Traumatic Sacral Fractures: Navigation Technique in Instrumented Stabilization

Neuro Navigation Versus Conventional Spinal Techniques in Analyzing Nerve Injury and Anatomical Accuracy: A Systematic Review

Neuronavigation, a computer-assisted surgical technique, enhances the accuracy of spinal surgery by using medical imaging to guide the surgeon's instruments. This method mitigates the serious complications of screw misplacement, such as dural tears, nerve damage, vascular injuries, and internal organ damage, by integrating pre-operative imaging data with real-time intraoperative sensor readings. Because of this integration, it is possible to visualize the spine in three dimensions, guaranteeing accurate instrument placement and greatly lowering the risk of complications. Despite its growing popularity, the benefits of neuronavigation in spinal instrumentation are debated. While some studies report improved accuracy in pedicle screw placement, others find no significant difference compared to conventional freehand techniques. Further research is required to determine the long-term benefits of neuronavigation, including its impact on patient outcomes, like reduced pain and improved function. This systematic review will evaluate the evidence on the risks and benefits of neuronavigation in spinal instrumentation surgery, compared to conventional techniques.

Application of the pedicle axis view in percutaneous screw placement for type III fracture dislocation of the sacroiliac joint

AIM

To investigate the clinical application of axial view projection of the pedicle in percutaneous screw placement for type III fracture dislocation of the sacroiliac joint.

METHODS

Percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation was performed in 29 patients with type III sacroiliac joint fractures under X-ray fluoroscopy (C-arm) using axial view projection of the pedicle after preoperative traction reduction and preoperative preparation. The study included 19 males and 10 females, aged 20 to 75 years old, with a mean age of 42.1 ± 3.4 years.

RESULTS

The total operative time ranged between 44 and 135 min, with a mean of 95.5 ± 9.4 min. The intraoperative fluoroscopy time ranged between 15 and 42 s, with a mean of 25 ± 4.7 s. The intraoperative blood loss ranged between 5 and 10 ml, with a mean of 7.1 ± 1.3 ml. According to the Matta scoring system, excellent outcomes were achieved in 25 cases, whereas good outcomes were achieved in 4 cases. Based on the definition by Neo et al., pedicle screw positions were categorized into four grades: grade 0 (33 screws), grade I (2 screws), grade II (2 screws), and grade III (0 screws). Excellent outcomes were achieved in 94.6% of Grade 0 and I screws. According to Majeed's functional score, 21 cases achieved excellent outcomes, whereas 8 cases achieved good outcomes. The 29 patients were followed between 3 and 18 months, with a mean of 7.1 ± 1.2 months. All patients achieved anatomical reduction with accurate screw placement and successful healing of their fractures, with no cases of bone penetration or neurovascular injury.

CONCLUSION

Axial view imaging of the pedicle using fluoroscopy is a convenient and rapid fluoroscopy method for percutaneous screw placement for type III fracture dislocation of the sacroiliac joint, with a high rate of success, good safety, and short fluoroscopy time.

Causes of Increased Use of Closed Reduction and Internal Fixation for High-Energy-Related Traumatic Sacral Fractures

BACKGROUND

Reasons for the increased use of closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) for traumatic sacral fractures (SFs) are unclear in the literature. Therefore, we aimed to report the annual changes in the number of patients, mechanisms of injury, fracture patterns, and fixation methods.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we extracted data of 271 patients (mean age, 37.5 years) from the trauma register over an 8-year period. Annual records regarding the number of patients, injury mechanisms, fracture types, and treatment options were statistically analyzed to examine the interactions among these factors.

