Efficacy of Using Intermediate Screws in Short-Segment Fixation for Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Effective method of pedicle screw fixation in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review of studies published over the last 20 years

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of studies on various posterior pedicle screw fixation (PSF) methods used for treating neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures and to identify the most effective and safe approaches.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with the study registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024531093). The inclusion criteria were: (1) publication dates from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2023; (2) availability of full-text articles in English; (3) thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits; (4) patients aged over 18; (5) reports on treatment outcomes or complications; (6) a mean follow-up period of at least 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 69 articles covering 116 patient groups were included. Our analysis highlighted the advantages of short-segment fixation without fusion over monosegmental, short-segment and long-segment fusion in terms of shorter operation times and reduced intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Extensive fusion was associated with a significantly higher frequency of deep surgical site infections compared to other PSF methods (p = 0.043). Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, applied to patients with lower body compression rates and kyphotic deformities, led to less potential for correction (p = 0.004), yet significantly decreased blood loss (p = 0.011), operation duration (p < 0.0001), and hospitalization duration (p < 0.0001). No significant benefits were observed with the use of additional intermediate screws in short-segment PSF.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-segment pedicle screw fixation could be the optimal surgical treatment method for neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures. The use of posterior lateral fusion in this context may increase the deep surgical site infection rate without reducing the frequency of implant-related complications or improving long-term treatment outcomes. The percutaneous approach remains the preferred technique; however, its limited reduction capabilities should be carefully considered during surgical planning for patients with severe kyphotic deformities. The application of intermediate screws in such patients has not demonstrated significant advantages. Removing the fixation system has not led to a significant decrease in implant-related complications or improvement in quality of life. The data obtained from the systematic review may assist surgeons in selecting the most appropriate surgical treatment method for patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures, thereby avoiding ineffective procedures and improving both short-term and long-term outcomes.

A Prediction Nomogram for Fractured Vertebra Recollapse After Posterior Reduction and Pedicle Screw Fixation in Thoracolumbar Fractures

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to establish a predictive nomogram model for recollapse of fractured vertebra after posterior pedicle screw fixation in thoracolumbar fractures (TLFs).

METHODS

Patients undergoing posterior pedicle screw fixation for TLFs at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of recollapse of the fractured vertebra at the final follow-up. The predictors for fractured vertebra recollapse were identified by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis, and a nomogram model was developed. The prediction performance and internal validation were established.

RESULTS

A total of 224 patients were included in this study. Of these, 46 (20.5%) patients developed recollapse of fractured vertebra. Age, thoracic and lumbar injury severity score, screw distribution in the fractured vertebra, and anterior vertebral height compression ratio were associated with vertebral recollapse. These predictors were used to construct a predictive nomogram. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the nomogram model was 0.891. The concordance index was 0.891, and it was 0.877 with bootstrapping validation. The calibration curves and decision curve analysis also suggested that the nomogram model had excellent predictive performances for fractured vertebra recollapse.

CONCLUSIONS

A clinical nomogram incorporating 4 variables was constructed to predict fractured vertebra recollapse after posterior pedicle screw fixation for TLFs. The nomogram demonstrated good calibration and discriminative abilities, which may help clinicians to make better treatment decisions.

Posterior Fixation for Different Thoracic-Sacrum Alignments Containing a Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture: A Finite Element Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Thoracolumbar vertebral fractures are one of the most common fractures; however, there is a lack of mechanical analyses for what the posterior fixation is for different spine alignments.

METHODS

This study used a three-dimensional finite element model of a T1-sacrum. Three alignment models were created: intact, degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS), and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The burst fracture was assumed to be at the L1 vertebral level. Posterior fixation models with pedicle screws (PS) were constructed for each model: 1 vertebra above to 1 below PS (4PS) and 1 vertebra above to 1 below PS with additional short PS at the L1 (6PS); intact-burst-4PS, intact-burst-6PS, DLS-burst-4PS, DLS-burst-6PS, AIS-burst-4PS, and AIS-burst-6PS models. T1 was loaded with a moment of 4 Nm assuming flexion and extension.

