Management of Infected Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage in Posterior Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery

Remove the infected interbody cage using endoscopy in lumbar spine revision surgery: A case series and technique report

BACKGROUND

Current revision surgery to remove the infected interbody cage following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery is challenging and traumatic. The purpose of this study is to introduce a novel surgical technique to remove the infected interbody cage for chronic infection.

METHODS

Three patients with chronic infection following TLIF surgery underwent revision surgery. Instrumentations were removed and a spinal endoscope was obliquely inserted to the disc space through the initial annular breach. Under endoscope, the cage was found, released, turned around, and dragged to the posterior edge of the disc space. The cage was then removed without distracting the dural sac and nerve roots. For two cases, appropriately sized structural iliac bone grafts were used for interbody fusion without extra instrumentations.

RESULTS

Using endoscope, the interbody cage was easy to identify and expose without disrupting the dural sac and nerve roots. With various endoscopic tools, the cage was easily released and removed. In this case series, the infected interbody cage was removed within thirty minutes without dural sac rupture and nerve root injury. The infection was controlled after the surgery, and the patients obtained good clinical outcomes. At 6-month follow-up, bony fusion was achieved in two patients who underwent interbody fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

This endoscopy assisted technique simplified the revision surgery for chronic infection followed TLIF surgery, with the advantages of no disruption of the neural tissues, bright surgical field and complete disc debridement.

Vertebral osteomyelitis after spine instrumentation surgery: risk factors and management

BACKGROUND

Vertebral osteomyelitis after spine instrumentation surgery (pVOM) is a rare complication. Most cases of infection occur early after surgery that involve skin and soft tissue and can be managed with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR).

AIM

To identify pVOM risk factors and evaluate management strategies.

METHODS

From a multicentre cohort of deep infection after spine instrumentation (IASI) cases (2010-2016), pVOM cases were compared with those without vertebral involvement. Early and late infections were defined (<60 days and >60 days after surgery, respectively). Multivariate analysis was used to explore risk factors.

FINDINGS

Among 410 IASI cases, 19 (4.6%) presented with pVOM, ranging from 2% (7/347) in early to 19.1% (12/63) in late IASIs. After multivariate analysis, age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.18), interbody fusion (aOR: 6.96; 95% CI: 2-24.18) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) infection (aOR: 3.83; 95% CI: 1.01-14.53) remained independent risk factors for pVOM. Cases with pVOM had worse prognoses than those without (failure rate; 26.3% vs 10.8%; P = 0.038). Material removal was the preferred strategy (57.9%), mainly in early cases, without better outcomes (failure rate; 33.3% vs 50% compared with DAIR). Late cases managed with removal had greater success compared with DAIR (failure rate; 0% vs 40%; P = 0.067).

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for pVOM are old age, use of interbody fusion devices and CoNS aetiology. Although the diagnosis leads to a worse prognosis, material withdrawn should be reserved for late cases or when spinal fusion is achieved.

Total en bloc spondylectomy in the treatment of postoperative chronic osteomyelitis: a case report

BACKGROUND

Infection of the spine after surgical procedures is one of the most dreaded complications of spinal fusion surgery. Treatment goals are to eradicate the necrotic and infected tissue and to obtain a correct spinal profile. Traditionally many authors have recommended the posterolateral or double approach, anterior and posterior. Total en bloc spondylectomy is a surgical procedure traditionally used to treat primary and metastatic tumors. The use of this surgical procedure in treatment of chronic vertebral osteomyelitis is not clearly defined in literature.

CASE DESCRIPTION

This case involved a 66-year-old female patient with a history of T9-S1 instrumentation after several surgeries, who developed chronic osteomyelitis of T8-T9 with extensive destruction of the vertebral body and severe thoracic kyphosis. After targeted antibiotic therapy, total en bloc spondylectomy of T8-T9 was performed according to the Tomita technique. Necrotic and infected tissues were removed proceeding as if it were chronic osteomyelitis of long bones and performing en bloc resection with clear margins, that is, applying the criteria of oncological surgery to this chronic infection. After resection, the sagittal plane is reconstructed in the affected segment, restoring the normal distance between the two healthy vertebrae and the mechanical stability of the spine.

CONCLUSIONS

Total en bloc spondylectomy in the treatment of extensive infectious lesions with a mechanical component allows performing en bloc resection of infected and necrotic tissue along with biological and mechanical reconstruction. In our case, the complete resection of the infected bone and soft tissues achieved good outcome without complications. We propose total en bloc spondylectomy as a reasonable treatment option in complicated spondylodiscitis progressing to extensive chronic osteomyelitis and compromising spinal stability due to a significant loss of bone material.

Treatment strategy for surgical site infection post posterior lumbar interbody fusion: A retrospective study

Introduction

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) has been widely used to treat various degenerative spinal diseases. However, surgical site infection (SSI) post-PLIF is often difficult to cure. This study aimed to clarify the difference in clinical course due to the causative organism and develop a treatment strategy for SSI post-PLIF.

Methods

Between January 2011 and March 2019, 581 PLIF surgeries were performed at our hospital. Deep SSI occurred in 14 patients who were followed up for more than 2 years. Causative bacterial species were diagnosed by preoperative puncture and/or intraoperative drainage or by tissue culture in 13 patients and by intradiscal puncture in one patient who underwent conservative treatment. Of the 13 patients who underwent surgeries for infection, 10 had Propionibacterium acnes (Group A; n = 4) or coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS) (Group B; n = 6) as the causative bacterial species. Groups A and B were retrospectively compared in terms of age, sex, number of segments, presence of diabetes mellitus, operation time, blood loss, C-reactive protein on hematological examination, the elapsed time to diagnosis (ETD), the presence of clinical findings such as heat, redness, swelling, and discharge from the wound and healing time.

