Clinical and Urodynamic Determinants of Earlier Time to Failure for the Artificial Urinary Sphincter

Outcome of post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence surgery in men with preoperative idiopathic detrusor overactivity

Background

Urodynamic evidence of storage dysfunction such as detrusor overactivity (DO) and/or poor compliance are present in up to 30-40% of patients after Radical Prostatectomy (RP). However, the current optimal management of men with DO on preoperative urodynamics prior to male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery is not known.

Methods

We performed a systematic search of the literature including articles on patients undergoing SUI surgery after prostatectomy with preoperative DO between January 2003 and May 2023 to ensure contemporaneous data was obtained.

Results

We identified 11 eligible publications with a total of 792 patients. On Urodynamics, 29% (n = 229) patients had DO prior to SUI surgery. Overall 69% patients had a successful outcome after SUI surgery while 26% (132/499) failed while 34% (32/95) patients who had proven DO preoperatively failed SUI surgery. The difference was not statistically significant. Considering the sub-group analysis, the failure rate with preoperative DO was significantly higher in the sling group (43%) than in the AUS group (18%). The review was limited by the outcome heterogeneity, variability in study inclusion criteria, reporting and analysis and the quality of the available studies.

Conclusions

Within the limitations of the data, this review did not show a statistically significant higher failure rate of male incontinence surgery in patients with DO. Hence, patients with DO on preoperative urodynamics who are eligible for male SUI surgery should not be denied surgery but should be counselled appropriately of the risks and potential need for subsequent treatment, to manage expectations.

[Urinary stress incontinence in men: diagnostic workup and modern surgical treatment]

Radical prostatectomy is the most common cause of urinary stress incontinence in male patients. The exact pathophysiology is not clearly defined but probably due multifactorial. Thorough preoperative diagnostic workup before surgical therapy appears to be crucial for good postoperative results. Various systems are available. The artificial urinary sphincter continues to be considered standard procedure with a high success rate, even in patients with more complex situations and severe urinary incontinence. However, there are also relevant complication and revision rates. Modern alternatives include various sling systems. The adjustable sling systems consist of a cushion that is placed against the urethral bulb and leads to a permanent increase in urethral resistance, which can be readjusted in different ways depending on the system implanted. The adjustable sling systems also seem to be an alternative in patients with a prior history of radiation therapy. The AdVance XP sling (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) is a fixed sling that corrects the postoperative hypermobility of the posterior urethra after radical prostatectomy and, thus, leads to a longer functional urethral length. Good long-term results after AdVance XP implantation are only possible in selected patients.

Characterizing and Quantifying Material Fatigue of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter Pressure Regulating Balloon

OBJECTIVE

To characterize and quantify changes in elastic properties and in vivo pressure characteristics of pressure regulating balloons (PRB) over time, we conducted an analysis of the mechanical characteristics of the PRB after removal from patients for revision surgery.

METHODS

Pressure and elasticity characteristics of new and used 61-70 cm H2O PRBs were analyzed. Pressure-volume curves were generated using commercially available urodynamics equipment. PRB pressures were measured at a standard fill volume (23 cc). Elastance was calculated by the slope of the tangent line at the inflection point of the pressure-volume curve. Tests were repeated 5 times per PRB and intraclass correlations were used to gauge test-retest reliability. Regression models were used for continuous variables based on data distribution.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven used PRBs were analyzed after excluding 3 for alternative pressure ratings and 2 for occult pinpoint leaks. Time from artificial urinary sphincter placement to removal ranged from 0.02-17.6 years (median 8.4, interquartile range (IQR) 5.7-10.0). The mean pressure of all extracted PRBs: 58.8 cm H=O (± 7.4), 17 (62.9%) below the standard operating range. Each year of use in-vivo was associated with 1.09 cm H2O pressure loss on linear regression (P <.01 CI -1.52 to -0.65). PRB pressures were not significantly different according to indication for removal (1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) P = .11). Loss of elastance was non-linear, decreasing by 1.9% per year on Poisson regression (P <.01, CI -0.03 to -0.01). When accounting for PRB age, PRB pressure was independently associated with detrusor overactivity.

CONCLUSION

In PRBs tested for pressure-volume characteristics, increasing PRB age was associated with decreased pressure and elasticity.

Factors Influencing Postoperative Overactive Bladder after Adjustable Trans-Obturator Male System Implantation for Male Stress Incontinence following Prostatectomy

We aimed to determine the risk factors for postoperative overactive bladder (OAB) in patients treated with an adjustable trans-obturator male system (ATOMS) for stress incontinence after radical treatment of prostate cancer. A prospective study was performed on 56 patients implanted with an ATOMS for PPI. Clinical and urodynamic information was recorded before and after ATOMS implantation. We built a multivariate model to find out the clinical and urodynamic factors that independently influenced postoperative OAB and the prognostic factors that influenced the efficacy of medical treatment of OAB. We found that the clinical risk factors were the preoperative intensity of urinary incontinence (number of daily pads used and amount of urinary leakage), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) score, postoperative number of ATOMS adjustments, final cushion volume, and incontinence cure. The urodynamic data associated with OAB were cystometric bladder capacity, voided volume, volume at initial involuntary contraction (IC), maximum flow rate, bladder contractility index (BCI), and urethral resistance (URA). The prognostic factors for the efficacy of oral treatment of OAB were the volume at the first IC (direct relationship) and the maximum abdominal voiding pressure (inverse relationship). The multivariate model showed that the independent clinical risk factors were the daily pad count before the implantation and the ICIQ score at baseline and after treatment. The independent urodynamic data were the volume at the first IC (inverse relationship) and the URA value (direct relationship). Both predictive factors of treatment efficacy were found to be independent. Detrusor overactivity plays an important role in postoperative OAB, although other urodynamic and clinical factors such as the degree of urethral resistance and abdominal strength may influence this condition.

[Use of implants to treat male urinary incontinence]

Treatments for benign and malignant pathologies of the prostate can compromise urine control. Urinary incontinence (UI) affects the quality of life of patients and limits their ability to carry out usual activities. The degree of impact of UI is variable and the associated discomforts make patients seek treatment for it. At the center of the management of urinary incontinence in men are surgical interventions that seek to replace the affected sphincter function through implants. The artificial urinary sphincter since its development in the 1970s has been considered the standard of treatment for UI in men. More recently artificial sphincter and slings have been shown to be effective in a selected group of incontinent men. The goals of surgical treatment of incontinence include the preservation of bladder function, the ability to improve the strength of the urinary sphincter, and to reduce or eliminate urine leakage, and thereby improve the quality of life. The aim of the article is to present various implants for the correction of male urinary incontinence.