Birth Mode after Primary Cesarean among Hispanic and non-Hispanic Women at One U.S. Institution

Effects of factors influencing cesarean section rates between 2008 and 2018 in Taiwan: A population-based cross-sectional study

Many factors can affect delivery mode decisions. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the effects of maternal age, physician's sex, region, income, and hospital type on cesarean section (C/S) delivery rates between 2008 and 2018 in Taiwan. In this population-based cross-sectional study, data were extracted from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (2 million individuals). The logistic regression method was used to analyze the aforementioned risk factors, and data are expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals. In total, 9826 and 9714 deliveries in 2008 and 2018, respectively, were included in the analysis. The C/S ratio increased from 16.5% (n = 1607) in 2008 to 19.7% (n = 1916) in 2018. A higher C/S risk for women aged >34 years (ORs: 2.835 and 2.225 in 2008 and 2018, respectively) than for those aged ≤34 years was noted in both years. Female physicians had a lower risk of performing C/S than male physicians in 2008 (OR: .762, 95% confidence interval: .625-.928), but this was not apparent in 2018. Higher income levels (>new Taiwan dollar 45,081) and central Taiwan were associated with a lower C/S risk in both years. Private, not-for-profit hospitals had a lower C/S risk in 2008, which was not apparent in 2018. In conclusion, this study revealed a significant increase in C/S rates over the past decade, which was influenced by multiple factors. Maternal age, physician's sex, income status, location, and type of hospital may influence C/S rates. Analyzing these relationships can inform the development of strategies aimed at reducing future C/S rates, and targeted interventions may reduce the C/S rates.

The Importance of Discussing the History of Racism in Medical Student Education

Racial health disparities are tightly linked to the longstanding and pervasive institution of racism. Efforts to reverse disparities begin with awareness and accountability through education. The health care workforce must be formally educated about racist practices, tools, and ideologies that perpetuate poor health outcomes. This article explores prior efforts to integrate race didactics into medical school education, addresses current legislation, and illuminates lessons learned from a single institution pilot curriculum exploring the history of racism in the field of obstetrics and gynecology. Educating medical school students about the history of racism is an important and necessary tool for positive change.

Disparities by Race in Pregnancy Care and Clinical Outcomes in Women With Multiple Sclerosis: A Diverse Multicenter Cohort

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Racial disparities exist in both neurologic and obstetric populations, underscoring the importance of evaluating pregnancy outcomes in diverse women with multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of this multicenter retrospective study was to compare pregnancy care and outcomes between Black and Hispanic (underrepresented) and White women with MS.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical data were extracted from medical records of 9 US MS centers for women with MS/clinically isolated syndrome who delivered live births between 2010 and 2021. Sites identified at last 15 consecutive Black/Hispanic women and a matching number of White women. Socioeconomic factors, pregnancy, and MS care/outcomes were compared between groups (underrepresented and White and then Black and Hispanic) using Wilcoxon rank sum (U statistic and effect size r reported), χ2, t tests and logistic regressions as appropriate to data type. Multiple imputation by chained equation was used to account for missing data.

RESULTS

Overall, 294 pregnancies resulting in live births were analyzed ( 81 Black, 67 Hispanic, and 146 White mothers). Relative to underrepresented women, White women lived in areas of higher median (interquartile range [IQR]) Child Opportunity Index (79 [45.8] vs 22 [45.8], U = 3,824, r = 0.56, p < 0.0001) and were more often employed (84.9% vs 75%, odds ratio [OR] 2.57, CI 1.46-4.50, p = 0.0008) and privately insured (93.8% vs 56.8%, OR 11.6, CI 5.5-24.5, p < 0.0001) and more received a 14-week ultrasound (98.6% vs 93.9%, OR 4.66, CI 0.99-21.96, p = 0.027). Mode of delivery was significantly different between the three groups (X2(10,294) = 20.38, p = 0.03); notably, Black women had the highest rates of emergency cesarean deliveries, and Hispanic women highest rates of uncomplicated vaginal deliveries. Babies born to underrepresented women had lower median (IQR) birthweights than babies born to White women (3,198 g [435.3 g] vs 3,275 g [412.5 g], U = 9,255, r = 0.12, p = 0.04) and shorter median (IQR) breastfeeding duration (4.5 [3.3] vs 6.0 [4.2] months, U = 8,184, r = 0.21, p = 0.003). While underrepresented women were younger than White women (mean [SD] 30.9 [4.8] vs 33.8 [4.0], t = 1.97, CI 1.96-3.98, p < 0.0001), their median (Q1-Q3, IQR) Expanded Disability Status Scale was higher (1.5 [1-2.5, 1.5] vs 1 [0-1.5, 1.5], U = 7,260, r = 0.29, p < 0.0001) before pregnancy. Finally, medical records were missing more key data for Black women (19.7% missing vs 8.9% missing, OR 2.54, CI 1.25-5.06, p = 0.008).

