Health Equity Considerations in State Bills Related to Doula Care (2015-2020)

Return-on-Investment Analysis of an Enhanced Community Doula Program: Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Considerations

BACKGROUND

Community doulas are perinatal health workers who provide peer education, resource navigation, and support during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period. Evidence suggests that doulas improve the experience of care, reduce cesarean birth, and improve breastfeeding outcomes. However, people with low incomes cannot access affordable community doula support in most states due to lack of insurance reimbursement. To determine the affordability of Medicaid reimbursement for doula services, there is a need to fill a gap in research that employs real-world data and a return-on-investment (ROI) analysis approach.

METHODS

We conducted a ROI analysis from the healthcare perspective of an enhanced community doula intervention, Best Beginnings for Babies (BBB). Healthcare and program cost data were collected alongside clinical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of routine maternity care at Boston Medical Center with and without BBB. ROI was calculated as the net healthcare savings divided by the investment costs. Post-COVID-19 program costing estimates were also performed.

RESULTS

Average healthcare costs per patient were $18,969 for the BBB group compared with $20,121 for routine care, a savings of $1,152. BBB program costs were an average of $971 per person. There was an 18% ROI. Lower costs for the birth hospitalization and NICU stays accounted for the largest areas of savings. Per-person program costs using proposed MassHealth fees produced a positive return on investment, although 2023 hospital doula program wages and salaries did not.

DISCUSSION

The BBB-enhanced community doula program was cost-saving to payers and increased access to doula support for low-income people. Even with post-COVID-19 increases in program costs, analysis demonstrated doula support was still financially feasible. This study should reassure budget-conscious Medicaid payers that doula services are affordable.

An Interprofessional Collaboration Between a Community-Based Doula Organization and Clinical Partners: The Champion Dyad Initiative

As access to doula services expands through state Medicaid coverage and specific initiatives aimed at improving maternal health equity, there is a need to build and improve upon relationships between the doula community, hospital leaders, and clinical staff. Previous research and reports suggest rapport-building, provider education, and forming partnerships between community-based organizations and hospitals can improve such relationships. However, few interventions or programs incorporating such approaches are described in the literature. This article describes the development and 5 core components of the Champion Dyad Initiative (CDI), a novel program that uses bidirectional feedback between SisterWeb, a community-based doula organization, and 5 clinical sites (4 hospitals and one birthing center) to ensure pregnant and birthing people receive fair and equitable treatment. We also describe implementation challenges related to documentation, funding, and institutional support. The CDI is a promising model for community-based doula organizations and health care institutions to develop collaborative partnerships, build respectful doula-provider relationships, and work toward improving the pregnancy-related care that Black, Indigenous, and people of color receive in hospital and birth center settings. It is our hope that this innovative initiative can serve as a model that can be adapted for other locales, organizations, and hospitals.

Role of Doulas in Improving Maternal Health and Health Equity Among Medicaid Enrollees, 2014‒2023

Objectives. To assess the relationship between doula utilization and health outcomes of females enrolled in Medicaid-affiliated plans in the United States. Methods. In this retrospective, observational cohort study, we used Medicaid claims data from a national health insurer to compare health outcomes between females who used and who did not use a doula (2014-2023). We conducted propensity score matching using a 1:1 case‒control match, without replacement, and fit logistic regressions to analyze the relative risks for maternal health outcomes. Results. The study population included 722 matched pairs with and without a doula. Results indicate females with doulas had a 47% lower risk of cesarean delivery and a 29% lower risk of preterm birth, and were 46% more likely to attend a postpartum checkup (all differences P < .05). Conclusions. Doula care is associated with improved health outcomes among Medicaid enrollees. Public Health Implications. Doulas have garnered increasing interest from policymakers as a strategy to address increasing trends in maternal morbidity and persistent health disparities. This study provides evidence from Medicaid enrollees across the United States that doula care can improve maternal health. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(11):1275-1285. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307805).

Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of the implementation of doula care to address racial health equity in six state Medicaid programs

BACKGROUND

Racial inequities in severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and mortality constitute a public health crisis in the United States. Doula care, defined as care from birth workers who provide culturally appropriate, non-clinical support during pregnancy and postpartum, has been proposed as an intervention to help disrupt obstetric racism as a driver of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Black and other birthing persons of colour. Many state Medicaid programs are implementing doula programs to address the continued increase in SMM and mortality. Medicaid programs are poised to play a major role in addressing the needs of these populations with the goal of closing the racial gaps in SMM and mortality. This study will investigate the most effective ways that Medicaid programs can implement doula care to improve racial health equity.

