1
|
Pan DL, Zhang LF, Li XJ, Zhang KP, Gao PF, Yang B, Li NC. Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic radical cystectomy for male octogenarians with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:159. [PMID: 38297199 PMCID: PMC10829394 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11816-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
This study was designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) for male octogenarian patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Briefly, a total of 57 male octogenarian patients (A group) with bladder carcinoma were enrolled and underwent LRC and intracorporeal pelvic lymph node dissection with bilateral cutaneous ureterostomy from May 2016 to December 2022. Besides, 63 male patients (age < 80 years old) with bladder carcinoma undergoing LRC and 17 octogenarian male patients with bladder carcinoma undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC) were enrolled in B and C groups as control. All perioperative clinical materials and outcomes of long-term follow-up, and complication were collected. The specific results were shown as follows. Compared with C group, the operation time and resected lymph node in A group was increased, and the estimated blood loss, the number of transfusion needed, duration of pelvic drainage and hospital stay after surgery was decreased. The death rate and ileus complication rate were higher in A group (12 cases) than in C group (15 cases). The cases of ureteral stricture in A group (13 cases) was decreased compared with that in C group. Overall, LRC and bilateral cutaneous ureterostomy are safe, feasible and better choices for the treatment of male octogenarian patients with MIBC. The octogenarian receiving cutaneous ureterostomy heals slowly and exists certain incomplete intestinal obstruction after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Liang Pan
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, 100144, China
| | - Lu-Fang Zhang
- Department of Urology, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, Shandong, 261041, China.
| | - Xiao-Jian Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, 100144, China
| | - Ke-Ping Zhang
- Department of Urology, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, Shandong, 261041, China
| | - Peng-Fei Gao
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, 100144, China
| | - Bing Yang
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, 100144, China
| | - Ning-Chen Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, 100144, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stein R, Fichtner J. Ileum-Conduit. Aktuelle Urol 2022; 53:279-288. [PMID: 35671971 DOI: 10.1055/a-1804-9493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
3
|
Rosiello G, Palumbo C, Deuker M, Stolzenbach LF, Martin T, Tian Z, Larcher A, Capitanio U, Montorsi F, Shariat SF, Kapoor A, Saad F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Partial nephrectomy in frail patients: Benefits of robot-assisted surgery. Surg Oncol 2021; 38:101588. [PMID: 33945961 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the effect of robot-assisted (RAPN) vs. open (OPN) partial nephrectomy on short-term postoperative outcomes and total hospital charges in frail patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS Within the National Inpatient Sample database we identified 2745 RCC patients treated with either RAPN or OPN between 2008 and 2015, who met the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty-defining indicator criteria. We examined the rates of RAPN vs. OPN over time. Moreover, we compared the effect of RAPN vs. OPN on short-term postoperative outcomes and total hospital charges. Time trends and multivariable logistic, Poisson and linear regression models were applied. RESULTS Overall, 1109 (40.4%) frail patients were treated with RAPN. Rates of RAPN increased over time, from 16.3% to 54.7% (p < 0.001). Frail RAPN patients exhibited lower rates (all p < 0.001) of overall complications (35.3 vs. 48.3%), major complications (12.4 vs. 20.4%), blood transfusions (8.0 vs. 13.5%), non-home-based discharge (9.6 vs. 15.2%), shorter length of stay (3 vs. 4 days), but higher total hospital charges ($50,060 vs. $45,699). Moreover, RAPN independently predicted (all p < 0.001) lower risk of overall complications (OR: 0.58), major complications (OR: 0.55), blood transfusions (OR: 0.60) and non-home-based discharge (OR: 0.51), as well as shorter LOS (RR: 0.77) but also higher total hospital charges (RR: +$7682), relative to OPN. CONCLUSIONS In frail patients, RAPN is associated with lower rates of short-term postoperative complications, blood transfusions and non-home-based discharge, as well as with shorter LOS than OPN. However, RAPN use also results in higher total hospital charges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Rosiello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Carlotta Palumbo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Urology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Science and Public Health, University of Brescia, Italy
| | - Marina Deuker
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Lara Franziska Stolzenbach
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Martin
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anil Kapoor
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen J, Djaladat H, Schuckman AK, Aron M, Desai M, Gill IS, Clifford TG, Ghodoussipour S, Miranda G, Cai J, Daneshmand S. Surgical approach as a determinant factor of clinical outcome following radical cystectomy: Does Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) level the playing field? Urol Oncol 2019; 37:765-773. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2019] [Revised: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
