1
|
Patterns of Somatic Variants in Colorectal Adenoma and Carcinoma Tissue and Matched Plasma Samples from the Hungarian Oncogenome Program. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030907. [PMID: 36765865 PMCID: PMC9913259 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of colorectal adenoma (AD) and cancer (CRC) patients provides a minimally invasive approach that is able to explore genetic alterations. It is unknown whether there are specific genetic variants that could explain the high prevalence of CRC in Hungary. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on colon tissues (27 AD, 51 CRC) and matched cfDNAs (17 AD, 33 CRC); furthermore, targeted panel sequencing was performed on a subset of cfDNA samples. The most frequently mutated genes were APC, KRAS, and FBN3 in AD, while APC, TP53, TTN, and KRAS were the most frequently mutated in CRC tissue. Variants in KRAS codons 12 (AD: 8/27, CRC: 11/51 (0.216)) and 13 (CRC: 3/51 (0.06)) were the most frequent in our sample set, with G12V (5/27) dominance in ADs and G12D (5/51 (0.098)) in CRCs. In terms of the cfDNA WES results, tumor somatic variants were found in 6/33 of CRC cases. Panel sequencing revealed somatic variants in 8 out of the 12 enrolled patients, identifying 12/20 tumor somatic variants falling on its targeted regions, while WES recovered only 20% in the respective regions in cfDNA of the same patients. In liquid biopsy analyses, WES is less efficient compared to the targeted panel sequencing with a higher coverage depth that can hold a relevant clinical potential to be applied in everyday practice in the future.
Collapse
|
2
|
Bencina G, Chami N, Hughes R, Weston G, Baxter C, Maciejczyk A, Popovic L, Karamousouli E, Salomonsson S. Breast cancer-related mortality in Central and Eastern Europe: years of life lost and productivity costs. J Med Econ 2023; 26:254-261. [PMID: 36756852 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2169497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) poses a public health challenge as the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women globally. While BC mortality has declined across Europe in the past three decades, an opposite trend has been reported in some transitional European countries. This analysis estimates the mortality burden and the cost of lost productivity due to BC deaths in nine Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) countries: Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, and Slovenia, that have defied the favorable cancer mortality trends. These estimates may provide relevant evidence to aid decision-makers in the prioritization of BC-targeted policies. METHODS The human capital approach (HCA) was used to estimate years of life lost (YLL) and productivity losses due to premature death from BC (ICD-10 code: C50 Malignant neoplasm of breast). YLL and present value of future lost productivity (PVFLP) were calculated using age and gender-specific mortality, wages, and employment rates. Data were sourced from the World Health Organization (WHO), Eurostat, and the World Bank. RESULTS In 2019, there were 19,726 BC deaths in the nine CEE countries. This study estimated BC deaths resulted in 267,184 YLL. Annual PVFLP was estimated to be €85 M in Poland, €46 M in Romania, €39 M in Hungary, €21 M in Slovakia, €18 M in Serbia, €16 M in Czech Republic, €15 M in Bulgaria, €13 M in Croatia, and €7 M in Slovenia. CONCLUSION Premature death from BC leads to substantial YLL and productivity losses. Lost productivity costs due to premature BC-related mortality exceeded €259 million in 2019 alone. The data modeled provide important evidence toward resource allocation priorities for BC prevention, screening, and treatment that could potentially decrease productivity losses. Careful consideration should be given to BC-specific policies, such as surveillance programs and the availability of new treatments in CEE countries to decrease the medical and financial burden of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Goran Bencina
- Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence, MSD Spain, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Adam Maciejczyk
- Department of Oncology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
- Department of Radiotherapy, Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Haematology Center, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Lazar Popovic
- Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Faculty of Medicine, University Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | | | - Stina Salomonsson
- MSD, Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wéber A, Szatmári I, Dobozi M, Hilbert L, Branyiczkiné Géczy G, Nagy P, Kásler M, Polgár C, Kenessey I. Comparison of Hungarian Central Statistical Office's causes of death data with the database of the Hungarian National Cancer Registry. Orv Hetil 2022; 163:1481-1489. [PMID: 36088625 DOI: 10.1556/650.2022.32573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
