Incidence and Outcomes of C5 Palsy and Axial Pain After Open-Door Laminoplasty or Laminectomy and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis

Cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion: An umbrella review of postoperative outcomes

While multiple studies exist comparing cervical laminoplasty (CLP) and posterior cervical laminectomy with fusion (PCF), no clear consensus exists on which intervention is better. An umbrella review helps provide an overall assessment by analyzing a given condition's multiple interventions and outcomes. It integrates all available information on a topic and allows a consensus to be reached on the intervention of choice. A literature search was conducted using specific search criteria in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Titles and abstracts were screened based on inclusion criteria. A full-text review of articles that passed the initial inclusion criteria was performed. Nine meta-analyses were deemed eligible for the umbrella review. Data was extracted on reported variables from these meta-analyses. Subsequent quality assessment using AMSTAR2 and data analysis using the R package metaumbrella were used to determine the significance of postoperative outcomes. When the meta-analyses were pooled, statistically significant differences between CLP and PCF were found for postoperative overall complications rate and postoperative JOA score. PCF was associated with a lower overall complication rate and a higher postoperative JOA score, both supported by a weak level of evidence (class IV). Data regarding all other outcomes were non-significant. Our umbrella review investigates CLP and PCF by providing a comprehensive overview of existing evidence and evaluating inconsistencies within the literature. This umbrella review revealed that PCF had better outcomes for overall complications rate and postoperative JOA than CLP, but they were classified as being of weak significance.

Evaluation of enlarged laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation in relieving nerve root symptoms and correcting kyphosis for cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy

Purpose

This study aimed to compare the surgical efficacy of enlarged laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation (EL-LMSF) and anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for multilevel cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy (CMR) related to kyphosis.

Methods

75 patients were retrospectively reviewed and divided into ACDF and EL-LMSF group. Clinical results including operative time, blood loss, and postoperative complications were compared. The JOA scoring system was used to evaluate spinal cord function and the VAS score evaluate nerve root pain severity. Cervical alignment a C2-C7 was measured with Cobb method and compared to confirm the reconstruction effect.

Results

Data on 75 patients (M/F: 41:34; EL-LMSF/ACDF:42/33) with the mean age of 57.5 years (range 43-72 year old) were reviewed retrospectively. Discectomy and/or sub-toal corpectomy in ACDF group was performed with a mean of 3.24 levels (range, 3-4). Enlarged laminectomy in EL-LMSF group was performed with a mean of 3.89 enlarged levels (range, 3-5). The procedure of ACDF group showed a shorter operation time (103 ± 22 min vs. 125 ± 37 min, P = 0.000) and less blood loss (78 ± 15 ml vs. 226 ± 31 ml, P = 0.000) compared than that of the EL-LMSF group. Patients treated with EL-LMSF indicated lower VAS for upper extremity (1.3 ± 1.7 vs. 3.3 ± 1.3, P = 0.003) and better curvature corrected (10.7 ± 4.2° vs. 8.5 ± 3.5°, P = 0.013). The difference were of statistical significance. No statistical difference was found after surgery in the JOA score (14.1 ± 1.7 vs. 13.5 ± 2.1, P = 0.222). During the follow-up period, 15.2% of patients in the ACDF group had complications including 2 cases with transient dysphagia, 1 case with C5 palsy, 1 case with axial pain, and 1 case with screw pullout 3 month after surgery. However, only 9.5% of cases in the EL-LMSF group experienced complications, including 3 cases of axial pain and 1 case of epidural hematoma.

Conclusion

The EL-LMSF procedure requires a longer operation time and more blood loss because of the incision of the stenosed foramen. However, the procedure has obvious advantages in relieving nerve root symptoms and correcting cervical curvature with fewer postoperative complications.

Morphology of cervical periradicular fibrous sheath and nerve roots in relation to postoperative C5 palsy

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

C5 palsy is a major complication of cervical spine surgery, however, its exact pathogenesis remains unclear. Some studies have shown that the superficial layer of the posterior longitudinal ligament extends laterally and forms the periradicular fibrous sheath (PFS), and envelopes the nerve roots. However, the anatomical relationship between the PFS and nerve root at each cervical level has not been fully revealed.

