1
|
Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in a Laparoscopic Naïve Center. Adv Urol 2021; 2021:4731013. [PMID: 34306069 PMCID: PMC8279872 DOI: 10.1155/2021/4731013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic radical cystectomy is a challenging surgical procedure; however, it has been largely abandoned in favor of the more intuitive robotic-assisted cystectomy. Due to the prohibitive cost of robotic surgery, the adoption of laparoscopic cystectomy is of relevance in low-resource institutes. Methodology. This is a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) to open radical cystectomy (ORC) at a single institute. Each group included thirty patients. The trial was designed to compare both approaches regarding operative time, blood loss, transfusion requirements, length of hospital stay, time to oral intake, requirement of opioid analgesia, and complications. Results LRC was associated with less hospital stay (9.8 vs. 13.8 days, P=0.001), less time to oral solid intake (6 vs. 8.6 days, P=0.031), and lower opioid requirements (23.3% vs. 53.3%, P=0.033). There was a trend towards lower blood loss and transfusion requirements, but this did not reach statistical significance. Overall complication rates were comparable. Conclusion Laparoscopic radical cystectomy was associated with comparable postoperative outcomes when compared to ORC in the first laparoscopic cystectomy experience in our center. Benefitting from the assistance of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon is recommended to shorten the learning curve.
Collapse
|
2
|
Pekala KR, Yabes JG, Bandari J, Yu M, Davies BJ, Sabik LM, Kahn JM, Jacobs BL. The centralization of bladder cancer care and its implications for patient travel distance. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:834.e9-834.e20. [PMID: 34162498 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the impact of centralized surgical and nonsurgical care (i.e., radiation and chemotherapy) on travel distances and survival outcomes for patients with advanced bladder cancer. Bladder cancer is a disease with high mortality for which treatment access is paramount and survival is superior in patients receiving surgery at high-volume centers. METHODS Using SEER-Medicare, we identified patients 66 years or older diagnosed with bladder cancer between 2004-2013. We categorized patients as treated with either surgical (i.e., radical cystectomy) or nonsurgical (i.e., radiation or chemotherapy) care. We fit a linear probability model to generate the predicted proportion of patients treated at the top quintile of volume over time and assessed travel distance, 1-year all-cause mortality, and 1-year bladder cancer-specific mortality over time. RESULTS A total of 6,756 and 10,383 patients underwent surgical and nonsurgical care, respectively. The percentage of patients treated at high-volume centers increased over the study period for both surgical care (53% to 62%) and nonsurgical care (47% to 55%), (both P< 0.001). Median travel distance increased (11.8 to 20.3 miles) for surgical care and (6.5 to 8.3 miles) for nonsurgical care, (both P < 0.001). The 1-year adjusted all-cause mortality and 1-year adjusted bladder-cancer specific mortality decreased significantly for both surgical and nonsurgical care (both P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Over time, centralization of surgical and nonsurgical care for bladder cancer patients increased, which was associated with increasing patient travel distance and decreased all-cause and bladder-cancer specific mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jonathan G Yabes
- Center for Research on Health Care; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | | | | | | | - Lindsay M Sabik
- Center for Research on Health Care; Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health
| | - Jeremy M Kahn
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Bruce L Jacobs
- Department of Urology; Center for Research on Health Care
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leow JJ, Catto JWF, Efstathiou JA, Gore JL, Hussein AA, Shariat SF, Smith AB, Weizer AZ, Wirth M, Witjes JA, Trinh QD. Quality Indicators for Bladder Cancer Services: A Collaborative Review. Eur Urol 2020; 78:43-59. [PMID: 31563501 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT There is a lack of accepted consensus on what should constitute appropriate quality-of-care indicators for bladder cancer. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the optimal management of bladder cancer and propose quality indicators (QIs). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review was performed to identify literature on current optimal management and potential quality indicators for both non-muscle-invasive (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive (MIBC) bladder cancer. A panel of experts was convened to select a recommended list of QIs. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS For NMIBC, preoperative QIs include tobacco cessation counselling and appropriate imaging before initial transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT). Intraoperative QIs include administration of antibiotics, proper safe conduct of TURBT using a checklist, and performing restaging TURBT with biopsy of the prostatic urethra in appropriate cases. Postoperative QIs include appropriate receipt of perioperative adjuvant therapy, risk-stratified surveillance, and appropriate decision to change therapy when indicated (eg, bacillus Calmette-Guerin [BCG] unresponsive). For MIBC, preoperative QIs include multidisciplinary care, selection for candidates for continent urinary diversion, receipt of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy, time to commencing radical treatment, consideration of trimodal therapy as a bladder-sparing alternative in select patients, preoperative counselling with stoma marking, surgical volume of radical cystectomy, and enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. Intraoperative QIs include adequacy of lymphadenectomy, blood loss, and operative time. Postoperative QIs include prospective standardised monitoring of morbidity and mortality, negative surgical margins for pT2 disease, appropriate surveillance after primary treatment, and adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in appropriate cases. Participation in clinical trials was highlighted as an important component indicating high quality of care. CONCLUSIONS We propose a set of QIs for both NMIBC and MIBC based on established clinical guidelines and the available literature. Although there is currently a lack of level 1 evidence for the benefit of implementing these QIs, we believe that the measurement of these QIs could aid in the improvement and benchmarking of optimal care for bladder cancer. PATIENT SUMMARY After a systematic review of existing guidelines and literature, a panel of experts has recommended a set of quality indicators that can help providers and patients measure and strive towards optimal outcomes for bladder cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J Leow