Introduction: In international comparison, Hungary is in the forefront of cancer incidence and mortality statistics. Based on paper-based death certificates, mortality statistics are compiled by the Hungarian Central Statistical Office, while population-based measures of cancer incidences are performed by the Hungarian National Cancer Registry. Objective: Linking the records of these two independent databases can highlight their weaknesses and provide an opportunity to reconcile and verify collected data, which may emphasize the need to expand current data exchange protocols. Method: Based on the Hungarian unique health care insurance ID, the mortality database of the Hungarian Central Statistical Office between 2012 and 2020 was compared with the data of the Hungarian National Cancer Registry from 2001 to 2020. Deaths in 2018, in particular those related to lung cancer, were examined in more depth to demonstrate the biases resulting from erroneous data collection. Results: The mortality database of the Hungarian Central Statistical Office contained 32 586 cases with an underlying cause of death of malignant neoplasm for 2018, of which 29 970 were identified in the Hungarian National Cancer Registry. Out of the 8716 deaths coded to lung cancer, 7957 corresponding individuals were also found in the Registry. From the matches, 7381 cases were marked with lung cancer in the Hungarian National Cancer Registry. For the remaining 576 cases, the Registry recorded different types of cancers, of which in 69 cases with lung metastasis. Discussion: The differences between the two databases may be caused by methodological differences in data collection, incomplete, inaccurate reporting and differences in processing algorithms. Nevertheless, the majority of the data in the examined databases were found to be appropriate for epidemiological studies. Conclusion: Based on the outcomes of the present analysis, a revision of the data transfer between the two institutions is in order. The introduction of electronic Death certificate recording and validity checks are expected to improve the reliability of ID numbers and may shorten data processing times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- András Wéber
- 1 Országos Onkológiai Intézet Budapest, Ráth György u. 7-9., 1122 Magyarország
- 2 International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Cancer Surveillance Branch Lyon France
- 3 Nemzeti Tumorbiológiai Laboratórium Budapest Magyarország
| | - István Szatmári
- 1 Országos Onkológiai Intézet Budapest, Ráth György u. 7-9., 1122 Magyarország
- 3 Nemzeti Tumorbiológiai Laboratórium Budapest Magyarország
| | - Mária Dobozi
- 1 Országos Onkológiai Intézet Budapest, Ráth György u. 7-9., 1122 Magyarország
- 3 Nemzeti Tumorbiológiai Laboratórium Budapest Magyarország
| | | | | | - Péter Nagy
- 1 Országos Onkológiai Intézet Budapest, Ráth György u. 7-9., 1122 Magyarország
- 3 Nemzeti Tumorbiológiai Laboratórium Budapest Magyarország
- 5 Állatorvostudományi Egyetem, Anatómiai és Szövettani Tanszék Budapest Magyarország
- 6 Debreceni Egyetem, Onkokémiai Intézet Debrecen Magyarország
| | - Miklós Kásler
- 1 Országos Onkológiai Intézet Budapest, Ráth György u. 7-9., 1122 Magyarország
- 7 Emberi Erőforrások Minisztériuma Budapest Magyarország
| | - Csaba Polgár
- 1 Országos Onkológiai Intézet Budapest, Ráth György u. 7-9., 1122 Magyarország
- 3 Nemzeti Tumorbiológiai Laboratórium Budapest Magyarország
- 8 Semmelweis Egyetem, Általános Orvostudományi Kar, Onkológiai Tanszék Budapest Magyarország
| | - István Kenessey
- 1 Országos Onkológiai Intézet Budapest, Ráth György u. 7-9., 1122 Magyarország
- 3 Nemzeti Tumorbiológiai Laboratórium Budapest Magyarország
- 9 Semmelweis Egyetem, Általános Orvostudományi Kar, Patológiai, Igazságügyi és Biztosítási Orvostani Intézet Budapest Magyarország
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brodszky V, Beretzky Z, Baji P, Rencz F, Péntek M, Rotar A, Tachkov K, Mayer S, Simon J, Niewada M, Hren R, Gulácsi L. Cost-of-illness studies in nine Central and Eastern European countries. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2019; 20:155-172. [PMID: 31104219 PMCID: PMC6544593 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-019-01066-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, a multi-country review evaluating the cost-of-illness (COI) studies from the Central and Eastern European (CEE) region has not yet been published. Our main objective was to provide a general description about published COI studies from CEE. METHODS A systematic search was performed between 1 January 2006 and 1 June 2017 in Medline, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science to identify all relevant COI studies from nine CEE countries. COI studies reporting costs without any restrictions by age, co-morbidities, or treatment were included. Methodology, publication standards, and cost results were analysed. RESULTS We identified 58 studies providing 83 country-specific COI results: Austria (n = 9), Bulgaria (n = 16), Croatia (n = 3), the Czech Republic (n = 10), Hungary (n = 24), Poland (n = 11), Romania (n = 3), Slovakia (n = 3), and