Neobladder creation in patients with chronic kidney disease: A viable diversion strategy

Survival of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Treated with Radical Cystectomy and Risk Factors of Glomerular Filtration Rate Loss Following Radical Cystectomy: Two Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Interplay Between Radical Cystectomy and Renal Function

CONTEXT

There is no high-level evidence regarding the risk factors of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) loss following radical cystectomy (RC) and survival outcomes of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing RC.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the risk factors of CKD in patients treated with RC for bladder cancer and to assess overall and oncological survival of patients with CKD who underwent RC.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement, two systematic reviews were performed for studies published before September 30, 2022, assessing (1) risk factors of renal function (RF) decline following RC and (2) overall and oncological outcomes of CKD patients treated with RC.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 21 and 17 studies were included for qualitative and quantitative syntheses, respectively. The first meta-analysis of ten studies (15 502 patients) identified these factors to be significantly associated with GFR loss following RC: advanced age, lower baseline RF, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), diabetes mellitus, hypertension, postoperative hydronephrosis, ureteroenteric stricture, and locally advanced disease (hazard ratios [HRs] 1.03, 1.22, 1.5, 1.27, 1.24, 1.69, 1.92, and 5.13, respectively), while sex, preoperative hydronephrosis, perioperative chemotherapy, and diversion type were not. The second meta-analysis of seven studies (6900 patients) demonstrated significantly worse metastasis-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival in patients with higher CKD stages than in those with lower stages (HRs 1.54, 2.09, and 1.47, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that older age, lower baseline RF, higher CCI, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, postoperative hydronephrosis, ureteroenteric stricture, and locally advanced disease are associated with long-term GFR loss following RC. In addition, patients with higher stages of CKD have worse long-term overall and oncological outcomes following RC. These data may help in counseling and decision-making regarding therapy and preventive measures.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Several factors have been identified that can help identify patients at risk for glomerular filtration rate loss after radical cystectomy (RC). Chronic kidney disease is associated with poor cancer- and non-cancer-specific outcomes following RC.

Contemporary outcomes of patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: A comparative analysis between intracorporeal ileal conduit and neobladder urinary diversions

Objective

We aimed to compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes for patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal ileal conduit (IC) and neobladder (NB) urinary diversion.

Methods

Patients undergoing RARC with intracorporeal urinary diversion between January 2017 and January 2022 at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA were indexed. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, perioperative, and oncologic outcomes were analyzed. Survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meier plots.

Results

Of 261 patients (206 [78.9%] male), 190 (72.8%) received IC while 71 (27.2%) received NB diversion. Median age was greater in the IC group (71 [interquartile range, IQR 65-78] years vs. 64 [IQR 59-67] years, p<0.001) and BMI was 26.6 (IQR 23.2-30.4) kg/m2. IC group was more likely to have prior abdominal or pelvic radiation (15.8% vs. 2.8%, p=0.014). American Association of Anesthesiologists scores were comparable between groups. The IC group had a higher proportion of patients with pathological tumor stage 2 (pT2) tumors (34 [17.9%] vs. 10 [14.1%], p=0.008) and pathological node stages pN2-N3 (28 [14.7%] vs. 3 [4.2%], p<0.001). The IC group had less median operative time (272 [IQR 246-306] min vs. 341 [IQR 303-378] min, p<0.001) and estimated blood loss (250 [150-500] mL vs. 325 [200-575] mL, p=0.002). Thirty- and 90-day complication rates were 44.4% and 50.2%, respectively, and comparable between groups. Clavien-Dindo grades 3-5 complications occurred in 27 (10.3%) and 34 (13.0%) patients within 30 and 90 days, respectively, with comparable rates between groups. Median follow-up was 324 (IQR 167-552) days, and comparable between groups. Kaplan-Meier estimate for overall survival at 24 months was 89% for the IC cohort and 93% for the NB cohort (hazard ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.42, p=0.02). Kaplan-Meier estimate for recurrence-free survival at 24 months was 74% for IC and 87% for NB (hazard ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 0.82-4.04, p=0.10).

Conclusion

Patients undergoing intracorporeal IC urinary diversion had higher postoperative cancer stage, increased nodal involvement, similar complications outcomes, decreased overall survival, and similar recurrence-free survival compared to patients undergoing RARC with intracorporeal NB urinary diversion.

Detailed Description of the Karolinska Technique for Intracorporeal Studer Neobladder Reconstruction

In the last two decades, surgical techniques for intracorporeal urinary diversion have been developed with the aim of reducing surgical morbidity. Although increasing constantly, the numbers of urologists offering intracorporeal neobladder reconstruction remain limited due to the complex nature of the procedure. In this article, we aim to provide a detailed description of the surgical technique we currently use at our institution. This technique was initially developed and perfected at the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden starting in 2003. It is a reproducible surgical approach with standardized and well-defined surgical steps. We give a detailed description of the surgical steps and provide tips and tricks to address specific situations and to increase efficiency. We also review the indications, the preoperative considerations, equipment necessary, postoperative considerations, and clinical outcomes for this procedure. Finally, we provide an accompanying didactic surgical video. We believe that this standardized approach can be learned and reproduced safely by motivated robotic surgeons.