5
|
Tzelves L, Skolarikos A, Mourmouris P, Lazarou L, Kostakopoulos N, Manatakis DK, Kural AR. Does the Use of a Robot Decrease the Complication Rate Adherent to Radical Cystectomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Open with Robotic Counterparts. J Endourol 2019; 33:971-984. [PMID: 31161777 DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Radical cystectomy (RC) is the mainstay of treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In 2003, the first robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) was performed and since then many studies, mainly observational, were conducted to compare robotic and open methods. This study aims to assess perioperative outcomes between the two methods based on pooled data from existing literature. Methods: A literature search of articles in English and French languages was performed in three databases (Medline, Embase, and Cochrane) until 30th of June 2018, as well as in urology conference programs and reference lists of included studies. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42018103063). Terms such as "robotic," "open," and "radical cystectomy" and synonyms were used for the searching algorithm. The primary outcome was the number of minor and major postoperative complications (Clavien grading system). Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Comparison of continuous outcomes was performed with weighted mean differences, while for dichotomous outcomes, odds ratios (ORs) were used. Review Manager 5.3 was used. Results: Fifty-four studies (5 randomized trials and 49 observational) were eligible, including 29,697 patients (6500 in the RARC group and 23,197 in the open radical cystectomy group). Minor complications (grade 1-2) in pooled data of 29 studies were fewer in the RARC group (OR = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38-0.76, p < 0.001), a difference persisting after sensitivity analysis for 30 and 90 days. Major complications (grade 3-5) in 31 studies were fewer in the RARC group (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.94, p = 0.009), but this difference disappeared in the 30-day subanalysis. RARC was associated with lower blood transfusion rates (p < 0.001), lower length of stay (p < 0.001), faster return to regular diet (p < 0.001), and lower postoperative mortality rates (p < 0.001), but longer operating time. Conclusions: RARC appears to be associated with fewer complications and favoring perioperative outcomes in comparison with the open method. Due to the observational nature of most studies, larger randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lazaros Tzelves
- 2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Andreas Skolarikos
- 2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Mourmouris
- 2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Lazaros Lazarou
- 2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Kostakopoulos
- 2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Ali Riza Kural
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tyritzis SI, Gaya JM, Wallestedt-Lantz A, Pini G, Everaerts W, de Naeyer G, Palou J, Kelly J, Wiklund NP. Current role of robotic bladder cancer surgery. MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2019; 71:301-308. [PMID: 31086134 DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.19.03435-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radical cystectomy (RC) is one of the most complex and morbid surgical procedures in urology, that is not devoid of postoperative complications. Minimally invasive surgery, and especially robot-assisted RC (RARC) has emerged as an alternative to open RC (ORC) in an attempt to minimize surgical morbidity and facilitate the surgical approach. The aim of this paper was to present the current knowledge on the oncological efficacy and complication outcomes of RARC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A non-systematic review on all relevant studies with the keywords "Radical cystectomy," "Open," "Robot-assisted," "Complications," "Recurrence," "Survival," "Neobladder," "Potency," "Continence" and "Intracorporeal" was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, American Urological Association (AUA), European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS RARC shows similar lymph node yields and positive surgical margin rates as well as perioperative complication outcomes compared with ORC. RARC exhibits significantly less blood loss and less intra- and postoperative blood transfusion. Moreover, survival and recurrence rates are not related to the surgical approach. Finally, RARC seems to be more expensive and has a longer operating time compared to the open technique. CONCLUSIONS As current evidence shows, RARC seems as a technically feasible and safe procedure, providing equivalent perioperative and oncological results compared to ORC. More prospective, randomized-controlled trials are necessary to draw definitive conclusions on all comparative aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros I Tyritzis
- Section of Urology, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Sweden - .,Department of Urology, HYGEIA Hospital, Athens, Greece -
| | - Josep M Gaya
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Wallestedt-Lantz
- Section of Urology, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Sweden
| | - Giovannalberto Pini
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Turro Hospital, San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Wouter Everaerts