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James W F Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ahmed A Hussein
- Department of Urology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Angela B Smith
- Department of Urology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC-Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Alon Z Weizer
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Manfred Wirth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ghodoussipour S, Naser-Tavakolian A, Cameron B, Mitra AP, Miranda G, Cai J, Bhanvadia S, Aron M, Desai M, Gill I, Schuckman A, Daneshmand S, Djaladat H. Internal audit of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for radical cystectomy. World J Urol 2020; 38:3131-3137. [PMID: 32112242 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03135-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To perform an internal audit 5 years after implementation of our enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for patients undergoing radical cystectomy and to investigate the importance of physician driven compliance on outcomes. METHODS Using a prospectively maintained database, 472 consecutive patients were identified who underwent radical cystectomy with ERAS from July 2013 to July 2017. Compliance was measured by a Composite Compliance Score (CCS) generated as a percentage of 16 interventions. Patients with higher than median compliance were compared to patients with lower compliance. The primary outcome was length of stay. Secondary outcomes included complication and readmission rates. Multivariable regressions were used to control for differences between groups. RESULTS In 2013, median CCS was 81% and subsequently ranged from 81 to 88%. Five-year median CCS was 88%. Patients with higher compliance (CCS ≥ 88%, n = 262), as compared to those with lower compliance (CCS < 88%, n = 210), were younger (median 70.3 vs 72.7 years, p = 0.047), healthier (ASA3-4 81% vs 89.9%, p = 0.007), received more orthotopic diversions (59.2% vs 37.6%, p < 0.0001), more often had open surgery (78.5% vs 51.9%, p < 0.0001) and had shorter median operative times (5.5 vs 6.3 h, p = 0.005). Median length of stay was 4 days. Higher compliance was associated with shorter hospital stays (β = - 0.85, 95% CI - 1.62 to - 0.07) and decreased 30-day readmissions (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.96). CONCLUSIONS Greater ERAS compliance was achieved in younger and healthier patients. Patients with greater compliance had a decreased length of stay by almost 1 day and reduced odds of 30-day readmissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saum Ghodoussipour
- USC Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Aurash Naser-Tavakolian
- USC Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Brian Cameron
- USC Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anirban P Mitra
- USC Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gus Miranda
- USC Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jie Cai
- USC Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sumeet Bhanvadia
- USC Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Monish Aron
- USC Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mihir Desai
- USC Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Inderbir Gill
- USC Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anne Schuckman
- USC Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- USC Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- USC Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Waingankar N, Mallin K, Egleston BL, Winchester DP, Uzzo R, Kutikov A, Smaldone M. Trends in Regionalization of Care and Mortality For Patients Treated With Radical Cystectomy. Med Care 2019; 57:728-733. [PMID: 31313685 PMCID: PMC7537145 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regionalization to higher volume centers has been proposed as a mechanism to improve short-term outcomes following complex surgery. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess trends in regionalization and mortality for patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). RESEARCH DESIGN An observational study of patients receiving RC in the United States from 2004 to 2013. SUBJECTS Data for patients receiving RC were extracted from the National Cancer Database. MEASURES The primary exposure was hospital volume; low-volume hospitals (LVH) included those with <5 RC/year and high-volume hospitals (HVH) were those with ≥30 RC/year. Trends in the volume were assessed, as were 30- and 90-day mortality. Cochrane-Armitage tests were performed for volume, and propensity score-weighted proportional hazard regression was used to assess mortality. RESULTS A total of 47,028 RC were performed in 1162 hospitals from 2004 to 2013. The proportion of RC at LVH declined from 29% to 17% (P<0.01), whereas that of HVH increased from 16% to 33% (P<0.01). Unadjusted 30- (P=0.02) and 90-day (P<0.001) mortality decreased, and the absolute decrease was greatest at LVH (4.8% vs. 2.6%, P=0.03), whereas rates for HVH remained stable (1.9% vs. 1.4%, P=0.34). Following risk-adjustment, relative to treatment at HVH, treatment at LVH was associated with increased 30-day (hazard ratio: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.53-1.80) and 90-day mortality (hazard ratio: 1.37, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-1.44). CONCLUSIONS Regionalization of RC to HVH was observed from 2004 to 2013. Treatment at LVH was associated with 66% and 33% relative increases in hazard of death at 30 and 90 days, respectively. These findings support the selective referral of complex cases to higher volume centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katherine Mallin
