The 2020 immunization programme landscape: Piloting an assessment metric to evaluate the maturity of national immunization programmes across the life course

Readiness assessment for cervical cancer elimination and prevention of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers in Europe - are we winning the RACE?

INTRODUCTION

To address the cervical cancer burden globally, the World Health Organization and European Union released strategies to facilitate HPV-related cancers prevention, including cervical cancer elimination. This research assessed European country level readiness to achieve cervical cancer elimination by adhering to such strategies.

AREAS COVERED

Readiness for cervical cancer elimination was assessed across a range of guiding questions relevant to three defined key domains: vaccination, screening, and treatment, each with two sub-domains focusing on decision making and implementation efforts. Publicly available data sources were used to inform the scoring across domains, to tier countries into either high, moderate-high, moderate-low, and low readiness archetypes.Key parameters identified associated with the high readiness archetype were high vaccination coverage rates (>70%), availability of gender neutral and catch-up vaccination, school-based vaccination availability, organized screening programs, use of HPV DNA primary screening tests, and data surveillance.

EXPERT OPINION

Our analysis highlights significant variability in decision making and implementation of vaccination, screening, and treatment programmes across Europe. Country scores expose the need for a multifaceted approach to achieve cervical cancer elimination in Europe, encompassing solid decision making commitments, implementation of these commitments, and the ability to collect, surveil, and apply the data use accurately.

Assessment of the comprehensiveness of paediatric national immunisation programmes in Europe: expert validation and future perspectives

BACKGROUND

The breadth of protection of National Immunisation Programmes (NIPs) across Europe varies, however, this has not been assessed within published literature. Therefore, a framework was developed to assess the comprehensiveness of pediatric NIPs in Europe. This study aimed to validate and further develop criteria used to cluster countries into three tiers.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Independent Europe-based experts (n = 23) in the field of pediatric vaccination were invited to participate in a double-blinded modified Delphi panel, with two online survey rounds and a virtual consensus meeting. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% of experts rating their agreement/disagreement on a 9-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

The number of preventable diseases covered by an NIP, simplification of the vaccination calendar, strengthened protection by increasing serotype, degree of funding and epidemiological factors were considered key concepts for consideration of the comprehensiveness of pediatric NIPs in Europe. Experts highlighted that the framework should be extended to include adolescent vaccines and populations up to 18 years of age. Consensus regarding further amendments to the framework was also reached.

CONCLUSIONS

This Delphi panel validated a framework to assess the comprehensiveness of European NIPs. The framework can be used to facilitate discussions to help countries improve and expand the breadth of protection provided by their NIP.