- Department of Urology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - John Kelly
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nils P Wiklund
- Section of Urology, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Sweden.,ICAHN School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ghodoussipour S, Ahmadi N, Hartman N, Cacciamani G, Miranda G, Cai J, Schuckman A, Djaladat H, Gill I, Daneshmand S, Desai M. Factors influencing intraoperative conversion from planned orthotopic to non-orthotopic urinary diversion during radical cystectomy. World J Urol 2018; 37:1851-1855. [PMID: 30519743 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2582-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine and investigate the intraoperative factors that contribute to a change in plan from continent orthotopic neobladder to ileal conduit or continent cutaneous diversion at the time of radical cystectomy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained bladder cancer database was performed. Of the 711 patients who underwent radical cystectomy from 2012 to 2016, 387 (54.4%) had given consent to have a NB. Of these 387 patients, 348 (89.9%) ultimately received a neobladder while 34 (8.8%) received an ileal conduit and 5 (1.3%) continent cutaneous diversion. The factors involved in the intraoperative change of plan were examined in this study. RESULTS Patients who ultimately received a neobladder were significantly more likely to have clinical node-negative disease (p = 0.045), negative soft tissue margins (p = 0.001), lower body mass index (p = 0.045) and higher volume surgeons (p < 0.001). Oncologic reasons for intraoperative conversions were more common than technical reasons (58.3% vs 35.9%), in both robotic and open surgical techniques. The choice of surgical approach (open vs robotic) did not influence the rate of intraoperative conversion. CONCLUSION The factors influencing intraoperative decision not to perform neobladder are predominantly oncologic rather than technical. A clear understanding of the factors involved in influencing the intraoperative change in the urinary diversion plan may improve shared decision making in patients undergoing radical cystectomy in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saum Ghodoussipour
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nariman Ahmadi
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Natalie Hartman
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Giovanni Cacciamani
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gus Miranda
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jie Cai
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anne Schuckman
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Inderbir Gill
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mihir Desai
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Soria F, Moschini M, D'andrea D, Abufaraj M, Foerster B, Mathiéu R, Gust KM, Gontero P, Simone G, Meraney A, Krishna S, Konety B, Rouprêt M, Perry M, Rowe E, Ploussard G, Boorjian SA, Wiklund P, Sooriakumaran P, Shariat SF. Comparative Effectiveness in Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic versus Open Radical Cystectomy: Results from a Multicenter Contemporary Retrospective Cohort Study. Eur Urol Focus 2018; 6:1233-1239. [PMID: 30455153 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2018] [Revised: 10/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The comparative effectiveness of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) versus open radical cystectomy (ORC) in terms of perioperative outcomes is still a matter of debate affecting payors, physicians, and patients. OBJECTIVE To evaluate comparative perioperative and longer-term morbidity of RARC versus ORC in a multicenter contemporary retrospective cohort of patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective multicenter study included patients with bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy at 10 academic centers between 2000 and 2017. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Intraoperative outcomes including blood loss and operative time as well as postoperative outcomes including time to discharge, complication, readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates at 30 and 90 d were assessed. Multiple imputation and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used. IPTW-multivariable-adjusted regression and logistic analyses were performed to evaluate the associations of RARC versus ORC with perioperative outcomes at 30 and 90 d. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 1887 patients (1197 RARC and 690 ORC) were included in the study. After IPTW-adjusted analysis, no differences between the groups in terms of preoperative characteristics were observed. RARC was associated with lower blood loss (p<0.001), shorter length of stay (p<0.001), and longer operative time (p=0.007). On IPTW-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses, no differences in terms of 30- and 90-d complications, reoperation, and mortality rates were observed. RARC was independently associated with a higher readmission rate at both 30 and 90 d. Limitations are mainly related to the retrospective nature of the study. CONCLUSIONS While RARC was associated with less blood loss and shorter hospital stay, it also led to longer operation times and more readmissions. There were no differences in 30- and 90-d complications. Because there are no apparent differences in safety between ORC and RARC in expert centers, differences in oncologic and cost-effectiveness outcomes are likely to drive decision making regarding RARC utilization. PATIENT SUMMARY In this study we investigated the differences between RARC and ORC in terms of perioperative outcomes. We found no difference in early and late complications. We concluded that, to date, differences in oncologic and cost-effectiveness outcomes should drive decision making regarding RARC utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - David D'andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Beat Foerster