- American College of Surgeons, National Cancer Database, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Joshi SS, Handorf ER, Sienko D, Zibelman M, Uzzo RG, Kutikov A, Horwitz EM, Smaldone MC, Geynisman DM. Treatment Facility Volume and Survival in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2019; 3:104-111. [PMID: 31326500 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Revised: 06/02/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite improvements in medical management of advanced prostate cancer (aPC), it continues to be a leading cause of cancer death in men. Contemporary management of men with aPC is complex and requires resources to be more readily available at high-volume facilities. OBJECTIVE To determine the relationship between facility volume and survival in men with aPC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried from 2004 to 2013 for aPC, defined as T4, N+, or M+ disease, identifying 64815 patients. Six predefined patient cohorts were evaluated. Cohort "A" included all patients with aPC. "B" cohorts included only M0 patients. "C" cohorts included only M1 patients. Facilities were divided into quartiles based on median treatment volume (patients/yr). INTERVENTION Diagnosis and management of aPC at an NCDB-reporting facility. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Overall survival (OS) was assessed as a function of facility volume. Multivariable Cox regression models were fitted. Cox regressions using natural cubic splines were used to test for nonlinear relationships between volume and OS. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS OS improved as facility volume increased (top quartile vs bottom quartile, hazard ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.88, p<0.001) and was consistent across patient cohorts. Spline models demonstrate a continuous decrease in hazard of death as volume increases. Limitations include the retrospective analysis and a lack of precise treatment information. CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective analysis of nearly 65000 men who presented with aPC, we demonstrate an association between higher facility volume and improvements in OS. This OS advantage persisted with similar magnitudes of effect after narrowing the cohorts by disease and treatment characteristics. PATIENT SUMMARY In this retrospective review of the National Cancer Database, we analyzed the association between treatment facility volume and survival in men who are diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer. We found that survival improved as volume increased, indicating a possible imbalance of resources and expertise that favors higher-volume facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shreyas S Joshi
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Elizabeth R Handorf
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Danielle Sienko
- Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Matthew Zibelman
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert G Uzzo
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Eric M Horwitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Marc C Smaldone
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel M Geynisman
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of the study is to review and summarize major additions to the literature as pertains to enhanced recovery protocols after radical cystectomy in the past year. RECENT FINDINGS Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols is multimodal pathways that include elements to optimize all stages of care including preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative measures. Several authors have recently presented their results with initial implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol after radical cystectomy, while others have begun to examine outcomes beyond the index admission and to refine the various targeted components of the protocol. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols has revolutionized patient care following radical cystectomy, a procedure still burdened by high complication rates and lengthy hospital stay. Although still lacking in universal implementation and standardization of the protocol, significant advancements are made each year as we move towards best practice.
Collapse
|
8
|
Nutt M, Scaief S, Dynda D, Alanee S. Ileus and small bowel obstruction after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Analysis from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Surg Oncol 2018; 27:341-345. [PMID: 30217287 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Revised: 05/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/11/2018] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate prevalence and predictors of postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO) and ileus in a large cohort of bladder cancer (BCa) patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC). METHODS All patients within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample who underwent RC for BCa between 2006 and 2012 were identified. First, prevalence of SBO and ileus was analyzed. Second, predictors of these bowel-related complications were identified using multivariable regression analyses. Third, the association between SBO, ileus, and length of stay was evaluated using logistic regression models adjusted for clustering. Prolonged length of stay was defined as hospital stay above mean stay of the population (>10 days). Fourth, the effect of SBO and ileus on mean inpatient cost of healthcare was examined. RESULTS Of overall 41,498 patients, 1071 (2.6%) experienced SBO, and 11,155 (26.9%) experienced ileus. Predictors of ileus included age, male gender, black race, hospital characteristics, anemia, chronic pulmonary disease, drug abuse, hypothyroidism, fluid and electrolyte disorders, and neurological disorders (all p < 0.05) Predictors of SBO included male gender, Asian/Pacific islander race, hospital characteristics, congestive heart failure, fluid and electrolyte disorders, and psychosis (all p < 0.05). . Postoperative SBO (odds ratio (OR) 19.587; 95% confidence interval (CI):15.869-24.167) and ileus (OR 5.646; 95% CI:5.336-5.974) were associated with prolonged length of stay (all p < 0.001).Median cost of hospital stay was $56.315 for patients who developed SBO, $32,472 for patients who developed ileus, and $24,600 for patients after cystectomy without ileus or SBO. CONCLUSIONS Significant prevalence of bowel-related complications in patients after RC was observed. These complications are strongly associated with prolonged length of stay and higher healthcare cost. Increasing awareness of SBO and ileus, identification of patients at risk prior to surgery, and implementation of protective strategies are strongly indicated in cystectomy patients.
