The Adjustable Transobturator Male System in Stress Urinary Incontinence After Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

Risk factors for a failed trial without catheter following convective water vapor thermal therapy (CWVTT-Rezum)

OBJECTIVES

Convective water vapor thermal therapy (CWVTT-Rezum) is a minimally invasive surgical therapy that is being increasingly utilized for bladder outlet obstruction. Most patients leave the site of care with a Foley catheter in place for a mean reported duration of 3-4 days. A minority of men will fail their trial without catheter (TWOC). We aim to identify the frequency of TWOC failure following CWVTT and its associated risk factors.

METHODS

Patients who underwent CWVTT at a single institution from October 2018 to May 2021 were retrospectively identified and pertinent data extracted. The primary endpoint was TWOC failure. Descriptive statistics were performed, and rate of TWOC failure was determined. Potential risk factors for failed TWOC were assessed through univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients were analyzed. Seventeen percent (20/119) had a failed TWOC on their first attempt. Of those, 60% (12/20) failed in a delayed fashion. In patients who failed, the median number of total TWOC attempts required for success was two (interquartile range [IQR] = 2-3). All patients eventually had a successful TWOC. The median preoperative postvoid residual for successful and failed TWOC was 56 mL (IQR = 15-125) and 87 mL (IQR = 25-367), respectively. Preoperative elevated postvoid residual (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04; adjusted OR 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04) was associated with TWOC failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Seventeen percent of patients failed their initial TWOC after CWVTT. Elevated postvoid residual was associated with TWOC failure.

State of the art on stress incontinence management after benign prostatic obstruction surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is mostly seen after prostate surgery (radical prostatectomy or benign prostatic obstruction [BPO] relief). As new surgical techniques (laser, endoscopic enucleation) have been dramatically expanded in the past decade, a focus on postoperative SUI is necessary to provide the best management in this iatrogenic situation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Surgery is the main option for curative management of SUI after BPO as no oral medication is recommended. Preoperative work-up is mandatory to assess concomitant bladder dysfunction. All available surgical options (peri-urethral injections, periurethral balloons, various male slings, and artificial urinary sphincter) have been studied, but the level of evidence is very low. In this setting, SUI after BPO management is widely inspired from post-PR SUI management, mainly based on clinical experience.

SUMMARY

The available literature regarding persistent SUI after BPO relief is very scarce and further studies are warranted in this specific population.

Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) and male Readjustment Mechanical External (REMEEX) system for post-prostatectomy incontinence

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) compared to male Readjustment Mechanical External (REMEEX) system for post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis on adjustable device ATOMS compared to male REMEEX is presented. Studies on female or neurogenic incontinence were excluded. Primary objectives were evaluation of dryness (the proportion of patients with no-pad or one safety pad/day after device adjustment) and improvement between devices. Secondary objectives were complications and explant rate. They were estimated using a random-effect model. Statistical heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Cochran's Q test, Higgins's I² statistics and tau2.

RESULTS

Combined data of 29 observational studies with 1919 patients showed an equivalent proportion of patients treated with radical prostatectomy (p = .125) and previous radiation (p = .126). Dryness rate was 69.3% for ATOMS and 53.4% for male REEMEX (p = .008). Improvement rate was 90.8% for ATOMS and 80.2% for REMEEX (p = .007). Complication rate was 18.9% for ATOMS and 35.8% for REMEEX (p = .096) and explant rate was 5.5% for ATOMS and 13.9% for REMEEX (p = .027). Significant heterogeneity was evidenced, due to absence of randomized studies, variable incontinence severity baseline, difficulties for a common reporting of complications and difference in the follow-up. Differences observed between devices remained statistically significant when only studies with silicone-covered scrotal port (SSP) ATOMS and male REMEEX system II were considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the absence of direct comparison and the limitations observed ATOMS appears more effective than male REMEEX to treat PPI, and with less explant rate as reported in the literature.

Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) and Adjustable Continence Therapy (ProACT) for male stress incontinence

Background and purpose

Urinary incontinence is one of the most serious complications of prostate cancer treatment. The objective of this study was to assess efficacy and safety of Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) compared to Adjustable Continence Therapy (proACT) for male stress urinary incotinence according to literature findings.

Material and methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis on adjustable devices ATOMS and ProACT is presented. Studies on female or neurogenic incontinence were excluded. Differences between ATOMS and proACT in primary objective: dryness status (no-pad or one safety pad/day) after initial device adjustment, and in secondary objectives: improvement, satisfaction, complications and device durability, were estimated using random-effect model. Statistical heterogeneity among studies included in the meta-analysis was assessed using tau2, Higgins´s I2 statistics and Cochran´s Q test.