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Romain Mathiéu
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Killian M Gust
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy
| | - Anoop Meraney
- Urology Division, Hartford Healthcare Medical Group, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Suprita Krishna
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Badrinath Konety
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne Université, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Matthew Perry
- Department of Urology, St George's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Edward Rowe
- Bristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Prasanna Sooriakumaran
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Uro-oncology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Modi PK, Hollenbeck BK, Oerline M, Weizer AZ, Montgomery JS, Kaffenberger SD, Ryan AM, Ellimoottil C. Real-World Impact of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Radical Cystectomy on Perioperative Outcomes and Spending. Urology 2018; 125:86-91. [PMID: 30366043 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Revised: 10/04/2018] [Accepted: 10/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of the minimally invasive approach on spending and perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. In a randomized control trial conducted at high-volume centers, robotic, and open cystectomy were shown to have similar outcomes. However, because the majority of cystectomies are performed in low-volume centers, it is unknown whether these findings are broadly generalizable. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified Medicare patients who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer between 2008 and 2015. We examined the length of stay, readmission rate, and 90-day spending after minimally invasive or open cystectomy. We used multiple regressions to estimate the association between minimally invasive surgery and the outcomes, accounting for patient, hospital, and surgeon factors that may influence these outcomes. RESULTS Of 4760 patients, 693 (14.6%) underwent minimally invasive cystectomy and 4067 (85.4%) had an open approach. Minimally invasive cystectomy was associated with shorter length of stay (10.1 days vs 11.9 days, P <.001), but no difference in readmission rate (27.4% vs 26.8%, P = .77). Minimally invasive cystectomy was associated with lower adjusted 90-day episode spending ($34,369 vs $38,071, P <.001). CONCLUSION In patients across diverse institutions in the United States, minimally invasive cystectomy was associated with a shorter length of stay than open cystectomy and reduced 90-day episode spending, but with no significant difference in readmission rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parth K Modi
- Department of Urology, Division of Urologic Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Urology, Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | - Brent K Hollenbeck
- Department of Urology, Division of Urologic Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Urology, Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Mary Oerline
- Department of Urology, Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Alon Z Weizer
- Department of Urology, Division of Urologic Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jeffrey S Montgomery
- Department of Urology, Division of Urologic Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Samuel D Kaffenberger
- Department of Urology, Division of Urologic Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Andrew M Ryan
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Chad Ellimoottil
- Department of Urology, Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Postoperative management of radical cystectomy. Review of the evidence on the prevention and treatment of urological complications. Actas Urol Esp 2018; 42:143-151. [PMID: 28587844 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2017.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2017] [Accepted: 04/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES This review article focuses on the prevention and management of the most common postoperative urological complications of radical cystectomy. We reviewed the current literature and conducted an analysis of frequency, prevention and treatment of complications. ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE We conducted a search on Medline to identify original articles, literature reviews and editorials focusing on the urological complications of radical cystectomy during the first 90 days after surgery. We identified those series that included more than 100 patients. SYNTHESIS OF THE EVIDENCE The literature regarding the prevention and treatment of complications after cystectomy is in general retrospective and nonstandardised. The level of evidence is generally low, and it is difficult to make evidence-based recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Progress has been made in recent years in reducing mortality and preventing the complications of cystectomy. The most common complications are gastrointestinal, for which significant efforts have been made to implement ERAS and Fast Track protocols. The complications that can most significantly change patients' quality of life are urinary stoma.
