Subarachnoid Hemorrhage with Concurrent Dural and Perimedullary Arteriovenous Fistulas at Craniocervical Junction: Case Report and Literature Review

Enhanced Treatment Options for Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas at the Craniocervical Junction: Endovascular Embolization Versus Microsurgery? A Single-Center 23-Year Experience

OBJECTIVE

The occurrence of dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) at the craniocervical junction (CCJ) is an uncommon vascular malformation. The diagnosis and treatment of CCJ DAVFs present a formidable challenge. This study aims to investigate the effect of endovascular embolization and microsurgery on improving patient prognosis.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with CCJ DAVFs who received treatment at the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University between January 2000 and January 2023. The clinical records, imaging data, and treatment methods were obtained from the hospital's medical record system. The patients were classified into microsurgery and embolization groups based on the surgical technique employed for treatment. The primary outcome measures were surgical-associated neurological dysfunction (SAND) and long-term neurological outcomes. The Cox proportional hazard regression was utilized to determine hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to assess the relationship between treatment methods and prognosis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was employed to evaluate the incidence of SAND in both cohorts.

RESULTS

This study recruited 46 patients with an average age of 53.72 ± 13.83 years. In the microsurgery group, there were 12 cases (26.1%) observed. While in the embolization group, there were 34 cases (73.9%). Of these patients, 16 (34.8%) experienced SAND after treatment. In the microsurgery group, there were 8 cases (75.0%), while in the embolization group, only 8 cases (23.5%) were reported. Specifically, the embolization group exhibited a significantly lower risk of SAND [adjusted hazard ratio = 0.259, 95% CI = 0.096-0.700; P = 0.008)] compared to the microsurgery group. Additionally, the combined Borden grade 2-3 was found to be significantly associated with SAND (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.150, 95% CI = 1.132-8.766; P = 0.028). The results of the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of favorable functional outcomes between the 2 groups (log-rank P = 0.0081).

CONCLUSIONS

CCJ DAVFs are uncommon disorders characterized by a diverse range of clinical manifestations. The functional prognosis of endovascular treatment may be superior to microsurgery.

Treatment of high cervical arteriovenous fistulas in the craniocervical junction region

The craniocervical junction (CCJ) is a complex region. Rarely, arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) can occur in the CCJ region. Currently, it is accepted that CCJ AVFs should only refer to AVFs at the C1-C2 levels. It is reasonable to assume that high cervical CCJ AVFs are being referred to when discussing CCJ AVFs. High cervical CCJ AVFs can be divided into the following four types: dural AVF, radicular AVF, epidural AVF and perimedullary AVF. Until now, it was difficult to understand high cervical CCJ AVFs and provide a proper treatment for them. Therefore, an updated review of high cervical CCJ AVFs is necessary. In this review, the following issues are discussed: the definition of high cervical CCJ AVFs, vessel anatomy of the CCJ region, angioarchitecture of high cervical CCJ AVFs, treatment options, prognoses and complications. Based on the review and our experience, we found that the four types of high cervical CCJ AVFs share similar clinical and imaging characteristics. Patients may present with intracranial hemorrhage or congestive myelopathy. Treatment, including open surgery and endovascular treatment (EVT), can be used for symptomatic AVFs. Most high cervical CCJ AVFs can be effectively treated with open surgery. EVT remains challenging due to a high rate of incomplete obliteration and complications, and it can only be performed in superselective AVFs with simple angioarchitecture. Appropriate treatment can lead to a good prognosis.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to a craniocervical junction arteriovenous fistula associated with thrombus formation in the internal jugular vein: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

A craniocervical junction arteriovenous fistula (CCJAVF) is a rare vascular malformation, and its etiology remains unclear. Here, to the best of the authors' knowledge, they present the first case of CCJAVF associated with thrombus formation in the ipsilateral internal jugular vein.

OBSERVATIONS

An 80-year-old man presented with a sudden occipital headache. Computed tomography revealed a subarachnoid hemorrhage surrounding the brainstem and upper cervical cord. Digital subtraction angiography showed a CCJAVF fed by the left C2 radiculomeningeal artery with ascending intracranial drainage and epidural plexus. After endovascular treatment, the authors retrospectively found that his ipsilateral internal jugular vein and innominate vein were occluded with a huge thrombus at admission.

LESSONS

This case suggested a restricted antegrade venous flow due to thrombus-induced progressive retrograde intracranial drainage causing hemorrhage. Venous hypertension should be considered one of the causes of hemorrhage due to CCJAVF as well as intracranial arteriovenous fistulas.

Efficacy of intraarterial indocyanine green videoangiography in surgery for arteriovenous fistula at the craniocervical junction in a hybrid operating room: illustrative cases

BACKGROUND

Sufficient understanding of the angioarchitecture of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) at the craniocervical junction (CCJ) is crucial to surgical treatment but is often difficult because of the complex vascular anatomy. Intraarterial indocyanine green (ICG) videoangiography has emerged as a more useful option for understanding the vascular anatomy than intravenous ICG videoangiography. This report describes two cases of CCJ AVFs successfully treated by surgery using intraarterial ICG videoangiography and describes the efficacy of this technique.

