Robotic Simultaneous Repair of Rectovesical Fistula With Vesicourethral Anastomotic Stricture after Radical Prostatectomy: Step-by-Step Technique and Outcomes

A comprehensive review of urinary tract fistulas: the evolution of etiologies, surgical techniques, and contemporary outcomes

Urinary tract fistulas (UTFs) are abnormal connections between the urinary tract and adjacent structures such as the bowel, vagina, or blood vessels. UTFs result in significant personal, social, and financial challenges to patients worldwide. This review investigates the various causes, risk factors, symptoms, and historical evolution of repair techniques of UTFs. This focuses on the shift from open surgery to minimally invasive techniques, particularly the growing utilization of robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) approaches. This review emphasizes the growing role of RAL surgery in treating UTFs, citing its advantages of reduced blood loss, low recurrence rates, and decreased postoperative complications while acknowledging challenges such as limited access to the RAL platform and longer surgical times. The study concludes with advocacy for more widespread access to the RAL platform as well as more research, including randomized controlled trials, to further refine the body of evidence and promote patient outcomes.

Use of omentum during robotic-assisted reconstructive urological surgery: a systematic review of the current literature

PURPOSE

Due to its biological properties, the omentum is a very useful tool in the hands of reconstructive urologists. The purpose of this systematic review is to present all existing evidence regarding the use of omentum during different robotic-assisted reconstructive urological surgeries.

METHODS

In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines, three databases (PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane) were systematically screened. The following search string was used: (omentum OR omental) AND robotic. Retrospective studies and case-series were included, while case-reports were not included.

RESULTS

13 studies met all eligibility criteria and were included in final qualitative synthesis. Seven studies reported robotic vesicovaginal fistula repair, two studies reported robotic vesicouterine or vesicocervical fistula repair, one study reported robotic rectovesical fistula repair, one study reported robotic rectourethral fistula repair, one study reported ureterolysis with omental wrap and one study reported robotic repair of long ureteral strictures with omental wrap and autologous onlay flap or graft ureteroplasty. Recurrence rates ranged from 0% to 6.7%. The Grade I-II complications according to Clavien-Dindo Classification ranged from 0 to 40%, while no Grade III-IV were reported.

CONCLUSION

Robotic repair with the use of omentum is potentially a feasible, safe and efficient approach for complicated urological surgeries, such as vesicovaginal, vesicouterine, vaginocervical, rectovesical and rectourethral fistulas, idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis and long ureteral strictures. Because the evidence is based on small case series, further publications are needed to enhance confidence in omental harvesting and render it a routine component of reconstructive Urology.

Robotic management of urinary fistula

Objectives

To highlight critical preoperative and intraoperative considerations in approaching fistula repair robotically.

Methods

A search of the literature was conducted to identify relevant articles pertaining to robotic management of urinary fistulae.

Results

Fistulae of the genitourinary tract can be a challenging dilemma for urologists, as definitive management may require surgical intervention. Pathogenesis of both enteric and non-enteric fistulae are multifactorial, and successful repair hinges on the meticulous perioperative evaluation, planning, and execution. Traditional open techniques can subject patients to increased morbidity and prolonged hospitalizations. Since its introduction, the robotic surgical platform has continued to expand its indications. Its three-dimensional visualization and tremor free wristed instrument movements have made the robotic platform an attractive option for genitourinary fistula reconstruction.

Conclusion

Robotic management of complex urinary fistulae is feasible in expert hands; more studies are needed to define its role in the treatment algorithm of this devastating conditions.

Flaps and Grafts in Robotic Reconstructive Surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The robotic approach is increasingly popular in reconstructive urology. Reconstructive surgeons have commonly used flaps and grafts for obliterating dead space including tissue interposition or as an alternative to mesh in addressing lower urinary tract dysfunction. Advantages of the robotic approach are less incisional pain, excellent visualization in the deep pelvis, and improved surgeon ergonomics. In this literature review, we describe flaps and grafts used in lower urinary tract robotic reconstructive urology, serving as an almanac for these techniques.

RECENT FINDINGS

Omental, peritoneal, vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (VRAM), sigmoid epiploica, gracilis flaps, and Alloderm™ have been reported for tissue interposition during fistula repair. Fascia lata has been described as a mesh alternative for robotic sacrocolpopexy. Besides providing interposition, flaps support native tissue healing and blood supply. Grafts are easy to use with low patient morbidity, but rely on the blood supply at the recipient site. Robotic reconstruction is an emerging field, and more studies are needed to define the best uses for each flap and graft as well as strategies to maximize outcomes and minimize morbidity.

Robotic Management of Complex Vesicourethral Anastomosis Stenosis With Transperineal Urethral Advancement: A Step-by-Step Technique

BACKGROUND

Vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis (VUAS) refers to the diameter narrowing of a vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA). It is a known complication after radical prostatectomy that nowadays presents in less than 1% of these cases. When the lumen narrows sufficiently to impede urine flow, obstructive symptoms arise. While the incidence of VUAS used to be notably higher prior to the widespread use of the robotic approach, traditional procedures still fail in up to 42% of cases. Initial management typically involves endoscopic procedures, such as dilation, incision, or resection. If these approaches prove ineffective, VUA reconstruction is warranted. Following the resection of the unhealthy urethra, a potential drawback is the insufficient length of the healthy proximal urethral to reach the bladder without tension. In such cases, urinary diversion with an ileal conduit is an option. However, when the patient prefers to maintain an orthotopic urinary tract configuration, there is limited guidance in the literature regarding surgical techniques.

OBJECTIVE

To outline the indications, describe the step-by-step technique, and evaluate the outcomes of transperineal urethral advancement to facilitate a tension-free VUA.

MATERIALS

We first discuss the indications to identify which patients are candidates for this procedure. Then, a step-by-step description of the robotic VUA revision assisted by transperineal urethral mobilization is presented. Detailed steps and helpful hints are included. Finally, we outline the postoperative pathway and expected outcomes.

RESULTS

This technique allows patients with VUAS to preserve the orthotopic configuration of the urinary tract when a tension-free anastomosis proves challenging. Although urinary incontinence is expected, an artificial urinary sphincter could be placed in the following months.

CONCLUSION

The robotic management of complex vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis with transperineal urethral advancement is a feasible and safe procedure that requires the interdisciplinary management of robotic and reconstructive urologists.