DISCUSSION

In this geographically diverse multicenter cohort, underrepresented women entered pregnancy with higher disability and fewer health care resources. Pregnancy represents a pivotal window where structural factors affect maternal and fetal health and neurologic trajectories; it is a critical period to optimize care and health outcomes.

Office hours and caesarean section: systematic review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Unnecessary caesarean births may be affected by physician factors, such as preferences, incentives and convenience. Delivery during office hours can be a valuable proxy for measuring such effects.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of office hours on the decision for caesarean delivery by assessing the odds of caesarean during office hours compared to out-of-office hours.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov , The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science from the beginning of records through August 2021.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Search results were screened by three researchers. First, we selected studies that reported odds ratios of caesareans, or data allowing their calculation, for office and out-of-office hours. We extracted data on the study population, study design, data sources, setting, type of caesarean section, statistical analysis, and outcome measures. For groups reporting the same outcome, we performed a standard inverse-variance random-effects meta-analysis, which enabled us to calculate the overall odds ratios for each group. For groups reporting varying outcomes, we performed descriptive analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Meta-analysis of weekday vs weekend for any caesarean section showed higher odds of caesarean during weekdays in adjusted analysis 1.40 (95%CI 1.13, 1.72 from 1,952,691 births). A similar effect was observed in the weekday vs Sunday comparison (1.39, 95%CI 1.10, 1.75, 150,932 births). A lower effect was observed for emergency CS, with a slight increase in adjusted analysis (1.06, 95%CI 0.90, 1.26, 2,622,772 births) and a slightly higher increase in unadjusted analysis (1.15, 95%CI 1.03, 1.29, 12,591,485 births). Similar trends were observed in subgroup analyses and descriptive synthesis of studies examining other office hours outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Delivery during office hours is associated with higher odds for overall caesarean sections and little to no effect for emergency caesarean. Non-clinical factors associated with office hours may influence the decision to deliver by caesarean section. Further detailed investigation of the "office hours effect" in delivery care is necessary and could lead to improvements in care systems.

FUNDING

The authors received no direct funding for this study.

Women's perceptions of provider communication on birth options after cesarean: A qualitative study

In the United States, Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black women are more likely to have a repeat cesarean birth (RCB) than non-Hispanic White women. The underrepresentation of Hispanic women and women with previous cesarean births in prior studies has resulted in a limited understanding of the reasons for this disparity. This study used in-depth interviews to investigate the perceptions of 27 Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black and White women about the communication that took place with their providers about their birth options after a previous cesarean. The roles of cultural norms and trust in providers in communication about RCBs were also explored. Results suggest that patient-provider communication and trust of providers for Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black and White women may influence their perception of choice, uptake of information, and ability to make an informed choice regarding birth options. Findings have implications for providers and healthcare management systems who need to account for and attempt to address these differences as they directly affect women's birth outcomes.

Factors leading to satisfaction with counseling for Labor after Cesarean among Latina women in the United States

BACKGROUND

Cesarean birth, especially repeat cesarean, is associated with significantly higher morbidity than vaginal birth. Appropriately counseling women who are candidates for labor after cesarean (LAC) has the potential to confer significant health benefits for women. Little guidance exists about optimal counseling techniques, especially for Latina women. The aim of this study was to evaluate satisfaction among Latinas about how LAC counseling is performed, specifically as it relates to shared decision making.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study of pregnant women at several clinics in a Federally Qualified Health Center system in Utah. We interviewed eleven Latina women about satisfaction with recent LAC counseling with a specific aim of obtaining rich, personal narratives rather than reaching data saturation. A codebook representing the most common themes was developed.

RESULTS

Three major themes emerged related to LAC counseling including influences on satisfaction, influences on the birth decision process, and preferences surrounding method and timing of counseling. Women experienced greater satisfaction from providers who used jargon-free communication, were perceived as trustworthy, cared about her experiences, and empowered her to make an informed decision. Women's decisions were influenced by prior birth experiences, desire for a safe delivery and easy recovery, and future family planning.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the aspects of LAC counseling that are most meaningful for Latina women can promote effective communication between patient and provider and improve patient satisfaction. Globally, our findings highlight the importance of evaluating the experiences and preferences of minority groups; majority populations cannot be assumed to speak for minority populations.

