Intraoperative Ultrasonography for Definition of Less Invasive Surgical Technique in Patients with Chiari Type I Malformation

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Dura-Splitting versus Duraplasty Techniques in Pediatric Chiari I Malformation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Type I Chiari malformation is a developmental anomaly with various proposed surgical techniques for its management. The dura-splitting technique is a less invasive approach and involves the resection of the outer layer of the dura while sparing the internal layer. While this less-known approach may minimize the complication rates, there are concerns about its efficacy and outcome. Therefore, we have performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of available data on clinical and radiological outcomes of this technique in the pediatric population and compared them to the foramen magnum decompression and duraplasty technique. We have followed the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines in this review. Based on our predefined search strategy, we performed a systematic database search. Subsequently, the article screening process was done based on defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Following the quality assessment of included studies, two authors performed data extraction. Finally, the extracted data were summarized and presented in form of tables. Forest plots were used to demonstrate the results of the meta-analysis. A review of 8 included studies consisting of 615 patients revealed the significant advantage of the dura-splitting technique in terms of shorter operation duration and hospital stay. The recurrence rate and clinical and radiological outcomes were almost similar between the two surgical techniques. Complication rates were significantly lower in the dura-splitting technique. Dura-splitting can be an effective and safe approach for the management of pediatric Chiari I malformation. However, these results are mostly extracted from observational studies and future randomized controlled trials are recommended.

Foramen magnum decompression for Chiari malformation type I - UK surgical practice

Background: Symptomatic Chiari 1 malformation (CM1) is a common condition in Neurosurgery. Surgery involves hindbrain decompression and restoration of CSF flow through different surgical approaches. No Class 1 evidence exists to suggest the superiority of any of the surgical techniques.Aims: To investigate current surgical practice for symptomatic CM1 patients in the United Kingdom (UK) and determine the willingness to participate in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing different surgical techniques.Methods: An electronic survey was sent to consultant members of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons and the British Chiari-Syringomyelia Group. The questions covered pre-operative and intra-operative management, presence of equipoise/uncertainty in optimal technique and willingness to participate in an RCT.Results: 98 responses were received. 67% operate on adults. 30% on adult and paediatric patients. There is variation in routine pre-operative use of: ICP monitoring (18%), flexion/extension x-rays (16%), venography (20%) and ophthalmology assessment (26%). 18% of neurosurgeons would not offer foramen magnum decompression when the presenting symptom is only refractory cough/sneeze headache. 15% routinely perform bony decompression alone in adults vs 8% in children. In 68% of adult cases, durotomy is performed routinely (46% of them leave the dura open, 54% perform a type of duroplasty) and 16% routinely resect the cerebellar tonsils. Only 17% leave the dura open in children. The most common indicators for durotomy are syringomyelia and intra-operative ultrasound findings. 61% believe there is equipoise/uncertainty in the optimal strategy for decompression and would be willing to participate in an RCT. Comments also mention the heterogeneity of CM1 and that treatment should be tailored to each patient.Conclusion: There is wide variation in pre- and intra-operative management of CM1 patients in the UK and the majority of neurosurgeons would be willing to participate in an RCT comparing bony decompression alone vs dural opening with/without duroplasty.

Headache and Other Symptoms in Chiari Malformation Type I Are Associated with Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow Improvement After Decompression: A Two-Institutional Study

OBJECTIVE

Chiari malformation type I (CMI) is a common neurologic condition and surgery is the standard treatment. We aim to establish the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow change as a potential objective indicator of surgical efficacy to improve symptoms.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective 2-center analysis of surgically treated patients with CMI. Qualitative CSF flow studies obtained preoperatively and postoperatively were analyzed by the neuroradiologist, seeking improvement in CSF flow. Symptom status, including headache and neck pain, were recorded.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients were identified between 2010 and 2017. The average age was 36 years, with 47 females. After decompression, CSF flow was improved in 41 patients (group A) and unchanged in 8 (group B). Group A and B had a mean age of 34 and 42 years (P < 0.05) and an average tonsillar herniation of 8.3 and 8.5 mm (P = 0.40), respectively. Group A had improved clinical outcomes, compared with group B (P = 0.024), more specifically, in headache (50% vs. 37%), neck pain (66% vs. 33%), dizziness (78% vs. 50%), vision symptoms (84% vs. 80%), and weakness (100% vs. 66%), respectively. Group B had the only patient who did worse on clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CMI often present with a constellation of symptoms. We showed a significant association between improved CSF flow after decompression and symptom alleviation. Further, our study suggests that the presence of improved CSF flow postoperatively could represent an objective indicator for improved patient outcomes.

