Intradermal injection of a fractional dose of an inactivated HFMD vaccine elicits similar protective immunity to intramuscular inoculation of a full dose of an Al(OH)3-adjuvanted vaccine

Safety and immunogenicity of an experimental live combination vaccine against enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16 in rhesus monkeys

Enterovirus 71 (EV-A71) and Coxsackievirus A16 (CV-A16) are the two most common pathogens causing hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). Previously, we obtained one candidate live attenuated strain each for EV-A71 and CV-A16; here, we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a combinedlive vaccine against EV-A71 and CV-A16 generated from these two candidate strains. Rhesus monkeys were intramuscularly treated with a live combinationvaccine against both EV-A71 and CV-A16 or with either vaccine alone. No fever or atypical clinical signs were observed in any animals. Monkeys vaccinated with the combinationlive vaccine presented no notable pathological changes in the brain, spinal cord, lung, and liver; in contrast, these regions showed inflammatory cell infiltration in monkeys treated with EV-A71 alone or CV-A16 alone. Weak viremia was detected in plasma after inoculation with the combinationvaccine; however, the duration of viral shedding in feces was increased. Biochemical studies revealed a slight increase in aspartate aminotransferase levels in monkeys inoculated with the live combination vaccine; however, histopathological findings did not attribute this change to liver damage. We also found that the live combinationvaccine induced a dual humoral immune response. Cytokine analysis indicated that the combined EV-A71/CV-A16 vaccine significantly down-regulated interleukin-8 production. Here, we have demonstrated that the live attenuated EV-A71/CV-A16 vaccine was safe and could trigger a dual specific immune response. However, its immune protection efficacy requires further investigation.

Systematic Review of Device Parameters and Design of Studies Bridging Biologic-Device Combination Products Using Prefilled Syringes and Autoinjectors

Biologic-device combination products using prefilled syringes (PFSs) and autoinjectors (AIs) are popular for biological products administered subcutaneously. Pharmacokinetic (PK) comparability studies commonly provide the scientific data to support introduction of AI presentations via bridging with PFS. A survey of biological products approved by FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research identified 17 biologics license applications (BLAs) with both PFS and AI presentations for subcutaneous (SC) administration, including 16 approved on February 1, 2018, and one with AI presentation under review. A systematic review on the device parameters and the PK comparability studies bridging the two presentations was conducted. Subsequently, whether device parameters or the PK study design may have influenced the PK comparability study results was evaluated. The reported device parameters for AI and PFS are generally consistent across BLAs, whereas the approach to assess PK comparability varied, including the study design. Most PK comparability studies met bioequivalence (BE) criteria. Upon inspection of the studies that did not meet BE criteria, injection depth of AI and the injection site for either AI or PFS were identified as potential influencing factors to the outcome of PK comparability study. This study represents an initial attempt to identify the potential influencing factors on device bridging, including the characteristics of the device and the clinical pharmacology study. These findings may inform the combination product development strategy, specifically design considerations for device and PK comparability studies.

Role of innate lymphoid cells and dendritic cells in intradermal immunization of the enterovirus antigen

Enterovirus type 71 (EV71) and coxsackievirus A 16 (CA16) are the major pathogens of human hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). In our previous study, intramuscular immunization with the inactivated EV71 vaccine elicited effective immunity, while immunization with the inactivated CA16 vaccine did not. In this report, we focused on innate immune responses elicited by inactivated EV71 and CA16 antigens administered intradermally or intramuscularly. The distributions of the EV71 and CA16 antigens administered intradermally or intramuscularly were not obviously different, but the antigens were detected for a shorter period of time when administered intradermally. The expression levels of NF-κB pathway signaling molecules, which were identified as being capable of activating DCs, ILCs, and T cells, were higher in the intradermal group than in the intramuscular group. Antibodies for the EV71 and CA16 antigens colocalized with ILCs and DCs in skin and muscle tissues under fluorescence microscopy. Interestingly, ILC colocalization decreased over time, while DC colocalization increased over time. ELISpot analysis showed that coordination between DCs and ILCs contributed to successful adaptive immunity against vaccine antigens in the skin. EV71 and/or CA16 antigen immunization via the intradermal route was more capable of significantly increasing neutralizing antibody titers and activating specific T cell responses than immunization via the intramuscular route. Furthermore, neonatal mice born to mothers immunized with the EV71 and CA16 antigens were 100% protected against wild-type EV71 or CA16 viral challenge. Together, our results provide new insights into the development of vaccines for HFMD.