Results

All infections were eradicated with surgery except in one patient whose causative bacteria was CNS; cages were finally removed in 11 patients. There was a significant difference (P = 0.0105) in the ETD and clinical findings (P = 0.0476) between Groups A and B. Posterior one-stage simultaneous revision (POSSR) was performed in nine patients, of whom eight were cured and one required additional surgery.

Conclusions

The ETD and clinical findings were significantly different in SSI cases caused by different bacteria, which will be useful in predicting the causative bacteria in future cases. For the treatment of deep SSI post-PLIF, POSSR was effective.

Multidisciplinary Approach to Multiple Multiresistant Agent Infection of Instrumented Spine Surgery: A Case Report

CASE

We report the case of a patient with consecutive infections with several multidrug-resistant agents-including carbapenem-resistant strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae among others-from a surgical wound infection after lumbar spine fusion, only successfully treated after the resort to novel antibiotics (ceftazidime-avibactam) in combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidrug resistance has become a major challenge in today's medicine. Care should be taken to avoid their emergence, but when present, a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory to ensure clinically up-to-date treatment choices. Multimodal antibiotic schemes tend to show the most promising results, with which successful infection resolution can still be achieved.

Removal of instrumentation for postoperative spine infection: systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Currently, no consensus exists as to whether patients who develop infection of the surgical site after undergoing instrumented fusion should have their implants removed at the time of wound debridement. Instrumentation removal may eliminate a potential infection nidus, but removal may also destabilize the patient's spine. The authors sought to summarize the existing evidence by systematically reviewing published studies that compare outcomes between patients undergoing wound washout and instrumentation removal with outcomes of patients undergoing wound washout alone. The primary objectives were to determine 1) whether instrumentation removal from an infected wound facilitates infection clearance and lowers morbidity, and 2) whether the chronicity of the underlying infection affects the decision to remove instrumentation.

METHODS

PRISMA guidelines were used to review the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases to identify studies that compared patients with implants removed and patients with implants retained. Outcomes of interest included mortality, rate of repeat wound washout, and loss of correction.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles were included. Of 878 patients examined in these studies, 292 (33%) had instrumentation removed. Patient populations were highly heterogeneous, and outcome data were limited. Available data suggested that rates of reoperation, pseudarthrosis, and death were higher in patients who underwent instrumentation removal at the time of initial washout. Three studies recommended that instrumentation be uniformly removed at the time of wound washout. Five studies favored retaining the original instrumentation. Six studies favored retention in early infections but removal in late infections.

CONCLUSIONS

The data on this topic remain heterogeneous and low in quality. Retention may be preferred in the setting of early infection, when the risk of underlying spine instability is still high and the risk of mature biofilm formation on the implants is low. However, late infections likely favor instrumentation removal. Higher-quality evidence from large, multicenter, prospective studies is needed to reach generalizable conclusions capable of guiding clinical practice.

An unusual case of a persistent, infected retroperitoneal fluid collection 5 years after anterior lumbar fusion surgery: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Anterior lumbar fusion procedures have many benefits and continue to grow in popularity. The technique has many potential approach- and procedure-related complications. Symptomatic retroperitoneal fluid collections are uncommon but potentially serious complications after anterior lumbar procedures. Collection types include hematomas, urinomas, chyloperitoneum, cerebrospinal fluid collections, and deep infections.

OBSERVATIONS

The authors present an unusual case of a patient with persistent symptoms related to a retroperitoneal collection over a 5-year period following anterior lumbar fusion surgery. To the authors’ knowledge, no similar case with such extensive symptom duration has been described. The patient had an infected encapsulated fluid collection. The collection was presumed to be a postoperative lymphocele that was secondarily infected after serial percutaneous drainage procedures.

LESSONS

When retroperitoneal collections occur after anterior retroperitoneal approaches, clinical clues, such as timing of symptoms, hypotension, acute anemia, urinary tract infection, hydronephrosis, elevated serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen, low-pressure headaches, anorexia, or systemic signs of infection, can help narrow the differential. Retroperitoneal collections may continue to be symptomatic many years after anterior lumbar surgery. The collections may become infected after serial percutaneous drainage or prolonged continuous drainage. Encapsulated, infected fluid collections typically require surgical debridement of the capsule and its contents.

Revision Surgery for Postoperative Spondylodiscitis at Cage Level after Posterior Instrumented Fusion in the Lumbar Spine-Anterior Approach Is Not Absolutely Indicated

Spondylodiscitis at the cage level is rare but remains a challenge for spine surgeons. In this study, the safety and efficacy of revision surgery by a posterior approach to spondylodiscitis developed at the cage level were evaluated, and these data were compared to those of patients treated with revision surgeries using the traditional anterior plus posterior approach for their infections. Twenty-eight patients with postoperative spondylodiscitis underwent revision surgeries to salvage their infections, including 15 patients in the study group (posterior only) and 13 patients in the control group (combined anterior and posterior). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen in both groups. L4-L5 was the most common infection site in both groups. The operation time (229.5 vs. 449.5 min, p < 0.001) and blood loss (427.7 vs. 1106.9 mL, p < 0.001) were the only two data points that were statistically significantly different between the two groups. In conclusion, a single posterior approach with ipsilateral or contralateral transforaminal lumbar interbody debridement and fusion plus extending instrumentation was safe and effective for spondylodiscitis developed at the cage level. This strategy can decrease the operation time and blood loss.