RESULTS

The vertebrae stress varied with spinal alignment. The stress of L1 in intact burst (IB), DLS burst, and AIS burst increased by more than 190% compared with each nonfractured model. L1 stress in IB, DLS, and AIS-4PS increased to more than 47% compared with each nonfractured model. L1 stress in IB, DLS, and AIS-6PS increased to more than 25% compared with each nonfractured model. In flexion and extension, stress on the screws and rods of intact-burst-6PS, DLS-6PS, and AIS-6PS was lower than in the intact-burst-4PS, DLS-4PS, and AIS-4PS models.

CONCLUSIONS

It may be more beneficial to use 6PS compared with 4PS to reduce stresses on the fractured vertebrae and instrumentation, regardless of the spinal alignment.

Does Instrumentation of the Fractured Level in Thoracolumbar Fixation Affect the Functional and Radiological Outcome?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVES

To compare radiological and functional outcomes of patients with fixation constructs utilizing pedicle screw stabilization at the fracture level (FL group) versus patients with non-fracture level (NFL group) fixation in single level fractures of the thoracolumbar junction (T11-L1).

METHODS

53 patients of whom fracture level screw was used in 34 (FL group) were compared to 19 patients in NFL group. Radiological parameters analyzed were sagittal index, bi-segmental kyphosis (Cobb) angle and degree of vertebral height restoration. Prospectively collected patient reported functional outcomes and post-operative complications were also studied. Stepwise regression analysis adjusted by age, gender and functional scores was performed to account for the small numbers and unequal sizes of the groups.

RESULTS

Back pain score was significantly lower in the FL group (P < 0.025). Core Outcome Measures Index scores and leg pain scores, though low in the FL group, were not statistically significant. The regression analysis showed that the inclusion of the fracture-level screw was independently associated with a greater change in sagittal index and vertebral height restoration post-operatively. Sagittal index was maintained through to final follow up as well. The bi-segmental Cobb's angle correction was not associated with fracture-level screw construct. There was no significant difference between the groups for revision surgery, deep infection, implant failure or length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

The inclusion of the fracture-level pedicle screws in the fixation construct significantly improves the immediate and final measured radiological parameters, with improved functional scores in single level unstable vertebral fractures of the thoracolumbar junction.

Effect of the intermediate pedicle screws and their insertion depth on sagittal balance and functional outcomes of lumbar fracture

Objective

This study aimed to examine the effect of the intermediate pedicle screws and their insertion depth on sagittal balance and functional outcomes of lumbar fracture.

Methods

This study reviewed 1,123 patients with lumbar fractures between January 2015 and June 2019, and 97 patients were ultimately enrolled in this study: Group A: 32 patients in the four-pedicle screws fixation group; Group B: 28 patients in the six-pedicle screws fixation with long intermediate pedicle screws group; Group C: 37 patients in the six-pedicle screws fixation with short intermediate pedicle screws group. The radiographic outcomes were assessed with lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), fractured vertebral lordosis (FL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), and pelvic tilt (PT). The visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were used for assessing functional outcomes.

Results

The PI, PT, and SS showed no significant differences between the three groups (P > 0.05). Compared with Group A, Groups B and C showed better FL, SL, and LL 1 month after operation (5.96 ± 1.67/4.81 ± 1.49 vs. 8.78 ± 2.90, 24.39 ± 3.80/23.70 ± 4.10 vs. 20.09 ± 3.33, 39.07 ± 3.61/39.51 ± 3.23 vs. 36.41 ± 3.11, P < 0.05) and at final follow-up (8.75 ± 1.40/6.78 ± 1.70 vs. 11.31 ± 2.61, 22.11 ± 3.39/23.70 ± 4.10 vs. 17.66 ± 2.60, 38.04 ± 3.49/39.51 ± 3.23 vs. 35.41 ± 3.11, P < 0.05). The FL of Group C were significantly better than those of Group B 1 month after operation (4.81 ± 1.49 vs. 5.96 ± 1.67, P < 0.05) and at final follow-up (6.78 ± 1.70 vs. 8.75 ± 1.40, P < 0.05). No significant differences in VAS and ODI were found between Group A and Group B (P > 0.05). There were also no significant differences in VAS and ODI between Group A and Group C (P > 0.05). However, The VAS and ODI of Group C showed better than Group B 1 month after operation (3.05 ± 0.70 vs. 3.54 ± 0.79, 17.65 ± 3.41 vs. 19.71 ± 2.35, P < 0.05) and at final follow-up (2.19 ± 0.46 vs. 2.57 ± 0.57, 13.81 ± 2.20 vs. 15.57 ± 1.73, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Both four-pedicle screw fixation and six-pedicle screw fixation were effective in treating lumbar fracture. However, six-pedicle screw fixation with short intermediate pedicle screws showed better radiographic and functional outcomes after surgery. Therefore, we recommend six-pedicle screws fixation with short intermediate pedicle screws for the long-term recovery of sagittal balance and function.