PURPOSE

To examine the difference of the PFS that covers the nerve root at each cervical level, and to consider its potential in the onset of postoperative C5 palsy.

STUDY DESIGN

Anatomical study of cervical dissection of 13 embalmed cadavers.

METHODS

Thirteen human formalin-fixed cadavers were dissected from posterior approach, and were observed their cervical nerves bilaterally from C3 to C8 (the total number of nerves was 156). The bare area length (BAL), which is the distance between the medial posterior edge of the PFS and the bifurcation of the nerve and dura mater, was measured by using electronic calipers. Thus, BAL is the uncovered area of the nerve root by the PFS. We examined whether BAL significantly varied at each cervical level.

RESULTS

We confirmed the PFS macro- and/or microanatomically in all cadavers. The average BAL gradually increased craniocaudally, and there was a significant step between that of C5 and C6 level.

CONCLUSION

The average BAL of the C5 root was significantly shorter than that of C6, C7, and C8, suggesting that C5 root was more tightly anchored. This could be one reason for C5 palsy, making C5 nerve root vulnerable to the traction caused by the postoperative spinal cord shift.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study provides clinicians an additional understanding of the anatomical factor of C5 palsy. Consideration of the anchoring effect of the PFS for nerve roots, release of the PFS could be a preventive procedure for C5 palsy.

Optimizing the Application of Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 10]

STUDY DESIGN

Literature Review (Narrative).

OBJECTIVE

To introduce the number 10 research priority for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Individualizing Surgery.

METHODS

This article summarizes the current recommendations and indications for surgery, including how known prognostic factors such as injury time, age, disease severity, and associated comorbidities impact surgical outcome. It also considers key areas of uncertainty that should be the focus of future research.

RESULTS

While a small proportion of conservatively managed patients may remain stable, the majority will deteriorate over time. To date, surgical decompression is the mainstay of treatment, able to halt disease progression and improve neurologic function and quality of life for most patients. Whilst this recognition has led to recommendations on when to offer surgery, there remain many uncertainties including the type of surgery, or timing in milder and/or asymptomatic cases. Their clarification has the potential to transform outcomes, by ensuring surgery offers each individual its maximum benefit.

CONCLUSION

Developing the evidence to better guide surgical decision-making at the individual patient level is a research priority for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

C5 palsy after cervical laminectomy: natural history in a 10-year series

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

C5 palsy is a well-known complication following cervical laminectomy, however the cause of this complication remains elusive, with many studies providing conflicting reports on prognosis and the impact of specific risk factors.

PURPOSE

To describe the natural history of and risk factors for C5 palsy after first time cervical laminectomy involving C4 and/or C5, in a large series with a high rate of postoperative palsy.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a retrospective case series.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients undergoing first time cervical laminectomy for degenerative spine pathologies at a single institution between January 2008 and July 2018. Adult patients were included if a complete laminectomy was performed at C4 or C5 for degenerative pathology and pre- and postoperative upright lateral x-rays were performed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was postoperative C5 palsy, defined as a decrease in strength of at least one point in deltoid and/or biceps within 30 days of operation. The secondary outcome measure was recovery of function.

METHODS

A retrospective database of patients who underwent posterior cervical spine surgery was created and further focused by utilizing specific Common Procedural Technology (CPT) codes associated with our desired patient population. Patients were excluded from our study if they had inadequate pre- and postoperative imaging, as well as patients with a history of prior cervical spine surgery, concurrent anterior surgery, intradural pathology, spinal tumor, or spinal trauma. Patient history, surgical specifics, and neurologic function were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 190 patients were treated by 13 surgeons. 53 (27.9%) developed C5 palsy postoperatively. Of patients with C5 palsy, 40 (75.5%) recovered to baseline strength, 46 (86.6%) had at least grade 4 strength at last follow up, and 4 (7.5%) had strength worse than baseline and motor grade less than 4. Median time to recovery was 2.0 (IQR: 0.18 to 8.24) months. Age, gender, preoperative motor score, number of levels decompressed, smoking history, and comorbidities were not associated with a significant increase in the odds of C5 palsy. Risk of C5 palsy increased by 35% for every additional level fused below C4.