.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Nutt
- Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Steve Scaief
- Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Danuta Dynda
- Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Shaheen Alanee
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bazargani ST, Ghodoussipour S, Tse B, Miranda G, Cai J, Schuckman A, Daneshmand S, Djaladat H. The association between intraoperative fluid intake and postoperative complications in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with an enhanced recovery protocol. World J Urol 2018; 36:401-407. [PMID: 29299662 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2164-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2017] [Accepted: 12/26/2017] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the association between intraoperative fluid intake and postoperative complications in patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer with an enhanced recovery protocol. METHODS 287 patients underwent open RC with enhanced recovery protocol (ERAS) from 2012 to 2016. 107 were excluded; non-urothelial (30), palliative (37), had adjunct procedures or not-consented (40). We prospectively evaluated intraoperative fluid intake (crystalloid, colloid and blood) and correlated with length of stay, 30- and 90-day complications. RESULTS 180 patients enrolled into the study with median age of 70 years (78% male). 71% underwent orthotopic diversion. Median intraoperative crystalloid and colloid intake were 4000 and 500 cc, respectively. Nineteen percent of patients received blood transfusion. Median length of stay was 4 days. The overall 30- and 90-day complication rates were 59 and 75%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regressions controlling for a subset of clinically relevant variables showed no significant association between intraoperative fluid intake and complications at 30 or 90 days (p = 0.88 and 0.62, respectively). A multivariable linear regression similarly showed no association between total intraoperative fluid intake and length of stay (p = 0.099). CONCLUSION Higher intraoperative fluid intake was not found to independently increase the complication rate following radical cystectomy. Larger studies and prospective trials are needed to determine if fluid optimization may play a role in decreasing morbidity after this major surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soroush T Bazargani
- Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Saum Ghodoussipour
- Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Beverly Tse
- Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Gus Miranda
- Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Jie Cai
- Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Anne Schuckman
- Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mesman R, Faber MJ, Berden BJ, Westert GP. Evaluation of minimum volume standards for surgery in the Netherlands (2003–2017): A successful policy? Health Policy 2017; 121:1263-1273. [PMID: 29056240 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Revised: 09/16/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
11
|
Manach Q, Rouprêt M, Reboul-Marty J, Drouin SJ, Guillot-Tantay C, Matillon X, Parra J, Mozer P, Bitker MO, Lefèvre JH, Phé V. Hospital Readmissions After Urological Surgical Procedures in France: A Nationwide Cohort Study over 3 Years. Eur Urol Focus 2017; 4:621-627. [PMID: 28753813 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2017] [Revised: 05/11/2017] [Accepted: 06/02/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identifying the predictive factors for hospital readmission is required to target preventive measures. OBJECTIVE To assess the rate of surgical readmissions after a urological procedure and the risk factors associated with readmission. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Data from all hospitalizations between January 2010 and November 2012 in France, regarding planned urological surgeries, were retrieved from the national medical database. To limit interactions between recent hospitalizations and surgical interventions, we selected only patients who were not hospitalized during the 12 mo preceding the urological procedure. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Primary outcome was the rate of readmissions within 30 d after urological surgery. The following risk factors for readmission were assessed: sex, age, diagnosis-related group, length of stay of initial hospitalization, type of hospitalization (conventional or day surgery), hospital volume activity, hospital volume for day surgery, and hospital status. Logistic regression multivariate analysis was used to assess risk factors. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 419 787 patients were included among whom 77 241 patients (18.40%) were readmitted within the following 30 d. After multivariate analyses, male sex (odds ratio [OR]=1.84, confidence interval [CI] 95%: 1.81-1.88), high level of comorbidity (diagnosis-related group 3-4 vs 1-2: OR=2.14, CI 95%: 2.10-2.21), and initial management in a private hospital (private vs university hospital: OR=1.13, CI 95%: 1.11-1.16; private vs public general hospital: OR=1.21, CI 95%: 1.18-1.23) were associated with a higher risk of readmission within 30 d. CONCLUSIONS Reported readmission rate within 30 d after a planned a urological procedure was nearly 20%. PATIENT SUMMARY In this French national study, we investigated the readmission rate within 30 d after a planned urological procedure in a large French population and discovered it was nearly 20%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quentin Manach
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Academic Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie Medical School, University Paris Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Academic Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie Medical School, University Paris Sorbonne, Paris, France.
