Clinical Frailty Scale in Predicting Postoperative Outcomes in Older Patients Undergoing Curative Surgery for Urologic Malignancies: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Frailty Among Bladder Augmentation Patients: Healthcare Utilization and Perioperative Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of frailty on healthcare utilization in patients undergoing benign pelvic reconstructive surgery; specifically, bladder augmentation.

METHODS

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) was queried for adults undergoing bladder augmentation between 2005 and 2022. The Five-Item Frailty Index (FFI) was used to assign a score from 0 to 6. Healthcare resource utilization (HRU) was defined by 4 metrics: prolonged length of stay (PLOS), 30-day postoperative readmissions (AR), discharge to continued care (ie, non-home location) (DCC), overall HRU which is a composite of the other 3 outcomes, and complications. Multivariable risk-adjusted regression models were generated.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty-four patients were included, the majority being white (71%), female (52%), with a median age of 49 years. After controlling for baseline variables, higher FFI score (≥2) was independently associated with PLOS (OR 1.90 [1.02-3.53], P = .04), DCC (OR 2.76 [1.24-6.15], P = .01), and greater overall HRU (OR 2.64 [1.29-5.40], P = .008) but not AR (OR 2.27 [0.99-5.19], P = .05). Higher frailty (FFI ≥2) was independently associated with experiencing any complication (OR 2.32 [1.16-4.64], P = .02) as well as major complications (Clavien ≥3) (OR 2.56 [1.15-5.7] P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Frail adults undergoing bladder augmentation experience greater HRU and complications. This highlights the importance of frailty in benign pelvic reconstructive surgery and stresses the need for interventions to optimize frail patients.

The impact of frailty as a critical mediator causing postoperative neurocognitive disorders in postoperative cardiac patients

Frailty is prevalent in elderly cardiac patients and may be a critical predictor of post-operative neurocognitive disorders (PND). The aim of this review was to demonstrate the correlation of frailty with PND in postsurgical elder patients. A review of published literature and bibliometric analysis was undertaken. Electronic databases from 2009 to 2022 were searched to identify articles that evaluated the relationship between frailty and PND in aging populations. Demographic data, type of surgery performed, frailty measurement, and impact of frailty on PND were extracted from the selected studies. The quality of the studies and risk of bias were assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, and the included articles were assessed as medium to high quality. Eighty-one studies were selected for the Bibliometric review in terms of research trends and hotpots. Additionally, 35 observational studies (prospective and retrospective cohorts) were selected for this review. The mean age ranged from 63 to 84 years and included patients undergoing cardiac, orthopedic, and other surgeries who had cardiac symptoms. Regardless of how frailty was measured, the strongest evidence in terms of numbers of studies, consistency of results, and study quality was for associations between frailty and PND. This analysis found a steadily growing focus on frailty and PND research in cardiac and other patients. The observational studies account for the majority of this area, and frailty occurred in the older cardiac patients over 60 years of age, and pre-screening of frailty can be predictive of PND and mortality.

Associations of physical frailty with incidence and mortality of overall and site-specific cancers: A prospective cohort study from UK biobank

OBJECTIVE

Evidence regarding the role of physical frailty in cancer-related outcomes is limited. We aimed to examine the association of frailty with cancer incidence and mortality risk.

METHODS

This prospective study included 348,144 participants free of cancer at baseline from the UK Biobank. Frailty phenotypes (non-frail, pre-frail, and frail) were constructed from 5 components: weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, slow gait speed, and low grip strength. The outcome was incidence and mortality of overall and cite-specific cancers. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate the association of frailty phenotypes with cancer incidence and mortality risk.

RESULTS

A total of 43,304 incident cancer cases and 10,152 cancer deaths were documented during a median of 12.0 years of follow-up. For overall cancer, compared with non-frailty, the incidence risk increased by 4% for pre-frailty and 11% for frailty, and the mortality risk increased by 11% for pre-frailty and 39% for frailty. Frailty phenotypes were also dose-dependently associated with a higher risk of incidence and mortality of some site-specific cancers (including liver and lung), with significant sex differences. We observed a synergetic association of frailty phenotypes and smoking with overall cancer incidence and mortality risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty phenotypes contributed significantly to a higher risk of overall and some site-specific cancers incidence and mortality in a stepwise manner or within individual categories. Future studies are warranted to emphasize the identification, management and prevention of frailty in the whole population and complements of lifestyle-targeted interventions such as quitting smoking.