Slovenia (n = 4). Endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases (18%), neoplasms (12%), infections (11%), and neurological disorders (11%) were the most frequently studied clinical areas, and multiple sclerosis was the most commonly studied disease. Overall, 57 (98%) of the studies explicitly stated the source of resource use data, 45 (78%) the study perspective, 34 (64%) the costing method, and 24 (58%) reported at least one unit costs. Regardless of methodological differences, a positive relationship was observed between costs of diseases and countries' per capita GDP. CONCLUSIONS Cost-of-illness studies varied considerably in terms of methodology, publication practice, and clinical areas. Due to these heterogeneities, transferability of the COI results is limited across Central and Eastern European countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentin Brodszky
- Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8., 1093, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Zsuzsanna Beretzky
- Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8., 1093, Budapest, Hungary
- Doctoral School of Business and Management, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8., 1093, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Petra Baji
- Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8., 1093, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Fanni Rencz
- Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8., 1093, Budapest, Hungary
- Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Premium Postdoctoral Research Program, Nádor u. 7, 1051, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Márta Péntek
- Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8., 1093, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Alexandru Rotar
- Department of Social Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Konstantin Tachkov
- Department of Social Pharmacy and Pharmacoeconomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, 2, Dunav str., 1000, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Susanne Mayer
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/1, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Judit Simon
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/1, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Applied Diagnostics, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Maciej Niewada
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1b, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Rok Hren
- Institute of Mathematics, Physics, and Mechanics, Jadranska 19, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Physics, University of Ljubljana, Jadranska 19, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - László Gulácsi
- Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8., 1093, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Long-term costs and survival of prostate cancer: a population-based study. Int Urol Nephrol 2017; 49:1707-1714. [PMID: 28762117 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-017-1669-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2017] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is a rising interest in measuring the societal burden of malignancies including prostate cancer. However, population-based studies reporting incidence costs of prostate cancer in the long term are lacking in Europe. The objectives of the study are to analyse the long-term costs and survival of prostate cancer patients treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) or conservative management (nRP). METHODS A retrospective claims data analysis of the National Health Insurance Found Administration of Hungary between 01.01.2002 and 31.10.2013 was carried out. Annual incidence costs related to prostate cancer and overall survival were calculated for a cohort of patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2005. RESULTS Altogether 17,642 patients were selected; 2185 (12%) of them have undergone RP. The annual incidence rate ranged between 4177 and 4736 cases. Mean age of RP and nRP patients was 59.4 (SD 5.9) and 71.0 (8.4) years, respectively. The mean survival time of the RP patients was significantly longer compared to nRP patients both in the total sample (11.2 vs. 7.4 years; p < 0.001) and in the subgroup <70 years (11.3 vs. 8.8 years; p < 0.001). At the end of the 12-year follow-up, RP patients had a higher (0.83 vs. 0.68), while nRP patients had a slightly lower (0.35 vs. 38) probability of being alive compared with the age-matched general male population. The long-term cumulative costs of the RP and nRP patients amounted to €4448 and €8616. The main driver of the cost difference was the high drug costs in the nRP group. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this study applied the longest time-window in reporting population-based incidence costs in Europe. We found that not only RP patients lived longer but they had significantly lower total long-term costs than nRP patients. Therefore, radical prostatectomy is a cost-effective strategy in prostate cancer.
Collapse
|