Posterior Fossa Decompression and Duraplasty with and without Arachnoid Preservation for the Treatment of Adult Chiari Malformation Type 1: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The best surgical treatment for adult Chiari malformation type 1 remains widely debated.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of posterior fossa decompression and duraplasty with arachnoid preservation compared with arachnoid dissection for the treatment of adult Chiari malformation type 1.

METHODS

Two reviewers (M.O.-G. and M.A.) performed a PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase literature search using the following terms: ("Chiari" OR "Chiari 1") AND ("duraplasty" OR "arachnoid preservation" OR "arachnoid spar∗" OR "posterior fossa surgery" OR "posterior fossa decompression" OR "foramen magnum decompression"). Studies assessing the efficacy of posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty for the treatment of patients aged >18 years with Chiari malformation type 1 were included. Case reports with <10 patients, editorials, and non-English studies were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 195 studies identified, 24 were included for meta-analysis. In the 1006 participants, there was no difference in postoperative clinical or radiologic improvement between the 2 techniques. Patients who underwent posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty and arachnoid dissection had a greater prevalence of total complications (0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.29 vs. 0.09, 95% CI, 0.05-0.14; Q = 6.47; P = 0.01) and cerebrospinal fluid-related complications (0.15, 95% CI, 0.10-0.22 vs. 0.05, 95% CI, 0.02-0.12; Q = 4.88; P = 0.03) compared with arachnoid preservation. Furthermore, the prevalence of reoperation in the arachnoid dissection group was 25 times greater than in the arachnoid preservation group (0.08, 95% CI, 0.06-0.10 vs. 0.003, 95% CI, 0.00-0.02; Q = 10.73; P > 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior fossa decompression and duraplasty with arachnoid preservation is a beneficial technique to treat Chiari malformation type 1 and reduces the risk of complications, particularly cerebrospinal fluid-related complications and the rate of reoperation.

Treatment of symptomatic Chiari I malformation by "all-factors-surgery": a report of 194 cases

PURPOSE

Inadequate decompressions can lead to poor improvement of symptoms in patients with Chiari I malformation (CMI). In this study, the "all-factors-surgery" that including all levels decompressions was performed on symptomatic CMI patients for the snake of eliminating all possible pathogenic factors and reducing the chance of reoperation.

METHODS

The "all-factors-surgery" combined operations of posterior fossa decompression, enlarged cranioplasty, duraplasty, cerebellar tonsil partial resection and adhesion release. Total 194 patients from January 2010 to December 2015. The outcome measures included improvement rate of symptoms, patients self-evaluation (improved, unchanged, worsened), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS) score, the diameter of the syrinx and complications.

RESULTS

Postoperative data were collected from the three stages: at discharge, the short-term follow-up (average, 9.39 months), and the long-term follow-up (average, 54.44 months). Patients self-evaluation improvement rate in the three follow-up stages was 92.27%, 90.07% and 85.93%. The VAS scores (mean, 1.49, 1.21, 1.47 vs 3.76) and JOA scores (mean, 15.66, 15.99, 16.10 vs 14.84) were significant difference between the follow-up and pre-operation (P < .05). The CCOS scores of short-term and long-term follow-up were significantly better than that at discharge (mean, 14.75, 14.87 vs 13.68) (P < .05). The diameter of syrinx in each follow-up stage was significantly less than that in pre-operation (mean, 3.39, 1.95, 1.87 vs 5.09) (P < .05). There were no serious complications, and no one asked for reoperation during the follow up.

CONCLUSION

Symptomatic CMI patients undergoing "all-factors-surgery" had persistently high rates of symptom relief and rarely needed reoperation.

Posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty in Chiari malformation type 1: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgery for symptomatic Chiari type I malformation (CM-I) patients include posterior fossa decompression (PFD) involving craniectomy with or without dural opening, and posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD). This review aims to examine the evidence to aid surgical decision-making.

METHODS

A medical database search was expanded to include article references to identify all relevant published case series. Animal studies, editorials, letters, and review articles were excluded. A systemic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess clinical and radiological improvement, complications, and reoperation rates.

RESULTS

Seventeen articles, containing data on 3618 paediatric and adult participants, met the inclusion criteria. In the group, 5 papers included patients that had the dura left open. PFDD is associated with better clinical outcomes (RR 1.24, 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.44; P = 0.004), but has a higher complication rate (RR 4.51, 95% CI, 2.01 to 10.11; P = 0.0003). In adults, clinical outcomes differences did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) but re-operation rates were higher with PFD (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.86; P = 0.03), whilst in children re-operation rates were no different (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.30; P = 0.94). Patients with a syrinx did better with PFDD (P = 0.02). No significant differences were observed concerning radiological improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of hydrocephalus and craniocervical region instability, PFDD provides better clinical outcomes but with higher risk. The use of PFD may be justified in some cases in children, and in the absence of a syrinx. To help with future outcome assessments in patients with a CM-I, standardization of clinical and radiological grading systems are required.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

not required.

Minimally invasive foramen magnum durectomy and obexostomy for treatment of craniocervical junction-related syringomyelia in adults: case series and midterm follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Craniocervical junction-related syringomyelia (CCJS) is the most common form of syringomyelia. Approximately 30% of patients treated with foramen magnum decompression (FMD) will show persistence, recurrence, or progression of the syrinx. The authors present a pilot study with a new minimally invasive surgery technique targeting the pathophysiology of CCJS in adult patients.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed the clinical and radiological features of a consecutive series of patients treated for CCJS. An FMD and FM durectomy were performed through a 1.5- to 2-cm skin incision. Then arachnoid adhesions were cleared, creating a permanent communication from the fourth ventricle to the new paraspinal extradural cavity (obexostomy) and with the spinal subarachnoid space. The hypothesis was that the new CSF pouch acts like a pressure leak, interrupting the CCJS pathogenesis.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (13 female, 21-61 years old) were treated between 2014 and 2018. The etiology of CCJS was Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) in 20 patients (83.3%), Chiari malformation type 0 (CM-0) in 2 patients (8.3%), and CCJ arachnoiditis in 2 patients (8.3%). Two patients underwent reoperations after failed FMD for CM-I at other institutions. No major surgical complication occurred. One patient had postoperative meningitis with no CSF fistula. On postoperative MRI, shrinkage of the syrinx was seen in all patients. No patients experienced recurrence of the CCJS. No patient required a subsequent operation. The mean duration of surgery was 72 ± 11 minutes (mean ± SD), and blood loss was 35-80 ml (mean 51 ml). Follow-up ranged from 12 to 58 months. The average overall improvement in modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores was 10% (p < 0.001). The Odom scale showed that 19 patients (79.1%) were satisfied, 4 (16.7%) remained the same, and 1 (4.2%) reported a poor outcome. All patients experienced postoperative improvement in perception of quality of life (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive FM durectomy and obexostomy is a safe and effective treatment for CCJS and for patients who have not responded to other treatment.

Outcomes of dura-splitting technique compared to conventional duraplasty technique in the treatment of adult Chiari I malformation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chiari malformation type I is a developmental abnormality with an array of surgical techniques introduced for the management of it. The most common technique is foramen magnum decompression with duraplasty. Dura-splitting technique as one of the non-dura-opening techniques is a less known procedure that spares the internal layer of the dura and can theoretically result in fewer complications compared to duraplasty. So, we performed a review of literature and meta-analysis on different clinical and radiological aspects of this technique and compared its outcomes to duraplasty. MOOSE guidelines were followed. A systematic search of three databases based on predefined search strategy and inclusion/exclusion criteria was performed. After quality assessment and data extraction by two authors, summarized data were presented in form of tables, and meta-analysis results were illustrated in forest plots. A review of 10 included studies consisting of 370 patients revealed significantly shorter operation duration and less intraoperative blood loss in the dura-splitting technique compared to duraplasty. Interestingly, there was no significant difference between these two techniques in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes. Overall complication rate and incidence of CSF-related complications or infections were significantly in favor of the dura-splitting technique. Dura-splitting technique can be considered as a safe and effective surgical procedure for Chiari I malformation with comparable outcomes and fewer complications compared to duraplasty, although this interpretation is derived from retrospective observational studies and lack of a prospective clinical trial is evident.