Collapse
|
11
|
Sathianathen NJ, Risk MC, Konety BR. Lymphadenectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer and Upper Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 2018; 45:215-228. [PMID: 29650137 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2017.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
There are currently no reported randomized trials that characterize the staging or therapeutic benefit of performing a lymph node dissection in either bladder cancer or upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Several unanswered questions remain in this domain focused on the indications and patient selection for pelvic lymph node dissection, extent of dissection, its impact on outcome, and potential risks. However, the results of observational studies suggest that the burden of metastasis is high in both diseases when muscle invasive and performing a lymphadenectomy can provide prognostic information and yield therapeutic benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niranjan J Sathianathen
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Delaware Street Southeast, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Michael C Risk
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Delaware Street Southeast, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Badrinath R Konety
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Delaware Street Southeast, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Farber NJ, Faiena I, Dombrovskiy V, Tabakin AL, Shinder B, Patel R, Elsamra SE, Jang TL, Singer EA, Weiss RE. Disparities in the Use of Continent Urinary Diversions after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer. Bladder Cancer 2018; 4:113-120. [PMID: 29430511 PMCID: PMC5798533 DOI: 10.3233/blc-170162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Background: Radical cystectomy (RC) with ileal conduit (IC) or continent diversion (CD) is standard treatment for high-risk non-invasive and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Objective: Our aim is to study contemporary trends in the utilization of ICs and CDs in patients undergoing RC. Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample 2001–2012, we identified all patients diagnosed with a malignant bladder neoplasm who underwent RC followed by IC or CD. Patient demographics, comorbidities, length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital complications, mortality, and costs were compared. Multivariable logistic regression analysis, Chi square, and t-tests were used for analysis. Results: Between 2001–2012, approximately 69,049 ICs and 6,991 CDs were performed. CDs increased from 2001 to 2008, but declined after 2008 (p < 0.0001). Patients of all ages received ICs at a higher rate than CDs (40–59 years: 79.5% vs. 20.5%; 60–69 years: 88.0% vs. 12.0%; p < 0.0001). There was a difference in males vs. females (10.2% vs. 4.0%; OR 2.36) and Caucasians vs. African Americans (9.0% vs. 6.7%; OR 1.49) when comparing CD rates. CD rates were highest in the West, urban teaching centers, and large hospitals (p < 0.001). ICs were associated with higher rates of overall postoperative complications (p = 0.0185) including infection (p = 0.002) and mortality (p < 0.0001). In-hospital costs were greater for the CD group. Conclusions: The number of CDs has declined recently. Patients of all ages are more likely to receive ICs than CDs. Gender, racial, and geographic disparities exist among those receiving CDs. CDs are associated with lower rates of in-hospital complications and mortality, but higher in-hospital costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J Farber
- Division of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Izak Faiena
- Division of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Viktor Dombrovskiy
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Alexandra L Tabakin
- Division of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Brian Shinder
- Division of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Rutveej Patel
- Division of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Sammy E Elsamra
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Thomas L Jang
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Eric A Singer
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Robert E Weiss
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Robot-assistance is being increasingly used for radical cystectomy (RC). Fifteen years of surgical evolution might be considered a short period for a radical procedure to be established as the treatment of choice, but robot assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is showing promising results when compared with the current gold standard, open RC (ORC). In this review, we describe the current status of RARC and continue the discussion on the on-going RARC versus ORC debate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros Ioannis Tyritzis
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Center for Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery, Athens Medical Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Justin W Collins
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Center for Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery, Athens Medical Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Nils Peter Wiklund
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Center for Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery, Athens Medical Center, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tyritzis SI, Wiklund NP. Is the open cystectomy era over? An update on the available evidence. Int J Urol 2017; 25:187-195. [PMID: 29178344 DOI: 10.1111/iju.13497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
In 2018, robot-assisted radical cystectomy will enter its 15th year. In an era where an effort is being made to standardize complication reporting and videos of the procedure are readily available, it is inevitable and justified that like everything novel, robot-assisted radical cystectomy should be scrutinized against the gold standard, open radical cystectomy. The present comparison is focused on several parameters: oncological, functional and complication outcomes, and direct and indirect costs. Meta-analysis and prospective randomized trials comparing robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy have been published, showing an oncological equivalence and in some cases an advantage of robot-assisted radical cystectomy in terms of postoperative morbidity. In the present review, we attempt to update the available knowledge on this debate and discuss the limitations of the current evidence that prevent us from drawing safe conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros I Tyritzis
- Section of Urology, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.,Center for Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery, Athens Medical Center, Athens, Greece
| | - N Peter Wiklund
- Section of Urology, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Re: Pak et al.: Utilization Trends and Short-term Outcomes of Robotic Versus Open Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer (Urology 2017;103:117-123) and Borza et al.: No Differences in Population-based Readmissions After Open and Robotic-assisted Cystectomy: Implications for Post-discharge Care (Urology 2017;104:77-83). Urology 2017; 105:211. [PMID: 28450201 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.03.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2017] [Revised: 03/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|