Evaluation of the PhysioTel™ Digital M11 cardiovascular telemetry implant in socially housed cynomolgus monkeys up to 16 weeks after surgery

Surgical instrumentation of cardiovascular telemetry device has minimal impact on the general toxicology data interpretation in Cynomolgus monkeys

Increasing numbers of general toxicology studies with integrated implanted cardiovascular (CV) telemetry are being conducted due to the constrained supply of nonhuman primates and demands for higher method sensitivities as per ICH S7B Q&A. However, limited information is available for the potential impact of surgical instrumentation on the toxicology data. In this study, we reviewed the reports of implanted CV telemetry studies conducted in cynomolgus monkeys from 2017 to 2022 at our facility. The instrumentation had no impact on food consumption, respiration, pulse oximetry, neurological parameters, ophthalmology, troponin I, urinalysis, immunophenotyping, or organ weights. There was a low probability of needing to exclude animals from studies due to instrumentation-related technical (4.8 %) or health issues (0.8 %). Incidences were low (0.3 % to 2.6 %) to have instrumentation-related in-life or laboratory findings. Pathology findings were regional, rarely associated with clinical pathology changes, non-adverse, and clearly distinguishable from the test article effects in the studies examined. They were limited to localized effects (fibrosis and low-grade inflammation) associated with a foreign body reaction in the area immediately in contact with the device. Also, thrombus formation (0.2 %) was noted when the femoral artery was used for blood pressure catheter placement. Changing from intramuscular to intra-peritoneal placement greatly reduced the incidence of unusable ECG data and abnormal clinical signs. Use of the internal iliac artery for catheter placement also eliminated thrombus formation and the subsequent health impact. In conclusion, implanted telemetry integrated into a nonhuman primate toxicology study does not compromise the study objectives, study execution, or toxicology data interpretation.

Comparison of electrocardiogram and blood pressure recording methods in non-rodent toxicology studies: A retrospective analysis

Our study retrospectively examines 51 non-rodent general toxicology studies conducted over the past 8 years to ascertain the influence of recording methodologies on baseline cardiovascular (CV) parameters and statistical sensitivity. Specifically, our work aims to evaluate the frequency of cardiovascular parameter recording categorized by therapeutic modality and study type, to assess the variability in these parameters based on measurement techniques, and to determine the sample sizes needed for detecting relevant changes in heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and QTc interval in non-human primate (NHP) studies. Results indicate that electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements in dogs and NHP were recorded in 63% of studies, combined with BP recording in 18% of studies, while BP was never recorded alone. Trend analysis reveals a decline in the utilisation of restraint-based methods for ECG measurements post-2017, to the benefit of telemetry-based recordings, particularly Jacketed External Telemetry (JET). There was a marked difference in baseline values, with restraint-based methods showing significantly higher HR and QTc values compared to JET, likely linked to animal stress. Further analysis suggests an unrealistic and unethical sample size requirement in NHP studies for detecting biologically meaningful CV parameter changes using restraint-based methods, while JET methods necessitate significantly smaller sample sizes. This retrospective study indicates a notable shift from snapshots short-duration, restraint-based methods towards telemetry approaches over the recent years, especially with an increased usage of implanted telemetry. The transition contributes to potential consensus within industry or regulatory frameworks for optimal practices in assessing ECG, HR, and BP in general toxicology studies.

The incidence of spontaneous arrhythmias in telemetered beagle dogs, Göttingen Minipigs and Cynomolgus non-human primates: A HESI consortium retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Characterization of the incidence of spontaneous arrhythmias to identify possible drug-related effects is often an important part of the analysis in safety pharmacology studies using telemetry.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis in non-clinical species with and without telemetry transmitters was conducted. Electrocardiograms (24 h) from male and female beagle dogs (n = 131), Göttingen minipigs (n = 108) and cynomolgus non-human primates (NHP; n = 78) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) was observed in 3% of the dogs but was absent in minipigs and NHPs. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was not observed in the 3 species. Ventricular premature beats (VPBs) were more frequent during daytime and atrioventricular blocks (AVBs) were more frequent at night in all species. A limited number of animals exhibited a high arrhythmia frequency and there was no correlation between animals with higher frequency of an arrhythmia type and the frequency of other arrythmias in the same animals. Clinical chemistry or hematology parameters were not different with or without telemetry devices. NHP with a transmural left ventricular pressure (LVP) catheter exhibited a greater incidence of VPBs and PJCs compared to telemetry animals without LVP.

DISCUSSION

All species were similar with regards to the frequency of ventricular ectopic beats (26-46%) while the dog seemed to have more frequent junctional complexes and AVB compared to NHP and minipigs. Arrhythmia screening may be considered during pre-study evaluations, to exclude animals with abnormally high arrhythmia incidence.

Strategies to encourage the adoption of social housing during cardiovascular telemetry recordings in non-rodents

The National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) is working with industry to promote social housing during cardiovascular telemetry recordings within non-rodent safety pharmacology and toxicology studies. Following surveys to capture current practice, benefits and concerns to adoption of this refinement (2015 and 2017), a 2018 European workshop shared experience and practical advice to address common barriers such as sensitivity of different study designs and the potential for cross-contamination with test article in socially-housed conditions. A similar number of responses were received to each survey (38 in 2015; 36 in 2017), from biopharmaceutical companies and CROs that perform or outsource non-rodent telemetry studies. Each dataset had different respondents, but 19 facilities provided answers regarding dogs and non-human primates (NHPs) for both surveys. More respondents socially-housed their non-rodents in 2017; increases were apparent for both the non-recording/acclimatisation periods and the telemetry recording periods compared with 2015. However, on recording days only 60, 75 and 89% of respondents from Europe and 25, 14 and 36% of respondents from outside of Europe socially-housed their dogs, minipigs or NHPs respectively. The potential for contamination with test article between animals housed together is considered by some facilities as justification for individual housing during recordings, however, survey data did not support this rationale. Nine organisations provided data on prevalence of vomiting during telemetry studies, showing the risk was moderate for dogs and very low for minipig and NHP. Further, if vomiting did occur, this could be managed effectively with little impact on study outcomes or validity and with careful dose selection, the risk is further diminished. A recent increase in published papers and posters on this topic would suggest many more companies are planning, or have recently implemented, this refinement. The continued willingness of the community to share practical experience and publish validation data may lead to this approach becoming the 'new standard' across the industry in the near future, representing a core component of 'best-practice' recommendations to increase animal welfare whilst maintaining quality data provision for investigational and regulatory purposes.