Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy to the Posterior Fossa: Challenges and Nuances

The LITT Fit in neuro-oncology: indications, imaging, and adjunctive therapies

PURPOSE

There is an unmet need for new treatments for many central nervous system tumors. An expanding body of research supports the use of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) in the treatment of gliomas, recurrent brain metastases, and radiation necrosis.

METHODS

In this review, we highlight emerging indications for LITT, including its use adjacent to eloquent structures, in the posterior fossa, and for meningioma and tumors of the vertebral column. We conclude by providing an overview of current research into post-LITT response assessment and adjunctive therapies.

RESULTS

Evidence has continued to accumulate regarding the safety of LITT in locations as varied as the motor cortex, posterior fossa, and vertebral column, as well as for novel pathologies such as meningioma. Regardless of disease histology, most patients leave the hospital within 12-48 h of LITT and can rapidly return to systemic and radiation therapies. Emerging data has allowed for a characterization of post-LITT imaging findings, and receipt of LITT should not preclude subsequent clinical trial enrollment, especially as hyperthermia modulates blood-brain barrier permeability and may synergize with immunotherapies.

CONCLUSION

As LITT is incorporated into neurosurgical oncology practice, novel use cases will continue to emerge. Given that laser ablation is associated with shortened length of stay and decreased debility relative to open resection, development of radiographic response assessment criteria for LITT-treated lesions is urgently needed so that patients may more rapidly receive definitive management or proceed to clinical trial enrollment. Prospective evaluation of LITT and adjunctive combination therapies is ongoing.

The role of surgery in recurrent local cerebral metastases: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Local recurrent brain metastases are defined as lesions that recur in the brain at the same site after a previous local therapy. In patients already submitted to surgery, a second operation may be potentially challenging due to scar formation, infiltration of cerebral vessels or eloquent brain areas and local effect of previous radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to retrospectively review the results and complications of a second surgical treatment in a series of local recurrent lesions and to review the literature on this topic.

METHODS

37 patients submitted to surgery for a local, histologically confirmed, recurrent brain metastases between 2000 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed with respect to the following parameters: age, histology, anatomic location, time to recurrence, previous radiotherapy, size of recurrent tumors, preoperative and postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class and graded prognostic assessment (GPA) score, surgery-related complications and the presence of further cerebral metastases. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was developed using stepwise regression (forwards selection) with predictive variables that were significant in the univariate analyses.

RESULTS

A significant improvement of post-operative KPS status was obtained after second surgery. At multivariate analysis better results in terms of OS were achieved in patients with a pre-operative KPS ≥ 70 and in patients who had received radiotherapy after the initial surgery. No significant postoperative complications related to previous treatments were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection of local recurrent brain metastases may improve patients ́ neurologic conditions allowing more time for systemic therapies to act with a low incidence of surgery-related morbidity and mortality. However, careful patient selection with a fair pre-operative clinical status seems mandatory to achieve the best post-operative results, since uniform treatment-paradigms cannot be established yet, due to the highly heterogeneous patient cohort.

Surgical Resection Followed by Stereotactic Radiosurgery (S+SRS) Versus SRS Alone for Large Posterior Fossa Brain Metastases: A Comparative Analysis of Outcomes and Factors Guiding Treatment Modality Selection

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Around 20% of cancer patients will develop brain metastases (BrMs), with 15-25% occurring in the posterior fossa (PF). Although the effectiveness of systemic therapies is increasing, surgery followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (S+SRS) versus definitive SRS remains the mainstay of treatment. Given the space restrictions within the PF, patients with BrMs in this location are at higher risk of brainstem compression, hydrocephalus, herniation, coma, and death. However, the criteria for treating large PF BrMs with S+SRS versus definitive SRS remains unclear.

METHODS

We reviewed a prospective registry database (2009 to 2020) and identified 64 patients with large PF BrMs (≥4 cc) treated with SRS or S+SRS. Clinical and radiological parameters were analyzed. The two endpoints were overall survival (OS) and local failure (LF).

