Resuming anticoagulant therapy after intracerebral bleeding

ISCHEMIC STROKE AND MAJOR BLEEDING WHILE ON DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS IN NAÏVE PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: IMPACT OF RESUMPTION OR DISCONTINUATION OF ANTICOAGULANT TREATMENT. A population-based study

AIMS

We assessed the cumulative incidence of recurrent stroke, major bleeding and all-cause mortality associated with restarting antithrombotic treatment, in patients experiencing an anticoagulation-related event (stroke or major bleeding), occurred during anticoagulation therapy for AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a retrospective population-based analysis on linked claims data of patients resident in the Veneto Region, treated with DOACs for AF and discharged (2013-2020) from the hospital for stroke, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), and major bleeding. To adjust for competing risk of death and reduce confounding, we started the follow up after a 120-days blanking period, counting events in patients resuming oral anticoagulation versus those that did not. Risks of all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke (IS)intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), and other major bleeding events (MB) were estimated with multivariable Cox proportional hazard models and propensity score to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. Overall, 1029 patients (mean age 77 years) were included in the final cohort: 23% experienced an IS, 18% an ICH, and 59% MB. Of these, 77% resumed anticoagulation. The cumulative incidence of events was significantly lower in patients resuming therapy. In the multivariable analysis considering age, sex and propensity score as covariates, resumption of anticoagulation significantly reduced the risk of a cumulative event (HR 0.45, 95%CI 0.35-0.57, p < 0.01). Stratifying for the index event, among patients with IS (92% resumed therapy), we observed a risk reduction of 81%; in patients with ICH (64% resumed therapy), we observed a risk reduction of 64% and for patients with MB (76% resuming therapy), we observed a risk reduction of 49%.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AF who experienced an anticoagulation-related event, resuming oral anticoagulation was associated with better outcomes for all-cause mortality and subsequent events as compared with patients who did not resume treatment.

Spontaneous epidural hematoma induced by rivaroxaban: A case report and review of the literature

Background:

Trauma is the most frequent reason for epidural bleeding. However, numerous investigation had discovered that anticoagulants such as rivaroxaban could cause epidural hematoma. Here, we present a case of epidural hematoma in young man who got rivaroxaban as treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

Case Description:

A 27-year-old male with a history of deep vein thrombosis and one month of rivaroxaban medication presented with seizure and loss of consciousness following a severe headache. A CT scan of the head revealed epidural bleeding, and emergency blood clot removal was performed. As a reversal, prothrombin complex was utilized.

Conclusion:

Rivaroxaban has the potential to cause an epidural hemorrhage. Reversal anticoagulant should be administered before doing emergency surgery.

Anticoagulation and Stroke

In 2019, the American Heart Association did not recommend the emergent use of anticoagulation to prevent recurrence or progression of acute ischemic stroke. However, its indication in patients with extracranial artery intraluminal thrombus with artery-to-artery cerebral embolization must be analyzed. In this article, we will also discuss other indications of anticoagulation. This treatment could be indicated in patients with ischemic stroke caused by embolization from cervical artery dissection, catastrophic antiphospholipid antibodies syndrome (APS) and some cases of Covid 19. For secondary prevention, anticoagulation is recommended for Cardioembolic stroke such as nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and other cardiopathies, some patients with cervical artery dissection, stroke associated with cancer, and thrombophilia such as APS. The timing to restart anticoagulation after a large ischemic stroke or after a cerebral hemorrhagic transformation always represent a challenge. Even in patients with high risk of thromboembolism it should be delayed at least two weeks, ideal after four weeks.

Anticoagulation after Spontaneous Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valves and Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation

Aim Patients with mechanical heart valves and coexisting atrial fibrillation (AFib-MHV) who suffer an intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH, defined as bleeding solely within the brain parenchyma and/or ventricle) are at a high risk of thromboembolism without anticoagulation. Data are lacking regarding the safety of early re-initiation of anticoagulation in these patients.

Patients and Methods We performed a descriptive, single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with AFib-MHV who suffered a non-traumatic, supratentorial IPH between July 2013 and June 2017. We analyzed the patients and IPH characteristics, anticoagulation and antiplatelet use, the occurrence of thrombotic and hemorrhage complications, and discharge disposition. We described the timing of initiation of anticoagulation and outcomes after IPH while in-patient.

Results Six patients with AFib-MHV suffered a spontaneous IPH. Four were initiated on anticoagulation prior to discharge, of whom two were initiated within 3 days post-hemorrhage. These patients suffered no bleeding complications and were discharged home with a modified Rankin Scale of 1.

Conclusion Patients with AFib-MHV who suffer a spontaneous IPH are a rare population to study. Further studies to guide the management of restarting anticoagulation in this select population are warranted.

Treatment strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation and anticoagulant-associated intracranial hemorrhage: an overview of the pharmacotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Oral anticoagulants (OAC) reduce stroke/systemic embolism and mortality risks in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is an inherent bleeding risk with OAC, where intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is the most feared, disabling, and lethal complication of this therapy. Therefore, the optimal management of OAC-associated ICH is not well defined despite multiple suggested strategies.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors describe the severity and risk factors for OAC-associated ICH and the associated implications for using DOACs in AF patients. We also provide an overview of the management of OAC-associated ICH and treatment reversal strategies, including specific and nonspecific reversal agents as well as a comprehensive summary of the evidence about the resumption of DOAC and the optimal timing.

EXPERT OPINION

In the setting of an ICH, supportive care/measures are needed, and reversal of anticoagulation with specific agents (including administration of vitamin K, prothrombin complex concentrates, idarucizumab and andexanet alfa) should be considered. Most patients will likely benefit from restarting anticoagulation after an ICH and permanently withdrawn of OAC is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Although the timing of OAC resumption is still under debate, reintroduction after 4-8 weeks of the bleeding event may be possible, after a multidisciplinary approach to decision-making.