METHODS

We describe the protocol for a mixed-methods study to understand how variation in implementation of doula programs in Medicaid may affect racial equity in pregnancy and postpartum health. Primary study outcomes include SMM, person-reported measures of respectful obstetric care, and receipt of evidence-based care for chronic conditions that are the primary causes of postpartum mortality (cardiovascular, mental health, and substance use conditions). Our research team includes doulas, university-based investigators, and Medicaid participants from six sites (Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Virginia) in the Medicaid Outcomes Distributed Research Network (MODRN). Study data will include policy analysis of doula program implementation, longitudinal data from a cohort of doulas, cross-sectional data from Medicaid beneficiaries, and Medicaid healthcare administrative data. Qualitative analysis will examine doula and beneficiary experiences with healthcare systems and Medicaid policies. Quantitative analyses (stratified by race groups) will use matching techniques to estimate the impact of using doula care on postpartum health outcomes, and will use time-series analyses to estimate the average treatment effect of doula programs on population postpartum health outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Findings will facilitate learning opportunities among Medicaid programs, doulas and Medicaid beneficiaries. Ultimately, we seek to understand the implementation and integration of doula care programs into Medicaid and how these processes may affect racial health equity. Study registration The study is registered with the Open Science Foundation ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NXZUF ).

Medicaid Reimbursement for Doula Care: Policy Considerations From a Scoping Review

Evidence suggests that perinatal doula care can support maternal health and reduce racial inequities among low-income pregnant and postpartum people, prompting growing interest by state Medicaid agencies to reimburse for doula services. Emerging peer-reviewed and gray literature document factors facilitating or impeding that reimbursement. We conducted a scoping review of that literature (2012-2022) to distill key policy considerations for policymakers and advocates in the inclusion of doula care as a Medicaid-covered benefit. Fifty-three reports met the inclusion criteria. Most (53%) were published in 2021 or 2022. Their stated objectives were advocating for expanded access to doula care (17%), describing barriers to policy implementation, and/or offering recommendations to overcome the barriers (17%). A primary policy consideration among states was prioritizing partnership with doulas and doula advocates to inform robust and equitable policymaking to sustain the doula profession.

Florida Doulas' Perspectives on Their Role in Reducing Maternal Morbidity and Health Disparities

BACKGROUND

Maternal mortality rates continue to rise in the United States. Considerable racial disparities exist, as Black women face two to three times the risks of dying from pregnancy-related complications compared with white women. Doulas have been associated with improved maternal outcomes. This study aimed to 1) investigate Florida doulas' perspectives and influence on severe maternal morbidity/mortality and related inequities, as well as 2) identify opportunities for actionable change. The social ecological model, which acknowledges how individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and public policy factors intersect, informed our analysis.

METHODS

This qualitative study included seven online in-depth interviews and seven focus groups with doulas (N = 31) in Florida. Interview guides investigated how doulas perceive their role in the context of a) maternal morbidity and b) health disparities.

RESULTS

Doulas associated maternal morbidity and health disparities with Black pregnant people, identifying racism as a major contributor. Doulas identified their role as one that most often intersects with the individual and interpersonal levels of the social ecological model. Doulas report providing positive social surveillance and emotional support, contributing education and resources, and championing for advocacy in health care settings. Actionable steps recommended by doulas to further mitigate health disparities include the integration of implicit bias training into doula certification programs, increasing public health funding to bolster a doula workforce that can serve racial and ethnic communities, establishing doula-hospital partnerships to improve relational communication, providing tailored resources for clients featuring representative messaging, and doulas' continued engagement in positive social surveillance of their clients.

CONCLUSIONS

Doulas perceived their role as integral to mitigating maternal morbidity and health disparities, particularly in the context of supporting and advocating for birthing persons on all levels of the social ecological model. Equitable access to doulas for low-income and/or minoritized populations may be one key strategy to improve maternal health equity.

Doula Services and Birth Outcomes: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Doulas offer support and advice to some women during the childbirth process, however access to doula care is not available to all due to availability and cost.