CONCLUSION

The risk of C5 palsy is increased with instrumentation caudal to C5 in operations addressing degenerative cervical pathology. This should be taken into consideration during operative planning. Overall prognosis of C5 palsy is good; however, incidence of this condition may be greater than previously reported.

Open-Door versus French-Door Laminoplasty for Patients with Multisegmental Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

This study aimed to evaluate the superiority of open-door versus French-door posterior cervical laminoplasty in the treatment of multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy by comparing the intraoperative parameters and clinical and radiologic outcomes of these 2 procedures. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Wanfang database, the Weipu database, and China Biology Medicine disk were searched. Articles were retrieved from database establishment through May 22, 2020. Data analysis was carried out on the retrieved articles using RevMan 5.3 software. This meta-analysis included 14 studies involving 1010 patients, among which 6 were randomized controlled trials and 8 were retrospective analyses. Comparing the open-door and French-door groups, no statistically significant differences were found in operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -4.47, 95% CI [-17.85, 8.92], P = 0.51), postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (WMD= -0.24, 95% CI [-0.87, 0.38], P = 0.45), recovery rate (WMD= -0.58, 95% CI [-3.61, 2.45], P = 0.71), postoperative cervical lordosis (WMD= -0.15, 95% CI [-1.93, 1.63], P = 0.87), cervical range of motion (WMD = -3.04, 95% CI [-8.68, 2.59], P = 0.29), sagittal diameter of the spinal canal (WMD = -0.24, 95% CI [-0.54, 0.07], P = 0.13), incidence of C5 palsy (OR = 1.78, 95% CI [0.64, 4.93], P = 0.27), or incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leakage (OR = 1.51, 95% CI [0.48, 4.71], P = 0.48). However, the French-door group was associated with less intraoperative bleeding (WMD = 54.96, 95% CI [21.37, 88.55], P = 0.001) and a lower incidence of axial symptoms (OR = 2.50, 95% CI [1.32, 4.72], P = 0.005). This analysis suggests that both methods can achieve good postoperative outcomes. However, less intraoperative bleeding and a lower incidence of postoperative axial symptoms were found in the French-door group. This requires further validation and investigation in larger sample-size and well-designed randomized controlled studies.

Cervical laminoplasty with unilateral C4-5 foraminotomy: Technical note and case series

OBJECTIVE

The open-door laminoplasty technique is widely used in the treatment of multilevel cervical myelopathy. Despite the satisfactory functional and radiological results of this technique, postoperative C5 palsy is still a severe and disabling complication with a variable incidence in the literature. The objective of this article is to describe and demonstrate the surgical technique step by step with the addition of unilateral C4-5 foraminotomy and to evaluate the results obtained to date, with special emphasis on C5 palsy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 20 patients operated on for cervical myelopathy using the "extended" laminoplasty technique, which is described step by step.

RESULTS

Between January 2013 and April 2019, 20 patients were operated on using the extended laminoplasty technique. Only one patient (5%) presented postoperative C5 palsy. The postoperative recovery rate of the modified JOA (Japanese Orthopaedic Association) score was 54.5%, similar to that observed in other series.

CONCLUSION

The extended cervical laminoplasty technique with unilateral C4-5 foraminotomy was developed and demonstrated for the prevention of C5 palsy. The results were analysed and an incidence of C5 palsy coinciding with the lowest percentage reported in the literature was obtained. A prospective randomised study would be useful to assess the role of preventive unilateral C4-5 foraminotomy.

[Effect of modified lateral mass screws implantation strategy on axial symptoms in cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty]

Objective

To investigate the effect of modified lateral mass screws implantation strategy on axial symptoms in cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty.

Methods

A clinical data of 166 patients, who underwent cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty between August 2011 and July 2016 and met the selection criteria, was retrospective analyzed. Among them, 81 patients were admitted before August 2014 using the traditional mini-plate placement and lateral mass screws implantation strategy (control group), and 85 patients were admitted after August 2014 using modified lateral mass screws implantation strategy (modified group). There was no significant difference in the gender composition, age, clinical diagnosis, disease duration, diseased segment, and preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), cervical curvature and range of motion, spinal canal diameter and cross-sectional areas, and Pavlov's value between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the number of facet joints penetrated by lateral mass screws, effectiveness evaluation indexes (JOA score and improvement rate, VAS score, NDI), imaging evaluation indexes (cervical curvature and range of motion, spinal canal diameter and cross-sectional areas, Pavlov's value, and lamina open angle), and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results

The modified group had shorter operation time and lower intraoperative blood loss than the control group ( P<0.05). There were 121 (29.9%, 121/405) and 10 (2.4%, 10/417) facet joints penetrated by lateral mass screws in control and modified groups, respectively; and the difference in incidence was significant ( χ ²=115.797, P=0.000). Eighteen patients in control group had 3 or more facet joints penetrated while no patients in modified group suffered 3 or more facet joint penetrated. The difference between the two groups was significant ( P=0.000). All patients were followed up, the follow-up time was (28.7±4.9) months in modified group and (42.4±10.7) months in control group, showing significant difference ( t=10.718, P=0.000). The JOA score, VAS score, and NDI at last follow-up of the two groups were significantly improved compared with preoperative ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference in JOA score and improvement rate and VAS score between the two groups ( P>0.05), but the NDI was significantly lower in modified group than in control group ( P<0.05). There were significant differences in cervical curvature and range of motion, spinal canal diameter, Pavlov's value, and cross-sectional areas at last follow-up when compared with those before operation in both groups ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the above indicators and lamina open angle between the two groups ( P>0.05). The modified group has a relative lower axial symptom rate (23/85, 27.1%) than the control group (27/81, 33.3%), but the difference was not significant ( Z=-1.446, P=0.148). There was no significant differences between the two groups in the incidences of C ₅ nerve root palsy, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, wound infection, and lung or urinary tract infection ( P>0.05).

Conclusion

In the cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty, the modified lateral mass screws implantation strategy can effectively reduce the risk of lateral mass screw penetrated to the cervical facet joints, and thus has a positive significance in avoiding the axial symptoms caused by facet joint destruction.

Getting Down to the Bare Bones: Does laminoplasty or laminectomy With Fusion Provide Better Outcomes for Patients With Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?

Objective

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a degenerative disorder leading to progressive decline in spinal cord function. Cervical laminoplasty (CLP) and cervical laminectomy with fusion (CLF) are standard treatments for multilevel CSM. However, it is still unclear whether one procedure over the other provides better outcomes. Here, we performed a comprehensive review of published articles that compare the clinical outcomes and costs between CLP and CLF for CSM.

Methods

A literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Strict exclusion criteria were applied, and included articles were then assessed for publication year, study design, and significant differences in outcome variables.

Results

From 519 studies identified with search terms, 38 studies were included for the qualitative analysis. Statistically significant differences in the clinical outcomes and costs were found in 18 studies. Eleven studies were prospective or retrospective, and 8 studies were meta-analyses. For the outcome variables of interest, results were reported by classifying into prospective studies, retrospective studies, and meta-analyses.

Conclusion

CLP and CLF are 2 of the most commonly performed surgical procedures for the treatment of CSM. Although CLP and CLF each provide satisfactory clinical outcomes for patients with CMS, CLP may result in better cervical range of motion and less cost, length of stay, operation time, blood loss, paraspinal muscular atrophy, and rate of nerve palsies as compared to CLF. The major limitation of CLP versus CLF comparison studies includes the heterogeneity in techniques and preoperative criteria. Thus, further validation and investigations in larger cohorts will be required.