RESULTS

Patients in the S+SRS group were more highly symptomatic than patients in the SRS group. Gait imbalance and intracranial pressure symptoms were 97% and 80%, and 47% and 35% for S+SRS and SRS, respectively. Radiologically, there were significant differences in the mean volume of the lesions [6.7 cm3 in SRS vs. 29.8 cm3 in the S+SRS cohort, (p < 0.001)]; compression of the fourth ventricle [47% in SRS vs. 96% in S+SRS cohort, (p < 0.001)]; and hydrocephalus [0% in SRS vs. 29% in S+SRS cohort, (p < 0.001)]. Patients treated with S+SRS had a higher Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA). LF was 12 and 17 months for SRS and S+SRS, respectively. Moreover, the S+SRS group had improved OS (12 vs. 26 months, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A higher proportion of patients treated with S+SRS presented with hydrocephalus, fourth-ventricle compression, and larger lesion volumes. SRS-alone patients had a lower KPS, a lower GPA, and more brain metastases. S+SRS correlated with improved OS, suggesting that it should be seriously considered for patients with large PF-BrM.

Comparative analysis of bevacizumab and LITT for treating radiation necrosis in previously radiated CNS neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Radiation necrosis (RN) is a local inflammatory reaction that arises in response to radiation injury and may cause significant morbidity. This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of bevacizumab and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) in treating RN in patients with previously radiated central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were screened. Studies of patients with radiation necrosis from primary or secondary brain tumors were included. Indirect meta-analysis with random-effect modeling was performed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies were included with 210 patients in the bevacizumab group and 337 patients in the LITT group. Bevacizumab demonstrated symptomatic improvement/stability in 87.7% of cases, radiological improvement/stability in 86.2%, and steroid wean-off in 45%. LITT exhibited symptomatic improvement/stability in 71.2%, radiological improvement/stability in 64.7%, and steroid wean-off in 62.4%. Comparative analysis revealed statistically significant differences favoring bevacizumab in symptomatic improvement/stability (p = 0.02), while no significant differences were observed in radiological improvement/stability (p = 0.27) or steroid wean-off (p = 0.90). The rates of adverse reactions were 11.2% for bevacizumab and 14.9% for LITT (p = 0.66), with the majority being grade 2 or lower (72.2% for bevacizumab and 62.5% for LITT).

CONCLUSION

Both bevacizumab and LITT exhibited favorable clinical and radiological outcomes in managing RN. Bevacizumab was found to be associated with better symptomatic control compared to LITT. Patient-, diagnosis- and lesion-related factors should be considered when choosing the ideal treatment modality for RN to enhance overall patient outcomes.

LITT for biopsy proven radiation necrosis: A qualitative systematic review

INTRODUCTION

With the widespread use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), post-radiation treatment effects (PTREs) are increasing in prevalence. Radiation necrosis (RN) is a serious PTRE which carries a poor prognosis. Since 2012, laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has been used to treat RN. However, reviews have attempting to generalise the efficacy of LITT against biopsy-proven RN are limited. In this systematic review, patient demographic characteristics and post-LITT clinical outcomes are characterised.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in four major databases for cohort studies and case reports published between 2012 and 2022, following the PRISMA 2020 checklist. Data was extracted and descriptively analysed. Quality of reporting was assessed using the PROCESS criteria and reporting bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I scoring system.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria, with an overall moderate risk of reporting bias being observed. Mean pre-LITT target lesion volume was 6.75 cm3, and was independent of gender, time since SRS, age and number of interventions prior to LITT.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

LITT is a versatile treatment option which may be used to treat a vast range of patients with refractory biopsy-proven RN. However, neurosurgeons should exercise caution when selecting patients for LITT due to insufficient data on the treatment's efficacy against biopsy-proven RN. This warrants further studies to unequivocally determine the safety and clinical outcomes.

Posterior Fossa Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy in Children

Real-time, MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is emerging as a minimally invasive technique for epilepsy surgery and for deep-seated tumors in the pediatric population. However, MRgLITT for posterior fossa lesions poses a unique challenge that is especially evident in this age range and remains understudied. In this study, we report our experience and analyze the current literature on MRgLITT for the treatment of posterior fossa in children.

Surgical Management of Recurrent Brain Metastasis: A Systematic Review of Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy

The incidence of recurrent metastatic brain tumors is increasing due to advances in local therapy, including surgical and radiosurgical management, as well as improved systemic disease control. The management of recurrent brain metastases was previously limited to open resection and/or irradiation. In recent years, laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has become a promising treatment modality. As systemic and intracranial disease burden increases in a patient, patients may no longer be candidates for surgical resection. LITT offers a relatively minimally invasive option for patients that cannot tolerate or do not want open surgery, as well as an option for accessing deep-seated tumors that may be difficult to access via craniotomy. This manuscript aims to critically review the available data regarding the use of LITT for recurrent intracranial brain metastasis. Ten of seventy-two studies met the criteria for review. Generally, the available literature suggests that LITT is a safe and feasible option for the treatment of recurrent brain metastases involving supratentorial and cortical brain, as well as posterior fossa and deep-seated locations. Among all studies, only one directly compared craniotomy to LITT in the setting of recurrent brain metastasis. Prospective studies are needed to better elucidate the role of LITT in the management of recurrent brain metastases.