Maternal and fetal characteristics for predicting risk of Cesarean section following induction of labor: pooled analysis of PROBAAT trials

OBJECTIVE

Induction of labor (IOL) is one of the most widely used obstetric interventions. However, one-fifth of IOLs result in Cesarean section (CS). We aimed to assess maternal and fetal characteristics that influence the likelihood of CS following IOL, according to the indication for CS.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of pooled data from four randomized controlled trials, including women undergoing IOL at term who had a singleton pregnancy and an unfavorable cervix, intact membranes and the fetus in cephalic presentation. The main outcomes of this analysis were CS for failure to progress (FTP) and CS for suspected fetal compromise (SFC). Restricted cubic splines were used to determine whether continuous maternal and fetal characteristics had a non-linear relationship with outcome. Optimal cut-offs for those characteristics with a non-linear pattern were determined based on the maximum area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were computed, using multivariable logistic regression analysis, for the associations between optimally categorized characteristics and outcome.

RESULTS

Of a total of 2990 women undergoing IOL, 313 (10.5%) had CS for FTP and 227 (7.6%) had CS for SFC. The risk of CS for FTP was increased in women aged 31-35 years compared with younger women (aOR, 1.51 (95% CI, 1.15-1.99)), in nulliparous compared with parous women (aOR, 8.07 (95% CI, 5.34-12.18)) and in Sub-Saharan African compared with Caucasian women (aOR, 2.09 (95% CI, 1.33-3.28)). Higher body mass index (BMI) increased incrementally the risk of CS for FTP (aOR, 1.06 (95% CI, 1.04-1.08)). High birth-weight percentile was also associated with an increased risk of CS due to FTP (aOR, 2.66 (95% CI, 1.74-4.07) for birth weight between the 80.0th and 89.9th percentiles and aOR, 4.08 (95% CI, 2.75-6.05) for birth weight ≥ 90th percentile, as compared with birth weight between the 20.0th and 49.9th percentiles). For CS due to SFC, higher maternal age (aOR, 1.09 (95% CI, 1.05-1.12)) and BMI (aOR, 1.05 (95% CI, 1.03-1.08)) were associated with an incremental increase in risk. The risk of CS for SFC was increased in nulliparous compared with parous women (aOR, 5.91 (95% CI, 3.76-9.28)) and in South Asian compared with Caucasian women (aOR, 2.50 (95% CI, 1.23-5.10)). Birth weight < 10.0th percentile increased significantly the risk of CS due to SFC (aOR, 1.93 (95% CI, 1.22-3.05)), as compared with birth weight between the 20.0th and 49.9th percentiles. Bishop score did not demonstrate a significant association with the risk of CS for FTP or for SFC.

CONCLUSIONS

In women undergoing IOL, maternal age, BMI, parity, ethnicity and birth-weight percentile are predictors of CS due to FTP and of CS due to SFC, but the direction and magnitude of the associations differ according to the indication for CS. These characteristics should be considered in combination with the Bishop score to stratify the risk of CS for different indications in women undergoing IOL. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Cesarean Delivery and Gender of Delivering Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association of the gender of the delivering physician and the odds of performing cesarean delivery.

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science from the first year of records through May 2020.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

We included studies that reported odds ratios (OR), or data allowing the calculation of ORs, for cesarean delivery performed by female and male delivering physicians. We also included studies that reported the preference of physicians for performing cesarean deliveries.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Independent data extraction was carried out by at least two researchers. Standard inverse-variance random effects meta-analysis was used to generate overall ORs. Finally, in two separate meta-analyses, we analyzed 15 studies containing clinical data for 1,269,625 births, and 11 studies containing data for the preference for delivery mode of 4,911 obstetricians. Both the crude and adjusted odds of a cesarean delivery were lower for those performed by female physicians (crude OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.84, τ=0.029, adjusted OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.85, τ=0.031). We also found that female physicians had a lower preference for cesarean delivery in both crude and adjusted analysis (crude OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.96, I=77%, adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.84, I=67%).

CONCLUSION

Female physicians are less likely to perform cesarean delivery and less likely to prefer it. This was observed across different health systems and populations.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42020158442.