Coxsackievirus A 16 (CA16) and enterovirus 71 (EV71) infections are the most common cause of hand-foot-and-mouth diseases. Inactivated virus has been evaluated as potential vaccine for both viruses in animal models, but protection was only achieved for EV71. In this study, led by Qihan Li from the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, researchers show that intradermal, as compared to intramuscular immunization, results in an elevated immune response and improved protection from EV71 and CA16 infection in mice. Intradermal vaccination increases interaction of vaccine antigen with dendritic cells and innate lymphoid cells at the site of inoculation, as compared to intramuscular vaccination. Intradermal vaccination furthermore improves the antibody and T cell response and protects mice from infection. However, complete protection of mice from CA16 infection was only achieved after intradermal immunization with a combination of inactivated EV71 and CA16 vaccine, suggesting that further improvements of this vaccine candidate will be necessary.

Molecular epidemiology and clinical features of hand, foot and mouth disease in northern Thailand in 2016: a prospective cohort study

Background

Hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is a major communicable disease in children ≤6 years old, particularly in several countries in the Asia-Pacific Region, including Thailand. HFMD impacts public health and the economy, especially in northern Thailand.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted to estimate the incidence rate and to identify the serotype and clinical features of HFMD among children in northern Thailand. A validated questionnaire and throat swab were used for data collection. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect human enterovirus and identify its serotypes. Participants were recruited from 14 hospitals in two provinces in northern Thailand, specifically, Chiang Rai and Pha Yao Province, between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2016. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used to detect the associations of signs and symptoms with HFMD serotype. Logistic regression was used to detect the associations of variables with a positive enterovirus at alpha = 0.05.

Result

In total, 612 children aged ≤6 years from Chiang Rai and Pha Yao Province who were diagnosed with HFMD by a throat swab were recruited for the analysis. Approximately half of the cohort was male (57.2%), 57.5% was aged < 2 years, and 57.5% lived in rural areas. The incidence rate was 279.72/100,000 person-years in Chiang Rai Province and 321.24 per 100,000 person-years in Pha Yao Province. Additionally, 42.5% of children were positive for human enterovirus; among these children, 56.1% were positive for enterovirus-A (EV-A), 17.7% were positive for coxsackievirus (CV), and 26.2% were positive for other human RNA enteroviruses. During the study period, 21 distinct outbreaks of HFMD were recognized. Four to five patients (total 92 patients) were selected from each outbreak for identifying its serotype; enterovirus-A71 (EV-A71) was detected in 34.8% of HFMD cases, coxsackievirus-A16 (CV-A16) in 26.1%, coxsackivirus-A6 (CV-A6) in 15.2%, coxsackievirus-A10 (CV-A10) in 10.9%, coxsackievirus-A4 (CV-A4) in 2.2%, coxsackievirus-B2 (CV-B2) in 2.2%, human rhinovirus in 2.2%, and unknown serotype in 6.4%. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that a history of breastfeeding for ≤6 months was associated with a higher chance of enterovirus infection than a history of breastfeeding > 6 months, and children who had mother who worked as farmers, daily wage employees, and unprofessional skilled jobs had a greater chance of enterovirus infection than those who had unemployed mothers. Coxsackievirus-infected children had a higher rate of rashes on the buttocks, knee, and elbow and fever but a lower rate of lethargy and malaise than EV-A71-infected children.

Conclusions

EV-A71 is a major cause of HFMD in children < 6 years old in northern Thailand, but rash, fever, and mouth ulcers are mostly found in participants with coxsackievirus infection. Breastfeeding should be promoted during early childhood for at least 6 months to prevent HFMD particularly those mother who are working in unprofessional skill jobs.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-018-3560-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Recent development of enterovirus A vaccine candidates for the prevention of hand, foot, and mouth disease

INTRODUCTION

Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) is a childhood illness commonly caused by enterovirus A. Enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) and coxsackievirus A16 (CV-A16) are the most commonly identified viruses associated with HFMD. Recently, outbreaks caused by different enterovirus A including CV-A6 and CV-A10 are increasing. Being available now to protect against EV-A71 infection, inactivated EV-A71 vaccines cannot prevent coxsackievirus infections, thus limiting their general application in controlling HFMD. Multivalent HFMD vaccines are suggested to have broad cross-neutralizing responses against these emerging enteroviruses.

AREAS COVERED

We discuss the recent development of enterovirus A vaccines including the inactivated whole-virion vaccine and virus-like particle vaccine candidates and review the information of neutralization epitopes of these viruses.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the coxsackievirus vaccine and the multivalent HFMD vaccine candidates in clinical trials is urgently required. Epitopic analysis showed that common immunodominant sites exist across these enteroviruses. However, variations of amino acid residues in these regions limit the induction of cross-neutralization antibodies, and therefore, a multivalent HFMD vaccine is required for broad protection against HFMD. With the inclusion of major circulating viruses in the development of multivalent HFMD vaccines, an increase in the success in HFMD control is anticipated.