OBSERVATIONS

Case 1 involved a 71-year-old man presenting with tetraparesis after sudden onset of severe headache due to subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) demonstrated CCJ epidural AVF. Intraarterial ICG videoangiography revealed the drainer, which had been difficult to identify. The AVF disappeared after disconnection of the drainer. Case 2 involved a 68-year-old man presenting with severe headache due to SAH. DSA showed multiple AVFs at the CCJ and cerebellar tentorium. Intraarterial ICG videoangiography demonstrated concomitant perimedullary AVF and dural AVF at the CCJ. All AVFs disappeared postoperatively.

LESSONS

Intraarterial ICG videoangiography was useful for definitive diagnosis of CCJ AVF, facilitating identification of feeders and drainers with bright and high phase contrast and allowing repeated testing to confirm flow direction.

Variations and management for patients with craniocervical junction arteriovenous fistulas: Comparison of dural, radicular, and epidural arteriovenous fistulas

Background:

Craniocervical junction arteriovenous fistulas (CCJAVFs) are known to be rare, but variations and clinical behaviors remain controversial.

Methods:

A total of 11 CCJAVF patients (M: F=9:2, age 54–77 years) were investigated. Based on the radiological and intraoperative findings, they were categorized into three types: dural AVF (DAVF), radicular AVF (RAVF), and epidural AVF (EDAVF).

Results:

There were four symptomatic patients (subarachnoid hemorrhage in two, myelopathy in one, and tinnitus in one) and seven asymptomatic patients in whom coincidental CCJAVFs were discovered on imaging studies for other vascular diseases (arteriovenous malformation in one, intracranial DAVF in two, ruptured cerebral aneurysm in two, and carotid artery stenosis in two). Of these 11 patients, 2 (18.2%) had multiple CCJAVFs. Of 14 lesions, the diagnoses were DAVF in 5, RAVF in 3, and EDAVF in 6 (C1–C2 level ratio =5:0, 2:1, 3:3). Patients with DAVF/RAVF in four lesions with intradural venous reflux underwent surgery, although an RAVF remained in one lesion after embolization/radiation. Since all six EDAVFs, two DAVFs, and one RAVF had neither feeder aneurysms nor significant symptoms, no treatment was provided; of these nine lesions, one DAVF and one RAVF remained unchanged, whereas six EDAVFs showed spontaneous obliteration within a year. Unfortunately, however, one DAVF bled before elective surgery.

Conclusion:

CCJAVFs have many variations of shunting site, angioarchitecture, and multiplicity, and they were frequently associated with coincidental vascular lesions. For symptomatic DAVF/RAVF lesions with intradural drainage, surgery is preferred, whereas asymptomatic EDAVFs without dangerous drainage may obliterate during their natural course.

Perimedullary arteriovenous fistulas of the craniovertebral junction: A systematic review

Perimedullary arteriovenous fistulas (PMAVFs) are uncommon vascular malformations, and they rarely occur at the level of the craniovertebral junction (CVJ). The therapeutic management is challenging and can include observation alone, endovascular occlusion, or surgical exclusion, depending on both patient and malformation characteristics. A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases, searching for the following combined MeSH terms: (perimedullary arteriovenous fistula OR dural arteriovenous shunt) AND (craniocervical junction OR craniovertebral junction). We also present an emblematic case of PMAVF at the level of the craniovertebral junction associated to a venous pseudoaneurysm. A total of 31 published studies were identified; 10 were rejected from our review because they did not match our inclusion criteria. Our case was not included in the systematic review. We selected 21 studies for this systematic review with a total of 58 patients, including 20 females (34.5%) and 38 males (65.5%), with a female/male ratio of 1:1.9. Thirty-nine out of 58 patients underwent surgical treatment (67.2%), 15 out of 58 patients were treated with endovascular approach (25.8%), 3 out of 58 patients underwent combined treatment (5.2%), and only 1 patient was managed conservatively (1.7%). An improved outcome was reported in 94.8% of cases (55 out of 58 patients), whereas 3 out of 58 patients (5.2%) were moderately disabled after surgery and endovascular treatment. In literature, hemorrhagic presentation is reported as the most common onset (subarachnoid hemorrhage in 63% and intramedullary hemorrhage in 10%), frequently caused either by venous dilation, due to an ascending drainage pathway into an intracranial vein, or by the higher venous flow rates that can be associated with intracranial drainage. Hiramatsu and Sato stated that arterial feeders from the anterior spinal artery (ASA) and aneurysmal dilations are associated with hemorrhagic presentation. In agreement with the classification by Hiramatsu, we defined the PMAVF of the CVJ as a vascular lesion fed by the radiculomeningeal arteries from the vertebral artery and the spinal pial arteries from the ASA and/or lateral spinal artery. Considering the anatomical characteristics, we referred to our patient as affected by PMAVF, even if it was difficult to precisely localize the arteriovenous shunts because of the complex angioarchitecture of the fine feeding arteries and draining veins, but we presumed that the shunt was located in the point of major difference in vessel size between the feeding arteries and draining veins. PMAVFs of CVJ are rare pathologies of challenging management. The best diagnostic workup and treatment are still controversial: more studies are needed to compare different therapeutic strategies concerning both long-term occlusion rates and outcomes.