Evaluation of a novel ECG lead placement method in telemetered freely moving cynomolgus monkeys: Assessment of an intravascular biopotential lead

Performance and feasibility of three different approaches for computer based semi-automated analysis of ventricular arrhythmias in telemetric long-term ECG in cynomolgus monkeys

Computer-based analysis of long-term electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring in animal models represents a cost and time-consuming process as manual supervision is often performed to ensure accuracy in arrhythmia detection. Here, we investigate the performance and feasibility of three ECG interval analysis approaches A) attribute-based, B) attribute- and pattern recognition-based and C) combined approach with additional manual beat-to-beat analysis (gold standard) with regard to subsequent detection of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and time consumption. ECG analysis was performed on ECG raw data of 5 male cynomolgus monkeys (1000 h total, 2 × 100 h per animal). Both approaches A and B overestimated the total number of arrhythmias compared to gold standard (+8.92% vs. +6.47%). With regard to correct classification of detected VA event numbers (accelerated idioventricular rhythms [AIVR], ventricular tachycardia [VT]) approach B revealed higher accuracy compared to approach A. Importantly, VA burden (% of time) was precisely depicted when using approach B (-1.13%), whereas approach A resulted in relevant undersensing of ventricular arrhythmias (-11.76%). Of note, approach A and B could be performed with significant less working time (-95% and - 91% working time) compared to gold standard. In sum, we show that a combination of attribute-based and pattern recognition analysis (approach B) can reproduce VA burden with acceptable accuracy without using manual supervision. Since this approach allowed analyses to be performed with distinct time saving it represents a valuable approach for cost and time efficient analysis of large preclinical ECG datasets.

Best practice considerations for nonclinical in vivo cardiovascular telemetry studies in non-rodent species: Delivering high quality QTc data to support ICH E14/S7B Q&As

The ICH E14/S7B Questions and Answers (Q&As) guideline introduces the concept of a "double negative" nonclinical scenario (negative hERG assay and negative in vivo QTc study) to demonstrate that a drug does not produce a clinically relevant QT prolongation (i.e., no QT liability). This nonclinical "double negative" data package, along with negative Phase 1 clinical QTc data, may be sufficient to substitute for a clinical Thorough QT (TQT) study in some specific cases. While standalone GLP in vivo cardiovascular studies in non-rodent species are standard practice during nonclinical drug development for small molecule programs, a variety of approaches to the design, conduct, analysis and interpretation are utilized across pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations (CROs) that may, in some cases, negatively impact the stringent sensitivity needed to fulfill the new Q&As. Subject matter experts from both Pharma and CROs have collaborated to recommend best practices for more robust nonclinical cardiovascular telemetry studies in non-rodent species, with input from clinical and regulatory experts. The aim was to increase consistency and harmonization across the industry and to ensure delivery of high quality nonclinical QTc data to meet the proposed sensitivities defined within the revised ICH E14/S7B Q&As guideline (Q&As 5.1 and 6.1). The detailed best practice recommendations presented here cover the design and execution of the safety pharmacology cardiovascular study, including optimal methods for acquiring, analyzing, reporting, and interpreting the resulting QTc and pharmacokinetic data to allow for direct comparison to clinical exposures and assessment of safety margin for QTc prolongation.

Intravenous solid tip lead placement in telemetry implanted dogs. Part 1: Surgical methods, signal quality, and pathological endpoints

INTRODUCTION

Electrocardiogram (ECG) signals in safety pharmacology studies are generally collected via subcutaneous or epicardial leads. Subcutaneous placement is an easier procedure, but signals often contain artifacts. Epicardial leads offer improved quality but require additional surgical expertise. Signal quality and tolerability of intravenous (IV)/diaphragmatic ECG leads were investigated as a less invasive alternative to the epicardial ECG lead approach for cardiovascular assessment in dogs.

METHODS

Twenty-eight beagle dogs were implanted with PCT (n=14) or PCTP (n=14) transmitters with IV (negative)/diaphragmatic (positive) ECG leads arranged in approximate Lead II configuration. Surgical time for previous epicardial and current IV lead placement approaches was compared. The ECG signals were assessed for up to 32 weeks post-surgery. Signal quality was assessed based on good wave/total wave (GW/TW) ratios calculated using ECG PRO (Ponemah Physiology Platform, Version 4.8) and variability in ECG parameter measurements for each surgical model. Clinical pathology was assessed on all animals before surgery and approximately 2 and 12 weeks post-surgery. A specialized necropsy was conducted on four animals (two PCT and two PCTP) to assess the tolerability of telemetry equipment; selected tissues were examined microscopically.

RESULTS

Surgical time using the IV lead method was approximately 18% shorter than the epicardial lead method. The GW/TW ratio for IV lead-implanted dogs indicated good durability of signal that was similar to epicardial leads. Intra- and inter-animal variability in ECG parameter measurements was similar between IV lead-implanted and epicardial lead-implanted dogs. Clinical pathology revealed no noteworthy findings, and the IV/diaphragmatic surgical approach had minimal consequences on local vasculature and associated implantation sites.

DISCUSSION

Advantages of the IV/diaphragmatic lead model include a less invasive and shorter surgical procedure; high tissue tolerance, ECG signal quality, and durability; and data processing procedures similar to that of epicardial leads. Therefore, the IV/diaphragmatic lead configuration is a viable alternative to more invasive surgical approaches for telemetry device implantation in dogs.

Influence of surgically implantable telemetry solutions on in-life and post-mortem toxicology endpoints

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the appropriate application of telemetry and other technologies for nonclinical investigation of functional safety issues in the context of ongoing toxicology evaluations is a current industry challenge. One major issue is related to the potential impact of surgical implantation of a telemetry device on contemporarily established measures of drug toxicity, and potential for confounding pathological issues related to the systemic and local response of the experimental animal to the presence of a foreign body. This study was designed to evaluate the potential local and systemic impact of different implanted telemetry devices with varying requisite degrees of surgical complexity on general toxicology study endpoints.

METHODS

Sixteen male beagle dogs 1) no surgical instrumentation [n=4], 2) Jacketed External Telemetry (JET) with femoral artery blood pressure implant (PA-C10 LA) [n=4], or 3) fully implantable (DSI-D70-CCTP) devices [n=8], were assigned to experimental groups and evaluated within the context of a standard repeat-dose toxicology design to determine the potential impact of these treatments on routine in-life and post-mortem toxicological endpoints.

RESULTS

Device implantation, regardless of the level of invasiveness/complexity was without effect on any in-life safety parameter, including clinical chemistry and hematology, assessed in the experimental design. Histopathological findings were limited to the expected, primarily minimal to mild localized effects characteristic of a foreign body reaction (fibrosis, inflammation) in the area immediately in contact with the body of the transmitter device and associated sites of ECG lead and pressure catheter interface with local tissues.

DISCUSSION

This study represents the first definitive evaluation of the influence of variably invasive telemetry device implantation on standardized, essential toxicology endpoints in the context of a simulated repeated dose experimental design. The data suggest that, when carefully evaluated, the local effects of implanted telemetry devices can be managed in the context of a standard Investigational New Drug (IND)-enabling toxicology study. This study provides support for the potential incorporation of unrestrained cardiovascular assessments via implanted or external telemetry into standard multi-dose toxicology studies.