Repeat laser interstitial thermal therapy for recurrent primary and metastatic intracranial tumors

Background:

Repeat craniotomy in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors carries significant morbidity and can delay adjuvant treatments. Repeat laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for recurrent disease has been described and could benefit patients with limited cytoreductive options. We aim to describe the indications, safety, and efficacy of repeat LITT for recurrent primary and metastatic intracranial tumors.

Methods:

Patients undergoing repeat ablations for the same lesion were included in the study. We retrospectively analyzed 13 patients treated with 29 total LITT ablations.

Results:

Eleven patients were treated for glioblastoma (GBM), while two had brain metastases. Eleven patients had LITT performed only 2 times, while three patients underwent three total iterations of LITT for disease recurrence. Median length of stay after the 1^st ablation was 2 days, while the median length of stay after the 2^nd ablation was 1 day. The median time to resuming adjuvant treatments after the 1^st LITT was 11 days. The median time to resuming adjuvant treatments after the 2^nd LITT was 28 days. Four patients after the 1^st and 2^nd LITT sustained deficits persisting through 30-day follow-up. The median progression-free survival among the GBM patients from the first ablation was 6.0 months, 3.2 months from the 2^nd ablation, and 2.1 months from the 3^rd ablation.

Conclusion:

Recurrent tumors, especially GBM, can be safely treated using repeat LITT when surgery cannot be effectively performed. Our results indicate that patients tolerate the procedure well and have a meaningful survival given the salvage nature of the procedure.

Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Posterior Fossa Lesions: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Multi-Institutional Outcomes

Background: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has emerged as a treatment option for deep-seated primary and metastatic brain lesions; however, hardly any data exist regarding LITT for lesions of the posterior fossa. Methods: A quantitative systematic review was performed. Article selection was performed by searching MEDLINE (using PubMed), Scopus, and Cochrane electronic bibliographic databases. Inclusion criteria were studies assessing LITT on posterior fossa tumors. Results: 16 studies comprising 150 patients (76.1% female) with a mean age of 56.47 years between 2014 and 2021 were systematically reviewed for treatment outcomes and efficacy. Morbidity and mortality data could be extracted for 131 of the 150 patients. Death attributed to treatment failure, disease progression, recurrence, or postoperative complications occurred in 6.87% (9/131) of the pooled sample. Procedure-related complications, usually including new neurologic deficits, occurred in approximately 14.5% (19/131) of the pooled sample. Neurologic deficits improved with time in most cases, and 78.6% (103/131) of the pooled sample experienced no complications and progression-free survival at the time of last follow-up. Conclusions: LITT for lesions of the posterior fossa continues to show promising data. Future clinical cohort studies are required to further direct treatment recommendations.

Magnetic Resonance-guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (MRgLITT) for Brainstem Pathologies

OBJECTIVE

Magnetic Resonance-guided Laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is a minimally invasive and effective treatment option that can potentially treat deep-seated pathologies in cases where there are no safe open surgical corridors. In this report, we present our experience using MRgLITT for brainstem pathologies.

METHODS

A retrospective chart analysis was conducted of all patients who underwent MRgLITT for pathologies within or closely surrounding the brainstem between 2011 and 2020. The patients underwent stereotactic laser placement in the operating suite and were transported to the MRI suite for laser ablation with real-time monitoring. Demographics, operative parameters and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of twelve patients underwent MRgLITT for brainstem pathologies. The average age of the patients was 47.6 years old, ranging from 4 to 75. Pathologies included both primary and metastatic intracranial tumors. The average pre-ablation volume of the targets was 2.4cm³ ±SEM=0.50. The average time of ablation was 324.3± 60.7 seconds and average post-ablation volume was 2.92±0.53 cm³. There was one perioperative mortality directly related to the procedure and seven cases of post-operative deficits. Two patients had recurrence after MRgLITT and opted to undergo additional alternative treatments.

CONCLUSION

The brainstem represents formidable territory even for minimally invasive procedures. The overall morbidity and mortality remains high, and the probability of achieving a meaningful outcome needs to be carefully assessed.