| | - Jeanne Reboul-Marty
- Department of Medical Information, Marne la Vallée General Hospital, Jossigny, France
| | - Sarah J Drouin
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Academic Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie Medical School, University Paris Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Cyrille Guillot-Tantay
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Academic Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie Medical School, University Paris Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Xavier Matillon
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Academic Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie Medical School, University Paris Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Jérome Parra
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Academic Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie Medical School, University Paris Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Mozer
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Academic Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie Medical School, University Paris Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Marc-Oliver Bitker
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Academic Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie Medical School, University Paris Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Jérémie H Lefèvre
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-Antoine Academic Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie Medical School, University Paris Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Véronique Phé
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Academic Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie Medical School, University Paris Sorbonne, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Udovicich C, Perera M, Huq M, Wong LM, Lenaghan D. Hospital volume and perioperative outcomes for radical cystectomy: a population study. BJU Int 2017; 119 Suppl 5:26-32. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.13827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Cristian Udovicich
- Department of Urology; St Vincent's Hospital; Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Department of Surgery; Western Health; Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Department of Surgery; Mildura Base Hospital; Mildura Vic. Australia
| | - Marlon Perera
- Department of Surgery; Austin Health; The University of Melbourne; Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Molla Huq
- Department of Rheumatology; St Vincent's Hospital; Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Department of Medicine; The University of Melbourne; Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Lih-Ming Wong
- Department of Urology; St Vincent's Hospital; Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Department of Surgery; St Vincent's Hospital; The University of Melbourne; Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Daniel Lenaghan
- Department of Urology; St Vincent's Hospital; Melbourne Vic. Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Waingankar N, Mallin K, Smaldone M, Egleston BL, Higgins A, Winchester DP, Uzzo RG, Kutikov A. Assessing the relative influence of hospital and surgeon volume on short-term mortality after radical cystectomy. BJU Int 2017; 120:239-245. [PMID: 28192632 DOI: 10.1111/bju.13804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the relationship between surgeon (SV) and hospital volume (HV) on mortality after radical cystectomy (RC). PATIENTS AND METHODS We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for adult patients undergoing RC between 2010 and 2013. We calculated average volume for each surgeon and hospital. Using propensity-scored weights for combined volume groups with a proportional hazards regression model, we compared the associations between HV and SV with 90-day survival after RC. RESULTS A total of 19 346 RCs were performed at 927 hospitals by 2 927 surgeons in the period 2010-2013. The median (interquartile range) HV and SV were 12.3 (5.0-35.5) and 4.3 (1.3-12.3) cases, respectively. For HV, 90-day unadjusted mortality was 8.5% in centres with <5 cases/year (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.7-9.3) and 5.6% in those with >30 cases/year (95% CI 5.0-6.2). For SV, 90-day mortality was 8.1% for surgeons with <5 cases/year (95% CI 7.6-8.6) and 4.0% for those with >30 cases/year (95% CI 2.8-5.2; all P < 0.05). The 30-day mortality rate was lowest for the combined HV-SV groups with HV >30, ranging from 1.6% to 2.1%. CONCLUSIONS In hospitals reporting to the NCDB, volume was associated with improved mortality after RC. These associations appear to be driven by hospital- rather than surgeon-level effects. An elevated SV had a beneficial effect on mortality at the highest-volume hospitals. These findings inform efforts to regionalize complex surgical care and improve quality at community and safety net hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katherine Mallin
- American College of Surgeons, National Cancer Database, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | - David P Winchester
- American College of Surgeons, National Cancer Database, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Macleod LC, Rajanahally S, Nayak JG, Parent BA, Ramos JD, Schade GR, Holt SK, Dash A, Gore JL, Lin DW. Characterizing the Morbidity of Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testis Cancer in a National Cohort of Privately Insured Patients. Urology 2016; 91:70-6. [PMID: 26802801 PMCID: PMC5679272 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2015] [Revised: 12/28/2015] [Accepted: 01/14/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize morbidity of postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) for testis cancer, we analyze a contemporary national database. PC-RPLND is the standard for residual radiographic masses ≥1 cm (nonseminoma) and positron emission tomography-avid masses ≥3 cm (seminoma). Morbidity for PC-RPLND is greater than primary RPLND, which may be mitigated by performing surgery at a high-volume cancer center. METHODS Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition codes identified men with testis cancer undergoing PC- or primary RPLND in MarketScan (2007-2012). Multivariable logistic regression assessed factors associated with receiving adjunctive procedures (ie, nephrectomy, vascular reconstruction), prolonged