METHODS

This scoping review synthesizes literature related to the use of doula services and the experiences and outcomes of those who used the services. Eligibility criteria included peer-reviewed studies conducted in the United States and published between 2010 and 2022 that specified use of doulas and assessed maternal experiences and outcomes. Articles were accessed through PubMed, Google Scholar, and PsycInfo.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles met the criteria and were included in the review. Findings across eligible articles included qualitative analyses related to psychosocial aspects of experience and quantitative findings on birth experience, complications, breastfeeding initiation, and emotional health.

DISCUSSION

Findings suggest having doula support can improve experiences and outcomes. However, further implementation and evaluation is needed as well as greater access to doula services among the childbearing population who are historically marginalized and minoritized.

Readiness to Implement a Doula-Hospital Partnership Program

OBJECTIVE

To assess obstetric clinicians' and leaders' baseline knowledge, attitudes, and experience with doulas and their readiness to implement a novel doula-hospital partnership program.

DESIGN

Survey of obstetric clinicians and leaders before implementation of the doula program.

SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM

Academic medical center in Western Massachusetts that was preparing to pilot a doula-hospital partnership program with Black doulas for Black women to address racial disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality.

PARTICIPANTS

Obstetric clinicians and leaders (N = 48).

INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS

We used established questions from the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) scale and original questions to assess participants' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with doulas and their readiness to implement the planned doula program. We distributed the questionnaire to 103 potential respondents. We conducted descriptive and bivariate analyses and analyzed open-ended responses using content analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-eight participants responded to the survey. Of those who provided intrapartum care (n = 45), all were familiar with doula roles. Respondents who reported having experience working with a doula, 47.3% (n = 18/38) had at least one prior negative experience with a doula and 76.3% (n = 29/38) reported positive experiences with doulas. However, there was a mean score of 12.62 on the attitude toward doulas (scale range: 3-15). The mean score on the ORIC change commitment subscale was 20.65 (range: 15-25) and on the ORIC change efficacy subscale, mean score was 29.31 (range: 19-35). Results did not differ by participants characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggested strong support for and readiness to implement the doula-hospital partnership program.

Critical Changes in the Maternal Health Landscape: Community Care, Doulas, and Coverage

In this commentary, we present an overview of the accelerating trend toward community-based models for pregnancy care. Doula services, as part of community care programs, are the major target for new coverage changes. Obstetric professionals who include community care providers in their treatment plans can benefit from these local resources in the prenatal, birthing, and postpartum stages of patient management. Including community care programs may help achieve goals of improving health outcomes and health equity.

Association Between Doula Use on a Digital Health Platform and Birth Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between the use of virtual doula appointments on a comprehensive digital health platform and users' mode of birth and their birth experiences, among all platform users and Black platform users.

METHODS

Data for this retrospective cohort study were extracted from individuals who enrolled in a comprehensive digital health platform, between January 1, 2020, and April 22, 2023. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between number of virtual doula appointments completed on the digital health platform and odds of cesarean birth and user-reported birth experience outcomes, which included help deciding a birth preference, receiving a high level of support during pregnancy, learning medically accurate information about pregnancy complications and warning signs, and managing mental health during pregnancy, stratified by parity. The interaction of doula utilization by race for each outcome was also tested.

RESULTS

Overall 8,989 platform users were included. The completion of at least two appointments with a virtual doula on the digital health platform was associated with a reduction in odds of cesarean birth among all users (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.80, 95% CI, 0.65-0.99) and among Black users (aOR 0.32, 95% CI, 0.14-0.72). Among platform users with a history of cesarean birth, completion of any number of doula visits was associated with a reduction in odds of repeat cesarean birth (one visit: aOR 0.35, 95% CI, 0.17-0.72; two or more visits: aOR 0.37, 95% CI, 0.17-0.83). Analyses among all users indicated dose-response associations between increased virtual doula use and greater odds of users reporting support in deciding a birth preference (one visit: aOR 2.35, 95% CI, 2.02-2.74; two or more visits: aOR 3.67, 95% CI, 3.03-4.44), receiving a high level of emotional support during pregnancy (one visit: aOR 1.99, 95% CI, 1.74-2.28; two or more visits: aOR 3.26, 95% CI, 2.70-3.94), learning medically accurate information about pregnancy complications and warning signs (one visit: aOR 1.26, 95% CI, 1.10-1.44; two or more visits: aOR 1.55, 95% CI, 1.29-1.88), and help managing mental health during pregnancy (one visit: aOR 1.28, 95% CI, 1.05-1.56; two or more visits: aOR 1.78, 95% CI, 1.40-2.26).

