Effect of Knowledge of Self-removability of Intrauterine Contraceptives on Uptake, Continuation, and Satisfaction

Intrauterine Devices: Take Up and Discontinuation in a Time of Change

OBJECTIVES

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are a highly effective form of contraception. This paper examines who is more likely to use an IUD, who is more likely to discontinue IUD use due to dissatisfaction, and reasons for dissatisfaction, just before and after the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision that eliminated the federal right to abortion.

METHODS

This study analyzes data from the 2017-2019 and 2022-2023 National Survey of Family Growth. Changes in IUD prevalence and removal for dissatisfaction were estimated. Logistic regression was used to examine IUD use and discontinuation due to dissatisfaction. Respondents' reasons for discontinuation were explored.

RESULTS

IUD use increased very slightly but significantly, from 11.6 to 13.0%. Education, age, race, insurance status, living in a rural area, having given birth, and wanting any/more children were significant predictors of IUD use. The percentage of women who discontinued IUD use due to dissatisfaction decreased significantly, from 33.2 to 22.2%. Education and race/ethnicity were significant predictors of IUD removal. Most women who discontinued use due to dissatisfaction reported side effects.

CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE

IUDs are an increasingly important contraceptive method in the post-Dobbs era. However, we need to keep an eye on possible patient problems with the devices, particularly side effects such as pain, bleeding, and device migration, and educate patients on these possible side effects in advance of inserting an IUD. We also need to maintain users' ability to remove their IUDs if its benefits no longer outweigh its side effects, to preserve patient autonomy and well-being.

IUD self-removal: A randomized controlled trial of a self-removal guide in clinical and nonclinical settings

OBJECTIVES

Intrauterine device (IUD) users often encounter barriers to desired removal. Self-removal, while previously found to be successful only 19% of the time, may mitigate these obstacles. Our primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of our previously developed IUD self-removal guide. Our secondary objectives were to evaluate the acceptability of the guide and characterize the self-removal process. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial comparing IUD self-removal success rates with and without a guide. Participants selected a clinical or nonclinical setting for self-removal. The primary outcome was the rate of successful IUD self-removal. Covariates of interest included demographic characteristics, parity, body mass index, and attempted removal setting.

RESULTS

Of the 116 participants, 35 (30%) successfully removed their IUDs, 20 (32%) randomized to the guide, and 15 (28%) randomized to no guide (p = 0.7). While our guide was not associated with increased successful self-removal, the majority (97%) of those randomized to it reported it to be helpful. Those who selected a nonclinical setting (80%) were more successful at self-removal (35% vs 9%, p = 0.01). Most participants would recommend IUD self-removal to a friend (68%) and attempt again with a future IUD (80%).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of participants who successfully removed their IUDs was higher than previously shown, with or without the use of our guide. Our inclusion of a nonclinical setting was novel, in which the proportion of successful self-removal was significantly higher. Providers should consider discussion of IUD self-removal, with a reasonable expectation about the likelihood of success, as a means of increasing reproductive autonomy.

IMPLICATIONS

IUD self-removal was feasible and acceptable.

Measurement and Operationalization of the Social Determinants of Health and Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Use in the U.S.: A Systematic Scoping Review

Introduction

The objective of this review was to conduct a systematic evaluation of the measurement and operationalization of the social determinants of health in research on long-acting reversible contraception use in the U.S. To contribute to the ongoing refinement of the quality of social determinants of health and long-acting reversible contraception use research, this systematic scoping review examines how social determinants of health are measured and operationalized in studies that examine long-acting reversible contraception initiation and usage at the patient level.

Methods

A detailed search of 5 electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) was conducted between December 2020 and January 2021 according to PRISMA guidelines. Determinants were assessed using the Dahlgren and Whitehead model. The protocol and data extraction template were developed a priori.

Results

A total of 27 articles representing 26 studies were included in our study. A total of 12 studies were retrospective and cross-sectional in design; the remaining studies were a combination of designs. Healthcare services and health insurance were identified as the most frequently researched categories of determinants. There was wide variation in reported operationalization of race and ethnicity, limited engagement with sexuality, and uneven geographic representation across studies.

Discussion

This systematic scoping review is the first, to the best of our knowledge, to focus on the measurement and operationalization of social determinants of health and on current long-acting reversible contraception use research. Future research on the impact of social determinants of health on long-acting reversible contraception use must explore the full range of factors shaping contraceptive decision making and use and focus on equity-informed data collection methods and reporting.

Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study

Background

The intrauterine device (IUD) is a highly effective form of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) with few contraindications. Users, however, often encounter barriers to desired removal. IUD self-removal may mitigate these obstacles. We sought to develop a guide for IUD self-removal with the aim of increasing user control over the method.

Methods

This was a two-phase mixed-methods qualitative and small pilot study with the aim of developing an IUD self-removal guide. We conducted an online content analysis of advice for IUD self-removal as well as interviews with expert key informants to develop an IUD self-removal guide. We next recruited IUD-users who had previously attempted self-removal to participate in focus group discussion and individual interviews to further refine the guide. In the second phase of the study, we piloted the guide among eight IUD-users seeking removal interested in attempting self-removal.

Results

Expert key informants agreed that IUD self-removal was safe and low risk. The primary components of successful IUD self-removal elicited were ability to feel and grasp the strings, a crouched down position, and multiple attempts. A preference for presenting IUD self-removal as safe was emphasized. In the second phase, participants in the clinical pilot suggested more information for non-palpable strings, but liked the style and information provided. One participant successfully removed their IUD.

Conclusions

IUD-users reported satisfaction with our guide. In our small pilot, the majority were unable to remove their own IUD. A larger study is needed to assess acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy in increasing successful self-removal.

Reasons for Intent to Discontinue and Remove Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives: National Survey of Family Growth 2017-2019

Background: Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) are highly effective forms of contraception, which can reduce the risk of unintended pregnancy. Despite LARC effectiveness, women may desire to discontinue this method. This study will examine reasons for intent to discontinue and remove LARCs among U.S. women 15-49 years of age from 2017 to 2019. Methods: The National Survey of Family Growth 2017-2019 was utilized with a sample of 6141 female respondents. Descriptive statistics for intention to discontinue LARCs, difficulty removing LARCs, and reasons for LARC discontinuation and removal were examined. Rao-Scott chi-square tests were conducted in SAS. Results: Overall, 22.9% of women reported ever using LARCs. Among LARC users, most women (81.2%) reported using LARC in the past 10 years. Among these women, 63.9% intended to discontinue LARCs, and 11.5% had difficulty removing LARCs. Reasons for wanting to discontinue LARCs include side effects (29.6%), LARC expiration (26.8%), LARC complications (19.3%), and decided to get pregnant (15.9%). Primary reasons reported for difficulty removing LARCs included: complications (68.3%), other reasons (13.4%), discouragement by provider (5.8%), and provider's inability to remove (4.9%). Conclusion: Given that women who use a LARC method rely on providers to remove this contraceptive method, understanding the reasons for discontinuation and difficulties encountered is needed. Findings from this nationally representative sample identified provider-level and system-level barriers for LARC removal. To respect the reproductive autonomy of LARC users' method for pregnancy prevention, these barriers must be overcome.

Self-removal of long-acting reversible contraception: A content analysis of YouTube videos

OBJECTIVE

To explore publicly available information about the self-removal of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) on a popular video-sharing website.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a comprehensive keyword search of YouTube videos related to self-removal of LARC-namely intrauterine devices and implants. We analyzed video content to explore demographic characteristics, method and duration of LARC use, and motivations and experiences of self-removal.

RESULTS

Our keyword search identified 58 videos that met the criteria for inclusion, including 48 videos that featured individuals who removed an intrauterine device and 10 who removed an implant. Collectively, videos had over 4 million views. We identified most video creators as white (53%), 31% as Black, and 14% as Latinx. Users were motivated to remove their own device by both preferences and barriers to formal care. Most individuals in our sample (n = 56/58) successfully removed their device and described their experience in positive terms related to the ease of removal. Reasons for LARC discontinuation included negative side effects, fear of potential side effects, and desire for pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

This study builds upon prior research by describing publicly available information about LARC self-removal. The over representation of Black women in our sample may reflect a higher prevalence of LARC self-removal among this population. Positive experiences of self-removal and high levels of viewer engagement with online videos suggest a need for provider counseling on LARC removal at the time of insertion.

IMPLICATIONS

Prior to LARC insertion, patients should be made aware of any financial requirements for discontinuation. Provider counseling for self-removal at the time of insertion will likely minimize health risks and affirm patient reproductive autonomy.

Contraceptive Technology: Present and Future

Many sexually active, reproductive-aged persons capable of becoming pregnant use some method of contraception. To expand options for those desiring birth control, new choices include a vaginal ring, transdermal patch, progestin-only pill, and spermicide. Compared with currently available methods, additional technologies that are highly effective, easy to use, cost efficient, and well-tolerated lay on the horizon. During contraceptive counseling, patient choice, and reproductive autonomy should remain paramount.

