Predictive value of the HAS-BLED score for the risk of recurrent intracranial hemorrhage after first spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage

Advances in the medical treatment and diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage associated with oral anticoagulation

INTRODUCTION

With the increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), it entails expanding oral anticoagulants (OACs) use, carrying a higher risk of associated hemorrhagic events, including intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Despite advances in OACs development with a better safety profile and reversal agent for these anticoagulants, there is still no consensus on the optimal management of patients with OACs-associated ICH.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors have carried out an exhaustive search on the advances in recent years. The authors provide an update on the management of ICH in anticoagulated patients, as well as an update on the latest evidence on anticoagulation resumption, recent therapeutic strategies, and investigational drugs that could play a role in the future.

EXPERT OPINION

Following an ICH event in an anticoagulated patient, a comprehensive clinical evaluation is imperative. Anticoagulation should be promptly withdrawn and reversed. Once the patient is stabilized, a reintroduction of anticoagulation should be considered, typically within a timeframe of 4-8 weeks, if feasible. If re-anticoagulation is not possible, alternative options such as Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion are available.

Empiric use of anticoagulation in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a propensity score-matched study of risks and benefits

Background

Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 demonstrate a higher risk of developing thromboembolism. Anticoagulation (AC) has been proposed for high-risk patients, even without confirmed thromboembolism. However, benefits and risks of AC are not well assessed due to insufficient clinical data. We performed a retrospective analysis of outcomes from AC in a large population of COVID-19 patients.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 1189 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between March 5 and May 15, 2020, with primary outcomes of mortality, invasive mechanical ventilation, and major bleeding. Patients who received therapeutic AC for known indications were excluded. Propensity score matching of baseline characteristics and admission parameters was performed to minimize bias between cohorts.

Results

The analysis cohort included 973 patients. Forty-four patients who received therapeutic AC for confirmed thromboembolic events and atrial fibrillation were excluded. After propensity score matching, 133 patients received empiric therapeutic AC while 215 received low dose prophylactic AC. Overall, there was no difference in the rate of invasive mechanical ventilation (73.7% versus 65.6%, p = 0.133) or mortality (60.2% versus 60.9%, p = 0.885). However, among patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, empiric therapeutic AC was an independent predictor of lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.476, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.345–0.657, p < 0.001) with longer median survival (14 days vs 8 days, p < 0.001), but these associations were not observed in the overall cohort (p = 0.063). Additionally, no significant difference in mortality was found between patients receiving empiric therapeutic AC versus prophylactic AC in various subgroups with different D-dimer level cutoffs. Patients who received therapeutic AC showed a higher incidence of major bleeding (13.8% vs 3.9%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with a HAS-BLED score of ≥2 had a higher risk of mortality (HR 1.482, 95% CI 1.110–1.980, p = 0.008), while those with a score of ≥3 had a higher risk of major bleeding (Odds ratio: 1.883, CI: 1.114–3.729, p = 0.016).

Conclusion

Empiric use of therapeutic AC conferred survival benefit to patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, but did not show benefit in non-critically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Careful bleeding risk estimation should be pursued before considering escalation of AC intensity.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40364-021-00283-y.

Treatment strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation and anticoagulant-associated intracranial hemorrhage: an overview of the pharmacotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Oral anticoagulants (OAC) reduce stroke/systemic embolism and mortality risks in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is an inherent bleeding risk with OAC, where intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is the most feared, disabling, and lethal complication of this therapy. Therefore, the optimal management of OAC-associated ICH is not well defined despite multiple suggested strategies.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors describe the severity and risk factors for OAC-associated ICH and the associated implications for using DOACs in AF patients. We also provide an overview of the management of OAC-associated ICH and treatment reversal strategies, including specific and nonspecific reversal agents as well as a comprehensive summary of the evidence about the resumption of DOAC and the optimal timing.

EXPERT OPINION

In the setting of an ICH, supportive care/measures are needed, and reversal of anticoagulation with specific agents (including administration of vitamin K, prothrombin complex concentrates, idarucizumab and andexanet alfa) should be considered. Most patients will likely benefit from restarting anticoagulation after an ICH and permanently withdrawn of OAC is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Although the timing of OAC resumption is still under debate, reintroduction after 4-8 weeks of the bleeding event may be possible, after a multidisciplinary approach to decision-making.