Postoperative Spinal Implant Infections (PSII)-A Systematic Review: What Do We Know So Far and What is Critical About It?

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

Postoperative spinal implant infections (PSII) are an increasing challenge in the daily clinical routine. This review summarizes existing knowledge in the field of PSII, including definitions, epidemiology, classifications, risk factors, pathogenesis, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using a structured PubMed analysis, based on the PRISMA criteria. The search terminology was set as: "spinal implant associated infection OR spinal implant infection OR spinal instrumentation infection OR peri spinal implant infection." PubMed search was limited to the categories randomized controlled trials (RCT), clinical trials, meta-analysis and (systematic) reviews, whereas case reports were excluded. Studies from January 2000 to December 2020 were considered eligible. A total of 572 studies were identified, 82 references included for qualitative synthesis, and 19 for detailed sub analysis (12 meta-analysis, 7 prospective RCT).

RESULTS

Structural problems in the field of PSII were revealed, including (1) limited level of evidence in clinical studies (missing prospective RCT, metanalyzes), (2) small patient numbers, (3) missing standardized definitions, (4) heterogeneity in patient groups, and (5) redundancy in cited literature.

CONCLUSION

Evidence-based knowledge about spinal implant-associated infections is lacking. All involved medical fields should come together to define the term PSII and to combine their approaches toward research, training, and patient care.

A retrospective comparative study of clinical efficacy of percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation with or without screwing of the fractured vertebra with O-arm navigation

Objective

To retrospectively analyze the short and long-term efficacies of O-arm-navigated percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation, with or without screwing of the fractured vertebra.

Methods

A total of 42 patients who underwent O-arm-navigated percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures from February 2015 to December 2018 were selected for analysis. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical intervention they received: Group A received percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation with screwing of the fractured vertebra and Group B received percutaneous short segment pedicle screw fixation without screwing of the fractured vertebra. Radiographic analysis included Cobb angles and percentage of anterior vertebral height (AVH%). Clinical functional outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain and the oswestry disability index (ODI) scores.

Results

No significant differences were observed in the operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P > 0.05). The length of incision was statistically significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in Cobb angle and AVH% between the two groups before and after the surgery (P > 0.05). However, the Cobb angle and AVH% were both significantly larger in Group A than Group B at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). In terms of clinical outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences in VAS and ODI scores between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

In the short term, both minimally invasive treatments were safe and effective in treating thoracolumbar fracture. Although there was significant difference between the two groups in Cobb angle and vertebral body height at the last follow-up, the difference was small. Therefore, these specific parameters will be an important outcome measure in further investigations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05069-3.

Optimization of Spondylosynthesis for Certain Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

Intermediate transpedicular fixation, i.e. additional insertion of transpedicular screws into the injured vertebrae, is an improvement to the most popular surgical intervention for spinal injuries, currently gaining widespread use in clinical practice. Unilateral insertion of transpedicular screws into the injured vertebrae allows combining the advantages of intermediate transpedicular fixation with the possibility to perform anterior column support without remounting the transpedicular system.

The aim of the study was to use biomechanical computer modeling for evaluating the stability of intermediate transpedicular fixation components, which allow performing anterior column support if necessary.

