The Impact of Multiple Prostate Biopsies on Risk for Major Complications Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Population-based Cohort Study

The role of mpMRI in qualification of patients with ISUP 1 prostate cancer on biopsy to radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

To investigate the role of mpMRI and high PIRADS score as independent triggers in the qualification of patients with ISUP 1 prostate cancer on biopsy to radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

Between January 2017 and June 2019, 494 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies were performed in our institution, including 203 patients (41.1%) with ISUP 1 cT1c-2c PCa on biopsy. Data regarding biopsy results, digital rectal examination, PSA, mpMRI and postoperative pathological report have been retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

In 183 cases (90.1%) mpMRI has been performed at least 6 weeks after biopsy. Final pathology revealed ISUP Gleason Grade Group upgrade in 62.6% of cases. PIRADS 5, PIRADS 4 and PIRADS 3 were associated with Gleason Grade Group upgrade in 70.5%, 62.8%, 48.3% of patients on final pathology, respectively. Within PIRADS 5 group, the number of upgraded cases was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

PIRADS score correlates with an upgrade on final pathology and may justify shared decision of radical treatment in patients unwilling to repeated biopsies. However, the use of PIRADS 5 score as a sole indicator for prostatectomy may result in nonnegligible overtreatment rate.

Independent Validation of a Diagnostic Noninvasive 3-MicroRNA Ratio Model (uCaP) for Prostate Cancer in Cell-Free Urine

BACKGROUND

Detection of prostate cancer (PC) based on serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing leads to many unnecessary prostate biopsies, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment of clinically insignificant tumors. Thus, novel and more accurate molecular biomarkers are required.

METHODS

Using reverse transcription quantitative PCR, we measured the concentrations of 45 preselected microRNAs (miRNAs) in extracellular vesicle-enriched cell-free urine samples from 4 independent patient cohorts from Spain and Denmark, including 758 patients with clinically localized PC, 289 noncancer controls with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and 233 patients undergoing initial transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy owing to PC suspicion (101 with benign and 132 with malignant outcome). Diagnostic potential was assessed by ROC and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

We identified and successfully validated 8 upregulated and 21 downregulated miRNAs in urine from PC patients. Furthermore, we validated a previously identified 3-miRNA diagnostic ratio model, uCaP (miR-222-3p*miR-24-3p/miR-30c-5p). High uCaP scores were distinctive of PC in urine samples from BPH vs PC patients in 3 independent cohorts [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.84, 0.71, 0.72]. Additionally, uCaP predicted TRUS biopsy results with greater accuracy than PSA (AUC uCaP = 0.644; AUC PSA = 0.527) for patients within the diagnostic gray zone (PSA ≤ 10 ng/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully validated a urine-based diagnostic 3-miRNA signature for PC (uCaP) in 3 independent patient cohorts from 2 countries. In the future, the simple and noninvasive uCaP test may be used to help more accurately select patients for prostate biopsy. Prospective clinical validation is warranted.

Functional results in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. An updated literature review

Prostate cancer is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer in men. The initial diagnosis is made in increasingly younger patients, so it seems to be essential to guarantee optimal functional results. We carried out a systematic search to define the functional results of each of the therapeutic options for localized prostate cancer. Radical prostatectomy generates a greater negative effect on urinary continence and erectile function compared to active surveillance and radiotherapy. Robotic surgery seems to offer better functional results, especially at the level of erectile function. Urinary and bowel symptoms are more pronounced after radiotherapy compared to other options. Patients must be warned of the possible functional results prior to choice of treatment.

A Population-Based Cohort Study of the Impact of Infectious Complications Requiring Hospitalization after Prostate Biopsy on Radical Prostatectomy Surgical Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To compare radical prostatectomy outcomes in men with and without exposure to a major infectious event within 30-days of a prior TRUS-biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included men who underwent radical prostatectomy from 2002 to 2013 in Ontario, Canada. Several linked administrative databases were used. Exposure was defined as hospitalization with evidence of a urinary tract infection or sepsis during the first 30-days after a prostate biopsy. The primary outcome was a composite of procedures indicative of a likely serious complication of radical prostectomy within the first 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included oncological, functional, and hospital related events within 2 years of radical prostatectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 26,254 patients were included in this study and 530 (2.02%) had a post-TRUS-biopsy infection. A similar proportion of patients with and without a post-TRUS-biopsy infectious event experienced the composite primary outcome (1.7% vs 1.1%; odds ratio [OR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-3.14; P = .16). However, exposed patients had significantly higher odds of perioperative blood transfusion (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.30-2.00; P <.001), bladder neck contracture (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.12-1.63; P = .002), and 30-day hospital readmission (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.47-2.95; P <.001), and a small but significant increase in length of hospital stay (P = 0.005). No other significant differences were observed.

CONCLUSION

Although prior infectious events are associated with increased risk of blood transfusion, bladder neck contracture, and hospital readmission following radical prostatectomy, results from this study suggest that major surgical complications, are not adversely affected by TRUS-biopsy related infections.