1
|
Dłubak A, Karwacki J, Logoń K, Tomecka P, Brawańska K, Krajewski W, Szydełko T, Małkiewicz B. Lymph Node Dissection in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:1327-1344. [PMID: 37801187 PMCID: PMC10640513 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01460-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This narrative review aims to evaluate the role of lymph node dissection (LND) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and its implications for staging and management outcomes, as well as future perspectives. RECENT FINDINGS Multiple studies have demonstrated the limitations of conventional imaging techniques in accurately localizing lymph node metastasis (LNM) in UTUC. While 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) shows promise for preoperative LNM detection, its specificity is low. Alternative methods such as choline PET/CT and sentinel lymph node detection are under consideration but require further investigation. Additionally, various preoperative factors associated with LNM hold potential for predicting nodal involvement, thereby improving nodal staging and oncologic outcomes of LND. Several surgical approaches, including segmental ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy, provide a possibility for LND, while minimizing morbidity. LND remains the primary nodal staging tool for UTUC, but its therapeutic benefit is still uncertain. Advances in imaging techniques and preoperative risk assessment show promise in improving LNM detection. Further research and multi-center studies are needed to comprehensively assess the advantages and limitations of LND in UTUC, as well as the long-term outcomes of alternative staging and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Dłubak
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Jakub Karwacki
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Logoń
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Paulina Tomecka
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Kinga Brawańska
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Bartosz Małkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kanno T, Kobori G, Ito K, Nakagawa H, Takahashi T, Koterazawa S, Takaoka N, Somiya S, Nagahama K, Ito M, Megumi Y, Higashi Y, Moroi S, Akao T, Yamada H. Oncological outcomes of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection during retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for renal pelvic or upper ureteral tumors: Matched-pair analysis. J Endourol 2022; 36:1206-1213. [PMID: 35607848 DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns of clinically node-negative patients with renal pelvic and/or upper or middle ureteral tumors after a template-based retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in conjunction with retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU). METHODS A total of 283 patients who received LRNU with and without RPLND at three Japanese institutions were enrolled. The template of RPLND included the renal hilar and paraaortic lymph nodes (LNs) (left side) and renal hilar, paracaval, retrocaval, and intra-aortocaval LNs (right side). The LNs and kidneys were removed en bloc. The primary endpoint was set as recurrence-free survival. All RPLND cases were matched one-to-one with no RPLND cases using a propensity score matching approach, and 47 matched pairs were included in analyses. RESULTS Compared to the control group, significant differences were not observed in the RPLND group in terms of operation time, blood loss, postoperative complication rate, and pathological findings. The estimated five-year recurrence-free survival was significantly higher in the RPLND group (86.8%) compared to the group without RPLND (64.2%) (p = 0.014). The estimated five-year cancer-specific survival showed a similar tendency; however, it did not reach a statistically significant difference (87.5% vs 71.3%, respectively; p = 0.168). As for the first recurrence site, the RPLND group showed a lower incidence of distant recurrence, while a significant difference was not observed in the rate of regional LN recurrence. CONCLUSION This study suggests that a template-based RPLND in conjunction with retroperitoneal LRNU efficiently improves the recurrence-free survival by reducing distant recurrences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Kanno
- Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Urology, 28-1 Moriminami-cho, Ishida Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan, 601-1495;
| | | | - Katsuhiro Ito
- Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Urology, 28-1 ishidamoriminami-cho, fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan, 601-1495;
| | | | | | | | - Naoto Takaoka
- Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, 38070, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan;
| | - Shinya Somiya
- Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Urology, Kyoto, Japan;
| | | | - Masaaki Ito
- Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, 13684, Kyoto, Japan;
| | - Yuzuru Megumi
- Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, 38070, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan;
| | | | - Seiji Moroi
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan;
| | - Toshiya Akao
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan;
