Prognostic Indicators for Successful Low-intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction

Non-invasive alternative for phosphodiesterase inhibitor-refractory erectile dysfunction: Real-life experience with low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy

This retrospective study assessed the efficacy of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients unresponsive to phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDE5is). Between May 2020 and December 2022, we retrospectively analyzed the records of 126 ED patients who underwent Li-ESWT post unsuccessful PDE5is trials, defined as inadequate response following at least 6 consistent trials with correct dosage (preference given to 20 mg tadalafil). Patients with neurogenic disorders were excluded. Patients' ED severity was determined using the IIEF-5 score and further categorized into 2 groups. The Li-ESWT treatment protocol consisted of 12 weeks. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired t-tests. In the cohort of 126 patients, the mean age was 50.5 ± 12.4 years, with a BMI of 29.18 ± 3.49. Notably, 74.6% had ED for more than 12 months. Before Li-ESWT, 55.6% used sildenafil and 44.4% used tadalafil. Post 3 months of Li-ESWT, the average IIEF score rose significantly from 10.19 ± 7.71 to 14.29 ± 0.92 (P < .01). Particularly, Group 2 exhibited a significant improvement in their mean IIEF score from 13.78 ± 1.38 pretreatment to 21 ± 2.31 post-treatment. However, Group 1 (with higher diabetes prevalence) showed a marginal rise from 5.8 ± 1.47 to 6.1 ± 3.2 (P = .14). Similarly, the overall EHS score progressed significantly from 1.34 ± 0.8 to 2.3 ± 1.17 post-treatment. Post-treatment, while Group 1 showed no changes in successful vaginal penetration, Group 2 reported a dramatic increase in successes, from 16 before treatment to 68 after. This study demonstrated the efficacy of Li-ESWT for PDE5is-refractory ED, particularly in patients with moderate to mild ED. However, patients with severe ED and comorbidities did not show significant improvement. Further research with larger sample sizes, control groups, longer follow-up periods, and standardized protocols is required to confirm the effectiveness and limitations of Li-ESWT in ED treatment.

Conservative Non-surgical Options for Erectile Dysfunction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This study aimed to review recent evidence on conservative non-surgical options for erectile dysfunction (ED) in men. A narrative review of the literature was performed. A comprehensive search in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases was done. Papers in English language, published from May 2017 until May 2022, were included. Papers reporting basic research or animal research were excluded, as long as reviews or meta-analyses. Congress reports, clinical cases, or clinical trials protocols with no results were also excluded.

RECENT FINDINGS

We found a multitude of different treatment modalities for ED. We must take into account the type of patient, their comorbidities, the origin of their ED, and its severity in order to reproduce effective results using these therapies. Some of the treatments show good results with a good level of evidence (new IPDE5 formulations, intracavernous injections, shock wave therapy, hormonal theraphy, psycho-sexual theraphy). However, others (some new molecules, stem cell theraphy, platelet-rich plasma injections, oxygenation-based therapy, nutraceuticals), although some of them present promising results, require randomized studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up time to be able to establish firm recommendations. Regarding the conservative treatment of erectile dysfunction, in recent years, some therapies have been consolidated as effective and safe for certain types of patients. On the other hand, other treatment modalities, although promising, still lack the evidence and the necessary follow-up to be recommended in daily practice.

Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy for diabetic men with erectile dysfunction: A systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a very common complication in men with diabetes mellitus (DM). Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT) offers a promising nonsurgical treatment option for ED. A systematic scoping review investigating the outcomes of Li-ESWT in diabetic men with ED has not yet been performed.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review animal and clinical studies related to the use of Li-ESWT for treatment of DM-related ED.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched, unrestricted by dates or study design.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included qualitative studies, quantitative studies, primary research studies, meta-analyses, and research letters written in English. Full text reviewing was completed in all animal and human studies discussing Li-ESWT for the treatment of ED in subjects with DM. Data extracted included the journal citation, publication year, country of origin, study design, and a summary of the pertinent findings.

RESULTS

Our search yielded nine clinical studies and 10 animal studies. The results of the clinical studies suggest that Li-ESWT is a safe and effective treatment in men with well-controlled DM and moderate or better ED. However, the benefit is less durable in diabetic men than nondiabetic men. The results of the animal studies suggest that Li-ESWT can significantly improve erectile function in diabetic rat models with ED.

CONCLUSIONS

The examined studies present encouraging results for the use of Li-ESWT to treat diabetic men with ED. Future studies, particularly robust randomized controlled trials, are necessary to confirm these findings and provide long-term follow-up.

