients’ quality of life.

Successful surgical resection and reconstruction of scrotal elephantiasis

INTRODUCTION

An enlarged scrotum due to scrotal elephantiasis results in a poor quality of life. This condition is uncommon and challenging to manage for most urologists. We report a case of scrotal elephantiasis treated with resection and scrotal reconstruction.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 57-year-old man was referred to our hospital with a 6-year history of scrotal swelling. The scrotum was 20 cm in diameter, stiff, and thick. He was diagnosed with chronic scrotal lymphedema and underwent scrotal resection. The skin and subcutaneous tissues of the scrotum were excised, and the suprapubic skin, which was stretched by the enlarged scrotum, was used for the scrotal reconstruction. The penis was pulled out from this hole in the skin.

CONCLUSION

Utilizing suprapubic skin flap for scrotal reconstruction is an effective treatment for scrotal elephantiasis that can result in functionally and cosmetically successful outcomes.

Surgical management of male genital lymphedema: A systematic review

Genital lymphedema (GL) is an uncommon and disabling disease that manifests as enlargement of the genital region resulting from the disturbance of lymphatic drainage. Although conservative treatment such as decompression is typically the first-line approach, surgical intervention has been shown to be effective in certain cases. This study aimed to systematically review studies evaluating available surgical alternatives for the treatment of male GL. A systematic search strategy using keyword and subject headings was applied to PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library in May 2019. Studies investigating various surgical techniques to treat penile and scrotal lymphedema were included. The potential risk of bias of included trials was evaluated using the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS). In total, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria, nine of which were determined to be high-quality. The average MINORS score was 12.45 for studies involving excision and 14 for studies involving lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA). The most common reason for a low score was a failure to describe the inclusion criteria. Recurrence of lymphedema during follow-up was reported in four studies involving excision and in no studies involving LVA. In general, the quality of the included literature was considered to be fair. Although surgical intervention might not always prevent the recurrence of lymphedema, all of the studies reported improved quality of life after the procedure. This study could be used as the basis for evidence-based guidelines to be applied in clinical practice for managing male GL.

A novel 'Batman' scrotectomy technique for the management of scrotal lymphoedema following treatment for penile cancer

Background

To describe a novel 'Batman' scrotectomy technique and present our single centre experience in the management of secondary scrotal lymphoedema in penile cancer patients.

Methods

A retrospective review of the medical records of penile cancer patients with extensive and bothersome penoscrotal lymphoedema failing conservative therapy between 2013 and 2018. We analysed patients' demographics, pre-operative disease stage, post-operative outcomes and complications.

Results

Seven patients with a history of penile cancer and problematic scrotal lymphoedema were managed using a novel 'Batman' scrotectomy technique. The mean age was 56.4 (range, 28-71) years. The mean inpatient stay was 4.1 (range, 2-7) days. Two patients (28.6%) were found to have incidental metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the scrotal skin on histological analysis. One patient developed superficial wound dehiscence (Clavien-Dindo grade II) and two patients had mild post-operative residual penile lymphoedema. Following a mean follow-up period of 19 months, 2 patients died due to metastatic penile cancer. One patient developed skin metastases in his thigh and perineum. All of the patients reported a good cosmetic and functional outcome on post-operative review.

Conclusions

Genital lymphoedema is an uncommon side-effect of penile cancer treatment. In severe cases where patients fail conservative treatments, surgical intervention using this technique is effective and feasible.

Surgical management of giant scrotal lymphedema in morbidly obese patient with trisomy 21

Huge scrotal lymphedema is a rare problem that affects the patient's lifestyle and leads to physical and emotional disability. It also carries potential challenges for the treating surgeon, especially if the patient is noncompliant or morbidly obese. A 21-year-old morbidly obese trisomy 21 man with huge scrotal lymphedema and buried penis that developed within 2 years presented for excision scrotoplasty with reconstruction of the penis using the original invaginated penile skin. Giant scrotal lymphedema with buried penis can be treated successfully by excision scrotoplasty with preservation of the invaginated healthy penile skin to reconstruct the penis.

Evaluation and management of adult acquired buried penis

Adult acquired buried penis represents the clinical manifestation of a wide spectrum of pathology due to a variety of etiologies. It can be related to obesity, a laxity in connective tissue, lichen sclerosis (LS), complications from penile/scrotal enlargement surgery, scrotal lymphedema, or hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Buried penis can be associated with poor cosmesis and hygiene, voiding dysfunction, and sexual dysfunction. Evaluation and management of buried penis largely depends on etiology and degree of affected tissue. It is an increasingly common problem seen by reconstructive urologists and here we present several frequently seen scenarios of buried penis and management options.