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee HY, Chang CH, Huang CP, Yu CC, Lo CW, Chung SD, Wu WC, Chen IHA, Lin JT, Jiang YH, Lee YK, Hsueh TY, Chiu AW, Chen YT, Lin CM, Tsai YC, Chen WC, Chiang BJ, Huang HC, Chen CH, Huang CY, Wu CC, Lin WY, Tseng JS, Ke HL, Yeh HC. Is Lymph Node Dissection Necessary During Radical Nephroureterectomy for Clinically Node-Negative Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma? A Multi-Institutional Study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:791620. [PMID: 35574295 PMCID: PMC9099435 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.791620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PurposeThis study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) without clinical lymph node metastasis (cN0) undergoing lymph node dissection (LND) during radical nephroureterectomy (NU).MethodsFrom the updated data of the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration Group, a total of 2726 UTUC patients were identified. We only include patients with ≥ pT2 stage and enrolled 658 patients. The Kaplan–Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazards model were used to analyze overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS) in LND (+) and LND (−) groups.ResultsA total of 658 patients were included and 463 patients without receiving LND and 195 patients receiving LND. From both univariate and multivariate survival analysis, there are no significant difference between LND (+) and LND (-) group in survival rate. In LND (+) group, 18.5% patients have pathological LN metastasis. After analyzing pN+ subgroup, it revealed worse CSS (p = 0.010) and DFS (p < 0.001) compared with pN0 patients.ConclusionsWe found no significant survival benefit related to LND in cN0 stage, ≥ pT2 stage UTUC, irrespective of the number of LNs removed, although pN+ affected cancer prognosis. However, from the result of pN (+) subgroup of LND (+) cohort analysis, it may be reasonable to not perform LND in patients with cT2N0 stage due to low positive predictive value of pN (+). In addition, performing LND may be considered for ureter cancer, which tends to cause lymphatic and hematogenous tumor spreading. Further large prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiang-Ying Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hsiang Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ping Huang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Wen Lo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Shiu-Dong Chung
- Graduate Program in Biomedical Informatics, College of Informatics, Yuan-Ze University, Chung-Li, Taiwan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Che Wu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Khun Lee
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y. Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Allen W. Chiu
- College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chang-Min Lin
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chieh Chen
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Juin Chiang
- College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsu-Che Huang
- Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Hsin Chen
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney (TMU-RCUK), Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Lung Ke
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Chih Yeh
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- *Correspondence: Hsin-Chih Yeh,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Peyrottes A, Califano G, Ouzaïd I, Lainé-Caroff P, Long Depaquit T, Hermieu JF, Xylinas E. Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Nephro-Ureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Review. Front Surg 2022; 9:852969. [PMID: 35402485 PMCID: PMC8987284 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.852969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Although lymphonodal dissection is well-accepted for muscle-invasive bladder cancer management, its role is still debated during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The aim of this study was to summarize the current knowledge concerning the indication, anatomical template, prognostic, and therapeutic roles of lymph node dissection (LND) performed at the time of RNU. Quality control markers, such as the number of lymph nodes (LN) removed, lymph node density, and safety of the different surgical approaches, were assessed. We performed a narrative review using the PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. We identified and analyzed articles based on the practice and the role of lymph node dissection for non-metastatic UTUC. There are no clear guidelines regarding the indication of LND for UTUC, but aggressive tumors may beneficiate from lymphadenectomy since lymph node invasion is a clear independent poor prognostic factor, allowing for adjuvant treatments. It seems that an extended lymphadenectomy may provide therapeutic advantages as a higher number of nodes removed may be related to the removal of undetected LNs micrometastases and a subsequent improvement in recurrence rate and cancer-specific survival. Clear anatomical templates are thus needed based on the location and the laterality of the primary tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Peyrottes
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Idir Ouzaïd
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Paul Lainé-Caroff
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Thibaut Long Depaquit
- Urology Unit, Military Teaching Hospital Sainte Anne, French Military Health Service, Toulon, France
| | - Jean-François Hermieu
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
- *Correspondence: Evanguelos Xylinas
