1
|
Al-Tawfiq JA, Chopra H, Dhama K, Sah R, Schlagenhauf P, Memish ZA. The cholera challenge: How should the world respond? New Microbes New Infect 2022; 51:101077. [PMID: 36654941 PMCID: PMC9841269 DOI: 10.1016/j.nmni.2022.101077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq
- Infectious Disease Unit, Specialty Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hitesh Chopra
- Chitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab, India
| | - Kuldeep Dhama
- Division of Pathology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute (IVRI), Izatnagar, 243122, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Ranjit Sah
- Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
- Dr. Y Patl Medical College, Hospital and Research Center, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Patricia Schlagenhauf
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Travellers' Health, Institute for Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention, University of Zürich Centre for Travel Medicine, MilMedBiol Competence Centre, University of Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Ziad A Memish
- Al-Faisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud Medical City, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Deen J, Clemens JD. Vaccine clinical trials in low- and middle-income countries: a brief review of standard, newer and proposed approaches. Expert Rev Vaccines 2022; 21:1595-1602. [DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2126357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Deen
- Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Pedro Gil Street, Ermita, Manila 1000, Philippines
| | - John D Clemens
- International Vaccine Institute, SNU Research Park, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826 Korea
- UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, 650 Charles E Young Drive South, Los Angeles, California 90095-1772, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rane MS, Halloran ME. Estimating population-level effects of the acellular pertussis vaccine using routinely collected immunization data. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 73:2101-2107. [PMID: 33881527 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measuring and reporting the different population-level effects of the acellular pertussis vaccine on pertussis disease in addition to direct effects can increase the cost-effectiveness of a vaccine. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children born between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017, in King County, Washington, who were enrolled in the Washington State Immunization Information System. Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular-Pertussis (DTaP) vaccination data from WA-IIS was linked with pertussis case data from Public Health Seattle and King County. Census-level vaccination coverage was estimated as proportion of age-appropriately vaccinated children residing in it. Direct vaccine effectiveness was estimated by comparing pertussis risk in fully-vaccinated and under-vaccinated children. Population-level vaccine effects were estimated by comparing pertussis risk in census tracts in the highest vaccination coverage quartile to that in the lowest vaccination coverage quartile. RESULTS For direct protection, estimated vaccine effectiveness was 76% (95% CI: 63% - 84%) in low vaccination coverage clusters and it decreased to 47% (95% CI: 13% - 68%) in high vaccination coverage clusters, after adjusting for potential confounders. The estimated indirect effect was 45.0% (95% CI: 1%, 70%), total effect was 93.9% (95% CI: 91%, 96%), and overall effect was 42.2% (95% CI: 19%, 60%). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that DTaP vaccination provided direct as well as indirect protection in the highly immunized King County, WA. Routine DTaP vaccination programs may have the potential to provide not only protection for vaccinated individuals but also for the under-vaccinated individuals living in the same area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhura S Rane
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle USA
| | - M Elizabeth Halloran
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle USA.,Department of Biostatistics University of Washington, Seattle USA.,Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Epidemiology Program, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ilboudo PG, Mengel MA, Gessner BD, Ngwira B, Cavailler P, Le Gargasson JB. Cost-effectiveness of a reactive oral cholera immunization campaign using Shanchol™ in Malawi. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2021; 19:17. [PMID: 33691725 PMCID: PMC7945304 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-021-00270-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Oral cholera vaccines (OCV) have been recommended as additional measures for the prevention of cholera. However, little is known about the cost-effectiveness of OCV use in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in reactive outbreak contexts. This study aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of the use of OCV Shanchol in response to a cholera outbreak in the Lake Chilwa area, Malawi. Methods The Excel-based Vaccine Introduction Cost-Effectiveness model was used to assess the cost-effectiveness ratios with and without indirect protection. Model input parameters were obtained from cost evaluations and epidemiological studies conducted in Malawi and published literature. One-way sensitivity and threshold analyses of cost-effectiveness ratios were performed. Results Compared with the reference scenario i.e. treatment of cholera cases, the immunization campaign would have prevented 636 and 1 020 cases of cholera without and with indirect protection, respectively. The cost-effectiveness ratios were US$19 212 per death, US$500 per case, and US$738 per DALY averted without indirect protection. They were US$10 165 per death, US$264 per case, and US$391 per DALY averted with indirect protection. The net cost per DALY averted was sensitive to four input parameters, including case fatality rate, duration of immunity (vaccine’s protective duration), discount rate and cholera incidence. Conclusion Relative to the Malawi gross domestic product per capita, the reactive OCV campaign represented a cost-effective intervention, particularly when considering indirect vaccine effects. Results will need to be assessed in other settings, e.g., during campaigns implemented directly by the Ministry of Health rather than by international partners. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-021-00270-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick G Ilboudo