Pedicle screw fixation of thoracolumbar fractures: conventional short segment versus short segment with intermediate screws at the fracture level-a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Posterior short-segment fixation (4-screw construct = 4S) is the conventional surgical technique for thoracolumbar fractures. The effect of adding two intermediate pedicle screws at the fractured level (6-screw construct = 6S) is still a matter of debate. This review aims to compare the results between 4 and 6S pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. The databases PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar were searched until January 2020. Inclusion criteria were studies comparing 4S and 6S techniques in patients with thoracolumbar fractures. Non-comparative studies and studies without full text were excluded. Cochrane risk of bias was assessed, and the GRADE approach was used to present the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies, of which 21 randomized controlled trials, with a total of 1890 patients (940 with 4S and 950 with 6S) were included. Meta-analysis showed that the 6S technique resulted in significantly lower pain scores, better short-term and long-term Cobb angles, less loss of correction and less implant failures. However, longer operation time and more blood loss were seen with the 6S technique. Length of hospital stay, Oswestry Disability Index scores and infections did not differ significantly between the 6S and 4S techniques. Quality of the evidence according to GRADE was moderate to low.

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures, adding intermediate screws at the fracture level (6S) results in less post-operative pain, better radiological outcomes and less implant failure at the cost of a longer operation time and higher blood loss.

Healing pattern classification for thoracolumbar burst fractures after posterior short-segment fixation

BACKGROUND

Thoracolumbar burst fractures can be treated with posterior short-segment fixation. However, no classification can help to estimate whether the healed vertebral body will have sufficient stability after implant removal. We aimed to develop a Healing Pattern Classification (HPC) to evaluate the stability of the healed vertebra based on cavity size and location.

METHODS

Fifty-two thoracolumbar burst fracture patients treated with posterior short-segmental fixation without fusion and followed up for an average of 3.2 years were retrospectively studied. The HPC was divided into 4 types: type I - no cavity; type II - a small cavity with or without the violation of one endplate; type III - a large cavity with or without the violation of one endplate; and type IV - a burst cavity with the violation of both endplates or the lateral cortical shell. The intraobserver and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the HPC were assessed. The demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes of the cohort were compared between the stable group (types I and II) and the unstable group (types III and IV). Logistic regression was conducted to evaluate risk factors for unstable healing.

RESULTS

The intraobserver and interobserver ICCs of the HPC were 0.86 (95% CI = 0.74-0.90) and 0.77 (95% CI = 0.59-0.86), respectively. While the unstable healing group (types III and IV) accounted for 59.6% of the patients, most of these patients were asymptomatic. The preoperative Load Sharing Classification (LSC) comminution score may predict the occurrence of unstable healing (OR = 8.4, 95% CI = 2.4-29.7).

CONCLUSIONS

A reliable classification for assessing the stability of a healed vertebra was developed. With type I and II healing, the vertebra is considered stable, and the implant can be removed. With type III healing, the vertebra may have healing potential, but the implant should not be removed unless type II healing is achieved. With type IV healing, the vertebra is considered extremely unstable, and instrumentation should be maintained. Assessing the LSC comminution score preoperatively may help to predict unstable healing after surgery.

Comparison of Polyaxial or Poly/Monoaxial Mixed Screw Fixation for Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures with O-Arm Navigation: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Navigation and minimally invasive techniques have revolutionized spinal surgery. There are different types of pedicle screws for navigation-assisted percutaneous internal fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures, resulting in 2 different types of internal fixation approaches: the PPP method (polyaxial screw fixation for all 3 vertebrae) and the MPM method (polyaxial screw fixation for the injured vertebra and monoaxial screw fixation for the adjacent vertebrae). This study aims to compare these 2 different methods for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures via O-arm navigation.

METHODS

From January 2017 to January 2018, 45 patients were enrolled according to the criteria with a minimal follow-up of 1 year; there were 21 patients in the PPP group, and 24 patients in the MPM group. For follow-up, the demographic features and clinical outcomes were collected and evaluated.

RESULTS

With regard to preoperative indices and demographic features, no significant difference was observed between these 2 groups (P > 0.05). For operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and length of hospitalization, no significant difference was observed either between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The Cobb angle and anterior vertebrae body height (AVBH) of the injured vertebra were significantly restored in both groups 1 day after surgery (P < 0.05). However, the Cobb angle and AVBH in the MPM group was better corrected than that in the PPP group 1 day, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery, respectively (P < 0.05). In contrast, loss of Cobb angle and AVBH in the PPP group were significantly larger than the MPM group (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, no difference in the Visual Analog Scale and the Oswestry Disability Index were found between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both MPM and PPP systems are good for treatment of single-segment thoracolumbar fracture. However, MPM showed better restoration effect and postoperative maintained Cobb angle than PPP.