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kanno T, Kobori G, Ito K, Nakagawa H, Takahashi T, Takaoka N, Somiya S, Nagahama K, Ito M, Megumi Y, Higashi Y, Moroi S, Akao T, Yamada H. Complications and their management following retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in conjunction with retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy. Int J Urol 2022; 29:455-461. [PMID: 35144321 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the detailed perioperative complications and their management after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma at three institutions. METHODS Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was performed on patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma located at the pelvis and/or upper or middle ureter, and its template included the renal hilar and para-aortic lymph nodes (left side) and the renal hilar, paracaval, retrocaval, and intra-aortocaval lymph nodes (right side). The lymph nodes and kidneys were removed en bloc. The primary endpoint was postoperative complication rates, and the secondary endpoints were intraoperative findings and chylous leakage management. The associations of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with postoperative complications were examined using logistic regression with propensity score techniques. RESULTS Eighty-eight (31%) and 195 (69%) patients underwent and did not undergo retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, respectively. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications and other perioperative findings in the entire cohort, except for prolonged operation time. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was not statistically significantly associated with total and serious complications in propensity score analyses. Postoperative chylous leakage could be conservatively managed even though it is common in patients with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (14/88 (16%)). The incidence of chylous leakage was significantly lower in patients whose lymphatic vessels were meticulously clipped completely during retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (5.3% vs 24%; P = 0.017). CONCLUSION There was no association between retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy and postoperative complications. However, chylous leakage is often observed after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and careful management is highly required. The use of clips during retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is recommended to minimize chylous leakage risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Kanno
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Go Kobori
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Katsuhiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | | | - Naoto Takaoka
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Shinya Somiya
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kanji Nagahama
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masaaki Ito
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuzuru Megumi
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Higashi
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Seiji Moroi
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Toshiya Akao
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Yamada
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Veccia A, Carbonara U, Djaladat H, Mehrazin R, Eun D, Reese AC, Meng X, Uzzo R, Srivastava A, Porter JR, Farrow J, Jamil M, Rosiello G, Tellini R, Mari A, Al-Qathani A, Rha KH, Wang L, Mastroianni R, Ferro M, De Cobelli O, Hakimi K, Crocerossa F, Ghoreifi A, Cacciamani G, Amit S Bhattu A, Mottrie A, Abdollah F, Minervini A, Wu Z, Simone G, Derweesh IH, Gonzalgo ML, Margulis V, Sundaram CP, Autorino R. Robotic vs laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter propensity-score matched pair "tetrafecta" analysis (ROBUUST collaborative group). J Endourol 2022; 36:752-759. [PMID: 35019760 DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the outcomes of robotic radical nephroureterectomy (RRNU) and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) within a large multi-institutional worldwide dataset. MATERIAL AND METHODS The ROBotic surgery for Upper tract Urothelial cancer STudy (ROBUUST) includes data from 17 centers worldwide regarding 877 RRNU and LRNU performed between 2015 and 2019. Baseline features, perioperative and oncological outcomes, were included. A 2:1 nearest-neighbor propensity-score matching with a 0.001 caliper was performed. An univariable and a multivariable logistic regression model were built to evaluate the predictors of a composite "tetrafecta" outcome defined as occurrence of bladder cuff excision + LND + no complications + negative surgical margins. RESULTS After matching, 185 RRNU and 91 LRNU were assessed. Patients in the RRNU group were more likely to undergo bladder cuff excision (81.9% vs 63.7%; p<0.001) compared to the LRNU group. A statistically significant difference was found in terms of overall postoperative complications (p=0.003) and length of stay (p<0.001) in favor of RRNU. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that LRNU was an independent predictor negatively associated with achievement of "tetrafecta" (OR: 0.09; p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS In general, RRNU and LRNU offer comparable outcomes. While the rate of overall complications is higher for LRNU in this study population, this is mostly related to low grade complications, and therefore with more limited clinical relevance. RRNU seems to offer shorter hospital stay but this might also be related to the different geographical location of participating centers. Overall, the implementation of robotics might facilitate achievement of a "tetrafecta" outcome as defined in the present study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Veccia
- Spedali Civili Hospital, University of Brescia, Department of Urology, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy, 25123;
| | - Umberto Carbonara
- Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 6887, Department of Urology, 11200 E BROAD ST, RICHMOND, Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23233.,Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, 9295, Department of Urology, Bari, Puglia, Italy;
| | | | - Reza Mehrazin