- Agence de Médecine Préventive, 10 BP 638, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
| | - Martin A Mengel
- Agence de Médecine Préventive, 21 boulevard Pasteur, Paris, 75015, France
| | - Bradford D Gessner
- Agence de Médecine Préventive, 21 boulevard Pasteur, Paris, 75015, France.,Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | | | - Philippe Cavailler
- Agence de Médecine Préventive, 21 boulevard Pasteur, Paris, 75015, France
| | - Jean-Bernard Le Gargasson
- Agence de Médecine Préventive, Bureau Ferney-Voltaire, Bat. JB Say, 4e, aile A, 13, chemin du Levant, Ferney-Voltaire, 01210, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ali M, Clemens J. Assessing Vaccine Herd Protection by Killed Whole-Cell Oral Cholera Vaccines Using Different Study Designs. Front Public Health 2019; 7:211. [PMID: 31417890 PMCID: PMC6685418 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The population level effectiveness of a vaccine may arise as the result of direct protection of vaccinees and vaccine herd protection, which may protect non-vaccinees, vaccinees, or both. Indirect, total, enhanced, and overall vaccine protection are measures of vaccine herd protection. The level of population level effectiveness induced by a vaccine is driven by several factors, including known vaccine-induced protective efficacy, the magnitude, and distribution of vaccine coverage at a point in time and the extent to which different groups mix with one another in the community. Data on vaccine herd protection are valuable in understanding the importance and cost-effectiveness in deploying the e vaccine in public health program. Killed whole-cell (WC) oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) have been evaluated for herd protection in various study settings, leveraging geographic information system (GIS) tools for the analyses. This article provides a brief description of the herd protective effects of killed WC OCVs measured using various study deigns that include (a) individually randomized, controlled clinical trials, (b) cluster randomized clinical trials, (c) observational cohort studies, and (d) observational case-control studies. In all of the study designs, significant herd protection was observed in unvaccinated persons as well as in the community as a whole. The findings of these studies suggest that using killed WC OCV as a public health tool for controlling cholera is impactful and cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Ali
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - John Clemens
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Crowcroft NS, Klein NP. A framework for research on vaccine effectiveness. Vaccine 2018; 36:7286-7293. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2017] [Revised: 03/07/2018] [Accepted: 04/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
7
|
Ilboudo PG, Le Gargasson JB. Delivery cost analysis of a reactive mass cholera vaccination campaign: a case study of Shanchol™ vaccine use in Lake Chilwa, Malawi. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17:779. [PMID: 29258447 PMCID: PMC5735524 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2885-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholera is a diarrheal disease that produces rapid dehydration. The infection is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity. Oral cholera vaccine (OCV) has been propagated for the prevention of cholera. Evidence on OCV delivery cost is insufficient in the African context. This study aims to analyze Shanchol vaccine delivery costs, focusing on the vaccination campaign in response of a cholera outbreak in Lake Chilwa, Malawi. METHODS The vaccination campaign was implemented in two rounds in February and March 2016. Structured questionnaires were used to collect costs incurred for each vaccination related activity, including vaccine procurement and shipment, training, microplanning, sensitization, social mobilization and vaccination rounds. Costs collected, including financial and economic costs were analyzed using Choltool, a standardized cholera cost calculator. RESULTS In total, 67,240 persons received two complete doses of the vaccine. Vaccine coverage was higher in the first round than in the second. The two-dose coverage measured with the immunization card was estimated at 58%. The total financial cost incurred in implementing the campaign was US$480275 while the economic cost was US$588637. The total financial and economic costs per fully vaccinated person were US$7.14 and US$8.75, respectively, with delivery costs amounting to US$1.94 and US$3.55, respectively. Vaccine procurement and shipment accounted respectively for 73% and 59% of total financial and economic costs of the total vaccination campaign costs while the incurred personnel cost accounted for 13% and 29% of total financial and economic costs. Cost for delivering a single dose of Shanchol was estimated at US$0.97. CONCLUSION This study provides new evidence on economic and financial costs of a reactive campaign implemented by international partners in collaboration with MoH. It shows that involvement of international partners' personnel may represent a substantial share of campaign's costs, affecting unit and vaccine delivery costs.
Collapse
|