Postoperative Anticoagulation After Neurologic Surgery

Management of anticoagulation and antiplatelet medications after neurosurgery can be complex, especially given that these patients have multiple medical comorbidities. In turn, neurosurgical patients are at high risk for the development of venous thromboembolism after surgery, so neurosurgeons must consider the use of pharmacologic prophylaxis. Developments in endovascular neurosurgery have produced therapies that require close management of antiplatelet medications to prevent postoperative complications. Any of these patient populations may need intrathecal access. This article highlights current strategies for managing these issues in the neurosurgical patient population.

Restarting antiplatelet therapy after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: Functional outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To compare the functional outcomes and health-related quality of life metrics of restarting vs not restarting antiplatelet therapy (APT) in patients presenting with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in the ERICH (Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage) study.

METHODS

Adult patients aged 18 years and older who were on APT before ICH and were alive at hospital discharge were included. Patients were dichotomized based on whether or not APT was restarted after hospital discharge. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were excellent outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1), mortality, Barthel Index, and health status (EuroQol-5 dimensions [EQ-5D] and EQ-5D visual analog scale scores) at 90 days.

RESULTS

The APT and no APT cohorts comprised 127 and 732 patients, respectively. Restarting APT was associated with lower rates of good functional outcome (36.5% vs 40.8%; p = 0.021) and lower Barthel Index scores at 90 days (p = 0.041). The 2 cohorts were then matched in a 1:1 ratio, and the matched cohorts each comprised 107 patients. No difference in primary outcome was observed between restarting vs not restarting APT (35.5% vs 43.9%; p = 0.105). There were also no differences between the secondary outcomes of the 2 cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Restarting APT in patients with ICH of mild to moderate severity after acute hospitalization is not associated with worse functional outcomes or health-related quality of life at 90 days. In patients with significant cardiovascular risk factors who experience an ICH, restarting APT remains the decision of the treating practitioner.

Anticoagulation Resumption After Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Purpose of review

Decision-making on resuming oral anticoagulant (OAC) after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) evokes significant debate among clinicians. Such patients have been excluded from randomized clinical trials. This review article provides a comprehensive summary of the evidence on anticoagulation resumption after ICH.

Recent findings

OAC resumption does not increase the risk of recurrent ICH and can also reduce the risk of all-cause mortality. OAC cessation exposes patients to a significantly higher risk of thromboembolism, which could be reduced by resumption. The optimal timing of anticoagulation resumption after ICH is still unknown. Both early (< 2 weeks) and late (> 4 weeks) resumption should be reached only after very careful assessment of risks for ICH recurrence and thromboembolism. The introduction of new oral anticoagulants and other interventions, such as left atrial appendage closure, has provided some patients with more alternatives.

Summary

Given the lack of high-quality evidence to guide clinical decision-making, clinicians must carefully balance the risks of thromboembolism and recurrent ICH in individual patients. We propose a management approach which would facilitate the decision-making process on whether anticoagulation is appropriate, as well as when and how to restart anticoagulation after ICH.

Efficacy and safety of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin for stroke prevention in Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation: the Hong Kong Atrial Fibrillation Project

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) compared to warfarin in Chinese atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Our aim was to compare the ischemic stroke risk reduction and incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) of warfarin in relation to quality of anticoagulation control (as reflected by time in therapeutic range [TTR]), and to dabigatran and rivaroxaban in a real-world cohort of Chinese AF patients.

HYPOTHESIS

NOAC, rather than warfarin, is preferred in Chinese AF patients.

METHODS

Of 2099 patients studied (73.1 ± 12.3 years, female: 44.6%, CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc 3.7 ± 1.9 and HAS-BLED 2.0 ± 1.0) with nonvalvular AF, 963 patients (45.9%) were on warfarin (only 16.3% had TTR ≥65%), 669 patients were on rivaroxaban, and 467 patients were on dabigatran.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 21.7 ± 13.4 months, there were 156 ischemic strokes (annual incidence of 4.10%/year), with the incidence of ischemic stroke being highest in patients on warfarin with TTR <65% (5.24%/year), followed by those on rivaroxaban (3.74%/year), and those on warfarin with TTR ≥65% (3.35%/year), whereas patients on dabigatran had the lowest incidence of ischemic stroke (1.89%/year). The incidence of ICH was lowest in patients on dabigatran (0.39%/year) compared with those on rivaroxaban (0.52%/year) and warfarin, with TTR <65% (0.95%/year) and TTR ≥65% (0.58%/year). Patients on rivaroxaban 20 mg daily had similar ischemic stroke risk (1.93%/year) and ICH risk (0.21%/year) compared to dabigatran.