CONCLUSION

This analysis demonstrates that virtual doula support on a digital health platform is associated with lower odds of cesarean birth and an improved birth experience. Positive findings among Black users and users with vaginal birth after cesarean suggest that doula support is critical for patient advocacy, and that digital health may play a meaningful role in increasing health equity in birth outcomes.

Using Prevention Research to Reduce Racial Disparities in Health Through Innovative Funding Strategies: The Case of Doula Care

Racial disparities in maternal birth outcomes are substantial even when comparing women with similar levels of education. While racial differences in maternal death at birth or shortly afterward have attracted significant attention from researchers, non-fatal but potentially life-threatening pregnancy complications are 30-40 times more common than maternal deaths. Black women have the worst maternal health outcomes. Only recently have health researchers started to view structural racism rather than race as the critical factor underlying these persistent inequities. We discuss the economic framework that prevention scientists can use to convince policymakers to make sustainable investments in maternal health by expanding funding for doula care. While a few states allow Medicaid to fund doula services, most women at risk of poor maternal health outcomes arising from structural racism lack access to culturally sensitive caregivers during the pre-and post-partum periods as well as during birth. We provide a guide to how research in health services can be more readily translated to policy recommendations by describing two innovative ways that cost-benefit analysis can help direct private and public funding to support doula care for Black women and others at risk of poor birth outcomes.

Governing therapeutic pluralism: An environmental scan of the statutory regulation and government reimbursement of traditional and complementary medicine practitioners in the United States

The World Health Organization has called on nation-states to statutorily govern, and integrate into state-funded healthcare systems, practitioners of traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) (whose therapeutic approaches that fall outside the boundaries of conventional biomedicine). To date, however, there exist few rigorous reports of the degree to which individual nations have responded to this call. This study, an environmental scan, comprehensively documents the statutory governance and government reimbursement of T&CM practitioners in the United States (US). Across the US, where health practitioner governance falls within state and territorial (rather than federal) jurisdiction, over 300 laws have been enacted to statutorily regulate a wide range of T&CM practitioners. Nurse-midwives and chiropractors are universally licensed across all 56 US regulatory jurisdictions (50 states, 5 territories and the District of Columbia); other major T&CM practitioner groups are regulated in fewer jurisdictions (acupuncturists, n = 52; massage therapists, n = 50; direct-entry [non-nurse] midwives, n = 36; naturopaths, n = 24). Additional statutory stipulations exist to govern chiropractic assistants (n = 30), auricular (ear) acupuncture practitioners (n = 24), homeopathic practitioners (n = 3), and psychedelic facilitators (n = 1), as well as biomedical professionals who practice acupuncture and related techniques, e.g., 'dry needling' (n = 44). While professional entry requirements for licensed T&CM practitioners are substantially harmonized across jurisdictions, restricted titles and statutory scopes of practice vary. Ten states have furthermore implemented 'safe harbor' ('negative licensing') exemption laws enabling otherwise-unregulated T&CM practitioners to legally practice. Limited government reimbursement for T&CM care is available across several federal and state programs, including Medicare, Tricare, Veterans Health Authority, and Medicaid. Nurse-midwifery and chiropractic care is most frequently reimbursed; acupuncturists, naturopaths and massage therapists are eligible for much more limited coverage. Medicaid programs for low-income people in ten states furthermore cover the services of (unlicensed but statutorily-recognized) birth doulas. Additional research is needed to assess the impact of these regulations on US health care.

Listen to the Whispers before They Become Screams: Addressing Black Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in the United States

Black women in the United States (U.S.) disproportionately experience adverse pregnancy outcomes, including maternal mortality, compared to women of other racial and ethnic groups. Historical legacies of institutionalized racism and bias in medicine compound this problem. The disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on communities of color may further worsen existing racial disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality. This paper discusses structural and social determinants of racial disparities with a focus on the Black maternal mortality crisis in the United States. We explore how structural racism contributes to a greater risk of adverse obstetric outcomes among Black women in the U.S. We also propose public health, healthcare systems, and community-engaged approaches to decrease racial disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality.