Quantitative Anatomic Analysis of the Transcallosal-Transchoroidal Approach and the Transcallosal-Subchoroidal Approach to the Floor of the Third Ventricle: An Anatomic Study

Endoscopic approaches to the posterior wall of the third ventricle: An anatomical comparison

INTRODUCTION

Surgery of lesions in the posterior wall of the third ventricle requires great expertise due to its deep location and important surrounding structures. This region has been traditionally reached through a supracerebellar infratentorial approach, but new options have emerged, especially with the development of neuroendoscopy.

METHODS

One formalin-fixed cadaver human head was dissected. Five different endoscopic approaches were performed: interhemispheric transcallosal transchoroidal, frontal transforaminal transchoroidal, supraorbital subfrontal translamina terminalis, expanded endonasal, and supracerebellar infratentorial. An anatomical description of the different approaches was conducted and quantitative measurements (craniocaudal and latero-lateral distances) were taken using the StealthStation ® workstation after performing a CT scan of the specimen.

RESULTS

The interhemispheric transcallosal transchoroidal, frontal transforaminal transchoroidal, and supraorbital subfrontal translamina terminalis approaches provided great view of all the structures of the posterior wall of the third ventricle. Maximum craniocaudal distance was obtained through the supraorbital subfrontal translamina terminalis approach (10.6 mm), with great difference from the expanded endonasal approach (5.2 mm). The widest latero-lateral distance from inside the third ventricle was achieved through the interhemispheric transcallosal transchoroidal approach (4.6 mm), similar to the expanded endonasal (4.1 mm), and differing from the supraorbital subfrontal translamina terminalis (2.4 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic approaches provided an adequate alternative to more traditional microsurgical approaches to the posterior wall of the third ventricle, with a great view of all its structures. The selection of the approach must be taken under consideration in each case.

Transcallosal Retroforniceal Transchoroidal Approach: To the Posterior Third Ventricle and Beyond

BACKGROUND

The transcallosal retroforniceal transchoroidal approach represents an advanced neurosurgical technique that allows access to lesions located within the posterior third ventricle and mesencephalon. It relies on a comprehensive understanding of microsurgical anatomy and embryology, integrating modern neurosurgical operative techniques to minimize retraction and injury to the normal neuronal structures.

METHODS

We report the cases of 2 patients undergoing treatment via this approach, one presenting with a thalamic cavernoma and the other with cystic low-grade glioma of the midbrain.

RESULTS

In these 2 cases, the decision to use the transcallosal approach was mainly due to improved trajectory, gravitational retraction of the hemisphere, and improved delivery of the lesion into the operative field by gravity alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Through a detailed description of the surgical approach and anatomy, we illustrate the feasibility of the transcallosal retroforniceal transchoroidal approach for accessing lesions located deeply in the brain.

Quantitative analysis of exposure and surgical maneuverability of three purely endoscopic keyhole approaches to the floor of the third ventricle

BACKGROUND

The quantitative anatomic analysis of comprehensively endoscopic approaches to the third ventricle is scarce at present. The objective of the study is to quantitatively assess and compare the exposure and microsurgical maneuverability of three absolutely endoscopic keyhole approaches, including interhemispheric transcallosal transchoroidal (TCTC), frontal transforminal transchoroidal (TFTC) and supraorbital subfrontal translamina terminalis (SFTL) approaches.

METHODS

Anatomical dissections and exposure of the important structures of the third ventricle were performed using six formalin-fixed cadaveric human heads (twelve sides) under endoscope. Tubular retractor system was used in the TFTC approach. Quantitative anatomical relationship between the important landmarks were obtained. Moreover, the exposure and surgical operability of three approaches were evaluated through applying the rating scale and accomplishing the quantitative anatomic analysis, area of surgical freedom and angle of attack.

RESULTS

The mediolateral, anteroposterior (AM: between aqueduct and mammillary body; IM: between infundibular recess and mammillary body) and superoinferior distance of TCTC, TFTC and SFTL approaches were 4.0±1.0, 4.2±0.4, 4.1±1.1 mm; 17.3±1.4, 17.6±0.5, 12.8±3.3 mm (AM); 7.7±0.3, 7.8±0.5 mm, not measured (IM); and 5.6±0.3, 7.8±0.8, 7.8±1.5 mm, respectively. Similar to TFTC, the exposed landmarks of TCTC were almost scored a "4" by three neurosurgeons except the infundibular recess scored a "3" according to the rating scale. During the SFTL approach, apart from the roof, the majority of the landmarks were scored a "4" except for the infundibular recess, which was scored a "3." The mean area of surgical freedom of TCTC (0° endoscope: 220±47; 30°: 247±56 mm2) was not significantly different from that of TFTC approach (0° endoscope: 216±49; 30°: 245±53 mm2) under same endoscope, P>0.05. Mean angle of attack of TCTC (0° endoscope: 21±4°; 30°: 26±4°) was significantly larger than that of TFTC approach (0° endoscope: 16±3°; 30°: 19±3°), P<0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Purely endoscopic TCTC and TFTC approaches offer brilliant exposure of the anterior, middle and posterior third ventricle. TCTC approach may have better surgical maneuverability than TFTC approach. Despite the long working distance, the whole third ventricle are exposed well except for the roof in the SFTL approach, and surgical manipulation can be accomplished smoothly.

Anatomical step-by-step dissection of common approaches to the third ventricle for trainees: surgical anatomy of the anterior transcortical and interhemispheric transcallosal approaches, surgical principles, and illustrative pediatric cases

PURPOSE

To create a high-quality, cadaver-based, operatively oriented resource documenting the anterior transcortical and interhemispheric transcallosal approaches as corridors to the third ventricle targeted towards neurosurgical trainees at all levels.

METHODS

Two formalin-fixed, latex-injected specimens were dissected under microscopic magnification and endoscopic-assisted visualization. Dissections of the transcortical and transcallosal craniotomies with transforaminal, transchoroidal, and interforniceal transventricular approaches were performed. The dissections were documented in a stepwise fashion using three-dimensional photographic image acquisition techniques and supplemented with representative cases to highlight pertinent surgical principles.

RESULTS

The anterior transcortical and interhemispheric corridors afford excellent access to the anterior two-thirds of the third ventricle with varying risks associated with frontal lobe versus corpus callosum disruption, respectively. The transcortical approach offers a more direct, oblique view of the ipsilateral lateral ventricle, whereas the transcallosal approach readily establishes biventricular access through a paramedian corridor. Once inside the lateral ventricle, intraventricular angled endoscopy further enhances access to the extreme poles of the third ventricle from either open transcranial approach. Subsequent selection of either the transforaminal, transchoroidal, or interforniceal routes can be performed through either craniotomy and is ultimately dependent on individual deep venous anatomy, the epicenter of ventricular pathology, and the concomitant presence of hydrocephalus or embryologic cava. Key steps described include positioning and skin incision; scalp dissection; craniotomy flap elevation; durotomy; transcortical versus interhemispheric dissection with callosotomy; the aforementioned transventricular routes; and their relevant intraventricular landmarks.

CONCLUSIONS

Approaches to the ventricular system for maximal safe resection of pediatric brain tumors are challenging to master yet represent foundational cranial surgical techniques. We present a comprehensive operatively oriented guide for neurosurgery residents that combines stepwise open and endoscopic cadaveric dissections with representative case studies to optimize familiarity with third ventricle approaches, mastery of relevant microsurgical anatomy, and preparation for operating room participation.

Quantitative Anatomical Studies in Neurosurgery: A Systematic and Critical Review of Research Methods

BACKGROUND

The anatomy laboratory can provide the ideal setting for the preclinical phase of neurosurgical research. Our purpose is to comprehensively and critically review the preclinical anatomical quantification methods used in cranial neurosurgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid EMBASE databases were searched, yielding 1667 papers. A statistical analysis was performed using R.

RESULTS

The included studies were published from 1996 to 2023. The risk of bias assessment indicated high-quality studies. Target exposure was the most studied feature (81.7%), mainly with area quantification (64.9%). The surgical corridor was quantified in 60.9% of studies, more commonly with the quantification of the angle of view (60%). Neuronavigation-based methods benefit from quantifying the surgical pyramid features that define a cranial neurosurgical approach and allowing post-dissection data analyses. Direct measurements might diminish the error that is inherent to navigation methods and are useful to collect a small amount of data.

CONCLUSION

Quantifying neurosurgical approaches in the anatomy laboratory provides an objective assessment of the surgical corridor and target exposure. There is currently limited comparability among quantitative neurosurgical anatomy studies; sharing common research methods will provide comparable data that might also be investigated with artificial intelligence methods.

Surgical Approaches to the Third Ventricle: An Update

The third ventricle is located in the deepest part of the brain and is delimited by both telencephalic and diencephalic structures. Its location makes every surgical procedure inside or around it quite challenging, due to the distance from the surface to the fragility of the neurovascular structures that is necessary to dissect before entering its cavity and to the narrow surgical corridors through which it is necessary to work. Its geometric localization inside the cranial cavity and the anatomical relationship with the interhemispheric fissure offers nevertheless to the surgeon an impressive variety of surgical approaches, which allow to reach every millimeter of the third ventricle lumen. Mastering properly all these approaches requires an impressive anatomical knowledge, the best available technology, and most refined technical skills, making the surgery of the third ventricle a point of excellence in the evolution of each neurosurgeon. The development of neuronavigation and neuroendoscopy has been a revolution in neurosurgery in the last 20 years and offered special advantages for the surgery of the third ventricle. In fact, the narrow corridors of approach make the precision of the neuronavigation and the enlightenment and magnification of the neuroendoscopy especially useful to reach the third ventricle cavity and working inside or around it. This chapter reviews the history of the surgery of the third ventricle and offers an update of the variety of surgical corridors identified and of the technology now available to properly work through them and inside the third ventricle cavity.

A Case of Cavernous Malformation of the Midbrain Removed via an Interhemispheric Transcallosal Subchoroidal Approach

Cavernous malformations of the midbrain have a higher rate of hemorrhage and a poorer prognosis than vascular malformations of other brain areas. Surgical resection of these lesions is often necessary to avoid neurological deficits in affected patients. Herein, the literature surrounding cavernous malformations was examined, and the case of a 48-year-old man with left hemiparesis and diplopia caused by incomplete right oculomotor nerve palsy, who was diagnosed with a hemorrhage from a midbrain cavernous malformation, was discussed. The lesion expanded gradually on magnetic resonance imaging and was symptomatic; radical removal of the lesion before the onset of irreversible symptoms due to recurring bleeding was therefore considered to be beneficial for the patient. Surgical removal of the entire cavernous malformations of the midbrain was performed using an interhemispheric transcallosal subchoroidal approach, with excellent postoperative results and complete recovery from the oculomotor nerve palsy and left hemiparesis. This case shows that this approach is the most appropriate for surgical resections of lesions in the upper midbrain.

Surgical Approach to Thalamic Tumors

Thalamic tumors are deep-seated lesions. Recent improvements in therapeutic approaches and surgical techniques have allowed a more accurate approach to these lesions and a reduction in morbidity and mortality. In this article, the various surgical approaches for the resection of thalamic tumors are described. Each of these approaches has its own indications and risk of complications. Resection of thalamic tumors needs specific anatomical knowledge, especially the vascular anatomy of the region and the thalamic peduncles.

Modern endoscopic skull base neurosurgery

INTRODUCTION

Since the early use of the endoscopic view for treating simple intrasellar pituitary adenomas, the skull base surgery has experienced an unprecedented revolution elevating the treatment of skull base lesions to the next level in proficiency and excellence of care.

METHODS

We have reviewed the preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the use of the endoscope in the treatment of skull base lesions. In this article, we aim to discuss and provide a wide view of the current indications and future perspectives of the endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) and of the endoscopic transcranial approaches.

RESULTS

As in the development of any other technique, EEA have gone through a transformation process from theoretical anatomic models to a pragmatic clinical use. Along the way, EEA have required several modifications, as well as pushbacks in the application of this technique in some indications. This process has resulted in the provision of an additional tool to the current surgical armamentarium that allows the skull base surgeon to face most challenging lesions along the skull base.

CONCLUSIONS

The judicious combination of transcranial and endoscopic-transnasal approaches warrants highest chances of achieving satisfactory tumors resection with a reduced risk of complications.