CONCLUSIONS

In Chinese AF patients, the benefits of warfarin therapy for stroke prevention and ICH reduction depend on TTR. Of the treatments compared, dabigatran, as well as rivaroxaban 20 mg daily, was associated with lowest ischemic stroke and ICH rates.

2016 Guidelines of the Taiwan Heart Rhythm Society and the Taiwan Society of Cardiology for the management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia. Both the incidence and prevalence of AF are increasing, and the burden of AF is becoming huge. Many innovative advances have emerged in the past decade for the diagnosis and management of AF, including a new scoring system for the prediction of stroke and bleeding events, the introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and their special benefits in Asians, new rhythm- and rate-control concepts, optimal endpoints of rate control, upstream therapy, life-style modification to prevent AF recurrence, and new ablation techniques. The Taiwan Heart Rhythm Society and the Taiwan Society of Cardiology aimed to update the information and have appointed a jointed writing committee for new AF guidelines. The writing committee members comprehensively reviewed and summarized the literature, and completed the 2016 Guidelines of the Taiwan Heart Rhythm Society and the Taiwan Society of Cardiology for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation. This guideline presents the details of the updated recommendations, along with their background and rationale, focusing on data unique for Asians. The guidelines are not mandatory, and members of the writing committee fully realize that treatment of AF should be individualized. The physician's decision remains most important in AF management.

Resuming anticoagulant therapy after intracerebral bleeding

The clinical benefit of resuming anticoagulant treatment after an anticoagulants-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is debated. No randomized trial has been conducted on this particular clinical issue. The risk of ICH recurrence from resuming anticoagulant therapy is expected to be higher after index lobar than deep ICH and in patients with not amendable risk factors for ICH. Retrospective studies have recently shown improved survival with resumption of treatment after index anticoagulants-associated ICH. Based on these evidences and on the risk for thromboembolic events without anticoagulant treatment, resumption of anticoagulation should be considered in all patients with mechanical heart valve prosthesis and in those with amendable risk factors for anticoagulants-associated ICH. Resumption with direct oral anticoagulants appears a reasonable option for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients at moderate to high thromboembolic risk after deep ICH and for selected NVAF patients at high thromboembolic risk after lobar ICH. For VTE patients at high risk for recurrence, resumption of anticoagulation or insertion of vena cava filter should be tailored on the estimated risk for ICH recurrence.

CHA2DS2-VASc Recalibration With an Additional Age Category (50-64 Years) Enhances Stroke Risk Stratification in Chinese Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and a low CHA₂DS₂-VASc have a disproportionately high ischemic stroke risk; nonetheless, little is known about the impact of age on ischemic stroke risk in this population. In this study, we aimed to examine the age-related ischemic stroke risk in Chinese patients with nonvalvular AF without other risk factors for stroke.

METHODS

This was a hospital-based observational registry.

RESULTS

A total of 1198 Chinese patients with AF (mean age, 73.6 ± 16.5 years; male sex, 53.3%) were included in this analysis. The mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED score were 1.81 ± 1.00 and 1.32 ± 0.77, respectively, and none of the patients was prescribed antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy. After a mean follow-up of 2.95 years, there were 234 ischemic strokes (19.5%), with an annual ischemic stroke incidence of 6.62%/y. The overall annual ischemic stroke risk was 0.43%/y, 5.87%/y, 7.49%/y, and 8.04%/y for age groups < 50 years, 50-64 years, 65-74 years, and ≥ 75 years, respectively. There was a 10- to 20-fold gradient in ischemic stroke risk that increased sharply after the age of 50 years. The hazard ratios were 1.0, 13.0, 19.3, and 21.6 for age groups < 50 years, 50-64 years, 65-74 years and ≥ 75 years, respectively (P for trend < 0.0001). Similar trends were also observed in both male and female patients with AF.

CONCLUSIONS

Chinese patients with AF and a low CHA₂DS₂-VASc were at a disproportionally high risk of ischemic stroke. Chinese patients between 50 and 64 years have a high risk for stroke despite a low CHA₂DS₂-VASc and a low bleeding risk. Only patients aged < 50 years have a truly low risk.

Stroke prevention using dabigatran in elderly Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the clinical benefit of a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant compared with warfarin in elderly Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of dabigatran in elderly (age ≥80 years) Chinese patients with nonvalvular AF with regard to the risk of ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).

