Treatment of premature ejaculation

An observational, national and multicentric study to describe the detection, diagnosis and treatment of erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation from the patient's perspective

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

To examine the opinions, attitudes and perceptions of patients regarding the diagnosis and treatment protocols of erectile dysfunction (ED) and premature ejaculation (PE) and their interaction with the urology specialists.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Observational, national and multicentric study based on a self-designed online questionnaire in which ED and PE patients described their perception of ED and PE at diagnosis and during treatment and monitoring, the patient-physician relationship and the role of the patient's partner in the course of the disease.

RESULTS

306 ED and 70 PE participants were recruited. After the occurrence of the first symptoms, the time elapsed until the patient decided to go to the doctor was 28.6 months for PE and 14.0 months for ED (p<0.001). ED patients saw physicians more frequently (especially those aged between 60 and 69 years: 60.7%, p<0.001) than PE patients (52.1% vs 36.8%, respectively; p<0.001) and discussed this problem with their partner more (34.0% vs 22.8%, p<0.001). These disorders were mainly diagnosed at the urologist's office (ED: 74.8% vs 42.5%; PE: 75.7% vs 34.3%; diagnosis vs detection). One third of all participants reported that the sexual problem was not the main reason for the visit. The time elapsed between the first consultation for related symptoms and therapy was 8.7 months (oral drugs) and 7.6 months (dapoxetine) for ED and PE, respectively. ED patients and their partners felt particularly better once treatment had started (p<0.001). PE patients presented the highest degree of sexual dissatisfaction (78%). 50% of the patients agreed with the statement that initiating a discussion about sexual concerns was regarded as taboo and most of them did not say that their partner had encouraged them to seek medical advice.

CONCLUSION

A concerted effort is called for to expand ED and PE patients' proactivity in taking care of their own and their partner's sexual health. Current therapies would appear to have a benefit in couples' sexual relationships.

Premature ejaculation in couples using contraceptive withdrawal and associations with characteristics of its use: A cross-sectional study

This study aimed to investigate the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) and its related factors in couples using contraceptive withdrawal (WD). The study sample was composed of 108 participants including 54 males and 54 females (their partners) who used WD. The data were collected via a questionnaire and the male and female forms of the PEP. The mean total PEP index score of the couples (female (F); 1.69 ± 0.55 and male (M); 1.65 ± 0.36) was below the average possible score. Although both males and their partners generally rated control over ejaculation (F; 57.4%, M; 61.1%) and satisfaction with sexual intercourse (F; 63%, M; 79.7%) as good/very good, they rate personal distress related to ejaculation (F; 64.8%, M; 83.4%) and interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation (F; 81.5%, M; 92.6%) as 'extremely/quite a lot'. As the time of using WD increased, male control over ejaculation increased (p = .019); as the marriage duration (p = .045) and ages (F; p = .012, M; p = .045) of the couples increased, their problems related to ejaculation increased. According to the results, couples who use WD experience PE-related problems, and the problems they experience vary depending on the period of WD use, marriage duration and age.

A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Control Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of OLNP-05 Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Subjects with Premature Ejaculation

Premature ejaculation (PE) is one of the foremost sex-related health problems among men. The global occurrence ranges from 20% to 30%, according to various studies. PE has a great impact on the men's quality of life, with deleterious effects such as embarrassment, frustration, and feeling of incompetence. Considering the necessity of treatment of PE, this study was planned to compare the efficacy and safety of OLNP-05 versus placebo for treating subjects suffering from PE. In this randomized clinical study, 60 men with PE were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either OLNP-05 or placebo one capsule twice daily for a period of 8 weeks. Subjects were evaluated during visits on day 1, day 28, and day 56. Mean change from baseline in intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), improvement in premature ejaculation profile (PEP), and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I) were used to assess the efficacy of treatment. P-value <.05 was considered significant. At the end of the treatment, the improvement in IELT score in the OLNP-05 group was remarkably higher than the placebo. Subjects in the OLNP-05 treatment group also reported significantly greater improvement in PEP subscale score. Majority of OLNP-05-treated subjects were found to be in the "much improved" category as per CGI-I assessment. The result confirms the safety and efficacy of OLNP-05, therefore suggesting that OLNP-05 may be a safe and effective intervention for the management of PE. Trial registration: Clinical Trials Registry India (Registration No: CTRI/2017/08/009226, 02/08/2017).

Assessing satisfaction in men with premature ejaculation after dapoxetine treatment in real-world practice

INTRODUCTION

There are limited data on the treatment satisfaction with dapoxetine in patients with premature ejaculation (PE).

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the treatment satisfaction, effectiveness and safety of dapoxetine for PE patients.

METHODS

Subjects received dapoxetine (30 mg or 60 mg) alone or in combination with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, if concurrent with erectile dysfunction for more than 4 weeks in clinical practice. Main outcome measures include Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) and Clinical Global Impression of Satisfaction (CGIS).

RESULTS

From March 2014 to January 2015, a total of 286 PE patients received dapoxetine treatment in this study, with 137 (47.9%) patients diagnosed with lifelong PE and 149 (52.1%) patients diagnosed with acquired PE. At the final follow-up visit, the mean intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (an increase of 3.4 min) and mean score of Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (a decrease of -5.0) improved significantly from baseline, and the satisfaction rate and response rate to dapoxetine treatment were 45.0% and 74.6%, respectively. Satisfaction with dapoxetine treatment was highly correlated with treatment response, and might be improved by scheduled follow-up visits and escalation to a higher dose. Subjects with diabetes mellitus (DM) reported a lower treatment response than those without DM. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAEs) occurred in 47.7% of patients, but no serious TEAEs were reported.

CONCLUSION

Our real-world data highlight the effectiveness of dapoxetine and the importance of follow-up visits for the treatment of PE. Half of PE patients were not satisfied with dapoxetine treatment, which reflects an unmet need of present approach or an unrealistic expectation from PE patients.