The evaluation of endpoint variability and implications for study statistical power and sample size in conscious instrumented dogs

Collaborative science in action: A 20 year perspective from the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) Cardiac Safety Committee

The Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to resolving global health challenges through collaborative scientific efforts across academia, regulatory authorities and the private sector. Collaborative science across non-clinical disciplines offers an important keystone to accelerate the development of safer and more effective medicines. HESI works to address complex challenges by leveraging diverse subject-matter expertise across sectors offering access to resources, data and shared knowledge. In 2008, the HESI Cardiac Safety Committee (CSC) was established to improve public health by reducing unanticipated cardiovascular (CV)-related adverse effects from pharmaceuticals or chemicals. The committee continues to significantly impact the field of CV safety by bringing together experts from across sectors to address challenges of detecting and predicting adverse cardiac outcomes. Committee members have collaborated on the organization, management and publication of prospective studies, retrospective analyses, workshops, and symposia resulting in 38 peer reviewed manuscripts. Without this collaboration these manuscripts would not have been published. Through their work, the CSC is actively addressing challenges and opportunities in detecting potential cardiac failure modes using in vivo, in vitro and in silico models, with the aim of facilitating drug development and improving study design. By examining past successes and future prospects of the CSC, this manuscript sheds light on how the consortium's multifaceted approach not only addresses current challenges in detecting potential cardiac failure modes but also paves the way for enhanced drug development and study design methodologies. Further, exploring future opportunities and challenges will focus on improving the translational predictability of nonclinical evaluations and reducing reliance on animal research in CV safety assessments.

The in vivo QTc core assay: An evaluation of QTc variability, detection sensitivity and implications for the improvement of conscious dog and non-human primate telemetry studies

The ICH S7B guideline describes the requirement to conduct an in vitro I_Kr (hERG) and in vivo QTc assay for human risk assessment of new drug products, but the guidance is devoid of recommendations on study execution or quality. In the absence of standard practice, multiple study designs and experimental approaches have been utilized, especially with the nonclinical QTc assay. Since 2009, our approach to the in vivo QTc assay has been consistent for small molecules and yields reproducible and sensitive levels for QTc signal detection. Our database and experience indicate that nonrodent telemetry studies can achieve high sensitivity and a calculated metric of study power can be used to indicate study quality. Using a retrospective statistical power analysis of multiple studies (n = 14 dog; n = 6 NHP), the detection sensitivity for a specific study design (N = 8; double Latin square cross-over) was determined. The output of the power analysis is the minimal detectable effect at 80% power and a 95% probability level. The design provided an average sensitivity to detect a 4.7 (2.0%) and 6.5 (1.9%) msec QTcI change in dog and NHP, respectively. These findings suggest that this experimental approach has a consistent and reproducible sensitivity to enable a robust QTcI risk evaluation and can be used confidently to support an integrated nonclinical-clinical pro-arrhythmia risk assessment. The inclusion of power analysis (i.e., QTc sensitivity) data in a regulatory submission provides key information to critical stakeholders about the quality of the in vivo QTc assessment and its value for human safety testing.

Strategies to encourage the adoption of social housing during cardiovascular telemetry recordings in non-rodents

The National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) is working with industry to promote social housing during cardiovascular telemetry recordings within non-rodent safety pharmacology and toxicology studies. Following surveys to capture current practice, benefits and concerns to adoption of this refinement (2015 and 2017), a 2018 European workshop shared experience and practical advice to address common barriers such as sensitivity of different study designs and the potential for cross-contamination with test article in socially-housed conditions. A similar number of responses were received to each survey (38 in 2015; 36 in 2017), from biopharmaceutical companies and CROs that perform or outsource non-rodent telemetry studies. Each dataset had different respondents, but 19 facilities provided answers regarding dogs and non-human primates (NHPs) for both surveys. More respondents socially-housed their non-rodents in 2017; increases were apparent for both the non-recording/acclimatisation periods and the telemetry recording periods compared with 2015. However, on recording days only 60, 75 and 89% of respondents from Europe and 25, 14 and 36% of respondents from outside of Europe socially-housed their dogs, minipigs or NHPs respectively. The potential for contamination with test article between animals housed together is considered by some facilities as justification for individual housing during recordings, however, survey data did not support this rationale. Nine organisations provided data on prevalence of vomiting during telemetry studies, showing the risk was moderate for dogs and very low for minipig and NHP. Further, if vomiting did occur, this could be managed effectively with little impact on study outcomes or validity and with careful dose selection, the risk is further diminished. A recent increase in published papers and posters on this topic would suggest many more companies are planning, or have recently implemented, this refinement. The continued willingness of the community to share practical experience and publish validation data may lead to this approach becoming the 'new standard' across the industry in the near future, representing a core component of 'best-practice' recommendations to increase animal welfare whilst maintaining quality data provision for investigational and regulatory purposes.