hospitalization, and 90-day readmission. Geographic variables assessed regionalization of PC-RPLND. RESULTS Of 559 men with claims for PC- or primary RPLND (206, 37% PC-RPLND), 19% of PC-RPLND underwent adjunctive procedures (vs 1% among RPLND, P < .01). For PC-RPLND, the nephrectomy rate was 10% and the vascular reconstruction rate was 8%. On multivariable analysis, PC-RPLND was associated with undergoing adjunctive procedures (odds ratio 41.9; 95% confidence interval 11.7, 150) and prolonged hospitalization (odds ratio 3.75; 95% confidence interval 1.68, 8.42) compared to primary RPLND. PC-RPLND was not associated with 90-day readmission. Up to 29% of PC-RPLNDs are performed in centers, billing just a single case through MarketScan in the 6 years studied. CONCLUSION PC-RPLND is associated with adjunctive procedures and longer hospitalizations. Given the morbidity of PC-RPLND in this young patient population, efforts are needed to establish quality benchmarks for, reduce the morbidity of, and to accurately discriminate risk during patient discussions prior to this complex, specialized surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam C Macleod
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
| | - Saneal Rajanahally
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Jasmir G Nayak
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Brodie A Parent
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Jorge D Ramos
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - George R Schade
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Sarah K Holt
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Atreya Dash
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Daniel W Lin
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kamat AM, Agarwal P, Bivalacqua T, Chisolm S, Daneshmand S, Doroshow JH, Efstathiou JA, Galsky M, Iyer G, Kassouf W, Shah J, Taylor J, Williams SB, Quale DZ, Rosenberg JE. Collaborating to Move Research Forward: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Bladder Cancer Think Tank. Bladder Cancer 2016; 2:203-213. [PMID: 27376139 PMCID: PMC4927866 DOI: 10.3233/blc-169007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The 10th Annual Bladder Cancer Think Tank was hosted by the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network and brought together a multidisciplinary group of clinicians, researchers, representatives and Industry to advance bladder cancer research efforts. Think Tank expert panels, group discussions, and networking opportunities helped generate ideas and strengthen collaborations between researchers and physicians across disciplines and between institutions. Interactive panel discussions addressed a variety of timely issues: 1) data sharing, privacy and social media; 2) improving patient navigation through therapy; 3) promising developments in immunotherapy; 4) and moving bladder cancer research from bench to bedside. Lastly, early career researchers presented their bladder cancer studies and had opportunities to network with leading experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, TX, USA
| | - Piyush Agarwal
- Section of Urological Surgery, National Cancer Institute , Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Trinity Bivalacqua
- Brady Urological Institute , Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Sia Daneshmand
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James H Doroshow
- Section of Urological Surgery, National Cancer Institute , Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew Galsky
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine , New York, NY, USA
| | - Gopa Iyer
- Department of Medicine, Genitourinary Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY, USA
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Urology, McGill University , Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jay Shah
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, TX, USA
| | - John Taylor
- Division of Urology, University of Connecticut Health , Farmington, CT, USA
| | | | | | - Jonathan E Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Genitourinary Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Moschini M, Simone G, Stenzl A, Gill IS, Catto J. Critical Review of Outcomes from Radical Cystectomy: Can Complications from Radical Cystectomy Be Reduced by Surgical Volume and Robotic Surgery? Eur Urol Focus 2016; 2:19-29. [PMID: 28723446 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2016] [Accepted: 03/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Radical cystectomy (RC) is a highly complex procedure with multiple risks for perioperative complications. OBJECTIVE We reviewed the literature to report perioperative outcomes and the incidence of complications in contemporary RC series. We focused on the potential impact of surgical approach and surgeon volume on these outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic literature search was performed in December 2015 using the Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases for articles published in English between 2005 and 2015. The search strategy included the terms complications, cystectomy, robotic assisted radical cystectomy, and surgical volume, alone or in combination. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Our searches retrieved 49 papers. Open RC (ORC) and robot-assisted RC (RARC) are morbid procedures with consistent risk of perioperative complications (mean weighted incidence: 48.7%; range: 27.0-72.5%). Higher hospital and surgeon volumes were associated with reduced risks of perioperative complications. Prior robotic expertise in radical prostatectomy showed a beneficial protective risk on development of complications after RARC. Surgical volume appears to be a good predictor of safety in ORC and RARC. RARC is associated with reduced estimated blood loss and lower perioperative transfusion rates compared with ORC. Further evidence is needed to support the reproducibility of intracorporeal diversion during RARC, beyond large tertiary referral centers. Several strategies have been demonstrated to be effective for reducing the risk of incurring perioperative complications and should be pursued by physicians. CONCLUSIONS Despite improvements in quality of care, RC remains a challenging procedure with high morbidity, regardless of surgical approach. RARC is a safe procedure with potential advantages in terms of reduced blood loss and transfusion rates. Surgical volume appears to be related to the improvement of perioperative outcomes and complications. PATIENT SUMMARY Radical cystectomy is a challenging and morbid procedure. The robotic approach has gained popularity and proved to be safe and effective in tertiary referral centers, although further studies are needed to confirm its wide reproducibility. Centers with higher surgical volume have lower incidence of perioperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Moschini