- Mount Sinai Health System, 5944, Urology, 5 East 98th St, 6th floor, New York, New York, United States, 10029;
| | - Daniel Eun
- Temple University, Urology, 255 South 17th street, 7th Floor Urology Suite, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19103;
| | - Adam C Reese
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Urology, 3401 N Broad St., Suite 340, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19140;
| | - Xiaosong Meng
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Urology, Dallas, Texas, United States;
| | - Robert Uzzo
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, 6565, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19111;
| | | | - James Robert Porter
- Swedish Medical Center, Urology, 1101 Madison, Suite 1400, Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104;
| | - Jason Farrow
- Indiana University Health, 22529, Urology, 535 N Barnhill, Suite 150, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46206-1367;
| | | | - Giuseppe Rosiello
- San Raffaele Hospital, 9372, Urology, Via Olgettina, 52, Milano, Italy, 20132;
| | - Riccardo Tellini
- University Hospital Careggi, 18561, Department of Oncologic, Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence, Toscana, Italy, 50134;
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy., Urology, Largo Brambilla 3, Firenze, Italy, 50100.,University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.;
| | | | - Koon Ho Rha
- Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Urology, Yonseiro 50-1, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of);
| | - Linhui Wang
- Changzheng Hospital, 56652, Shanghai, Shanghai, China;
| | | | - Matteo Ferro
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, 9290, Urology , via ripamonti 435, Milano, Italy, 90020.,Italy;
| | | | | | - Fabio Crocerossa
- Virginia Commonwealth University, 6889, 1200 E Broad St, Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23284-2512;
| | | | - Giovanni Cacciamani
- AOUI Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Urology, Piazzale Stefani 1, Verona, Italy, 37100;
| | | | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis, 37467, Dep. of Urology, Aalst, Belgium, 9300;
| | - Firas Abdollah
- Henry Ford Health System, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Center for Outcomes Research Analytics and Evaluation, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202;
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy., Urology, Clinica Urologica I, Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi, Università di Firenze., Largo Brambilla 3 - San Luca Nuovo Padiglione 16/Settore C/Piano II, Florence, Italy, 50134;
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Changhai hospital, the second military medical university, the department of Urology, Changhai Road NO. 163, Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200433;
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Regina Elena, urology, via elio chianesi 53, Roma, Italy, 00144.,Italy;
| | - Ithaar H Derweesh
- University of California - San Diego, Urology, La Jolla, California, United States;
| | - Mark L Gonzalgo
- university of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, urology, Miami, Florida, United States;
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- UT Southwestern Medical, Urology, 5339 harry hines blvd, Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390;
| | - Chandru P Sundaram
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Urology, 535 N Barnhill Dr, Suite 420, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202;
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 6887, Surgery (Urology), 1200 East Broad st, Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sato R, Watanabe K, Matsushita Y, Watanabe H, Motoyama D, Ito T, Sugiyama T, Otsuka A, Miyake H. Prognostic assessments in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma undergoing radical nephroureterectomy and systematic regional lymph node dissection. Urologia 2021; 89:354-357. [PMID: 34325582 DOI: 10.1177/03915603211034943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Systematic regional lymph node dissection (LND) combined with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) has been reported to improve the outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients. The objective of the present study was to assess the prognostic outcomes of UTUC patients undergoing systematic regional LND combined with RNU. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective evaluation of prognostic outcomes of 68 consecutive UTUC patients treated with RUN and systematic regional LND. RESULTS The median durations of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 45 and 166 months, respectively. Univariate analyses of several parameters showed that despite the lack of a significant predictor for RFS, the presence of lymph node metastasis correlated with poor OS. CONCLUSION These results suggest that comparatively favorable outcomes are achievable in UTUC patients by RNU and systematic regional LND; however, special attention is needed for patients with nodal involvement even after systematic regional LND due to the adverse impact of this factor on OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryo Sato
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kyohei Watanabe
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yuto Matsushita
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Watanabe
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Daisuke Motoyama
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Toshiki Ito
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takayuki Sugiyama
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Atsushi Otsuka
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Hideaki Miyake
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|