Cervical laminoplasty with unilateral C4-5 foraminotomy: Technical note and case series

OBJECTIVE

The open-door laminoplasty technique is widely used in the treatment of multilevel cervical myelopathy. Despite the satisfactory functional and radiological results of this technique, postoperative C5 palsy is still a severe and disabling complication with a variable incidence in the literature. The objective of this article is to describe and demonstrate the surgical technique step by step with the addition of unilateral C4-5 foraminotomy and to evaluate the results obtained to date, with special emphasis on C5 palsy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 20 patients operated on for cervical myelopathy using the "extended" laminoplasty technique, which is described step by step.

RESULTS

Between January 2013 and April 2019, 20 patients were operated on using the extended laminoplasty technique. Only one patient (5%) presented postoperative C5 palsy. The postoperative recovery rate of the modified JOA (Japanese Orthopaedic Association) score was 54.5%, similar to that observed in other series.

CONCLUSION

The extended cervical laminoplasty technique with unilateral C4-5 foraminotomy was developed and demonstrated for the prevention of C5 palsy. The results were analysed and an incidence of C5 palsy coinciding with the lowest percentage reported in the literature was obtained. A prospective randomised study would be useful to assess the role of preventive unilateral C4-5 foraminotomy.

Comparative Five-Year Surgical Outcomes of Open-Door versus French-Door Laminoplasty in Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Objective

To compare the five-year surgical outcomes between Open-Door laminoplasty (ODL) and French-Door laminoplasty (FDL) in the management of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM).

Methods

Sixty patients with MCSM, who were operated by ODL or FDL, were included in this study and followed up for at least 5 years. The average follow-up period was 69.2 ± 3.2 months. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score and radiological assessments including the Cobb angle and cervical range of motion (ROM) were evaluated and compared before surgery and at the final follow-up. The incidence of postoperative complications and medical costs were also compared.

Results

Both ODL and FDL groups achieved significant improvements of the mJOA score in postoperative 5 years; the average recovery rate (RR) of the mJOA score in the ODL and FDL groups was 72.14 ± 6.97% and 69.53 ± 7.51%, respectively. No statistically significant differences regarding the pre- and postoperative mJOA score, the RR of the mJOA score, the loss and the loss rate of the Cobb angle, and the incidence of postoperative complications existed between ODL and FDL. The mean loss and the loss rate of cervical ROM in the FDL group (18.70 ± 8.91°, 41.08 ± 11.17%) were significantly higher than those of the ODL group (13.81 ± 8.62°, 31.47 ± 12.43%) (P < 0.05). FDL reduced medical costs more greatly than ODL (33014.37 ± 3424.12 China Yuan versus 82096.62 ± 7093.07 China Yuan, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Both ODL and FDL are effective for MCSM. The 5-year neurological results are similar between the two groups. ODL trends to be superior to FDL in postoperative preservation of cervical ROM while FDL reduced medical costs more greatly.

Is laminectomy and fusion the better choice than laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy with signal changes on magnetic resonance imaging? A comparison of two posterior surgeries

Background

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and complications between laminectomy and fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) for multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) with increased signal intensity (ISI) on T2-weighted images (T2WI).

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 52 patients with MCSM with ISI on T2WI who underwent laminoplasty (LP group). The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, the physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS) of Short-Form 36 (SF-36), and the extension and flexion ranges of motion (ROMs) were recorded. As controls, propensity score matching identified 52 patients who underwent laminectomy and fusion (LF group) from January 2014 to June 2016 using 7 independent variables (preoperation): age, sex, JOA score, SF-36 PCS, SF-36 MCS, preoperative symptom duration and high signal intensity ratio (HSIR).

Results

The operative duration in the LF group was significantly higher than that in the LP group. At the last follow-up, the JOA score, VAS score, and SF-36 (PCS and MCS) scores were all significantly improved in both groups. The extension and flexion ROMs were decreased in both groups but significantly better in the LP group than in the LF group. Both groups demonstrated similar clinical improvements at the final follow-up. The complication rate was higher in the LF group.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrates that LP for MCSM with ISI on T2WI achieves similar clinical improvement as LF. However, longer operative durations, higher complication rates and lower extension and flexion ROMs were found in the LF group.