Co-delivery of PSMA antigen epitope and mGM-CSF with a cholera toxin-like chimeric protein suppressed prostate tumor growth via activating dendritic cells and promoting CTL responses

Advancing tumor vaccines: Overcoming TME challenges, delivery strategies, and biomaterial-based vaccine for enhanced immunotherapy

Tumor vaccines, as an immunotherapeutic approach, harness the body's immune cells to provoke antitumor responses, which have shown promising efficacy in clinical settings. However, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and the ineffective vaccine delivery systems hinder the progression of many vaccines beyond phase II trials. This article begins with a comprehensive review of the complex interactions between tumor vaccines and TME, summarizing the current state of vaccine clinical research. Subsequently, we review recent advancements in targeted vaccine delivery systems and explore biomaterial-based tumor vaccines as a strategy to improve the efficacy of both delivery systems and treatment. Finally, we have presented our perspectives on tumor vaccine development, aiming to advance the field towards the creation of more effective tumor vaccines.

Immunotherapy Vaccines for Prostate Cancer Treatment

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic tumor vaccines have emerged as a compelling avenue for treating patients afflicted with advanced prostate cancer (PCa), particularly those experiencing biochemical relapse or ineligible for surgical intervention. This study serves to consolidate recent research findings on therapeutic vaccines targeting prostate tumors while delineating prevalent challenges within vaccine research and development.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus, up to August 31, 2024, using keywords such as 'vaccine', 'prostate cancer', 'immunotherapy', and others. We reviewed studies on various therapeutic vaccines, including dendritic cell-based, antigen, nucleic acid, and tumor cell vaccines.

RESULTS

Studies consistently showed that therapeutic vaccines, notably DC vaccines, had favorable safety profiles with few adverse effects. These vaccines, with varied antigenic formulations, demonstrated strong clinical outcomes, as indicated by metrics such as PSA response rates (9.5%-58%), extended PSA doubling times (52.9%-89.7%), overall survival durations (17.7-33.8 months), two-year mortality rates (0%-12.5%), biochemical relapse rates (42%-73%), and antigen-specific immune responses (33.3%-71.4% in responsive groups).

CONCLUSION

While clinical data for tumor vaccines have illuminated robust evidence of tumoricidal activity, the processes of their formulation and deployment are riddled with complexities. Combining vaccines with other therapies may enhance outcomes, and future research should focus on early interventions and deciphering the immune system's role in oncogenesis.

Mechanism study of cross presentation of exogenous antigen induced by cholera toxin-like chimeric protein

Tumor subunit vaccines have great potential in personalized cancer immunotherapy. They are usually administered with adjuvant owing to their low immunogenicity. Cholera toxin (CT) is a biological adjuvant with diverse biological functions and a long history of use. Our earlier study revealed that a CT-like chimeric protein co-delivered with murine granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (mGM-CSF) and prostate cancer antigen epitope could co-stimulate dendritic cells (DCs) and enhance cross presentation of tumor epitope. To further study the molecular mechanism of CT-like chimeric protein in cross presentation, major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I)-restricted epitope 257-264 of ovalbumin (OVAT) was used as a model antigen peptide in this study. Recombinant A subunit and pentameric B subunit of CT protein were respectively genetically constructed and purified. Then both assembled into AB5 chimeric protein in vitro. Three different chimeric biomacromolecules containing mGM-CSF and OVAT were constructed according to the different fusion sites and whether the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention sequence was included. It was found that A2 domain and B subunit of CT were both available for loading epitopes and retaining GM1 affinity. The binding activity of GM1 was positively correlated with antigen endocytosis. Once internalized, DCs became mature and cross-presented antigen. KDEL helped the whole molecule to be retained in the ER, and this improved the cross presentation of antigen on MHC I molecules. In conclusion, hexameric CT-like chimeric protein with dual effects of GM1 affinity and ER retention sequence were potential in improvement of cross presentation. The results laid a foundation for designing personalized tumor vaccine based on CT-like chimeric protein molecular structure.

AB Toxins as High-Affinity Ligands for Cell Targeting in Cancer Therapy

Conventional targeted therapies for the treatment of cancer have limitations, including the development of acquired resistance. However, novel alternatives have emerged in the form of targeted therapies based on AB toxins. These biotoxins are a diverse group of highly poisonous molecules that show a nanomolar affinity for their target cell receptors, making them an invaluable source of ligands for biomedical applications. Bacterial AB toxins, in particular, are modular proteins that can be genetically engineered to develop high-affinity therapeutic compounds. These toxins consist of two distinct domains: a catalytically active domain and an innocuous domain that acts as a ligand, directing the catalytic domain to the target cells. Interestingly, many tumor cells show receptors on the surface that are recognized by AB toxins, making these high-affinity proteins promising tools for developing new methods for targeting anticancer therapies. Here we describe the structure and mechanisms of action of Diphtheria (Dtx), Anthrax (Atx), Shiga (Stx), and Cholera (Ctx) toxins, and review the potential uses of AB toxins in cancer therapy. We also discuss the main advances in this field, some successful results, and, finally, the possible development of innovative and precise applications in oncology based on engineered recombinant AB toxins.

Bridging nanoplatform and vaccine delivery, a landscape of strategy to enhance nasal immunity

Vaccination is an urgently needed and effective option to address epidemic, cancers, allergies, and other diseases. Nasal administration of vaccines offers many benefits over needle-based injection including high compliance and less risk of infection. Inactivated or attenuated vaccines as convention vaccine present potential risks of pathogenic virulence reversal, the focus of nasal vaccine development has shifted to the use of next-generation (subunit and nucleic acid) vaccines. However, subunit and nucleic acid vaccine intranasally have numerous challenges in development and utilization due to mucociliary clearance, mucosal epithelial tight junction, and enzyme/pH degradation. Nanoplatforms as ideal delivery systems, with the ability to enhance the retention, penetration, and uptake of nasal mucosa, shows great potential in improving immunogenic efficacy of nasal vaccine. This review provides an overview of delivery strategies for overcoming nasal barrier, including mucosal adhesion, mucus penetration, targeting of antigen presenting cells (APCs), enhancement of paracellular transportation. We discuss methods of enhancing antigen immunogenicity by nanoplatforms as immune-modulators or multi-antigen co-delivery. Meanwhile, we describe the application status and development prospect of nanoplatforms for nasal vaccine administration. Development of nanoplatforms for vaccine delivery via nasal route will facilitate large-scale and faster global vaccination, helping to address the threat of epidemics.