1
|
Chavda VP, Ghali ENHK, Balar PC, Chauhan SC, Tiwari N, Shukla S, Athalye M, Patravale V, Apostolopoulos V, Yallapu MM. Protein subunit vaccines: Promising frontiers against COVID-19. J Control Release 2024; 366:761-782. [PMID: 38219913 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
The emergence of COVID-19 has posed an unprecedented global health crisis, challenging the healthcare systems worldwide. Amidst the rapid development of several vaccine formulations, protein subunit vaccines have emerged as a promising approach. This article provides an in-depth evaluation of the role of protein subunit vaccines in the management of COVID-19. Leveraging viral protein fragments, particularly the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, these vaccines elicit a targeted immune response without the risk of inducing disease. Notably, the robust safety profile of protein subunit vaccines makes them a compelling candidate in the management of COVID-19. Various innovative approaches, including reverse vaccinology, virus like particles, and recombinant modifications are incorporated to develop protein subunit vaccines. In addition, the utilization of advanced manufacturing techniques facilitates large-scale production, ensuring widespread distribution. Despite these advancements, challenges persist, such as the requirement for cold-chain storage and the necessity for booster doses. This article evaluates the formulation and applications of protein subunit vaccines, providing a comprehensive overview of their clinical development and approvals in the context of COVID-19. By addressing the current status and challenges, this review aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse on optimizing protein subunit vaccines for effective pandemic control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek P Chavda
- Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, L. M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad 380009, Gujarat, India.
| | - Eswara Naga Hanuma Kumar Ghali
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, TX 78504, USA; South Texas Center of Excellence in Cancer Research, School of Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, TX 78504, USA.
| | - Pankti C Balar
- Pharmacy Section, L. M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad 380009, Gujarat, India
| | - Subhash C Chauhan
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, TX 78504, USA; South Texas Center of Excellence in Cancer Research, School of Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, TX 78504, USA.
| | - Nikita Tiwari
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai 400019, India
| | - Somanshi Shukla
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai 400019, India
| | - Mansi Athalye
- Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, L. M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad 380009, Gujarat, India
| | - Vandana Patravale
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai 400019, India
| | - Vasso Apostolopoulos
- Institute for Health and Sport, Immunology and Translational Research, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3030, Australia; Immunology Program, Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), Melbourne, VIC 3021, Australia.
| | - Murali M Yallapu
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, TX 78504, USA; South Texas Center of Excellence in Cancer Research, School of Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, TX 78504, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kuriyama K, Murakami K, Sugiura K, Sakui S, Schuring RP, Mori M. Immunogenicity and safety of a second heterologous booster dose of NVX-CoV2373 (TAK-019) in healthy Japanese adults who had previously received a primary series of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine: Interim analysis report of a phase 3 open-label trial. Vaccine 2024; 42:662-670. [PMID: 38129286 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.12.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The phase 3, single-arm, open-label TAK-019-3001 study assessed two heterologous booster doses of NVX-CoV2373 administered 5 months apart in healthy Japanese adults who had completed a primary series of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine 6-12 months previously. In the main part of this study, a first booster induced rapid and robust anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses, addressing waning immunity in participants. METHODS This interim analysis evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of a second booster in the extension part of this study including comparisons with the first booster. Immunogenicity was assessed on extension day (ED) 1 (before vaccination) and ED15. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events occurring in the 7 and 28 days, respectively, after vaccination were assessed. RESULTS Of the 150 participants who received a first NVX-CoV2373 booster, 129 were administered a second booster on ED1. Participant characteristics were consistent between the main and extension parts of the study. Titres of anti-SARS-CoV-2 rS serum immunoglobulin G and serum neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral strain at ED15 were 4.0- and 3.0-fold higher, respectively, than those observed 5 months after the first booster on ED1, and 3.0- and 1.4-fold higher, respectively, than those observed 14 days after the first booster on day 15. The proportions of participants who experienced solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs) in the 7 days after the second booster were 73.6 % and 51.2 %, respectively: most were of grade 2 severity or lower. Seven percent of participants experienced unsolicited AEs in the 28 days after the second booster: all were unrelated to the treatment. There were no deaths or AEs leading to study discontinuation. DISCUSSION A second heterologous NVX-CoV2373 booster in healthy Japanese adults induced more robust anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses than the first booster. The second booster was well tolerated. No new safety concerns were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Kuriyama
- Japan Development, Global Vaccine Business Unit, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, Japan Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Kyoko Murakami
- Medical Franchise Vaccine, Japan Medical Office, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kenkichi Sugiura
- Statistical and Quantitative Sciences, Data Sciences Institute, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Sho Sakui
- Statistical and Quantitative Sciences, Data Sciences Institute, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Ron P Schuring
- Clinical Development, Global Vaccine Business Unit, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Mitsuhiro Mori
- Japan Development, Global Vaccine Business Unit, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, Japan Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Osaka, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|