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, URI Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Inderbir S Gill
- University of Southern California Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Xu W, Daneshmand S, Bazargani ST, Cai J, Miranda G, Schuckman AK, Djaladat H. Postoperative Pain Management after Radical Cystectomy: Comparing Traditional versus Enhanced Recovery Protocol Pathway. J Urol 2015; 194:1209-13. [PMID: 26021824 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.05.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Opioids have traditionally been the mainstay of pain management after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer but they have many side effects. The efficacy of opioid sparing analgesics after cystectomy as part of a protocol of enhanced recovery after surgery has yet to be proved. We compared opioid use, pain score and postoperative ileus in consecutive patients on a protocol of enhanced recovery after surgery and those on a traditional protocol after radical cystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using our institutional review board approved bladder cancer database we retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent open radical cystectomy using a traditional protocol or a protocol of enhanced recovery after surgery for pain management. A total of 205 patients were ultimately enrolled in study, including 81 on a traditional protocol and 124 on the enhanced protocol. Opioid use and pain scores were analyzed and compared up to postoperative day 4. All routes of opioid use were recorded and converted to the morphine equivalent dose for comparison. Postoperative pain was recorded using a visual analog scale. Postoperative records were reviewed for the incidence of ileus. RESULTS Patients on the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and those on a traditional protocol were similar demographically. When analyzing data up to the median hospital stay on the case group, patients on enhanced recovery used significantly less opioids per day (4.9 mg vs 20.67 mg morphine equivalents, p <0.001) and reported more pain (visual analog scale 3.1 vs 1.14, p <0.001). They also experienced a significantly lesser incidence of postoperative ileus (7.3% vs 22.2%, p = 0.003) and had a significantly shorter median length of hospital stay (4 vs 8 days, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients on the protocol of enhanced recovery after surgery used significantly less opioid analgesics, possibly contributing to decreased postoperative ileus and shorter length of hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weichen Xu
- Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Soroush T Bazargani
- Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jie Cai
- Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gus Miranda
- Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Anne K Schuckman
- Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Preston MA, Lerner SP, Kibel AS. New Trends in the Surgical Management of Invasive Bladder Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2015; 29:253-69, viii. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2014.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
19
|
Gandaglia G, Varda B, Sood A, Pucheril D, Konijeti R, Sammon JD, Sukumar S, Menon M, Sun M, Chang SL, Montorsi F, Kibel AS, Trinh QD. Short-term perioperative outcomes of patients treated with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Can Urol Assoc J 2014; 8:E681-7. [PMID: 25408807 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.2069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We report the contemporary outcomes of radical cystectomy (RC) in patients with bladder cancer using a national, prospective perioperative database specifically developed to assess the quality of surgical care. METHODS The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried from 2006 to 2011 for RC. Data on postoperative complications, operative time, length of stay, blood transfusions, readmission, and mortality within 30 days from surgery were abstracted. RESULTS Overall, 1094 patients undergoing RC were identified. Rates of overall complications, transfusions, prolonged length of hospitalization, readmission, and perioperative mortality were 31.1%, 34.4%, 25.9%, 20.2%, and 2.7%, respectively. Body mass index represented an independent predictor of overall complications on multivariate analysis (p = 0.04). Baseline comorbidity status was associated with increased odds of postoperative complications, prolonged operative time, transfusion, prolonged hospitalization, and perioperative mortality. In particular, patients with cardiovascular comorbidities were 2.4 times more likely to die within 30 days following cystectomy compared to their healthier counterparts (p = 0.04). Men had lower odds of prolonged operative time and blood transfusions (p ≤ 0.03). Finally, the receipt of a continent urinary diversion was the only predictor of readmission (p = 0.02). Our results are limited by their retrospective nature and by the lack of adjustment for hospital and tumour volume. CONCLUSIONS Complications, transfusions, readmission, and perioperative mortality remain relatively common events in patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer. In an era where many advocate the need for prospective multi-institutional data collection as a means of improving quality of care, our study provides data on short-term outcomes after RC from a national quality improvement initiative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Gandaglia
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC; ; Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Briony Varda
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC; ; Division of Urologic Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital / Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Akshay Sood
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
| | - Daniel Pucheril
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
