Martins TR, Mrozinski NS, Bertuol DA, Tanabe EH. Recovery of copper and aluminium from coaxial cable wastes using comparative mechanical processes analysis.
Environ Technol 2021;
42:3205-3217. [PMID:
32005087 DOI:
10.1080/09593330.2020.1725141]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
This work aims to perform a comparative study of two mechanical processes for the recycling of metals from coaxial cables (aluminium and copper-clad steel): Process I - comminution, sieving and electrostatic separation; and Process II - comminution, magnetic separation and electrostatic separation. Characterization techniques were performed on the cables to discover their composition. The parameters evaluated of electrostatic separation were: roll speed (n), electrostatic electrode distance (D2), voltage applied to the electrodes (U) and splitter angle (γ). The best conditions for electrostatic separation were: Process I - n = 30 rpm, D2 = 8 cm, U = 30 kV and γ = 0°; Process II - n = 10 rpm, D2 = 10 cm, U = 25 kV and γ = 2.5°. Process I presented aluminium with purity of 99.51% and recovery efficiency of 94.53%, as well as copper-clad steel with purity of 96.79% and recovery efficiency of 99.68%. Process II presented aluminium with purity of 96.51% and recovery of 70.12%, as well as copper-clad steel with purity of 99.53% and recovery of 99.46%. A simplified economic assessment was performed on both process, and Process I has demonstrated to be the most profitable for coaxial cable recycling. The results showed that Process I is promising for the recovery of metals from cables due to its simplicity and lower cost, being capable of wide application to other processes that contain a mixture of conductive and non-conductive particles.
Collapse