Impact of backwash on biofiltration-related nitrogenous disinfection by-product formation

Evaluation of enzyme activity for monitoring biofiltration performance in drinking water treatment

Many water providers monitor adenosine triphosphate (ATP) as an indicator of biological acclimation of their biofilters; however, strong correlations between ATP concentration and filter performance (e.g., organic matter or disinfection by-product precursor removal) are not typically observed. As an alternative, this study evaluated the use of enzyme activity for monitoring biological processes within filters. Recent studies have proposed that enzyme activity may be used as an indicator of biofilter function as it provides a means to quantify biodegradation which may allow for a more accurate measure of degradation potential and to gain a better understanding of biofilter performance. Sampling was completed from full- and pilot-scale biofilters to assess impacts associated with pre-treatments, varying sources waters, as well as pre-treatment and operating conditions. Enzyme activity (carboxylic esterase, phosphatase, ß-glucosidase, α-glucosidase, ß-xylosidase, chitinase, and cellulase) and ATP were measured from the top 5 cm of biofilter media representative of typical full-scale sampling; water quality parameters included dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and disinfection by-products (DBPs): trihalomethane (THM) formation potential (FP), and haloacetic acid FP (HAA FP). Results confirmed that ATP was not a reliable monitoring tool for DOC and DBP FP reduction in biofilters. A strong relationship was observed between esterase activity and DOC reduction; chitinase activity significantly correlated to THM FP reduction for filters treating three different source waters and HAA FP reduction achieved by filters treating the same source water with a range of pre-treatment and backwash conditions. This study showed that enzyme activity may be appropriate for monitoring biological processes within drinking water filters and may act as a surrogate for the removal of organic compounds.

The effect of operational conditions on the disinfection by-products formation potential of exopolymeric substances from biofilms in drinking water

Biofilms are ubiquitous in drinking water systems due to their external matrix of exopolymeric substances (EPS) that provide them protection and adaptability. They are even more common in low flow conditions where hydraulics favor their growth. EPS are organic substances (i.e., proteins, carbohydrates and humic substances) that can react with disinfectant, forming disinfection byproducts (DBP), some of which are controlled by water regulation. However, there is little information available on biofilm-disinfectant interaction and the effect of operational conditions such as biofilm age, water velocity, chlorine and pipeline length on the DBP formation potential of EPS (DBP_fpEPS). Using experimental setup and studies of two different biofilms: Biofilm 1 (2.6 ± 0.8 mg Cl/L) and Biofilm 2 (0.7 ± 0.2 mg Cl/L), the DBP_fpEPS was studied and compared to the DBP_fp of filtered water (FW). The DBP studied were trihalomethanes (THM), haloacetic acids (HAA), haloacetonitriles (HAN), chloropropanones (CP) and chloropicrin (CPK). The DBP concentration trend in both EPS and FW was HAA > THM > CP > HAN > CPK. Biofilm age only increased chloroform (CF)_fpEPS in Biofilm 1, while other DBP_fpEPS decreased. A direct relationship between water velocity and CF_fp in Biofilm 1 was found, probably related to higher chlorine diffusion and the production of a more reactive matrix. Chlorine positively affected DBP_fpEPS, increasing Cl-HAA, Cl-THM, CPK and Br-HAN. Biofilm 2 produced higher quantities of EPS per meter of pipeline, this constituting a precursor of intermediary DBP 1,1 dichloropropanone (1,1, DCP). The study compared DBP in chlorinated water in contact with biofilm (BCW) and without (CW). Biofilm 1 increased levels of Cl-HAA, Cl-CP and dichloro-acetonitrile, while Biofilm 2 diminished Cl-HAA and Cl-HAN. Biofilm 1 reduced some Br-HAA in BCW, whereas Biofilm 2 promoted Br-HAA and 1,1, DCP in BCW. EPS and biofilms were significant in terms of their effect on DBP formation.