Exploring the experience of IUD self-removal in the United States through posts on internet forums

OBJECTIVE

Some intrauterine devices (IUD) users self-remove their IUDs, and these experiences are not well understood. This study examines what IUD users post in internet forums about their experience, as well as advice and questions shared among IUD users about self-removal.

METHODS

This study uses qualitative analysis of internet health and parenting forum postings about IUD self-removal identified from an internet search engine. We analyzed the data using inductive and deductive content analyses.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight sites, containing 1742 posts by 1197 unique users, satisfied our eligibility criteria. Users reported successful IUD self-removal attempts as "quick," "easy," and "painless"; it was rare to encounter IUD users describing complications of their self-removal attempts. Users described unsuccessful attempts as failure to find or grasp strings. Many IUD users described their successful removal techniques and gave advice to other users who were struggling with self-removal. Users frequently utilized the forum to ask questions about IUD self-removal methods and timing, pain, when to seek medical intervention, and the effects on future fertility.

CONCLUSIONS

Posts describing successful IUD self-removal report positive experiences. IUD users who have difficulty with self-removal may utilize internet forums to learn from others' experiences.

IMPLICATIONS

Exploring IUD users' experiences with and questions about self-removal may inform strategies to develop better resources for those who desire self-removal.

Taking the provider "out of the loop:" patients' and physicians' perspectives about IUD self-removal

OBJECTIVE

This study describes the perspectives of patients and providers about intrauterine device (IUD) self-removal.

STUDY DESIGN

This qualitative study is a subanalysis of two datasets from a single project, which included semistructured individual interviews with 15 patients and 12 physicians. We derived the data for this analysis from portions of the interviews pertaining to IUD self-removal and provider removal. We analyzed data using deductive and inductive techniques to perform content and thematic analyses.

RESULTS

The majority of patients and physicians cited both concerns about and potential benefits of IUD self-removal. Patients cited concerns about safety as the reason they did not wish to remove their own IUD, but physicians did not share these concerns; instead, physicians were apprehensive about not being involved in the discussion to remove the IUD. Both patients and physicians valued having the provider "in the loop" and reported fears about hasty or coerced removal.

CONCLUSIONS

IUD self-removal is an option that some patients may be interested in. Addressing concerns about safety may make self-removal more appealing to some patients. Addressing physicians' concern about "hasty" removal may require additional training so that providers are better able to support patients' decision making around contraceptive use.

IMPLICATIONS

The option of self-removal could have a positive impact on reproductive autonomy and patient decision making.

Predictors of DMPA-SC continuation among urban Nigerian women: the influence of counseling quality and side effects

Objectives

In 2015, private healthcare providers in Nigeria introduced DMPA-SC (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate administered subcutaneously) into the method mix. We aimed to [1] examine the sociodemographic predictors of continued DMPA-SC use after 3 months, and [2] characterize the additional influences of contraceptive counseling quality and experiences of side effects on continuation.

Study design

From March to August, 2016, we conducted phone interviews with a convenience sample of women obtaining DMPA-SC from selected providers to survey them about their experience obtaining an initial dose of DMPA-SC. Study coordinators contacted women again about 3 months later after when they were due for reinjection. We used logistic regressions to examine the likelihood of having obtained a subsequent dose of DMPA-SC at follow-up as predicted by sociodemographic characteristics, a quality of counseling indicator based on responses to a 14-item scale, and reports of side effects experienced.

Results

Of the 541 DMPA-SC users who completed the first survey, 311 were reached again via phone after 3 months to conduct a second survey. Multivariate results for sociodemographic predictors of continued DMPA-SC use show that those with some college education or more (OR=2.79; 95% CI: 1.09–7.14), and those with four or more children (OR=2.89; 95% CI: 1.09 0 7.67) were more likely to obtain another dose. Our summary quality measure showed that women overall rated the quality of their initial counseling session high. Logistic regressions indicated that higher quality during the initial counseling session is related to the likelihood of getting another dose of DMPA-SC (OR=2.04; 95% CI: 1.12–3.47) whereas experiencing more bleeding reduced the likelihood of continuation after 3 months (OR=0.15; 95% CI: 0.07–0.34).

Conclusions

Among urban Nigerian women, both counseling quality and experiencing side effects were important factors in predicting continued use of DMPA-SC after 3 months. These findings are consistent with previous studies of DMPA and injectable contraception continuation.

Implications

New contraceptive methods that are designed for increased access and ease of use, combined with high quality provision, have potential to increase contraceptive use in settings with low levels of contraceptive prevalence. Higher quality counseling can help encourage women's continuation of a new injectable contraceptive method at 3 months.