Real-world clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving pembrolizumab + axitinib vs. ipilimumab + nivolumab

First-line dual immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies versus combination therapies comprising immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a comparative analysis of the effectiveness using real-world data

BACKGROUND

There are few comparative studies on dual immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (i.e., IO-IO) and combination therapies comprising ICIs plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (i.e., IO-TKI) for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), especially in real-world settings.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated data of 175 patients with IMDC intermediate-risk or poor-risk RCC; as first-line therapy, 103 received IO-IO, and 72 received IO-TKI. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was conducted to balance patients' backgrounds in the IO-IO and IO-TKI groups.

RESULTS

Based on the IPTW analysis, progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (median: 15.6 vs. 8.3 months; p = 0.0386). In contrast, overall survival was not different between groups (median: 46.7 vs. 49.0 months; p = 0.465). Although the IPTW-adjusted objective response rate was not significantly different (51.2% vs. 43.9%; p = 0.359), the progressive disease rate as the best overall response was lower in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (3.3% vs. 27.4%; p < 0.0001). Regarding the safety profile, the treatment interruption rate was higher in the IO-TKI group than in the IO-IO group (70.3% vs. 49.2%; p = 0.005). In contrast, the IO-IO group had a higher corticosteroid administration rate (43.3% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

IO-TKI therapy exhibited superior effectiveness over IO-IO therapy in terms of PFS improvement and immediate disease progression prevention and was associated with a higher risk of treatment interruption and a lower risk of needing corticosteroids.

LRP6 is a potential biomarker of kidney clear cell carcinoma related to prognosis and immune infiltration

Renal cell carcinoma is the most common and most lethal genitourinary tumor. The causes of renal clear cell carcinoma are complex and the heterogeneity of the tumor tissue is high, so patient outcomes are not very satisfactory. Exploring biomarkers in the progression of renal clear cell carcinoma is crucial to improve the diagnosis and guide the treatment of renal clear cell carcinoma. LRP6 is a co-receptor of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, which is involved in cell growth, inflammation and cell transformation through activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Abnormal expression of LRP6 is associated with the malignant phenotype, metastatic potential and poor prognosis of various tumors. In this study, we found that LRP6 was abnormally highly expressed in a variety of tumors and significantly correlated with microsatellite instability, tumor mutation burden, and immune cell infiltration and immune checkpoint expression in a variety of tumors. Moreover, we found that LRP6 was significantly associated with the prognosis of renal clear cell carcinoma. Further we found a significant correlation between LRP6 and the expression of m6A-related genes and ferroptosis-related genes. Finally, we also found a significant correlation between the expression of LRP6 and the sensitivity to common drugs used in kidney clear cell carcinoma treatment. These results suggest that LRP6 is likely to be a potential target for kidney clear cell carcinoma treatment.