| | - Ramdev Konijeti
- Division of Urologic Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital / Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jesse D Sammon
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
| | - Shyam Sukumar
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC
| | - Mani Menon
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
| | - Maxine Sun
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC
| | - Steven L Chang
- Division of Urologic Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital / Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Division of Urologic Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital / Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urologic Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital / Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Daneshmand S, Ahmadi H, Schuckman AK, Mitra AP, Cai J, Miranda G, Djaladat H. Enhanced Recovery Protocol after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer. J Urol 2014; 192:50-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/23/2014] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Siamak Daneshmand
- Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Pathology and Center for Personalized Medicine (APM), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Hamed Ahmadi
- Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Pathology and Center for Personalized Medicine (APM), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Anne K. Schuckman
- Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Pathology and Center for Personalized Medicine (APM), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Anirban P. Mitra
- Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Pathology and Center for Personalized Medicine (APM), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jie Cai
- Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Pathology and Center for Personalized Medicine (APM), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gus Miranda
- Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Pathology and Center for Personalized Medicine (APM), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Pathology and Center for Personalized Medicine (APM), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gandaglia G, Karakiewicz PI, Trinh QD, Sun M. High hospital volume reduces mortality after cystectomy. BJU Int 2014; 114:5-6. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.12780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Gandaglia
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit; University of Montreal Health Centre; Canada
- Urological Research Institute; San Raffaele Hospital; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University; Milan Italy
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Urological Research Institute; San Raffaele Hospital; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University; Milan Italy
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Center for Surgery and Public Health; Division of Urologic Surgery; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Boston MA USA
| | - Maxine Sun
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit; University of Montreal Health Centre; Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Leow JJ, Reese SW, Jiang W, Lipsitz SR, Bellmunt J, Trinh QD, Chung BI, Kibel AS, Chang SL. Propensity-matched comparison of morbidity and costs of open and robot-assisted radical cystectomies: a contemporary population-based analysis in the United States. Eur Urol 2014; 66:569-76. [PMID: 24491306 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 177] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2013] [Accepted: 01/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical cystectomy (RC) is a morbid procedure associated with high costs. Limited population-based data exist on the complication profile and costs of robot-assisted RC (RARC) compared with open RC (ORC). OBJECTIVE To evaluate morbidity and cost differences between ORC and RARC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent RC at 279 hospitals across the United States between 2004 and 2010. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Multivariable logistic and median regression was performed to evaluate 90-d mortality, postoperative complications (Clavien classification), readmission rates, length of stay (LOS), and direct costs. To reduce selection bias, we used propensity weighting with survey weighting to obtain nationally representative estimates. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The final weighted cohort included 34 672 ORC and 2101 RARC patients. RARC use increased from 0.6% in 2004 to 12.8% in 2010. Major complication rates (Clavien grade ≥ 3; 17.0% vs 19.8%, p = 0.2) were similar between ORC and RARC (odds ratio [OR]: 1.32; p = 0.42). RARC had 46% decreased odds of minor complications (Clavien grade 1-2; OR: 0.54; p = 0.03). RARC had $4326 higher adjusted 90-d median direct costs (p = 0.004). Although RARC had a significantly shorter LOS (11.8 d vs 10.2 d; p = 0.008), no significant differences in room and board costs existed (p = 0.20). Supply costs for RARC were significantly higher ($6041 vs $3638; p < 0.0001). Morbidity and cost differences were not present among the highest-volume surgeons (≥ 7 cases per year) and hospitals (≥ 19 cases per year). Limitations include use of an administrative database and lack of oncologic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS The use of RARC has increased between 2004 and 2010. Compared with ORC, RARC was associated with decreased odds of minor but not major complications and with increased expenditures attributed primarily to higher supply costs. Centralization of ORC and RARC to high-volume providers may minimize these morbidity and cost differences. PATIENT SUMMARY Using a US population-based cohort, we found that robotic surgery for bladder cancer decreased minor complications, had no impact on major complications and was more costly than open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J Leow
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen W Reese
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wei Jiang
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stuart R Lipsitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin I Chung
- Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven L Chang
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|