Professional Profiles, Technical Preferences, Surgical Opinions, and Management of Clinical Scenarios from a Panel of 63 International Experts in the Field of Chiari I Malformation

BACKGROUND

Chiari I Malformation (CMI) and the topics concerning it have been the subject of numerous discussions and polarizing controversies over the course of the past 20 years.

METHODS

The opinions of 63 recognized international Neurosurgical CMI experts from 4 continents, with a collective surgical experience of more than 15,000 CMI cases, were gathered through a detailed questionnaire, divided in two parts: diagnostic and therapeutic. The therapeutic part was organized into four sections: Professional Profile, Technical Preferences, Surgical Opinions, and Clinical Scenarios.

RESULTS

The data reflected a wide spectrum of opinions, approaches, and expertise. The second part of the questionnaire dealt with the surgical aspects of CMI care and painted a more complex picture: • 81% of the surgeons preferred the Intradural technique. • 88% of the experts agreed that CMI surgery is not indicated for minimal non-debilitating symptoms alone, or as prophylaxis. • In the face of given clinical scenarios, a wide spectrum of therapeutic approaches was chosen by the whole group, but the 4 Surgeons with the largest case series expressed the same opinion. • Eight out of 63 Surgeons had a surgical experience above 600 cases, were responsible for more than half of the total 15,000 declared CMI cases, and shared a similar profile in terms of technical surgical choices, therapeutic opinions, and low complication rate, with a marked preference for Intradural techniques and tonsillar manipulation. • Once large individual case series were accumulated, we did not see any differences in the opinions and preferences between Adult and Pediatric Neurosurgeons.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons who have focused on CMI have been able to accumulate large surgical series, have chosen in their practices the more aggressive (and intrinsically more effective) CMI surgical techniques, and have achieved a low complication rate which compares favorably with that one of the extradural techniques.

Comparison of Results Between Posterior Fossa Decompression with and without Duraplasty for the Surgical Treatment of Chiari Malformation Type I: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Posterior fossa decompression without (PFD) or with duraplasty (PFDD) for the treatment of type 1 Chiari malformation (CM-1) is controversial. We thus performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies to assess the effect on clinical and imaging improvement, operative time, complications, and recurrence rate between PFD and PFDD in patients with CM-1.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Knowledge, and ClinicalTrials.gov for retrospective or prospective studies comparing PFD with PFDD. Our main end points were clinical and imaging improvement, operative time, complications, and recurrence rate. We assessed pooled data by use of a fixed-effects or random-effects model according to the between-study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Of 214 identified studies, 13 were eligible and were included in our analysis (N = 3481 patients). Compared with PFD, PFDD led to a mean greater increase in operative time than did PFD [standardized mean difference, -2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], (-2.70 to -1.99)], a higher likelihood of clinical improvement in patients with syringomyelia (relative risk [RR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49-0.98), no increased RR of clinical improvement in patients without syringomyelia, no increased RR of imaging improvement, but an increased RR of cerebrospinal fluid-related complications (RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.15-0.58), cerebrospinal fluid leak, aseptic meningitis, pseudomeningocele, and a decreased likelihood of recurrence rate.

CONCLUSIONS

PFDD can be an optimal surgical strategy because of its higher clinical improvement and lower recurrence rate in the patients with syringomyelia. In patients without syringomyelia, PFD can be a preferred choice because of its similar clinical improvement and lower costs. Future randomized studies with large numbers and the power to provide illumination for surgical decision making in CM-1 are warranted.