The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) employment in the frailty assessment of patients suffering from Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs): A systematic review

Background

The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a well-established tool that has been widely employed to assess patients' frailty status and to predict clinical outcomes in the acute phase of a disease, but more information is needed to define the implications that this tool have when dealing with Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs).

Methods

An electronic literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases to identify studies employing the CFS to assess frailty in patients with NCDs.

Findings

After database searching, article suitability evaluation, and studies' quality assessment, 43 studies were included in the systematic review. Researches were conducted mostly in Japan (37.5%), and half of the studies were focused on cardiovascular diseases (46.42%), followed by cancer (25.00%), and diabetes (10.71%). Simplicity (39.29%), efficacy (37.5%), and rapidity (16.07%) were the CFS characteristics mostly appreciated by the authors of the studies. The CFS-related results indicated that its scores were associated with patients' clinical outcomes (33.92%), with the presence of the disease (12.5%) and, with clinical decision making (10.71%). Furthermore, CFS resulted as a predictor of life expectancy in 23 studies (41.07%), clinical outcomes in 12 studies (21.43%), and hospital admissions/readmissions in 6 studies (10.71%).

Discussion

CFS was found to be a well-established and useful tool to assess frailty in NCDs, too. It resulted to be related to the most important disease-related clinical characteristics and, thus, it should be always considered as an important step in the multidisciplinary evaluation of frail and chronic patients.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp? PROSPERO 2021, ID: CRD42021224214.

Frailty is associated with poor prognosis after resection for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

With population aging, the number of frail patients with pancreatic cancer has increased. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a simple and validated tool to assess frailty, and higher scores predict worse clinical outcomes after cardiovascular surgery. In this retrospective study, we aimed to examine the association of preoperative frailty with prognosis after resection for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 142 consecutive patients undergoing resection for pancreatic cancer between April 2010 and December 2018. We used the CFS: 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill) to assess frailty and examined associations of the CFS scores with recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs), controlling for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of the 142 patients, 113 (80%) had CFS scores of ≤ 3, 13 (9.2%) scores of 4, and 16 (11%) scores of ≥ 5. Scores of ≥ 5 on the CFS were associated with worse CSS (univariable HR: 2.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-5.18, P = 0.019; multivariable HR: 2.49, 95% CI 1.05-5.34, P = 0.039) and OS (univariable HR: 2.42, 95% CI 1.19-4.46, P = 0.016; multivariable HR: 2.25, 95% CI 1.05-4.43, P = 0.038). The association between CFS scores and RFS was not significant in multivariable analysis (univariable HR: 2.11, 95% CI 1.08-3.79, P = 0.030; multivariable HR: 1.47, 95% CI 0.71-2.83, P = 0.29).

CONCLUSION

Higher scores on the CFS are associated with worse CSS and OS after resection for pancreatic cancer. Preoperative measurement of frailty may improve risk assessment among patients with pancreatic cancer.

Safety and efficacy of different anesthetic regimens for parturients with COVID-19 undergoing Cesarean delivery: a case series of 17 patients

Purpose

To assess the management and safety of epidural or general anesthesia for Cesarean delivery in parturients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and their newborns, and to evaluate the standardized procedures for protecting medical staff.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the cases of parturients diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection disease (COVID-19). Their epidemiologic history, chest computed tomography scans, laboratory measurements, and SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid positivity were evaluated. We also recorded the patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics, anesthesia and surgery-related data, maternal and neonatal complications, as well as the health status of the involved medical staff.

Results

The clinical characteristics of 17 pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 were similar to those previously reported in non-pregnant adult patients. All of the 17 patients underwent Cesarean delivery with anesthesia performed according to standardized anesthesia/surgery procedures. Fourteen of the patients underwent continuous epidural anesthesia with 12 experiencing significant intraoperative hypotension. Three patients received general anesthesia with tracheal intubation because emergency surgery was needed. Three of the parturients are still recovering from their Cesarean delivery and are receiving in-hospital treatment for COVID-19. Three neonates were born prematurely. There were no deaths or serious neonatal asphyxia events. All neonatal SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid tests were negative. No medical staff were infected throughout the patient care period.

Conclusions

Both epidural and general anesthesia were safely used for Cesarean delivery in the parturients with COVID-19. Nevertheless, the incidence of hypotension during epidural anesthesia appeared excessive. Proper patient transfer, medical staff access procedures, and effective biosafety precautions are important to protect medical staff from COVID-19.