RESULTS

The number of patients with SFs increased significantly each year. The rate of admission to the intensive care unit after resuscitation was high (64.9%). Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) type C pelvic ring injury (PRI), Dennis zone II injury, Roy-Camille type 2 injury, and U/H-type injury were the most common fracture types. Trans-iliac trans-sacral screws were mainly used in AO type B PRI, and their use significantly increased each year. For AO type C PRI, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with rigid fixation was the main treatment, and the use of CRIF with iliosacral screws decreased each year. Stepwise statistical analysis revealed that the increase in AO type B PRI and ORIF for anterior PRI were the factors contributing to the increased use of CRIF for SFs.

CONCLUSIONS

While the use of osteosynthesis for SFs is increasing, an increased use of CRIF for traumatic SFs has also been observed in clinical practice. This increase can be attributed to the increase in AO type B PRIs and ORIF for anterior PRIs.

Reconstruction of Shattered Lumbo-Sacral Junction/Pelvis Utilizing Bilateral L4-Sacrum Fibula Strut Allograft And Double Iliac Screws Plus Routine Lumbar Pedicle Screw Fixation

Background:

A traumatically shattered lumbosacral junction/pelvis may be difficult to repair. Here the authors offer a pelvic fixation technique utilizing routine pedicle screws, interbody lumbar fusions, bilateral iliac screws/ rods/crosslinks, and bilateral fibular strut allografts from the lumbar spine to the sacrum.

Methods:

A middle aged male sustained a multiple storey fall resulting in a left sacral fracture, and right sacroiliac joint (SI) dislocation. The patient had previously undergone attempted decompressions with routine pedicle screw L4-S1 fusions at outside institutions; these failed twice. When the patient was finally seen, he exhibited, on CT reconstructed images, MR, and X-rays, a left sacral fracture nonunion, and a right sacroiliac joint dislocation.

Results:

The patient underwent a bilateral pelvic reconstruction utilizing right L4, L5, S1 and left L4, L5 pedicle screws plus interbody fusions (L4-L5, and L5, S1), performed from the left. Unique to this fusion construct was the placement of bilateral double iliac screws plus the application of bilateral fibula allografts from L4-sacrum filled with bone morphogenetic protein (BMP). After rod/screw/connectors were applied, bone graft was placed over the fusion construct, including the decorticated edges of the left sacral fractures, and right SI joint dislocation. We additionally reviewed other pelvic fusion reconstruction methods.

Conclusions:

Here, we utilized a unique pelvic reconstruction technique utilizing pedicle screws/rods, double iliac screws/rods, and bilateral fibula strut grafts extending from the L4-sacrum filled with BMP.

Functional outcome of traumatic spinopelvic instabilities treated with lumbopelvic fixation

The aim of this study was to assess the functional outcome after lumbopelvic fixation (LPF) using the SMFA (short musculoskeletal functional assessment) score and discuss the results in the context of the existing literature. The last consecutive 50 patients who underwent a LPF from January 1st 2011 to December 31st 2014 were identified and administered the SMFA-questionnaire. Inclusion criteria were: (1) patient underwent LPF at our institution, (2) complete medical records, (3) minimum follow-up of 12 months. Out of the 50 recipients, 22 questionnaires were returned. Five questionnaires were incomplete and therefore seventeen were included for analysis. The mean age was 60.3 years (32–86 years; 9m/8f) and the follow-up averaged 26.9 months (14–48 months). Six patients (35.3%) suffered from a low-energy trauma and 11 patients (64.7%) suffered a high-energy trauma. Patients in the low-energy group were significantly older compared to patients in the high-energy group (72.2 vs. 53.8 years; p = 0.030). Five patients (29.4%) suffered from multiple injuries. Compared to patients with low-energy trauma, patients suffering from high-energy trauma showed significantly lower scores in “daily activities” (89.6 vs. 57.1; p = 0.031), “mobility” (84.7 vs. 45.5; p = 0.015) and “function” (74.9 vs. 43.4; p = 0.020). Our results suggest that patients with older age and those with concomitant injuries show a greater impairment according to the SMFA score. Even though mostly favorable functional outcomes were reported throughout the literature, patients still show some level of impairment and do not reach normative data at final follow-up.