Supralesional Ablation Volumes Are Feasible in the Posterior Fossa and May Provide Enhanced Symptomatic Relief

BACKGROUND

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for posterior fossa lesions remains rare as the small size of the infratentorial compartment, proximity to the brainstem, and thickness/angulation of the occipital bone creates barriers to procedural success. Furthermore, evaluation of the effect of ablation volume on outcomes is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze our institutional experience with LITT in the posterior fossa stratifying perioperative and long-term outcomes by ablation volumes.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with posterior fossa lesions treated with LITT from 2013 to 2020 were identified. Local progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, steroid dependence, and edema reduction were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis grouped by ablation volume. Preoperative, postoperative, and last known Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) were compared using a matched paired t test.

RESULTS

No differences in pathology, preoperative KPS, or preoperative lesion volume were found between patients with total (100%-200% increase in pre-LITT lesion volume) versus radical (>200% increase in pre-LITT lesion volume) ablations. Patients who underwent radical ablation had a higher postoperative KPS (93 vs 82, P = .02) and higher KPS (94 vs 87, P = .04) and greater reduction in perilesional edema at last follow-up (P = .01). Median follow-up was 80.8 wk.

CONCLUSION

Despite obvious anatomical challenges, our results demonstrate that radical ablations are both feasible and safe in the posterior fossa. Furthermore, radical ablations may lead to greater decreases in perilesional edema and improved functional status both immediately after surgery and at last follow-up. Thus, LITT should be considered for patients with otherwise unresectable or radioresistant posterior fossa lesions.

Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for posterior fossa neoplasms

PURPOSE

Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has been increasingly used to treat a number of intracranial pathologies, though its use in the posterior fossa has been limited to a few small series. We performed a multi-institutional review of targets in the posterior fossa, reporting the efficacy and safety profile associated with laser ablation in this region of the brain.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing LITT in the posterior fossa was performed from August 2010 to March 2020. Patient demographic information was collected alongside the operative parameters and patient outcomes. Reported outcomes included local control of the lesion, postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, and steroid requirements.

RESULTS

58 patients across four institutions underwent LITT in the posterior fossa for 60 tumors. The median pre-ablation tumor volume was 2.24 cm³. 48 patients (50 tumors) were available for follow-up. An 84% (42/50) overall local control rate was achieved at 9.5 months median follow up. There were two procedural complications, including insertional hemorrhage and laser misplacement and 12/58 (21%) patients developed new neurological deficits. There was one procedure related death. The median length of hospital stay was 1 day, with 20.7% of patients requiring discharge to a rehabilitation facility.

CONCLUSIONS

LITT is an effective approach for treating pathology in the posterior fossa. The average target size is smaller than what has been reported in the supratentorial space. Care must be taken to prevent injury to surrounding structures given the close proximity of critical structures in this region.

The intersection between immunotherapy and laser interstitial thermal therapy: a multipronged future of neuro-oncology

The rise of immunotherapy (IT) in oncological treatment has greatly improved outcomes in a number of disease states. However, its use in tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) remains limited for multiple reasons related to the unique immunologic tumor microenvironment. As such, it is valuable to consider the intersection of IT with additional treatment methods that may improve access to the CNS and effectiveness of existing IT modalities. One such combination is the pairing of IT with localized hyperthermia (HT) generated through technologies such as laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). The wide-ranging immunomodulatory effects of localized and whole-body HT have been investigated for some time. Hyperthermia has demonstrated immunostimulatory effects at the level of tumor cells, immune cells, and the broader environment governing potential immune surveillance. A thorough understanding of these effects as well as the current and upcoming investigations of such in combination with IT is important in considering the future directions of neuro-oncology.

Hyperthermia treatment advances for brain tumors

Hyperthermia therapy (HT) of cancer is a well-known treatment approach. With the advent of new technologies, HT approaches are now important for the treatment of brain tumors. We review current clinical applications of HT in neuro-oncology and ongoing preclinical research aiming to advance HT approaches to clinical practice. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is currently the most widely utilized thermal ablation approach in clinical practice mainly for the treatment of recurrent or deep-seated tumors in the brain. Magnetic hyperthermia therapy (MHT), which relies on the use of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) and alternating magnetic fields (AMFs), is a new quite promising HT treatment approach for brain tumors. Initial MHT clinical studies in combination with fractionated radiation therapy (RT) in patients have been completed in Europe with encouraging results. Another combination treatment with HT that warrants further investigation is immunotherapy. HT approaches for brain tumors will continue to a play an important role in neuro-oncology.