METHODS

This was an observational study.

RESULTS

We studied 571 Chinese patients (mean age 84.8 ± 4.0 years; 58.1% women) with nonvalvular AF. The primary outcome was hospital admission for ischemic stroke, and the secondary outcome was admission for ICH. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure [1 point], hypertension [1 point], age 65-74 years [1 point] and age ≥75 years [2 points], diabetes mellitus [1 point], prior stroke or transient ischemic attack [2 points], vascular disease [1 point], sex category [female] [1 point]) and HAS-BLED (hypertension [1 point], abnormal renal/liver function [1 point], stroke [1 point], bleeding history [1 point] or predisposition [1 point], labile international normalized ratio [1 point], elderly [age >65 years] [1 point], drugs/alcohol concomitantly [1 point]) scores were 4.8 ± 1.6 and 2.4 ± 0.8, respectively. Of 571 patients, 129 (22.6%) were taking dabigatran 110 mg twice daily and the remaining were on warfarin. After a mean follow-up of 2.6 years (a total of 1471 patient-years), ischemic stroke occurred in 83 patients on warfarin (6.9% per year) compared with 4 patients on dabigatran (1.4% per year) (hazard ratio 0.22; 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.67). There were 8 incidences of ICH: 7 in patients on warfarin (0.59% per year) and 1 patient on dabigatran (0.35% per year). Dabigatran was associated with a substantially lower ischemic stroke risk (1.4% per year vs 5.4% per year) and similar ICH risk (0.35% per year vs 0.36% per year) as compared with warfarin with time in therapeutic range (TTR) ≥55%.

CONCLUSION

In elderly Chinese patients with AF, this study suggested that dabigatran achieved superior stroke risk reduction and similar risk of ICH compared with warfarin with TTR ≥55%. Dabigatran may be preferable to warfarin in elderly patients with AF for stroke prevention, particularly in those with poor TTR.

Impact of the HAS-BLED Score on Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become an established treatment for coronary artery disease. In patients receiving a drug-eluting stent (DES), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended for at least 12 months. However, DAPT is a risk factor for bleeding, and risk stratification for bleeding is very important for patients with an implanted DES. The HAS-BLED score has been proposed as a practical tool to assess the bleeding risk of patients with atrial fibrillation. The aims of the study were to assess whether the HAS-BLED score has predictive value for major bleeding and survival in patients after PCI using a DES. A total of 2,171 patients were treated by PCI from 2004 to 2011 at our institution. Of these, 1,207 consecutive patients with an implanted DES were analyzed. The patients were classified into 2 groups based on the HAS-BLED score (high ≥3, low 0 to 2). The primary outcome was major bleeding and death. There were several severe co-morbidities in the high HAS-BLED score group compared with the low group. The median follow-up period was 3.6 years (interquartile range 1.5 to 5.4 years). The incidence of both death and major bleeding was higher in the high HAS-BLED score group than in the low HAS-BLED score group. On multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, high HAS-BLED score was associated with both death and major bleeding. In conclusion, the HAS-BLED score could predict the risk of bleeding and mortality for patients who underwent PCI independent of the presence of atrial fibrillation.

Impact of Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation on the Presentation of Coronary Artery Disease

Background

Little is known about whether atrial fibrillation is a presentation of coronary disease. There is a paucity of knowledge about their causal relationship and also the impact of different antithrombotic strategies on the subsequent presentation of symptomatic coronary disease.

Methods and Results

We studied 7,526 Chinese patients diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and no documented history of coronary artery disease. The primary endpoint was the new occurrence of coronary artery disease—either stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndrome. After a mean follow-up of 3.2±3.5 years (24,071 patient-years), a primary endpoint occurred in 987 patients (13.1%). The overall annual incidence of coronary artery disease was 4.10%/year. No significant differences in age, sex, and mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc score were observed between patients with and without the primary endpoint. When stratified according to the antithrombotic strategies applied for stroke prevention, the annual incidence of coronary artery disease was 5.49%/year, 4.45%/year and 2.16%/year respectively in those prescribed no antithrombotic therapy, aspirin, and warfarin. Similar trends were observed in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Diabetes mellitus, smoking history and renal failure requiring dialysis were predictors for primary endpoint in all antithrombotic therapies.

Conclusion

In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, there is a modest association with coronary artery disease. Patients prescribed warfarin had the lowest risk of new onset coronary artery disease.