Effect of end-inspiratory pause on airway and physiological dead space in anesthetized horses

A Retrospective Study on Pre- and Intraoperative Predictors on the Recovery Quality of Horses After General Anesthesia

Equine anesthesia is related to high morbidity and mortality rates and recent studies suggested that the period of recovery remains the phase associated with the greatest risk of mortality in horses. Intraoperative hypotension, hypoxemia, and hypercapnia are recognized as potential determinants of recovery quality. This study, conducted at the Equine University Hospital of Liege, aimed to explore how these factors influence recovery outcomes and compare complications between non-emergency and emergency procedures. We analyzed data from 1057 horses, with a mean weight of 498 kg (ranging from 150 to 850 kg) and a mean age of 10.7 (ranging from 0.5 to 37 years), undergoing standardized general anesthesia for non-emergency and emergency procedures to assess which factors influence recovery quality. Recoveries were graded as 'good' or 'bad' and age, sex, breed, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, weight, anesthesia duration, presence of hypotension, hypoxemia, and hypercapnia were compared with a logistic regression analysis. Our findings highlight the multifactorial nature of anesthetic recovery in horses, with breed, age, anesthesia and recovery duration, and emergency status emerging as significant influencing factors. Additionally, monitoring and managing hypoxemia and hypotension remain critical due to their recognized impact on recovery quality. However, despite their clinical relevance, the specific effects of these variables on anesthetic recovery in horses remain insufficiently studied, emphasizing the need for further research to refine perioperative management strategies and improve outcomes.

Comparison of inhaled salbutamol and salmeterol for the treatment of arterial hypoxaemia in anaesthetized horses: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of inhaled salbutamol with salmeterol for the treatment of arterial hypoxaemia in anaesthetized horses.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, clinical study.

ANIMALS

A total of 108 client-owned horses (American Society of Anesthesiologists status I-V) anaesthetized for elective and emergency procedures.

METHODS

Horses were premedicated with acepromazine [intramuscularly 0.1 mg kg-1 or intravenously (IV) 0.05 mg kg-1] and xylazine (0.6 mg kg-1 IV). Midazolam (0.06 mg kg-1 IV) and ketamine (2.2 mg kg-1 IV) were combined to induce anaesthesia, and isoflurane in oxygen/air mixture (inspired oxygen fraction 0.7) was used for maintenance of anaesthesia. Mechanical ventilation was initiated without delay using the following ventilator settings: tidal volume 10 mL kg-1, respiratory rate 8 breaths minute-1, inspiratory-to-expiratory time ratio 1:2, no positive end-expiratory pressure. If arterial blood gas analysis revealed PaO2 < 100 mmHg (13.3 kPa), the administration of either inhaled salbutamol (2 μg kg-1) or salmeterol (0.5 μg kg-1) was randomly assigned Blood gas analysis was repeated 15 and 30 minutes after treatment. The intervention was considered successful when PaO2 after treatment ≥ 1.2 × PaO2 before treatment (i.e. ≥20% increase). PaO2 at 15 and 30 minutes was compared between groups using Mann-Whitney U test; p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Of the 108 horses, 60 were administered salbutamol, 65% and 60% responded successfully at 15 and 30 minutes, increasing their initial PaO2 by 38% and 44%, respectively. The other 48 horses were administered salmeterol, 35% responded successfully at 15 and 30 minutes, increasing their initial PaO2 by 3% and 4%, respectively. PaO2 was significantly higher after salbutamol than after salmeterol at 15 and 30 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Using the described protocol, inhaled salbutamol was more effective than salmeterol in improving PaO2 in anaesthetized horses with value < 100 mmHg (13.3 kPa).

Effect of increased resistance on dynamic compliance assessed by two clinical monitors during volume-controlled ventilation: A test-lung study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of increased respiratory system resistance (RRS) on dynamic compliance (Cdyn) assessed by the NM3 monitor (Cdyn(NM3)) and the E-CAiOV module (Cdyn(ECAiOV)).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective laboratory study.

METHODS

A training test lung (TTL) simulated the mechanical ventilation of a mammal with 50 and 300 mL tidal volumes in three conditions of RRS [normal (RBL), moderately increased (R1) and severely increased (R2)] and a wide range of clinically relevant Cdyn. Simulations at increased RRS were paired with simulations at RBL with the same static compliance for comparisons. Pearson's correlation coefficient and concordance correlation coefficient between the measurements at RBL with the ones with increased RRS were calculated. Bland-Altman plots were also used to evaluate the agreement of Cdyn(ECAiOV) and Cdyn(NM3) at RBL (control values) with their paired values at R1 and R2. Relative bias and limits of agreement (LOAs) were calculated and LOAs larger than 30% were considered unacceptable. Trending ability of Cdyn(NM3) and Cdyn(ECAiOV) were evaluated by polar plots. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

The effect of increased RRS was more pronounced for Cdyn(ECAiOV) than for Cdyn(NM3). Unacceptable agreement was only observed in Cdyn(NM3) at R2 in the 300 mL simulation (bias = -18.3% and lower LOA = -45%). For Cdyn(ECAiOV), agreement was unacceptable for all tested RRS in both simulations, being the worst at R2 in the 300 mL simulation (bias = -54.7% and lower LOA = -100.2%). Both levels of increased RRS caused poor trending ability for Cdyn(ECAiOV), whereas the same effect was only observed for Cdyn(NM3) at R2.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In the presence of increased RRS, Cdyn estimated by the NM3 monitor presented better capability to distinguish between changes in RRS from changes in respiratory system compliance.

Setting the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure: a narrative review

The primary goals of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) are to restore functional residual capacity through recruitment and prevention of alveolar collapse. Through these mechanisms, PEEP improves arterial oxygenation and may reduce the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Because of the many potential negative effects associated with the use of PEEP, much research has concentrated on determining the optimal PEEP setting. Arterial oxygenation targets and pressure-volume loops have been utilized to set the optimal PEEP for decades. Several other techniques have been suggested, including the use of PEEP tables, compliance, driving pressure (DP), stress index (SI), transpulmonary pressures, imaging, and electrical impedance tomography. Each of these techniques has its own benefits and limitations and there is currently not one technique that is recommended above all others.