Results

Combined data of 41 observational studies with 3059 patients showed higher dryness (68 vs. 55%; p = .01) and improvement (91 vs. 80%; p = .007) rate for ATOMS than ProACT. Mean pad-count (-4 vs. -2.5 pads/day; p = .005) and pad-test decrease (-425.7 vs. -211.4 cc; p < .0001) were also significantly lower. Satisfaction was higher for ATOMS (87 vs. 56%; p = .002) and explant rate was higher for proACT (5 vs. 24%; p < .0001). Complication rate for ProACT was also higher, but not statistically significant (17 vs. 26%; p = .07). Mean follow-up was 25.7 months, lower for ATOMS than ProACT (20.8 vs. 30.6 months; p = .02). The rate of working devices favoured ATOMS at 1-year (92 vs. 76; p < .0001), 2-years (85 vs. 61%; p = .0008) and 3-years (81 vs. 58%; p = .0001). Significant heterogeneity was evidenced, due to variable incontinence severity baseline, difficulties for a common reporting of complications, different number of adjustments and time of follow-up and absence of randomized studies.

Conclusions

Despite the limitations that studies available are exclusively descriptive and the follow-up is limited, literature findings confirm ATOMS is more efficacious, with higher patient satisfaction and better durability than ProACT to treat male stress incontinence.

Effectiveness of Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) to Treat Male Stress Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS) is a surgical device developed to treat male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostate surgery. The objective was to assess the effectiveness of the ATOMS device to treat male SUI as described in the literature.

Methods

Two independent reviewers identified studies eligible for a systematic review and meta-analysis of various sources written in English, German and Spanish, using the databases PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. We excluded studies on female incontinence. We employed the DerSimonian and Laird method for defining heterogeneity, calculating the grouped standard mean deviation (SMD). The primary objective of this review is the assessment of clinical efficacy based on the achievement of dryness after device adjustment, defined as use of no pad or one safety pad per day (PPD). The secondary objective was focused on analysing improvement of incontinence with the device. Magnitude of effect was calculated by analysing decrease in pad count (PPD) and/or in 24-h pad test. Number and severity of complications according to Clavien–Dindo classification were also reviewed.

Results

The pooled data of 1393 patients from 20 studies (13 retrospective and 7 prospective) showed that treatment with ATOMS resulted in a mean 67% dryness rate and 90% improvement after adjustment. Mean total number of system fillings per patient was 2.4. Mean pad count and 24-h pad test decrease were − 4.14 PPD and − 443 cc, respectively. There is significant heterogeneity of the sample analysed, mainly based on variable baseline severity of incontinence, proportion of patients treated with irradiation and different generation devices. Proportion of irradiated patients affected dryness rate (p = 0.0014), together with baseline severity of incontinence (p = 0.0035) and different generation device used (p < 0.0001). Standardized mean follow-up was 20.9 months, with complications occurring in 16.4% (major complications 3.0%) and explantations in 5.75%. No randomized study has been developed so far to compare ATOMS to other devices for treating male SUI.

Conclusion

Despite the evidence being exclusively based on descriptive studies and limited follow-up, ATOMS has proven to be a safe alternative to treat different degrees of male SUI after prostate surgery. Better results are evidenced for patients with less than 6 PPD before implantation, non-irradiated patients and use of third-generation device with silicone-covered pre-attached scrotal port.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-018-0852-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS®) as treatment of stress urinary incontinence secondary to transurethral resection of the prostate

OBJECTIVES

Feasibility study to evaluate efficacy and safety of Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS^®) for male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after transurethral resection of the prostate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients were implanted ATOMS^® for SUI caused by transurethral resection of the prostate with or without radiotherapy. Incontinence severity was evaluated as mild (2 pads/day), moderate (3-5 pads/day) or severe (≥6pads/day), and dryness as none or one security pad/day. Changes in pad-test and pad-count after adjustment were investigated, together with operative parameters, patient satisfaction with the procedure, and number and grade of complications (Clavien-Dindo).

RESULTS

Median age was 76.5years. Five patients received previous pelvic radiation (3 prostate, 2 rectal cancer) and 2 (10%) previous failed artificial urinary sphincter with urethral erosion and mechanical failure, respectively. Preoperative SUI was mild in 4 (20%), moderate in 7 (35%) and severe in 9 (45%). Median filling of the system was 13.5ml. Median pad-test decreased from 375±855ml baseline to 10±31.5ml and pad-count from 4±3 to 0±1.5 after adjustment (1±3fillings). Postoperative SUI distribution was mild in 2 (10%), moderate in one (5%) and severe in 2 (10%). Satisfaction rate was 80%, equal for transurethral resection of the prostate with/without previous radiotherapy. No patient had urinary retention after catheter removal. Complications presented in 3 (15%) patients, all minor. After median 38.5mo follow-up no system has been removed, 19 (95%) self-considered better than before and 11 (55%) very much better.

CONCLUSION

Based on short-term efficacy and patient satisfaction ATOMS^® can be considered a realistic alternative for SUI after transurethral resection of the prostate, even after irradiation. Absence of urethral erosion and very limited problems make this alternative especially attractive for cases with diminished dexterity, advanced age and previous failed treatments.