A single-centre result of two courses of low-intensity shockwave therapy (Li-SWT) in erectile dysfunction

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of two courses of low-intensity shock wave therapy (Li-SWT) in the treatment of patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). Between June 2015 and December 2020, diabetic and non-diabetic patients with ED treated with two Li-SWT courses were evaluated retrospectively among the data of 317 patients. The outcomes were evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) questionnaire values at baseline and 6 months post-treatment for each Li-SWT course with (0.09 mJ/mm²) 18000 shock waves. Successful treatment criteria for patients who also underwent physical examination and anamnesis before and after each course were IIEF-EF scores≥26 during the 6 months follow-up. Forty-one patients with a mean age of 51.61 ± 11.80 years were included in the study. The mean IIEF-EF scores were 15.17 ± 3.75 at baseline, 21.61 ± 3.60 after the first course [mean difference(MD): -6.439; 95%, confidence interval(CI), -7.138: -5.740; t = -18.621; p < 0.001], and 25.27 ± 4.05 after the second course(MD: -3.658; 95% CI, -4,067: -3.249; t = -18,071; p < 0.001). Evaluation of score increases in diabetic patients was also statistically significant for each course (p < 0.001). Our study shows that two courses of Li-SWT treatments are safe for both diabetic and non-diabetic patients with ED and effective for each course.

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Enhances the Cisplatin Efficacy by Improving Tissue Infiltration and Cellular Uptake in an Upper Urinary Tract Cancer Animal and Human-Derived Organoid Model

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively rare cancer with a poor prognosis if diagnosed at an advanced stage. Although cisplatin-based chemotherapy is a common treatment strategy, it has a limited response rate. Shock wave lithotripsy is a common treatment for upper urinary tract stones. Low-energy shock waves (LESWs) temporarily increase tissue permeability and enhance drug penetration to the targeted tissue. However, no study has investigated the efficacy of the combination of shock wave lithotripsy and chemotherapy in UTUC. Hence, in this study, we aimed to identify the potential application of the combination of LESW and chemotherapy in UTUC. We evaluated the synergistic effects of LESW and cisplatin in vitro, in vivo, and in patient-derived organoid (PDO) models. Compared with cisplatin alone, the combination treatment caused more significant tumour suppression in vitro and in animal models, without increased toxicity. Histological examination showed that compared with animals treated with cisplatin alone, those who received the combination treatment showed more deteriorated cell arrangement and cell oedema. Moreover, LESW improved the cytotoxicity of cisplatin in the preclinical PDO model of UTUC. Thus, LESW combined with cisplatin is a potential new antitumour strategy for improving the treatment response in locally advanced UTUC.

Comparison of the efficacy of low-intensity shock wave therapy and its combination with platelet-rich plasma in patients with erectile dysfunction

We aimed to compare the efficacy of low-intensity shock wave therapy (Li-SWT) alone and its combination with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). Between January 2015 and October 2020, patients who did not benefit from the use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i; 5 mg/day) for at least 3 months and underwent Li-SWT or Li-SWT with PRP were evaluated retrospectively. There were 93 patients who were subjected to Li-SWT only (Group 1) and 91 patients subjected to Li-SWT with PRP (Group 2). Analysis of the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function Area (IIEF-EF) scores showed a significant increase in both the groups post-treatment (Group 1: from 14.33 ± 4.39 to 23.8 ± 4.37, p = .001; Group 2: from 17.82 ± 3.44 to 26.3 ± 2.55, p = .001). When the increase in the IIEF-EF scores was compared pre- and post-treatment between the groups with respect to the ED grades, there was no statistically significant difference between them. Furthermore, while the intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) in successfully treated patients of Group 1 remained the same, Group 2 presented 1.5-3.5 times (mean, 2.4) prolongation. Their mean IELT score showed an increase from 2.2 (0.8-3.5) min to 5.3 (2.8-10.5) min. Our study shows that combination treatment of Li-SWT with PRP injections is not only safe for patients with ED, but also effective and safe in prolonging the IELT.

Restorative Therapies for Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statement From the Sexual Medicine Society of North America (SMSNA)

INTRODUCTION

Current non-invasive treatments for erectile dysfunction (ED) include oral medications, intracavernosal injections, and vacuum-assisted devices. Though these therapies work well for many, a subset of patients have contraindications or are unsatisfied with these options. Restorative therapies for ED are a new frontier of treatments focused on regenerating diseased tissue and providing a potential "cure" for ED.

AIM

The aim of this position statement is to examine existing clinical trial data for restorative therapies and identify elements that require further research before widespread adoption.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify all clinical trials performed with regenerative therapy for ED. This includes treatments such as stem cell therapy (SCT), platelet rich plasma (PRP), and restorative related technologies like low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiSWT).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Most clinical trials in restorative therapies were assessed for safety, feasibility, or efficacy. This included recording adverse events, changes in sexual function and erectile function questionnaires, and diagnostics measures.

RESULTS

To date there is an absence of robust clinical data supporting the efficacy of restorative therapies regarding ED, though technologies such as LiSWT have established relative safety.

CONCLUSIONS

Restorative therapies are a promising technology that represents a new frontier of treatment geared towards reversing disease pathology rather than just treating symptoms. However, current published clinical studies are limited. Future work needs to be adequately powered, multi-center, randomized, sham/placebo-controlled trials in well-characterized patient populations to ensure safety and demonstrate efficacy. Until these studies are done, restorative therapies should be reserved for clinical trials and not offered in routine clinical practice. Liu JL, Chu KY, Gabrielson AT, et al. Restorative Therapies for Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statement From the Sexual Medicine Society of North America (SMSNA). J Sex Med 2021;9:100343.