Anterior Lumbar Dural Tear: A Transthecal Route for Primary Closure After Iatrogenic Durotomy

Anterior Dural Tear in Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Fractures: Single-Center Experience with Coating Technique and Literature Review of the Available Strategies

Differently from the posterior, the anterior dural tears associated with spinal fractures are rarely reported and debated. We document our experience with a coating technique for repairing ventral dural lacerations, providing an associated literature review on the available strategies to seal off such dural defects. A PubMed search on watertight repair techniques of anterior dural lacerations focused on their association with spinal fractures was performed. Studies on animal or cadaveric models, on cervical spine, or based on seal/gelfoam or “not suturing” strategies were excluded. 10 studies were finally selected and our experience of three patients with thoracic/lumbar spinal fractures with associated ventral dural tear was integrated into the analysis of the surgical techniques. Among the described repair techniques for ventral dural lacerations a preference for primary suturing, mostly trans-dural, was noted (n = 6/10 papers). Other documented strategies were the plugging of the dural opening with a fat graft sutured to its margins, or stitched to the dura adjacent to the defect, and the closure of the dural tear with two patches, both trans-dural and epidural. Our coating techniques of the whole dural sac with the heterologous patch were revealed as safe and effective alternatives strategies, even when patch flaps wrapping nerve roots have to be cut and a fat graft has to be stitched in the patch respectively for sealing off antero-lateral and wide anterior dural tears. Compared to all the documented strategies for obtaining a watertight closure of an anterior dural laceration, the coating techniques revealed advantages of preserving neural structures, being adaptable to anterior and antero-lateral dural tears of any size.

Comparison of Transthecal Approach With Traditional Conservative Approach for Primary Closure After Incidental Durotomy in Anterior Lumbar Tear

BACKGROUND

Incidental durotomies (IDs) are frequent complications of spinal surgeries which are mostly posterior or lateral. Anterior IDs are rare; however, they may lead to severe complications. We compared the transthecal approach with the conservative approach for primary closure after durotomy in anterior lumbar dural tear to assess the efficacy of these approaches to decrease postsurgical complications and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 21 patients undergoing L2-S1 laminectomy with anterior ID were randomly divided into a transthecal group (n = 9) and a conservative group (n = 12) based on the surgical dural closure technique. Postoperative pseudomeningocele, wound infection, rootlet herniation, pneumocephalus, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, headache, meningitis, in addition to surgery duration and length of hospitalization were examined and compared in both groups.

RESULTS

The frequency of pseudomeningocele and CSF leakage in patients undergoing the transthecal approach was significantly lower than those undergoing the conservative approach (P = .045 and .008, respectively). Furthermore, although the differences in the frequency of meningitis, pneumocephalus, headache, and wound infection were not statistically significant between the 2 groups, the effect sizes of the comparison were obtained as 49.4, 19.8, 7.1, and 2.6, respectively. This indicated that the differences were clinically significant between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the transthecal approach was significantly more successful in managing CSF leakage as well as its complications and clinical outcomes. However, further clinical trials with bigger sample sizes are needed to substantiate this claim.

Pedicled Multifidus Muscle Flap To Treat Inaccessible Dural Tear In Spine Surgery: Technical Note And Preliminary Experience

OBJECTIVE

To assess the usefulness, feasibility, and limitations of pedicled multifidus muscle flaps (PMMFs) for the treatment of inaccessible dural tears during spine surgery.

METHODS

The technique of PMMF harvesting was investigated together with relevant anatomy. We prospectively evaluated 8 patients treated with the PMMF technique between January 2017 and December 2019. Results were compared with a retrospective series of 9 patients treated with a standard technique between January 2014 and December 2016. Inclusion criteria were inaccessible dural tear or dural tear judged not amenable to direct repair because of tissue loosening. Exclusion criteria were surgical treatment of intradural disease. Clinical and demographic data of all patients were collected. Clinical evaluations were performed according to American Spinal Injury Association criteria and Oswestry Disability Index. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography was performed in all patients. The primary end point was wound healing (cerebrospinal fluid leakage, infection, and fluid collection); secondary end points were neurologic outcome and complications.

RESULTS

Control group: 1 death as a result of wound infection secondary to cerebrospinal fluid fistula and 2 patients needed lumbar subarachnoid drain; neurologic outcome: 3 patients improved and 6 were unchanged. Flap group: no wound-related complications were observed; neurologic outcome: 3 patients improved and 5 were unchanged. No flap-related complications were described. Flap harvesting was feasible in all cases, with an average 20 minutes adjunctive surgical time.

CONCLUSIONS

The PMMF technique was feasible and safe; in this preliminary experience, its use is associated with lower complications as a result of dural tears but larger series are needed to confirm its effectiveness.

Postoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak After Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: A Diagnostic and Management Challenge

BACKGROUND

Lumbar total disc replacement is increasingly becoming a more common treatment for discogenic low back pain refractory to conservative measures. Nevertheless, several complications have been reported, including, among others, wound infection, vascular injury, retrograde ejaculation, postsympathectomy syndrome, ileus, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Although CSF leakage is rare, we discuss a case of CSF leakage and the diagnosis and management of CSF leakage after lumbar total disc replacement.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 25-year-old man had presented with discogenic low back pain caused by degenerative disc disease of 9 years' duration. His symptoms were exacerbated by activity, worse with sitting, and relieved by ice baths. He developed a cerebrospinal fluid leak after L5-S1 lumbar total disc replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

Our patient ultimately required device removal, direct repair, and replacement with a different prosthesis to treat his CSF leak.

Effectiveness of Method of Repair of Incidental Thoracic and Lumbar Durotomies: A Comparison of Direct Versus Indirect Repair

Introduction

Incidental durotomy (ID) is a well-known complication in spine surgery. Surveys have not identified a consensus for repair method among neurosurgeons. IDs may lead to complications such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula, which may predispose patients to infection, additional procedures, increased length of stay and morbidity. This study aims to compare durotomy repair methods with clinical outcomes.

Methods

The neurosurgery database at a single institution, Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, was screened for all patients who underwent thoracic and lumbar spine surgery from 2007-2017. Retrospective chart review of operative reports identified patients with an ID. Data collection included: length of stay, infection, additional procedures, time lying flat, CSF fistula formation (primary endpoint) with analysis using t-tests.

Results

A total of 384 patients underwent initial analysis. Of the 384 patients, 25 had an incidental durotomy based on operative reports. Four patients were excluded from this subset: two were repaired with muscle graft (low N), two were excluded for unclear repair method. The remaining 21 were stratified into two groups, those repaired directly with suture with or without adjunct (N=9) and those repaired indirectly with sealant (N=12). No patients developed a CSF fistula. The indirect group had a length of stay of six days, while the direct group had a length of stay of four days, p=0.184. Two of the nine patients in the direct group and two of the twelve patients in the indirect group developed an infection, p=0.586.

Conclusion

No patients developed CSF fistulas. Secondary endpoints of length of stay and infection rate did not differ. This study was unable to determine if direct versus indirect repair was a more effective repair method for ID. It is possible that if an incidental durotomy is identified and repaired with a water-tight seal, the repair method does not affect the outcome. It is up to the surgeon to individualize repair based on ability and circumstances.