Contemporary analysis of the effect of marital status on survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy: A population-based study

Contemporary sex-specific analysis of the association of marital status with cancer-specific mortality in primary urethral carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether married status may be associated with lower cancer-specific mortality (CSM) rates in primary urethral carcinoma (PUC) patients. To test for differences in CSM rates, according to marital status, we relied on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database 2000-2020.

METHODS

Patient (age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status), tumor (stage, histology), and treatment (surgery, systemic therapy) characteristics of PUC patients were tabulated. Then, Kaplan-Meier plots, as well as univariable and multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models tested for differences in CSM rates according to marital status in overall cohort and then in sex-specific subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

Of all 1,571 PUC patients, 70% were male vs. 30% female. Females were statistically significantly younger (68 vs. 73 years), more frequently unmarried (54 vs. 28%), non-Caucasian (43 vs. 24%), more frequently harbored T3-4N0M0 (39 vs. 18%) and less frequently T1-2N0M0 (53 vs. 69%) or TanyN1-2M0/TanyNanyM1 (8 vs. 13%), relative to males. Moreover, we recorded differences in histotype proportions in females vs. males (urothelial 30 vs. 64%; squamous 24 vs. 22%; adenocarcinoma 36 vs. 7%; others 10 vs. 6%) and surgical treatment (none 22 vs. 17%; excisional biopsy 22 vs. 36%; partial urethrectomy 14 vs. 16%; radical urethrectomy 42 vs. 31%). In MCR models focusing on the entire cohort, married status independently predicted lower CSM (hazard ratio [HR]:0.82; P = 0.02). Similarly, in MCR models focusing on females, married status independently predicted lower CSM (HR:0.73; P = 0.03). Conversely, in MCR models focusing on males, married status failed to independently predict lower CSM (HR:0.89; P = 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Married status was associated with lower CSM in PUC patients. However, this benefit applies to female PUC patients, but not to their male counterparts.

The effect of married status on cancer-specific mortality in nonmetastatic pelvic liposarcoma patients according to sex

BACKGROUND

In nonmetastatic pelvic liposarcoma patients, it is unknown whether married status is associated with better cancer-control outcome defined as cancer-specific mortality (CSM). We addressed this knowledge gap and hypothesized that married status is associated with lower CSM rates in both male and female patients.

METHODS

Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000-2020), nonmetastatic pelvic liposarcoma patients were identified. Kaplan-Meier plots and univariable and multivariable Cox regression models (CRMs) predicting CSM according to marital status were used in the overall cohort and in male and female subgroups.

RESULTS

Of 1078 liposarcoma patients, 764 (71%) were male and 314 (29%) female. Of 764 male patients, 542 (71%) were married. Conversely, of 314 female patients, 192 (61%) were married. In the overall cohort, 5-year cancer-specific mortality-free survival (CSM-FS) rates were 89% for married versus 83% for unmarried patients (Δ = 6%). In multivariable CRMs, married status did not independently predict lower CSM (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74, p = 0.06). In males, 5-year CSM-FS rates were 89% for married versus 86% for unmarried patients (Δ = 3%). In multivariable CRMs, married status did not independently predict lower CSM (HR: 0.85, p = 0.4). In females, 5-year CSM-FS rates were 88% for married versus 79% for unmarried patients (Δ = 9%). In multivariable CRMs, married status independently predicted lower CSM (HR: 0.58, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In nonmetastatic pelvic liposarcoma patients, married status independently predicted lower CSM only in female patients. In consequence, unmarried female patients should ideally require more assistance and more frequent follow-up than their married counterparts.

The association of marital status with kidney cancer surgery morbidity - a retrospective cohort study

Purpose

To better understand whether the marital status impacts 90-day postoperative outcomes following kidney cancer surgery.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing elective partial or radical nephrectomy to manage kidney masses from 2003 to 2017 using the Premier Hospital Database, a national hospital discharge dataset. Multinomial logistic regression models controlling for a wide range of clinicodemographic, surgical, and hospital characteristics were used to assess an association between marital status and postoperative complications. The primary outcome was 90-day complications, including minor complications (Clavien grades 1-2), non-fatal major complications (Clavien grades 3-4), and mortality (Clavien grade 5). Secondary outcomes included patient disposition and readmission rates.

Results

The study cohort comprised 106,752 patients, of which 61,188 (57.32%) were married. The overall incidence of minor complications, major complications, and death was 24.04%, 6.00%, and 0.71%, respectively. Marriage was associated with a significantly lower incidence of minor (RR 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94-0.99) complications following open or radical nephrectomy and major complications (RR 0.89; 95% CI: 0.84-0.95) for all surgical types and approaches. There was no association between marital status and mortality (RR 0.94; 95% CI: 0.81-1.10).

Conclusion

Marriage is associated with a significant reduction in major complications following kidney cancer surgery, likely because it is associated with greater social support, which is beneficial in the postoperative phase of care. Marital status and social support may play a role in the preoperative decision-making process and counseling for patients considering kidney cancer surgery.

Demographics, Clinical Characteristics and Survival Outcomes of Primary Urinary Tract Malignant Melanoma Patients: A Population-Based Analysis

All primary urinary tract malignant melanoma (ureter vs. bladder vs. urethra) patients were identified from within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database 2000-2020. Kaplan-Maier plots depicted the overall survival (OS) rates. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models were fitted to test the differences in overall mortality (OM). In the overall cohort (n = 74), the median OS was 22 months. No statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences were recorded according to sex (female vs. male; p = 0.9) and treatment of the primary (endoscopic vs. surgical; p = 0.6). Conversely, clinically meaningful but not statistically significant (p ≥ 0.05) differences were recorded according to the patient's age at diagnosis (≤80 vs. ≥80 years old; p = 0.2), marital status (married 26 vs. unmarried 16 months; p = 0.2), and SEER stage (localized 31 vs. regional 14 months; p = 0.4), and the type of systemic therapy (exposed 31 vs. not exposed 20 months; p = 0.06). Finally, in univariable and MCR analyses, after adjustment for the SEER stage and type of systemic therapy, tumor origin within the bladder was associated with a three-fold higher OM (Hazard ratio: 3.00; p = 0.004), compared to tumor origin within the urethra. In conclusion, primary urinary tract malignant melanoma patients have poor survival. Specifically, tumor origin within the bladder independently predicted a higher OM, even after adjustment for the SEER stage and systemic therapy status.