Antithrombotic Management After Intracranial Hemorrhage

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intracranial hemorrhage remains one of the most feared acute neurological emergencies. However, apart from the acute management, secondary risk factor management and prevention of ischemic events remains ambiguous. We present a thorough review of the current data available regarding management of antithrombotics after intracranial hemorrhage.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most robust evidence comes from the investigators of the RESTART trial which reassured the safety of resuming antiplatelet therapy after ICH, namely in patients with prior indication and treatment with antithrombotics. We conclude that based on available data, the risk of recurrent ICH is probably too small to exceed the found benefits of antiplatelet therapy in the secondary prevention of ischemic vascular disease.

Acute parenchymal hemorrhage of three cases report after burr hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common neurological diseases, which mainly occurs among elderly people and usually develop after minor head injuries. Over the years, a simple burr hole evacuation of the hematoma has been accepted as the widespread method for most cases of CSDH, but acute parenchymal hemorrhage is a rare and deadly complication after surgery. We report three elderly cases of post-operative parenchymal hemorrhage and analyse the underlying factors and formulate relevant strategies in this article. Three advanced age patients had been admitted to our department with gradually increasing headache and limb activity disorder urgently and underwent an emergency operation of burr hole drainage of CSDH in frontal-temporal region after preoperative evaluations and examinations. Unfortunately, acute post-operative parenchymal hemorrhage occurred in three advanced age patients. Ultimately, the patients achieved satisfying outcome with no significant neurological deficit through conservative treatment. The exact mechanism of such uncommon complications are difficult to explain and remain poorly understood. Advanced age, hypertension, amyloidosis, high perfusion triggered by rapid hematoma release, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) loss, oral anticoagulant, primary disease aggravation were the main mechanisms which were speculated in our report. Simultaneously, positive measures could be adopt to prevent this rare complication.

Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin-Associated Intracerebral Hemorrhage Protocol Reduces Timing of Door to Correction Interventions

BACKGROUND

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a life-threatening complication of oral anticoagulant therapy that sometimes results in hematoma expansion after onset. Our facility did not have a standardized process for treating oral anticoagulant-associated ICH; this resulted in lag times from order to reversal agent administration.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine the impact of a rapid anticoagulant reversal protocol, combined with warfarin and direct-acting oral anticoagulant therapy, in decreasing door to first intervention times.

METHODS

This study used a retrospective quality assessment research approach in examining an oral anticoagulant reversal protocol to compare the control and intervention groups. Phytonadione was the first intervention treatment for most study participants diagnosed with warfarin-associated ICH with an international normalized ratio greater than 1.4. Factor IX was the first intervention treatment for all but one study participant with DOAC-associated ICH.

RESULTS

Findings were statistically significant (P < .05) for door to first intervention treatments. Door to phytonadione in minutes decreased from 232.7 (SD, 199.4) to posttest findings of 111.4 (SD, 64.6). Door to factor IX in minutes decreased from 183.9 (SD, 230.2) to posttest findings of 116.6 (SD, 69.1).

CONCLUSION

Study findings support the hypothesis that the new protocol was associated with lower door-to-treatment times for eligible patients.

Anticoagulation Resumption After Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Purpose of review

Decision-making on resuming oral anticoagulant (OAC) after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) evokes significant debate among clinicians. Such patients have been excluded from randomized clinical trials. This review article provides a comprehensive summary of the evidence on anticoagulation resumption after ICH.

Recent findings

OAC resumption does not increase the risk of recurrent ICH and can also reduce the risk of all-cause mortality. OAC cessation exposes patients to a significantly higher risk of thromboembolism, which could be reduced by resumption. The optimal timing of anticoagulation resumption after ICH is still unknown. Both early (< 2 weeks) and late (> 4 weeks) resumption should be reached only after very careful assessment of risks for ICH recurrence and thromboembolism. The introduction of new oral anticoagulants and other interventions, such as left atrial appendage closure, has provided some patients with more alternatives.

Summary

Given the lack of high-quality evidence to guide clinical decision-making, clinicians must carefully balance the risks of thromboembolism and recurrent ICH in individual patients. We propose a management approach which would facilitate the decision-making process on whether anticoagulation is appropriate, as well as when and how to restart anticoagulation after ICH.

Reintroduction of anticoagulant therapy after intracranial haemorrhage: If and when?

Intracranial haemorrhage is a devastating complication of anticoagulation. In surviving patients, physicians will be faced with the dilemma of if and when treatment should be reintroduced. There is little evidence to support this decision making and guidelines refrain from making specific recommendations. Existing data relates almost exclusively to vitamin K antagonists and is entirely retrospective. There appears to be an overall benefit to reintroducing anticoagulation in most patients; although, this may not be advocated in those at the highest risk of recurrent bleeding. The issue of when to reintroduce treatment is more controversial. The literature suggests timing could be anywhere between 7days and 30weeks; however there is no overall consensus. This review summarises what evidence is currently available to support decision making and suggests pragmatic management options based on a risk-benefit assessment of thromboembolism and recurrent bleeding; however, it should be acknowledged this may not be entirely evidence-based.

Decision Algorithms for Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Practical Guide for Neurologists

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are valid alternative options to vitamin K antagonists due to their limited interactions with drugs or food and the fact that they do not require regular coagulation monitoring. To this regard, recent practice guidelines recommend that DOACs should be considered as first-line anticoagulant therapy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This review (1) outlines current international guidelines for the management of DOACs to prevent stroke in patients with NVAF, (2) outlines indications for elderly patients as well as specific settings including acute coronary syndromes and intracranial hemorrhage, and (3) offers a practical guide for the use of DOACs in neurological settings.